West Virginia 2026 Session Status: Enacted

SB 690 — Creating alternative DOH procurement procedure

Last action — Chapter 137, Acts, Regular Session, 2026

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2026. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

Establishes a new procurement procedure for the Department of Health.

This bill creates an alternative procedure for how the Department of Health acquires goods and services. It aims to improve efficiency and flexibility in the procurement process.

Summary

Creating alternative DOH procurement procedure

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

50 added · 52 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised bill, formerly known as the "West Virginia Highway Design-Build Pilot Program," is now titled the "Alternative Project Delivery Act." The changes significantly increase the monetary limits on highway and bridge projects, allowing the Division of Highways to commit up to $300 million for individual projects and $600 million in each fiscal year when financed through bonds. This matters because it enables more extensive infrastructure development, potentially leading to faster improvements in transportation and greater investment in state projects. The new rules also simplify the contracting process, which could enhance efficiency in project delivery.

→
Previous
Latest
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 690 BYSENATORM.
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Enrolled Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 690 BYSENATORM.
AYNARD [Reported February 17, 2026, from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure] CS for SB 690 A BILL to amend and reenact §17-2D-1, §17-2D-2, and §17-2D-5 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended;
AYNARD [Passed March 6, 2026;
in effect 90 days from passage (June 4, 2026)] Enr CS for SB 690 AN ACT to amend and reenact §17-2D-1, §17-2D-2, and §17-2D-5 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended;
HIGHWAY DESIGN-BUILD PILOT PROGRAM.ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY ACT.
ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY ACT.
This article shall be known and may be cited as the West Virginia Highway Design-Build Pilot Program Alternative Project Delivery Act.
This article shall be known and may be cited as the Alternative Project Delivery Act.
(a) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, the Commissioner of the West Virginia Division of Highways may expedite the construction of projects by combining the design and construction elements of a highway or bridge any project into a single contract as provided in this article for design-build projects.
(a) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, the Commissioner of the West Virginia Division of Highways may expedite the construction of projects by combining the design and construction elements of any project into a single contract as provided in this article for design-build projects.
(b)(1) The Division of Highways may contractually obligate no more than $50 million in each year in the program:
(b)(1) For design-build projects authorized by this section, the Division of Highways may contractually obligate in the program:
Provided, That if any of the $50 million is not so contractually obligated in one year, the remaining amount may be applied to the following year’s contractual obligation amount:
Provided, however, That the total aggregate amount to be contractually obligated may not exceed $150 million in any one year:
Provided further, That for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2017, the Division of Highways may contractually obligate no more than $200 million on CS for SB 690 any one project:
And provided further, That for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2017, the Division of Highways may contractually obligate no more than $400 million in each year in the program:
And provided further, That for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2017, if any of the $400 million is not contractually obligated in any year, the remaining amount may be applied to the following year’s contract obligation amount:
And provided further, That for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2017, the total aggregate amount to be contractually obligated may not exceed $500 million in any one year.
(2) Notwithstanding the limits set forth in §17-2D-2(b)(1) of this code, for projects financed without bonds for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2019, For design-build projects authorized by this section, the Division of Highways may contractually obligate in the program:
(3) (2) Notwithstanding and in addition to the limits set forth in §17-2D-2(b)(1) and §17- 2D-2(b)(2) of this code subdivision (1) of this subsection, for projects financed with bonds for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2018, the Division of Highways may contractually obligate in the program:
(2) Notwithstanding and in addition to the limits set forth in subdivision (1) of this subsection, for projects financed with bonds, the Division of Highways may contractually obligate in the program:
(A) No more than $300 million on any one project;
Enr CS for SB 690 (A) No more than $300 million on any one project;
(d) Projects receiving funding above the amount of federal core funding as appropriated to the state by formula in a federal highway authorization, currently titled MAP-21, may utilize the program, but shall not be included in calculating contractual obligation limits provided by subsection (b) of this section.
(d) Projects receiving funding above the amount of federal core funding as appropriated to the state by formula in a federal highway authorization may utilize the program, but shall not be included in calculating contractual obligation limits provided by subsection (b) of this section.
CS for SB 690 (e) The contractual obligations made for projects that are necessitated by a declared state of emergency within a county that the Governor has included in a declaration of emergency shall not be included in calculating contractual obligation limits provided in §17-2D-2(b) of this code.
(e) The contractual obligations made for projects that are necessitated by a declared state of emergency within a county that the Governor has included in a declaration of emergency shall not be included in calculating contractual obligation limits provided in §17-2D-2(b) of this code.
On or before January 15, 2014, and annually thereafter, the commissioner shall prepare and submit to the Joint Committee on Government and Finance a written report evaluating the experience of the Division of Highways with each project completed using an alternative project delivery method authorized by this article during the prior calendar year, including whether the division realized any cost or time savings, the number and cost of change orders, the quality of work performed, the number of bids received, and other issues the commissioner considers appropriate:
On or before January 15, 2014, and annually thereafter, the commissioner shall prepare and submit to the Joint Committee on Government and Finance a written report evaluating the experience of the Division of Highways with each project completed using an alternative project delivery method authorized by this article during the prior calendar year, including whether the division realized any cost or time savings, the number and cost of change orders, the quality of work performed, the number of bids received, and other issues the commissioner considers appropriate.
Provided, That the report submitted on or before January 15, 2014, shall contain such information as to all design-build projects that have been completed under the program prior to 2014.
of this code that set forth what conditions the commissioner shall consider in entering into CM/GC agreements, any necessary or preferred terms that should be incorporated into these agreements, and any other guidelines or standards that are relevant to the implementation of this section.
of this code that set forth what conditions the commissioner shall consider in entering into CM/GC agreements, any necessary or preferred terms that should be Enr CS for SB 690 incorporated into these agreements, and any other guidelines or standards that are relevant to the implementation of this section.
CS for SB 690 (2) No more than $200 million in each fiscal year;
(2) No more than $200 million in each fiscal year;
Enr CS for SB 690 The Clerk of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Delegates hereby certify that the foregoing bill is correctly enrolled.
...............................................................
Clerk of the Senate ...............................................................
Clerk of the House of Delegates Originated in the Senate.
In effect 90 days from passage.
...............................................................
President of the Senate ...............................................................
Speaker of the House of Delegates __________ The within is ................................................
this the...........................................
Day of ..........................................................................................................., 2026.
.............................................................
Governor 5
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Chapter 137, Acts, Regular Session, 2026

  2. Approved by Governor 3/17/2026

  3. Approved by Governor 3/17/2026 - Senate Journal

  4. Approved by Governor 3/17/2026 - House Journal

  5. To Governor 3/10/2026

  6. House Message received

  7. On 3rd reading, Special Calendar

  8. Read 3rd time

  9. Passed House (Roll No. 359)

  10. Communicated to Senate

  11. Completed legislative action

  12. On 2nd reading, Special Calendar

  13. Read 2nd time

  14. On 1st reading, Special Calendar

  15. Read 1st time

  16. Do pass

  17. House received Senate message

  18. Introduced in House

  19. To Government Organization

  20. To House Government Organization

  21. On 3rd reading

  22. Read 3rd time

  23. Passed Senate (Roll No. 165)

  24. Ordered to House

  25. On 2nd reading

  26. Read 2nd time

  27. On 1st reading

  28. Read 1st time

  29. Committee substitute reported

  30. Filed for introduction

  31. To Transportation and Infrastructure

  32. Introduced in Senate

  33. To Transportation and Infrastructure

Sponsors

  • M. Maynard · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 151 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • M. Maynard

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (151)

151 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 151 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Roll Call

Passed 31 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 26102
Unaffiliated 1000
Democrat 4000
Total 31102
% of votes cast 91%3%0%6%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
Anitra Hamilton Democrat Yea
Mike Woelfel Democrat Yea
Mike Woelfel Democrat Yea
Rick Garcia Democrat Yea
Ben Queen Republican Yea
Carl Martin Republican Yea
Chris Phillips Republican Yea
Chris Rose Republican Yea
Chris Rose Republican Yea
Dean Jeffries Republican Yea
Eric Tarr Republican Yea
Eric Tarr Republican Yea
Glenn Jeffries Republican Yea
Jack Woodrum Republican Not Voting
Jack Woodrum Republican Yea
Jay Taylor Republican Yea
Jimmy Willis Republican Yea
Mark R. Maynard Republican Nay
Mike Oliverio Republican Yea
Patricia Rucker Republican Yea
Patricia Rucker Republican Yea
Robbie Morris Republican Yea
Rollan A. Roberts Republican Yea
Rollan A. Roberts Republican Yea
Rupie Phillips Republican Yea
Rupie Phillips Republican Yea
Ryan Weld Republican Yea
Ryan Weld Republican Not Voting
Tom Takubo Republican Yea
Tom Takubo Republican Yea
Tom Willis Republican Yea
Trenton Barnhart Republican Yea
Trenton Barnhart Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 690 do?
Creating alternative DOH procurement procedure
Who sponsors SB 690?
SB 690 is sponsored by M. Maynard.
What is the current status of SB 690?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 690?
Track SB 690 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 690

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 690

Last checked for changes 16 days ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →