SB 1345 — An Act amending the act of July 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), known as the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, in zoning, providing for optional temporary moratorium on acceptance or consideration of new applications for high impact data centers.
Last action — Second consideration
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced June 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
3 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill allows local governments to pause new applications for high impact data centers.
This legislation provides an option for municipalities to temporarily halt the acceptance of new applications related to high impact data centers. This pause enables communities to evaluate the impact of such developments.
What this means for you
- Families: This means families can have more time for local officials to assess the impact of data centers on their communities.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
190 added · 122 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 1345 introduces a more detailed framework for municipalities to impose a temporary moratorium on new applications for high impact data centers. Key changes include specifying that the moratorium can last up to 18 months and making it retroactively applicable from the date of public notice. This matters because it gives local governments clearer guidelines and more control over the timing of high impact data center developments, allowing them to better manage local growth and infrastructure demands.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
1766 THEPRINTER'S GENERALNO. ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
13451889 2026THE INTRODUCEDGENERAL BYASSEMBLY COLEMANOF ANDPENNSYLVANIA GEBHARD,SENATE JUNEBILL 4,Session 2026 REFERRED TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT, JUNE 4, 2026 AN ACT Amending the act of JulyNo. 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), entitled "An act to empower cities of the second class A, and third class, boroughs, incorporated towns, townships of the first and second classes including those within a county of the second class and counties of the second through eighth and to govern the same by zoning, subdivision and landpment development ordinances, planned residential development and other ordinances, by official maps, by the reservation of certain land for future public purpose and by the acquisition of such land;
1345 2026 INTJUNE 4, 2026OLEMAN, GEBHARD, DUSH, PENNYCUICK AND BARTOLOTTA, SENATOR PITTMAN, RULES AND EXECUTIVE NOMINATIONS, RE-REPORTED AS AMENDED, JULY 11, 2026 AN ACT Amending the act of July 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), entitled "An act to empower cities of the second class A, and third class, boroughs, incorporated towns, townships of the first second class and counties of the second through eighththe classes, individually or jointly, to plan their development and to govern the same by zoning, subdivision and land development ordinances, planned residential development and other ordinances, by official maps, by the reservation of certain land for future public purpose and by the acquisition of such land;
and repealing acts and parts of acts," in zoning, providing for optional moratorium on filing ACCEPTANCE or consideration of newnewRARY <-- applications for high impact data centers.
Optional TEMPORARY Moratorium on Filing <-- ACCEPTANCE or Consideration of New Applications for High Impact <-- Data Centers.--(a) A municipality may impose by ordinance <-- RESOLUTION a temporary moratorium prohibiting the filing or <-- consideration of documents relating to ON ACCEPTANCE AND <-- CONSIDERATION OF NEW APPLICATIONS FOR high impact data centers as follows:
(1) A moratorium may last no longer than 18 months from <-- the ordinance's effective date.
(2)THE DURATION OF A prohibitionTEMPORARY may<-- applyMORATORIUM toMAY anNOT application,EXCEED petition18 orMONTHS submissionAND seekingSHALL approval,BE reviewRETROACTIVE orTO reliefTHE forDATE aWHEN highTHE impactGOVERNING dataBODY center,OF including,THE butMUNICIPALITY notGAVE limitedPUBLIC to:NOTICE AS REQUIRED UNDER 65 PA.C.S.
§ 709(C.1) (RELATING TO PUBLIC NOTICE).
(2) A prohibition TEMPORARY MORATORIUM may apply to an <-- application, petition or submission seeking THAT SEEKS <-- approval, review or relief for a high impact data center, including, but not limited to:
OR <-- (iii) land development plans or subdivision applications;applications.;
or <-- (iv) a building permit or certificate tied to an approval for a high impact data center when the permit or certificate requires prior land use or zoning approval.
(3) A TEMPORARY moratorium may not:
<-- (i) prohibit the consideration or filing of documents unrelated to high impact data centers;
(ii) affect data centers that do not meet the 20260SB1345PN1889 - 2 - definition of a "high impact data center" under subsection (i);(i) (L);
<-- (iii) suspend enforcement actions or remedial proceedings for violations of law;
or (iv) impair routine maintenance or safety upgrades at existing HIGH IMPACT DATA CENTER facilities.
<-- (b) (1) A moratorium ordinance TEMPORARY MORATORIUM <-- RESOLUTION RELATED TO APPLICATIONS FOR HIGH IMPACT DATA CENTERS shall identify the planning, study or ordinance-developmentordinance- development activities to be undertaken 20260SB1345PN1766 - 2 - during the TEMPORARY <-- moratorium, which may include:
(i) infrastructure capacity assessments, including, but not limited to, assessments relating to water, wastewater or an electrical ELECTRIC grid;
<-- (ii) public safety and emergency services impact analysis;
(2) A municipality shall make reasonable progress on the activities listed under paragraph (1) during the TEMPORARY <-- moratorium period identified in the ordinance.
<-- (c) Prior to the adoption of a moratorium ordinance <-- TEMPORARY MORATORIUM RESOLUTION under this section, the <-- governing body shall conduct a public hearing with notice as required by this act.
The ordinance shall include findings <-- supporting the necessity of the moratorium and identifying the moratorium's relationship to the planning activities in 20260SB1345PN1889 - 3 - subsection (b).
(e)UNDER (1)65 APA.C.S. moratorium ordinance shall provide a process by which an applicant may request a waiver upon a showing that:
(i)§ strict709(C.1). application of the moratorium would result in substantial, unique and demonstrable hardship not created by the applicant;
andTHE (ii)PUBLIC granting<-- theHEARING waiverNOTICE wouldSHALL beCLEARLY consistentSTATE withTHAT theTHE publicMUNICIPALITY interestINTENDS andTO theCONSIDER purposesA ofTEMPORARY thisMORATORIUM section.ON ACCEPTANCE AND CONSIDERATION OF NEW APPLICATIONS FOR HIGH IMPACT DATA CENTERS.
(2)(D) TheA governingMUNICIPALITY bodyMAY ofNOT theACCEPT municipalityOR mayCONSIDER grant,AN 20260SB1345PN1766APPLICATION -FOR 3A -HIGH grantIMPACT withDATA conditionsCENTER orBY denyCHANGING aTHE waiverAGENDA afterUNDER a65 publicPA.C.S. meeting.
§ 712.1(E) (RELATING TO NOTIFICATION OF AGENCY BUSINESS REQUIRED AND EXCEPTIONS).
(E) THE RESOLUTION SHALL INCLUDE FINDINGS SUPPORTING THE NECESSITY OF THE MORATORIUM AND IDENTIFYING THE MORATORIUM'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE PLANNING ACTIVITIES IN SUBSECTION (B).
(F) (1) THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE FOLLOWING:
(I) APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED OR GRANTED BY THE MUNICIPALITY PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM.
(II) ACCEPTANCE OR CONSIDERATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR A HIGH IMPACT DATA CENTER THAT HAS, PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM, ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH A POWER GENERATION FACILITY BY WHICH THE HIGH IMPACT DATA CENTER AND THE POWER GENERATION FACILITY AGREE TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE HIGH IMPACT DATA CENTER AT THE SITE OF THE POWER GENERATION FACILITY, AND FURTHER AGREE THAT THE POWER GENERATION FACILITY WILL SUPPLY ENERGY TO THE HIGH IMPACT DATA CENTER.
(2) AN APPLICATION FOR A HIGH IMPACT DATA CENTER THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF PARAGRAPH (1)(II) SHALL BE ACCEPTED 20260SB1345PN1889 - 4 - AND CONSIDERED BY THE MUNICIPALITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF THE MUNICIPALITY'S ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE POWER GENERATION FACILITY.
(e) (G) (1) A moratorium ordinance TEMPORARY MORATORIUM <-- RESOLUTION shall provide a process by which an applicant may request a waiver upon a showing that:
(i) strict application of the TEMPORARY moratorium <-- would result in substantial, unique and demonstrable <-- UNDUE hardship not created by the applicant;
and <-- (ii) granting the waiver would be consistent with the public interest and the purposes of this section.
<-- (2) The governing body of the municipality may grant, grant with conditions or deny a waiver REQUEST after a public <-- meeting.
(f) (H) During a moratorium period,period TEMPORARY MORATORIUM, the <-- municipality shall consult, as applicable, with the county planning agency regarding planning and ordinance updates contemplated under subsection (b).
(g)(I) IF A moratoriumMUNICIPALITY authorizedADOPTS, underAMENDS thisOR sectionREPEALS andPROVISIONS implemented<-- inOF complianceAN withORDINANCE thisRELATED actTO isHIGH aIMPACT reasonable,DATA time-CENTERS limitedDURING planningA measureTEMPORARY andMORATORIUM, shallTHE notCHANGE beTO construedTHE toORDINANCE effectSHALL aNOT takingBECOME orEFFECTIVE toPRIOR createTO liabilityTHE forEXPIRATION damagesOF ifTHE theTEMPORARY municipalityMORATORIUM affordsAND theSHALL exemptionsNOT andAPPLY proceduresTO requiredANY underAPPLICATION thisFOR section.A HIGH IMPACT DATA CENTER RECEIVED BY THE MUNICIPALITY PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM.
(h)AN (1)APPLICATION NothingTHAT inIS thisRECEIVED sectionBY shall:A MUNICIPALITY DURING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM SHALL BE DEEMED RECEIVED ON THE DAY AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM.
Show all 52 changed lines (12 more)
(i)20260SB1345PN1889 - 5 - (g) (J) A TEMPORARY moratorium authorized under this section <-- and implemented in compliance with this act is a reasonable, <-- time-limited planning measure and shall not be construed to limiteffect anya othertaking municipalor powersto orcreate proceduresMUNICIPAL authorizedliability underfor thisdamages act,if nor<-- tothe mandatemunicipality affords the adoptionexemptions ofand aprocedures moratorium;required under this section.
or(h) (ii)(K) alter(1) orNothing diminishin thethis rightssection ofshall: public utilities or electric cooperatives under other applicable statutes.
(2)<-- In(i) thebe eventconstrued ofto alimit conflictany withother anothermunicipal provisionpowers ofor law,procedures thisauthorized sectionunder shallthis beact, harmonizednor withto othermandate provisionsthe adoption of thisa actTEMPORARY tomoratorium; the maximum extent possible.
(i)or As<-- used(ii) inalter thisor section,diminish the followingrights wordsof andpublic phrasesutilities shallor haveelectric thecooperatives meaningsunder givenother toapplicable them<-- instatutes thisLAW. subsection unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
<-- (2) In the event of a conflict with another provision of law, this section shall be harmonized with other provisions of this act to the maximum extent possible.
(i) (L) As used in this section, the following words and <-- phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this subsection unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
20260SB1345PN1766 - 4 - "Data center." A facility or group of facilities that is <-- used to house and operate equipment that:
ALL OR <-- 20260SB1345PN1889 - 6 - PART OF A FACILITY THAT MAY BE COMPOSED OF ONE OR MORE BUSINESSES, OWNERS OR TENANTS, THAT IS OR WILL BE PREDOMINANTLY USED TO HOUSE WORKING SERVERS OR SIMILAR DATA STORAGE SYSTEMS AND THAT MAY HAVE UNINTERRUPTIBLE ENERGY SUPPLY OR GENERATOR BACKUP POWER, OR BOTH, COOLING SYSTEMS, TOWERS AND OTHER TEMPERATURE CONTROL INFRASTRUCTURE.
AND <-- (2) consists of one or more parcels in this <-- Commonwealth, along with the buildings, substations and other infrastructure, fixtures and personal property located on the parcels;
and (4) (2) has a critical IT load of 25 megawatts or <-- higher.
"POWER GENERATION FACILITY." A FACILITY THAT IS OPERATIONAL <-- OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION AND WHICH, WHEN CONSTRUCTED, WILL GENERATE ELECTRICITY THAT WILL SUPPLY POWER TO A HIGH IMPACT DATA CENTER AND TO AN ELECTRIC GRID BY INTERCONNECTION TO A REGIONAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE REGIONAL TRANSMISSION OPERATOR'S INTERCONNECTION STANDARDS.
20260SB1345PN176620260SB1345PN1889 - 57 -
Show all 52 changed rows (12 more)
Action History
-
Second consideration
-
Re-reported as amended
-
Re-referred to Rules & Executive Nominations
-
First consideration
-
Reported as committed
-
Referred to Local Government
Sponsors
- Camera Bartolotta · Cosponsor
- Jarrett Coleman · Primary
- Chris Gebhard · Cosponsor
- Cris Dush · Cosponsor
- Tracy Pennycuick · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 248 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jarrett Coleman Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- Camera Bartolotta Republican
- Chris Gebhard Republican
- Cris Dush Republican Voted No
- Tracy Pennycuick Republican
Not signed on (248)
248 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 248 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 24% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Nay |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Nay |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Nick Miller | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Nay |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Nay |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Gebhard | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Greg Rothman | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 24% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Nay |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Nay |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Nick Miller | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Nay |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Nay |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Gebhard | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Greg Rothman | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn T. Comitta | Democratic | Yea |
| James Andrew Malone | Democratic | Yea |
| Patty Kim | Democratic | Yea |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Nay |
| Cris Dush | Republican | Yea |
| Dawn W. Keefer | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Mastriano | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Schlegel Culver | Republican | Yea |
| Rosemary M. Brown | Republican | Yea |
| Scott E. Hutchinson | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 18% | 82% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn T. Comitta | Democratic | Yea |
| James Andrew Malone | Democratic | Nay |
| Patty Kim | Democratic | Nay |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Nay |
| Cris Dush | Republican | Nay |
| Dawn W. Keefer | Republican | Nay |
| Doug Mastriano | Republican | Nay |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Schlegel Culver | Republican | Nay |
| Rosemary M. Brown | Republican | Yea |
| Scott E. Hutchinson | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1345?
- SB 1345 is sponsored by Camera Bartolotta (Republican), Jarrett Coleman (Republican), Chris Gebhard (Republican), Cris Dush (Republican), and Tracy Pennycuick (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1345?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced June 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 1345?
- Track SB 1345 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1345
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1345
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →