SB 1192 — An Act amending the act of June 27, 2006 (1st Sp.Sess., P.L.1873, No.1), known as the Taxpayer Relief Act, in taxation by school districts, further providing for public referendum requirements for increasing certain taxes.
Last action — Referred to Finance
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 27, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Printer's No. PN1464 View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill updates the Taxpayer Relief Act to modify public referendum requirements for tax increases by school districts.
-
Section 333
for the [2006-2007] 2026-2027 fiscal year, the tax increase proposed by any board of school directors shall [not exceed the index unless an exception under subsection (f) or (n) is approved pursuant to subsection (j), provided that a board of school directors that did not elect to participate in the former act of July 5, 2004 (P.L.654, No.72), known as the Homeowner Tax Relief Act, shall have the authority to petition the court of common pleas for an additional tax rate increase if the tax rate increase allowed by the index and any exception approved pursuant to subsection (j) is insufficient to balance the proposed budget. No later than July 15, 2006, the court shall grant the school district's request for the tax rate increase upon good cause shown if the school district proves by clear and convincing evidence that the tax rate increase authorized under this paragraph is insufficient to balance the proposed budget. For a board of school directors subject to this paragraph, the dates by which the board of school directors, the department and the court of common pleas shall be required to comply with section 311 and subsections (e) and (j) shall be 92 days after the dates set forth in those provisions, except that the date by which the board of school directors shall be required to comply with all of the provisions of section 311(c) shall be ten days prior to the date by which the board of school directors is required to adopt a preliminary budget. Any exceptions granted to a board of school directors under section 333 of the former Homeowner Tax Relief Act shall remain in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, a board of school directors that sought and was granted approval for one or more exceptions under section 333 of the former Homeowner Tax Relief Act may apply for any exception under subsections (f) (v) and (n), where the dollar amount of an exception approved by the department under the former Homeowner Tax Relief Act is less than the dollar amount of the exception for which the school district is eligible under this act.]→ receive a vote from the electorate of the school district in accordance with subsection (c)(3).This change mandates that any tax increase proposed by a school board must be approved by a public vote.
-
Section 333
[except as set forth in subsection (j), unless]→ UnlessThis change clarifies the conditions under which a school board may increase taxes without voter approval.
-
Section 333
[2005-2006] 2025-2026 fiscal year.→ 2026-2027 fiscal year.This change updates the fiscal year reference for existing restrictions on school boards levying new taxes.
-
Section 333
[Except as set forth in subsection (j), a] A school→ A schoolThis change removes unnecessary language and streamlines the text.
-
Section 333
must be submitted to the electors of the school district, and a majority of the electors voting on the question must approve the increase.→ must be submitted to the electors of the school district at a subsequent municipal election pursuant to the provisions of section 332.This change modifies the timing and requirement for voter approval of tax increases.
Action History
-
Referred to Finance
Sponsors
- Jarrett Coleman · Primary
- Kristin Phillips-Hill · Cosponsor
- Elder A. Vogel · Cosponsor
- Patrick J. Stefano · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 249 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jarrett Coleman Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican
- Elder A. Vogel Republican
- Patrick J. Stefano Republican
Not signed on (249)
249 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 249 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1192?
- SB 1192 is sponsored by Jarrett Coleman (Republican), Kristin Phillips-Hill (Republican), Elder A. Vogel (Republican), and Patrick J. Stefano (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1192?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 27, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 1192?
- Track SB 1192 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1192
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1192
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →