An Act amending the act of May 3, 1933 (P.L.242, No.86), referred to as the Cosmetology Law, further provid...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 87 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 87.
You're tracking HB 87
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 87 — An Act amending the act of May 3, 1933 (P.L.242, No.86), referred to as the Cosmetology Law, further providing for eligibility requirements for examination and for apprentices in cosmetology salons.
Last action — Laid on the table
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (4 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
66 added · 35 removedPlain-language change summary
The most significant change in the updated version of Bill HB 87 is the revision of eligibility requirements for those seeking to become licensed cosmetologists. The age requirement has been retained at 16 years, but there is a clearer emphasis on needing at least a tenth-grade education or equivalent, and additional training options have been specified. This matters because it may broaden access to the cosmetology profession, potentially allowing more individuals, including those who may benefit from rehabilitation services, to pursue a career in cosmetology more easily.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
70 THEPRINTER'S GENERALNO. ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
871618 2025THE INTRODUCEDGENERAL BYASSEMBLY MARCELL,OF KAZEEM,PENNSYLVANIA KHAN,HOUSE NEILSONBILL ANDSession KENYATTA, JANUARY 14, 2025 REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE, JANUARY 14, 2025 AN ACT Amending the act of MayNo. 3, 1933 (P.L.242, No.86), entitled "An act to promote the public health and safety by providing for examination, licensing and granting of permits for those who desire to engage in the profession of cosmetology;
defining87 2025 INTRODUCED BY MARCELL, KAZEEM, KHAN, NEILSON AND GREEN, JANUARY 14, 2025 AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, MAY 6, 2025 AN ACT Amending the act of May 3, 1933 (P.L.242, No.86), entitled "An act to promote the public health and safety by providing for examination, licensing and granting of permits for those who cosmetology, and regulating cosmetology salons, schools,schools,ing students, apprentices, teachers, managers, manicurists and cosmetologists;
conferring powers and duties upon the Commissioner of Professional and Occupational Affairs of the byDepartment applicantsof andState; licensees;
and providing penalties,"courtsfor furtherappeals providingto forcertain apprenticescourts inby cosmetologyapplicants salons.and licensees;
and providing penalties," further providing for ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR <-- EXAMINATION AND FOR apprentices in cosmetology salons.
Section 10 of the act of May 3, 1933 (P.L.242, <-- No.86), referred to as the Cosmetology Law, is amended to read:
SectionSECTION 10.1.
ApprenticesSECTIONS in4(A) CosmetologyAND Salons.--Any10 cosmetologistOF whoTHE isACT aOF cosmetologyMAY salon3, owner,1933 at<-- least(P.L.242, twenty-NO.86), threeREFERRED yearsTO ofAS age,THE whoCOSMETOLOGY isLAW, aARE highAMENDED schoolTO graduateREAD: or the equivalent thereof[,] and who has had at least [five] ten years experience as a licensed cosmetologist in Pennsylvania[, and] or who is a holder of a teacher's license, may instruct apprentices in a duly licensed cosmetology salon, provided that there shall be no less than two licensed cosmetologists in addition to the teacher for each apprentice in any salon and there shall be no more than two apprentices in any salon, and provided such salon is not held out as a school of cosmetology and provided each teacher instructing an apprentice shall report quarterly hours to the board on a form provided by the board.
SECTION 4.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR EXAMINATION.--(A) NO PERSON SHALL BE PERMITTED BY THE BOARD TO RECEIVE A LICENSE AS A COSMETOLOGIST UNLESS SUCH PERSON (1) SHALL BE AT LEAST SIXTEEN YEARS OF AGE AND OF GOOD MORAL CHARACTER AT THE TIME OF MAKING APPLICATION, AND (2) SHALL HAVE COMPLETED A TENTH GRADE EDUCATION OR THE EQUIVALENT THEREOF, OR IN LIEU OF SUCH EDUCATION OR THE EQUIVALENT THEREOF SHALL HAVE RECEIVED TRAINING FROM OR UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE BUREAU OF REHABILITATION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, AND (3) SHALL HAVE EITHER (I) COMPLETED NOT LESS THAN ONE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY HOURS AS A STUDENT IN A DULY REGISTERED SCHOOL OF COSMETOLOGY AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED IN THIS ACT, OR (II) SHALL HAVE BEEN REGISTERED AND SERVED AS AN APPRENTICE AT LEAST TWO THOUSAND HOURS IN A LICENSED COSMETOLOGY SALON AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED IN THIS ACT.
THE APPLICATION SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A NOTARIZED STATEMENT FROM EITHER THE LICENSED COSMETOLOGY SCHOOL THE APPLICANT ATTENDED OR THE LICENSED COSMETOLOGY TEACHER OR LICENSED COSMETOLOGIST WHO SERVED AS THE INSTRUCTOR IN THE LICENSED COSMETOLOGY SALON WHERE THE APPLICANT STUDIED AND TRAINED, STATING THAT THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLETED THE STUDY AND TRAINING PERIOD REQUIRED UNDER THIS ACT.
* * * Section 10.
Apprentices in Cosmetology Salons.--Any cosmetologist who is a cosmetology salon owner, at least twenty- three years of age, who is a high school graduate or the equivalent thereof[,] and who has had at least [five] ten years experience as a licensed cosmetologist in Pennsylvania[, and] or who is a holder of a teacher's license WITH AT LEAST FIVE YEARS <-- OF EXPERIENCE AS A LICENSED COSMETOLOGIST IN PENNSYLVANIA, may instruct apprentices in a duly licensed cosmetology salon, provided that there shall be no less than two licensed cosmetologists in addition to the teacher OR A LICENSED <-- COSMETOLOGIST SERVING AS AN INSTRUCTOR for each apprentice in 20250HB0087PN1618 - 2 - any salon and there shall be no more than two apprentices in any salon, and provided such salon is not held out as a school of cosmetology and provided each teacher OR COSMETOLOGIST <-- instructing an apprentice shall report quarterly hours to the board on a form provided by the board.
20250HB0087PN007020250HB0087PN1618 - 23 -
Action History
-
Laid on the table
-
First consideration
-
Reported as amended
-
Referred to Professional Licensure
Sponsors
- Kristin Marcell · Primary
- Carol Kazeem · Cosponsor
- Tarik Khan · Cosponsor
- Ed Neilson · Cosponsor
- G. Roni Green · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 248 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Kristin Marcell Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- Carol Kazeem Democratic
- Tarik Khan Democratic
- Ed Neilson Democratic
- G. Roni Green Democratic
Not signed on (248)
248 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 248 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Miller | — | Yea |
| Torren Ecker | — | Yea |
| Arvind Venkat | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Munroe | Democratic | Yea |
| Bridget M. Kosierowski | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| Ismail Smith-Wade-El | Democratic | Yea |
| Kyle J. Mullins | Democratic | Yea |
| Malcolm Kenyatta | Democratic | Yea |
| Manuel Guzman | Democratic | Yea |
| Nancy Guenst | Democratic | Yea |
| Nathan Davidson | Democratic | Yea |
| Pat Gallagher | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert E. Merski | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven R. Malagari | Democratic | Yea |
| Andrew Kuzma | Republican | Yea |
| Bryan Cutler | Republican | Yea |
| Dane Watro | Republican | Yea |
| Donna Scheuren | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Emrick | Republican | Yea |
| Kathleen C. Tomlinson | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Marcell | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Armanini | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas L. Mehaffie | Republican | Yea |
| Valerie S. Gaydos | Republican | Yea |
| Zachary Mako | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Miller | — | Yea |
| Torren Ecker | — | Yea |
| Arvind Venkat | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Munroe | Democratic | Yea |
| Bridget M. Kosierowski | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| Ismail Smith-Wade-El | Democratic | Yea |
| Kyle J. Mullins | Democratic | Yea |
| Malcolm Kenyatta | Democratic | Yea |
| Manuel Guzman | Democratic | Yea |
| Nancy Guenst | Democratic | Yea |
| Nathan Davidson | Democratic | Yea |
| Pat Gallagher | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert E. Merski | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven R. Malagari | Democratic | Yea |
| Andrew Kuzma | Republican | Yea |
| Bryan Cutler | Republican | Yea |
| Dane Watro | Republican | Yea |
| Donna Scheuren | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Emrick | Republican | Yea |
| Kathleen C. Tomlinson | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Marcell | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Armanini | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas L. Mehaffie | Republican | Yea |
| Valerie S. Gaydos | Republican | Yea |
| Zachary Mako | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 87?
- HB 87 is sponsored by Kristin Marcell (Republican), Carol Kazeem (Democratic), Tarik Khan (Democratic), Ed Neilson (Democratic), and G. Roni Green (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 87?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 87?
- Track HB 87 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 87
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 87
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →