An Act prohibiting the penalization of employees for nonparticipation in religious or political matters; pr...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 64 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 64.
You're tracking HB 64
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 64 — An Act prohibiting the penalization of employees for nonparticipation in religious or political matters; providing for notice requirements; establishing the Captive Audience Meeting Enforcement Fund; and imposing penalties.
Last action — Laid on the table
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
24 sponsors
1 primary, 23 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (22 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
189 added · 131 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HB 64 has added a section explicitly defining "employ" as allowing or permitting individuals to work, which clarifies the responsibilities of employers. It also includes the definition of "interested party," which refers to organizations that monitor compliance with labor laws, providing more context for who might be involved in oversight. These changes matter because they help create clearer guidelines and enforce rights concerning employee participation in meetings about political or religious issues at work, ensuring that employees understand their protection under the law.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
53 THEPRINTER'S GENERALNO. ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
3056 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
MILLER, DAWKINS, SIEGEL, GREEN, POWELL, FRANKEL, MATZIE, HADDOCK, RABB, VENKAT, BENHAM, SANCHEZ, PIELLI, HILL-EVANS, CIRESI, DONAHUE, SCHLOSSBERG, FIEDLER, FREEMANFREEMAN, OTTEN, INGLIS AND OTTEN,KENYATTA, JANUARY 14, 2025 REFERREDAS TOREPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND INDUSTRY, JANUARYHOUSE 14,OF 2025REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, MARCH 23, 2026 AN ACT Prohibiting the penalization of employees for nonparticipation in religious or political matters;
providing for notice requirements;ENFORCEMENT FUND;
and imposing penalties.penalties.DIENCE MEETING <-- The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:
The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:
"Employee.""EMPLOY." AnTO individualENGAGE, employedSUFFER byOR anPERMIT employer.TO WORK.
<-- "Employee." An individual employed by an employer.
THE TERM <-- INCLUDES THE COMMONWEALTH, ANY OF ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS, INCLUDING A PUBLIC SCHOOL ENTITY OR SCHOOL ENTITY, AND ANY OFFICE, BOARD, COMMISSION, AGENCY, AUTHORITY, LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ORGANIZATION OR OTHER INSTRUMENTALITY THEREOF.
"SECRETARY." THE SECRETARY OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF THE <-- COMMONWEALTH.
(2) Not taken under threat of a negative change in an employment condition for nonattendance, including a negative performance evaluation, an adverse change in a form of 20250HB0064PN3056 - 2 - compensation or an adverse change in any other benefit of employment.
20250HB0064PN0053 - 2 - (1) because the employee declines to attend or participate in an employer-sponsored meeting or declines to receive or listen to a communication from the employer or an agent, representative or designee of the employer if the purpose of the meeting or communication is to transmit the opinion of the employer about a religious matter or political matter;
20250HB0064PN3056 - 3 - (b) Damages.--A court may award an employee prevailing in an action under subsection (a) appropriate relief, including injunctive relief, reinstatement of a former employment position or an equivalent position, back pay, reestablishment of employee benefits, including seniority, to which the employee would otherwise have been eligible if the violation had not occurred or any other appropriate relief as deemed necessary by the court to make the employee whole.
A court shall award an employee 20250HB0064PN0053 - 3 - prevailing in an action under this section reasonable attorney fees and costs.
SectionSECTION 6.
INVESTIGATION.
<-- (A) AUTHORIZATION.--IF THE SECRETARY RECEIVES INFORMATION INDICATING THAT THIS ACT MAY HAVE BEEN VIOLATED, THE SECRETARY MAY INVESTIGATE THE MATTER.
(B) PERMITTED ACTIONS.--THE SECRETARY MAY TAKE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS:
(1) ENTER AND INSPECT A WORKSITE OR PLACE OF BUSINESS AT ANY REASONABLE TIME TO EXAMINE AND INSPECT RECORDS THAT RELATE TO COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ACT.
(2) SUBPOENA WITNESSES, ADMINISTER OATHS, EXAMINE WITNESSES AND COPY OR COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF RECORDS, CONTRACTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF THIS ACT.
(3) PETITION COMMONWEALTH COURT TO ENFORCE ANY SUBPOENA OR ORDER ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT.
Section 6 7.
The<-- (A) INVESTIGATION AFTER RECEIPT OF COMPLAINT.--The <-- department shall investigate an alleged violation of section 4 20250HB0064PN3056 - 4 - in a complaint received from an employee or interested party.
Section(B) 7.TYPES OF PENALTIES AUTHORIZED.--IF, AFTER AN <-- INVESTIGATION, THE DEPARTMENT DETERMINES THAT THE EMPLOYER HAS VIOLATED THIS ACT, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL:
(1) FOR A FIRST VIOLATION, BRING AN ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO ASSESS A FINE OF UP TO $2,500 PER EMPLOYEE WHOSE RIGHTS UNDER THIS ACT WERE VIOLATED.
(2) FOR A SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT VIOLATION, BRING AN ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO ASSESS A FINE OF UP TO $5,000 PER EMPLOYEE WHOSE RIGHTS UNDER THIS ACT WERE VIOLATED.
Section 7 8.
<-- Within (A) DUTY OF EMPLOYER.--NO LATER THAN 30 days after <-- the effective date of this section, an employer shall post and maintain a notice of the rights of employees under this act where notices for employees are customarily posted by the employer.
Section(B) 8.DUTY OF DEPARTMENT.--THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CREATE AND <-- POST, ON ITS PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE INTERNET WEBSITE, A NOTICE OF THE RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES UNDER THIS ACT.
THE DOCUMENT PRODUCED BY THE DEPARTMENT MAY BE USED BY EMPLOYERS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION (A).
Section 8 9.
<-- Nothing in this act shall be construed to:
(2) limit the right of an employer or an agent, representative or designee of an employer to conduct meetings 20250HB0064PN3056 - 5 - involving a religious matter or political matter if attendance is voluntary or to engage in a communication if the receipt or listening of the communication is voluntary;
20250HB0064PN0053 - 4 - (5) prohibit an institution of higher education or an agent, representative or designee of an institution of higher education from conducting a meeting or participating in a communication with an employee of the institution of higher education concerning any coursework, symposia, research, publication or academic program at the institution of higher education;
or <-- (6) prohibit a Commonwealth or municipal agency, the General Assembly, a governing body of a municipality, a county executive or any other State or local governing entity from requiring an employee of the Commonwealth or municipal agency, General Assembly, governing body of a municipality, county executive or other State or local governing entity to attend an employer-sponsored meeting or participate in a communication with the employer for the purpose of communicating the employer's proposals to change public policy.policy.;
Section<-- 9.(7) PROHIBIT AN EMPLOYER FROM REQUIRING ITS EMPLOYEES TO TAKE ANTIDISCRIMINATION TRAINING, INCLUDING TRAINING ADDRESSING RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION;
OR (8) PROHIBIT A LABOR ORGANIZATION FROM ACCESSING AN 20250HB0064PN3056 - 6 - EMPLOYER'S EMPLOYEES IN THE WORKPLACE FOR PURPOSES OF DISCUSSING MATTERS, INCLUDING MEMBERSHIP IN THE LABOR ORGANIZATION, ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT.
SECTION 10.
THE CAPTIVE AUDIENCE MEETING ENFORCEMENT FUND.
Show all 46 changed lines (6 more)
(A) ESTABLISHMENT.--THE CAPTIVE AUDIENCE MEETING ENFORCEMENT FUND IS ESTABLISHED IN THE STATE TREASURY.
(B) SOURCE OF FUNDING.--ALL FINES IMPOSED AND COLLECTED UNDER SECTION 7 SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO THE CAPTIVE AUDIENCE MEETING ENFORCEMENT FUND.
(C) USE OF FUND.--THE MONEY IN THE CAPTIVE AUDIENCE MEETING ENFORCEMENT FUND IS APPROPRIATED ON A CONTINUING BASIS TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENFORCING THIS ACT.
Section 9 11.
<-- This act shall take effect in 90 days.
20250HB0064PN005320250HB0064PN3056 - 57 -
Show all 46 changed rows (6 more)
Action History
-
Laid on the table
-
First consideration
-
Reported as amended
-
Referred to Labor & Industry
Sponsors
- Joshua Siegel · Cosponsor
- Tarik Khan · Primary
- Jason Dawkins · Cosponsor
- G. Roni Green · Cosponsor
- Lindsay Powell · Cosponsor
- Dan Frankel · Cosponsor
- Robert F. Matzie · Cosponsor
- Jim Haddock · Cosponsor
- Christopher M. Rabb · Cosponsor
- Arvind Venkat · Cosponsor
- Jessica Benham · Cosponsor
- Benjamin V. Sanchez · Cosponsor
- Chris Pielli · Cosponsor
- Carol Hill-Evans · Cosponsor
- Joe Ciresi · Cosponsor
- Kyle Donahue · Cosponsor
- Michael H. Schlossberg · Cosponsor
- Elizabeth Fiedler · Cosponsor
- Robert Freeman · Cosponsor
- Danielle Friel Otten · Cosponsor
- John C. Inglis III · Cosponsor
- Malcolm Kenyatta · Cosponsor
- Steven R. Malagari · Cosponsor
- Brett R. Miller · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 23 co-sponsors · 229 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Tarik Khan Democratic
Co-sponsors (23)
- Joshua Siegel
- Jason Dawkins Democratic
- G. Roni Green Democratic
- Lindsay Powell Democratic
- Dan Frankel Democratic
- Robert F. Matzie Democratic
- Jim Haddock Democratic
- Christopher M. Rabb Democratic
- Arvind Venkat Democratic
- Jessica Benham Democratic
- Benjamin V. Sanchez Democratic
- Chris Pielli Democratic
- Carol Hill-Evans Democratic
- Joe Ciresi Democratic
- Kyle Donahue Democratic
- Michael H. Schlossberg Democratic
- Elizabeth Fiedler Democratic
- Robert Freeman Democratic
- Danielle Friel Otten Democratic
- John C. Inglis III Democratic
- Malcolm Kenyatta Democratic
- Steven R. Malagari Democratic
- Brett R. Miller Republican
Not signed on (229)
229 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 229 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 46% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Goughnour | Democratic | Yea |
| Emily Kinkead | Democratic | Yea |
| G. Roni Green | Democratic | Yea |
| Greg Scott | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Dawkins | Democratic | Yea |
| Jennifer O'Mara | Democratic | Yea |
| Jim Haddock | Democratic | Yea |
| John C. Inglis III | Democratic | Yea |
| Jose Giral | Democratic | Yea |
| Kyle Donahue | Democratic | Yea |
| Regina G. Young | Democratic | Yea |
| Rick Krajewski | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert E. Merski | Democratic | Yea |
| Tim Brennan | Democratic | Yea |
| Aaron Bernstine | Republican | Nay |
| Barbara Gleim | Republican | Nay |
| Brian C. Rasel | Republican | Nay |
| Chad G. Reichard | Republican | Nay |
| Jill N. Cooper | Republican | Nay |
| Joseph D'Orsie | Republican | Nay |
| Leslie Rossi | Republican | Nay |
| Marc S. Anderson | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Jones | Republican | Nay |
| R. Lee James | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Barger | Republican | Nay |
| Wendy Fink | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 46% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Goughnour | Democratic | Yea |
| Emily Kinkead | Democratic | Yea |
| G. Roni Green | Democratic | Yea |
| Greg Scott | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Dawkins | Democratic | Yea |
| Jennifer O'Mara | Democratic | Yea |
| Jim Haddock | Democratic | Yea |
| John C. Inglis III | Democratic | Yea |
| Jose Giral | Democratic | Yea |
| Kyle Donahue | Democratic | Yea |
| Regina G. Young | Democratic | Yea |
| Rick Krajewski | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert E. Merski | Democratic | Yea |
| Tim Brennan | Democratic | Yea |
| Aaron Bernstine | Republican | Nay |
| Barbara Gleim | Republican | Nay |
| Brian C. Rasel | Republican | Nay |
| Chad G. Reichard | Republican | Nay |
| Jill N. Cooper | Republican | Nay |
| Joseph D'Orsie | Republican | Nay |
| Leslie Rossi | Republican | Nay |
| Marc S. Anderson | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Jones | Republican | Nay |
| R. Lee James | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Barger | Republican | Nay |
| Wendy Fink | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 64?
- HB 64 is sponsored by Joshua Siegel, Tarik Khan (Democratic), Jason Dawkins (Democratic), G. Roni Green (Democratic), Lindsay Powell (Democratic), Dan Frankel (Democratic), Robert F. Matzie (Democratic), Jim Haddock (Democratic), Christopher M. Rabb (Democratic), Arvind Venkat (Democratic), Jessica Benham (Democratic), Benjamin V. Sanchez (Democratic), Chris Pielli (Democratic), Carol Hill-Evans (Democratic), Joe Ciresi (Democratic), Kyle Donahue (Democratic), Michael H. Schlossberg (Democratic), Elizabeth Fiedler (Democratic), Robert Freeman (Democratic), Danielle Friel Otten (Democratic), John C. Inglis III (Democratic), Malcolm Kenyatta (Democratic), Steven R. Malagari (Democratic), and Brett R. Miller (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 64?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 64?
- Track HB 64 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 64
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 64
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →