An Act prohibiting enforcement of covenants not to compete in broadcast employment agreements.
This means more job flexibility for broadcast employees, as they can seek new positions without the risks associated with non-compete agreements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 142 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 142.
You're tracking SB 142
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 142 — An Act prohibiting enforcement of covenants not to compete in broadcast employment agreements.
Last action — Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 22, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (5 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill prohibits enforcing non-compete agreements for broadcast employees.
This bill makes it illegal to enforce non-compete clauses in broadcast employment contracts. It aims to allow broadcast workers more freedom to change jobs.
What this means for you
- Workers: This means more job flexibility for broadcast employees, as they can seek new positions without the risks associated with non-compete agreements.
Bill Text
- Printer's No. PN0087 View text Current pdf
Action History
-
Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9)
-
First consideration
-
Reported as committed
-
Referred to Labor & Industry
Sponsors
- Camera Bartolotta · Primary
- Jay Costa · Cosponsor
- Timothy P. Kearney · Cosponsor
- John I. Kane · Cosponsor
- Christine M. Tartaglione · Cosponsor
- Nick Pisciottano · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 247 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Camera Bartolotta Republican
Co-sponsors (5)
- Jay Costa Democratic
- Timothy P. Kearney Democratic
- John I. Kane Democratic
- Christine M. Tartaglione Democratic
- Nick Pisciottano Democratic
Not signed on (247)
247 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 247 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Yea |
| John I. Kane | Democratic | Yea |
| Marty Flynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Nick Pisciottano | Democratic | Yea |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| Devlin J. Robinson | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Picozzi | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Nay |
| Rosemary M. Brown | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 142?
- SB 142 is sponsored by Camera Bartolotta (Republican), Jay Costa (Democratic), Timothy P. Kearney (Democratic), John I. Kane (Democratic), Christine M. Tartaglione (Democratic), and Nick Pisciottano (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 142?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 22, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 142?
- Track SB 142 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 142
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 142
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →