An Act amending the act of April 28, 1937 (P.L.417, No.105), known as the Milk Marketing Law, in purpose, s...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 689 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 689.
You're tracking SB 689
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 689 — An Act amending the act of April 28, 1937 (P.L.417, No.105), known as the Milk Marketing Law, in purpose, short title and definitions, further providing for definitions and construction; in general powers of the board, providing for collection of premiums; in prices of milk, providing for board-established premiums and further providing for cooperatives; and, in moneys and expenses of board, further providing for Milk Marketing Fund and for payment and providing for audits.
Last action — Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced April 28, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (6 R · 5 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Printer's No. PN0668 View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill updates the Milk Marketing Law by establishing new powers and definitions related to board-established premiums and their collection.
-
Section 103
"Board-established premium" means a fee or charge established by official order of the board on Class 1 fluid milk.
Adds a definition for 'Board-established premium' to clarify its meaning in the context of milk pricing.
-
Section 312. Collection of Premiums.--(a) The board is hereby vested with the power to coordinate, facilitate or establish the collection and distribution of board-established premiums in accordance with section 801.1.
Grants the board the authority to manage the collection and distribution of premiums set by the board.
-
Section 801.1. Board-Established Premiums.--(a) The board may fix, by official order, a board-established premium based on evidence presented on cost of production, price received and return on equity.
Establishes a new section allowing the board to set premiums based on economic factors.
-
Section 809
the provisions of section 1107.→ the provisions of section 1107 and the distribution of moneys under section 1104.Clarifies that cooperatives are subject to regulations on the collection of premiums and distribution of funds.
-
Section 1101
Moneys collected or received by the board, that are not funds of the Commonwealth, but are due to producers, dealers or handlers for, or on account of, milk acquired or received by dealers or handlers from producers or other dealers or handlers, and placed in the Milk Marketing Fund, shall be paid to the persons entitled thereto by the State Treasurer, as directed by the board.
Clarifies the disbursement of funds from the Milk Marketing Fund to entitled parties.
-
Section 1104
Moneys transferred from the General Fund to the Milk Marketing Fund shall, by official order o
Updates the section regarding the transfer of funds into the Milk Marketing Fund, although text appears incomplete.
Action History
-
Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9)
-
First consideration
-
Reported as committed
-
Referred to Agriculture & Rural Affairs
Sponsors
- Elder A. Vogel · Primary
- Judith L. Schwank · Cosponsor
- Camera Bartolotta · Cosponsor
- John I. Kane · Cosponsor
- Wayne D. Fontana · Cosponsor
- Lynda Schlegel Culver · Cosponsor
- Tracy Pennycuick · Cosponsor
- Jay Costa · Cosponsor
- Patrick J. Stefano · Cosponsor
- Judy Ward · Cosponsor
- James Andrew Malone · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 242 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Elder A. Vogel Republican
Co-sponsors (10)
- Judith L. Schwank Democratic
- Camera Bartolotta Republican
- John I. Kane Democratic
- Wayne D. Fontana Democratic
- Lynda Schlegel Culver Republican
- Tracy Pennycuick Republican
- Jay Costa Democratic
- Patrick J. Stefano Republican
- Judy Ward Republican
- James Andrew Malone Democratic
Not signed on (242)
242 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 242 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn T. Comitta | Democratic | Yea |
| James Andrew Malone | Democratic | Yea |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Mastriano | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Greg Rothman | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 689?
- SB 689 is sponsored by Elder A. Vogel (Republican), Judith L. Schwank (Democratic), Camera Bartolotta (Republican), John I. Kane (Democratic), Wayne D. Fontana (Democratic), Lynda Schlegel Culver (Republican), Tracy Pennycuick (Republican), Jay Costa (Democratic), Patrick J. Stefano (Republican), Judy Ward (Republican), and James Andrew Malone (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 689?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced April 28, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 689?
- Track SB 689 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 689
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 689
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →