Creating alternative DOH procurement procedure
This bill creates an alternative procedure for how the Department of Health acquires goods and services. It aims to improve efficiency and flexibility in the procurement process.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 690 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 690.
You're tracking SB 690
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 690 — Creating alternative DOH procurement procedure
Last action — Chapter 137, Acts, Regular Session, 2026
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2026. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
Establishes a new procurement procedure for the Department of Health.
This bill creates an alternative procedure for how the Department of Health acquires goods and services. It aims to improve efficiency and flexibility in the procurement process.
Summary
Creating alternative DOH procurement procedure
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
50 added · 52 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised bill, formerly known as the "West Virginia Highway Design-Build Pilot Program," is now titled the "Alternative Project Delivery Act." The changes significantly increase the monetary limits on highway and bridge projects, allowing the Division of Highways to commit up to $300 million for individual projects and $600 million in each fiscal year when financed through bonds. This matters because it enables more extensive infrastructure development, potentially leading to faster improvements in transportation and greater investment in state projects. The new rules also simplify the contracting process, which could enhance efficiency in project delivery.
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Enrolled Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 690 BYSENATORM.
AYNARD [Reported[Passed FebruaryMarch 17,6, 2026,2026; from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure] CS for SB 690 A BILL to amend and reenact §17-2D-1, §17-2D-2, and §17-2D-5 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended;
in effect 90 days from passage (June 4, 2026)] Enr CS for SB 690 AN ACT to amend and reenact §17-2D-1, §17-2D-2, and §17-2D-5 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended;
HIGHWAYALTERNATIVE DESIGN-BUILD PILOT PROGRAM.ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY ACT.
This article shall be known and may be cited as the West Virginia Highway Design-Build Pilot Program Alternative Project Delivery Act.
(a) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, the Commissioner of the West Virginia Division of Highways may expedite the construction of projects by combining the design and construction elements of a highway or bridge any project into a single contract as provided in this article for design-build projects.
(b)(1) TheFor Divisiondesign-build ofprojects Highwaysauthorized mayby contractuallythis obligatesection, nothe moreDivision thanof $50Highways millionmay incontractually eachobligate year in the program:
Provided, That if any of the $50 million is not so contractually obligated in one year, the remaining amount may be applied to the following year’s contractual obligation amount:
Provided, however, That the total aggregate amount to be contractually obligated may not exceed $150 million in any one year:
Provided further, That for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2017, the Division of Highways may contractually obligate no more than $200 million on CS for SB 690 any one project:
And provided further, That for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2017, the Division of Highways may contractually obligate no more than $400 million in each year in the program:
And provided further, That for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2017, if any of the $400 million is not contractually obligated in any year, the remaining amount may be applied to the following year’s contract obligation amount:
And provided further, That for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2017, the total aggregate amount to be contractually obligated may not exceed $500 million in any one year.
(2) Notwithstanding the limits set forth in §17-2D-2(b)(1) of this code, for projects financed without bonds for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2019, For design-build projects authorized by this section, the Division of Highways may contractually obligate in the program:
(3) (2) Notwithstanding and in addition to the limits set forth in §17-2D-2(b)(1) and §17- 2D-2(b)(2) of this code subdivision (1) of this subsection, for projects financed with bondsbonds, for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2018, the Division of Highways may contractually obligate in the program:
Enr CS for SB 690 (A) No more than $300 million on any one project;
(d) Projects receiving funding above the amount of federal core funding as appropriated to the state by formula in a federal highway authorization,authorization currently titled MAP-21, may utilize the program, but shall not be included in calculating contractual obligation limits provided by subsection (b) of this section.
CS for SB 690 (e) The contractual obligations made for projects that are necessitated by a declared state of emergency within a county that the Governor has included in a declaration of emergency shall not be included in calculating contractual obligation limits provided in §17-2D-2(b) of this code.
On or before January 15, 2014, and annually thereafter, the commissioner shall prepare and submit to the Joint Committee on Government and Finance a written report evaluating the experience of the Division of Highways with each project completed using an alternative project delivery method authorized by this article during the prior calendar year, including whether the division realized any cost or time savings, the number and cost of change orders, the quality of work performed, the number of bids received, and other issues the commissioner considers appropriate:appropriate.
Provided, That the report submitted on or before January 15, 2014, shall contain such information as to all design-build projects that have been completed under the program prior to 2014.
of this code that set forth what conditions the commissioner shall consider in entering into CM/GC agreements, any necessary or preferred terms that should be Enr CS for SB 690 incorporated into these agreements, and any other guidelines or standards that are relevant to the implementation of this section.
CS for SB 690 (2) No more than $200 million in each fiscal year;
Enr CS for SB 690 The Clerk of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Delegates hereby certify that the foregoing bill is correctly enrolled.
...............................................................
Clerk of the Senate ...............................................................
Clerk of the House of Delegates Originated in the Senate.
In effect 90 days from passage.
...............................................................
President of the Senate ...............................................................
Speaker of the House of Delegates __________ The within is ................................................
this the...........................................
Day of ..........................................................................................................., 2026.
.............................................................
Governor 5
View plain text versions (3)
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
Action History
-
Chapter 137, Acts, Regular Session, 2026
-
Approved by Governor 3/17/2026
-
Approved by Governor 3/17/2026 - Senate Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/17/2026 - House Journal
-
To Governor 3/10/2026
-
House Message received
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 3rd time
-
Passed House (Roll No. 359)
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Completed legislative action
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
Do pass
-
House received Senate message
-
Introduced in House
-
To Government Organization
-
To House Government Organization
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 3rd time
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 165)
-
Ordered to House
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 1st reading
-
Read 1st time
-
Committee substitute reported
-
Filed for introduction
-
To Transportation and Infrastructure
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Transportation and Infrastructure
Sponsors
- M. Maynard · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 151 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- M. Maynard
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (151)
151 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 151 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 26 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 3% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| Anitra Hamilton | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Rick Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Dean Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Glenn Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Robbie Morris | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Trenton Barnhart | Republican | Yea |
| Trenton Barnhart | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 690 do?
- Creating alternative DOH procurement procedure
- Who sponsors SB 690?
- SB 690 is sponsored by M. Maynard.
- What is the current status of SB 690?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 690?
- Track SB 690 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 690
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 690
Last checked for changes 16 days ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →