HB 57 — An Act amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in other offenses, further providing for drug trafficking sentencing and penalties.
Last action — Referred to Judiciary
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Printer's No. PN0047 View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies the mandatory minimum sentencing and appellate review processes for drug trafficking offenses involving fentanyl in Pennsylvania.
-
18 Pa.C.S. § 7508
Proof of sentencing.--Provisions of this section shall not be an element of the crime. Notice of the applicability of this section to the defendant shall not be required prior to conviction, but reasonable notice of the Commonwealth's intention to proceed under this section shall be provided after conviction and before sentencing. The applicability of this section shall be determined at sentencing. The court shall consider evidence presented at trial, shall afford the Commonwealth and the defendant an opportunity to present necessary additional evidence and shall determine, by a preponderance of the evidence, if this section is applicable.→ Application of mandatory minimum penalty.--With the exception of prior convictions, any provision of this section that requires imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence shall constitute an element enhancing the underlying offense. Any enhancing element must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt at trial on the underlying offense and must be submitted to the finder of fact for deliberation together with the underlying offense. If the finder of fact finds the defendant guilty of the underlying offense, the finder of fact shall then also decide whether any enhancing element has been proven.This change establishes that mandatory minimum sentences are elements of the offense that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
18 Pa.C.S. § 7508
Appellate review.--If a sentencing court refuses to apply this section where applicable, the Commonwealth shall have the right to appellate review of the action of the sentencing court. The appellate court shall vacate the sentence and remand the case to the sentencing court for imposition of a sentence in accordance with this section.→ Appeal by Commonwealth.--If the finder of fact has found any enhancing element and a sentencing court imposes a sentence below the mandatory minimum sentence, the Commonwealth shall have the right to appellate review of the sentence. If the appellate court finds that the mandatory sentencing provision was applicable, the court shall vacate the sentence and remand the case for resentencing in accordance with that provision.This modification allows the Commonwealth to appeal if a court imposes a sentence below the mandatory minimum after finding enhancing elements.
Action History
-
Referred to Judiciary
Sponsors
- Marla Brown · Primary
- Brian Smith · Cosponsor
- Joanne Stehr · Cosponsor
- Andrew Kuzma · Cosponsor
- David H. Zimmerman · Cosponsor
- Mark M. Gillen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 247 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Marla Brown Republican
Co-sponsors (5)
- Brian Smith Republican
- Joanne Stehr Republican
- Andrew Kuzma Republican
- David H. Zimmerman Republican
- Mark M. Gillen Republican
Not signed on (247)
247 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 247 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 57?
- HB 57 is sponsored by Marla Brown (Republican), Brian Smith (Republican), Joanne Stehr (Republican), Andrew Kuzma (Republican), David H. Zimmerman (Republican), and Mark M. Gillen (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 57?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 57?
- Track HB 57 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 57
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 57
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →