Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 8 R cosponsors

SB 635 — An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in sentencing, providing for sentencing for offenses committed near drug and alcohol recovery houses.

Last action — Referred to Judiciary

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced April 14, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 58% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 8 sponsors

    1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

27 added · 49 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated bill, SB 635, now specifically adds a provision that imposes a stricter sentencing enhancement for offenses involving drug-related crimes committed within 1,000 feet of a drug and alcohol recovery house. This change shifts the focus from general drug trafficking penalties to emphasize the proximity to recovery houses, highlighting the intent to protect vulnerable individuals in recovery environments. This adjustment is important because it aims to deter criminal activity near these supportive facilities, reinforcing their role in helping people overcome addiction.

→
Previous
Latest
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NOS.
640 PRINTER'S NO.
640, 863 PRINTER'S NO.
863 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
1007 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
635 2025 INTRODUCED BY LANGERHOLC, FARRY, BROOKS, CULVER, DUSH, MASTRIANO, YAW AND STEFANO, APRIL 14, 2025 SENATOR BAKER, JUDICIARY, AS AMENDED, JUNE 3, 2025 AN ACT AmeConsolidated Statutes, in other offenses, further providing <-- for drug trafficking sentencing and penalties.
635 2025 INTRODUCED BY LANGERHOLC, FARRY, BROOKS, CULVER, DUSH, MASTRIANO, YAW AND STEFANO, APRIL 14, 2025 AS AMENDED ON THIRD CONSIDERATION, JUNE 25, 2025 AN ACT Amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in sentencing, providing for sentencing for offenses committed near drug and alcohol recovery houses.
AMENDING TITLE 42 (JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE) OF THE <-- PENNSYLVANIA CONSOLIDATED STATUTES, IN SENTENCING, PROVIDING FOR SENTENCING FOR OFFENSES COMMITTED NEAR DRUG AND ALCOHOL RECOVERY HOUSES.
Section 7508 of Title 18 of the Pennsylvania <-- Consolidated Statutes is amended by adding a subsection to read:
Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes is amended by adding a section to read:
§ 7508.
§ 9720.9.
Drug trafficking sentencing and penalties.
Sentencing for offenses committed near drug and alcohol recovery houses.
* * * (g) Sentencing enhancement.--The Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing, in accordance with 42 Pa.C.S.
(a) Sentencing enhancement.--The Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing, in accordance with section 2154 (relating to adoption of guidelines for sentencing), shall provide for a sentencing enhancement for an offense committed under section 13(a)(12), (14) 13(A)(14) or (30) of the act of April 14, 1972 <-- (P.L.233, No.64), known as The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, where the offense was committed within 1,000 feet of the real property on which a drug and alcohol recovery house is located.
§ 2154 (relating to adoption of guidelines for sentencing), shall provide for a sentencing enhancement for courts to consider in cases involving a person violating section 13(a)(12), (14) or (30) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance or a mixture containing it is classified in Schedule I, II, III or IV under section 4 of that act if the person manufactures, delivers or possesses with the intent to manufacture or deliver the controlled substance within 1,000 feet of the real property on which a drug and alcohol recovery house is located.
(b) Definition.--As used in this section, the term "drug and alcohol recovery house" means the same as defined under section 2311-A of the act of April 9, 1929 (P.L.177, No.175), known as The Administrative Code of 1929.
As used in this subsection, the term "drug and alcohol recovery house" shall be as defined in section 2311-A of the act of April 9, 1929 (P.L.177, No.175), known as The Administrative Code of 1929.
SECTION 1.
20250SB0635PN1007 - 2 -
TITLE 42 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA CONSOLIDATED <-- STATUTES IS AMENDED BY ADDING A SECTION TO READ:
§ 9720.9.
SENTENCING FOR OFFENSES COMMITTED NEAR DRUG AND ALCOHOL RECOVERY HOUSES.
(A) SENTENCING ENHANCEMENT.--THE PENNSYLVANIA COMMISSION ON SENTENCING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2154 (RELATING TO ADOPTION OF GUIDELINES FOR SENTENCING), SHALL PROVIDE FOR A SENTENCING ENHANCEMENT FOR AN OFFENSE COMMITTED UNDER SECTION 13(A)(12), (14) OR (30) OF THE ACT OF APRIL 14, 1972 (P.L.233, NO.64), KNOWN AS THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, DRUG, DEVICE AND COSMETIC ACT, WHERE THE OFFENSE WAS COMMITTED WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF THE REAL PROPERTY ON WHICH A DRUG AND ALCOHOL RECOVERY HOUSE IS LOCATED.
(B) DEFINITION.--AS USED IN THIS SECTION, THE TERM "DRUG AND ALCOHOL RECOVERY HOUSE" MEANS THE SAME AS DEFINED UNDER SECTION 2311-A OF THE ACT OF APRIL 9, 1929 (P.L.177, NO.175), KNOWN AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OF 1929.
SECTION 2.
THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IN 60 DAYS.
20250SB0635PN0863 - 2 -
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Referred to Judiciary

  2. Third consideration and final passage

  3. Amended on third consideration

  4. Third consideration

  5. Second consideration

  6. First consideration

  7. Reported as amended

  8. Referred to Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 245 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (7)

Not signed on (245)

245 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 245 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

FINAL PASSAGE

Passed 43 Yea · 7 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 27000
Democratic 16700
Total 43700
% of votes cast 86%14%0%0%
How each member voted (50)
Member Party Vote
Amanda M. Cappelletti Democratic Nay
Anthony H. Williams Democratic Yea
Art Haywood Democratic Yea
Carolyn T. Comitta Democratic Nay
Christine M. Tartaglione Democratic Yea
James Andrew Malone Democratic Yea
Jay Costa Democratic Yea
John I. Kane Democratic Yea
Judith L. Schwank Democratic Yea
Katie J. Muth Democratic Yea
Lindsey M. Williams Democratic Nay
Lisa M. Boscola Democratic Yea
Maria Collett Democratic Nay
Marty Flynn Democratic Yea
Nick Miller Democratic Yea
Nick Pisciottano Democratic Yea
Nikil Saval Democratic Nay
Patty Kim Democratic Yea
Sharif Street Democratic Yea
Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic Yea
Timothy P. Kearney Democratic Nay
Vincent J. Hughes Democratic Nay
Wayne D. Fontana Democratic Yea
Camera Bartolotta Republican Yea
Chris Gebhard Republican Yea
Cris Dush Republican Yea
Daniel Laughlin Republican Yea
David G. Argall Republican Yea
Dawn W. Keefer Republican Yea
Devlin J. Robinson Republican Yea
Doug Mastriano Republican Yea
Elder A. Vogel Republican Yea
Frank A. Farry Republican Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Greg Rothman Republican Yea
Jarrett Coleman Republican Yea
Joe Picozzi Republican Yea
Joe Pittman Republican Yea
Judy Ward Republican Yea
Kim L. Ward Republican Yea
Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican Yea
Lisa Baker Republican Yea
Lynda Schlegel Culver Republican Yea
Michele Brooks Republican Yea
Patrick J. Stefano Republican Yea
Rosemary M. Brown Republican Yea
Scott E. Hutchinson Republican Yea
Scott Martin Republican Yea
Tracy Pennycuick Republican Yea
Wayne Langerholc Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 9000
Democratic 4001
Total 13001
% of votes cast 93%0%0%7%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Amanda M. Cappelletti Democratic Yea
Art Haywood Democratic Not Voting
Maria Collett Democratic Yea
Nikil Saval Democratic Yea
Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic Yea
Camera Bartolotta Republican Yea
Cris Dush Republican Yea
Doug Mastriano Republican Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Kim L. Ward Republican Yea
Lisa Baker Republican Yea
Rosemary M. Brown Republican Yea
Tracy Pennycuick Republican Yea
Wayne Langerholc Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 4 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 9000
Democratic 0401
Total 9401
% of votes cast 64%29%0%7%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Amanda M. Cappelletti Democratic Nay
Art Haywood Democratic Not Voting
Maria Collett Democratic Nay
Nikil Saval Democratic Nay
Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic Nay
Camera Bartolotta Republican Yea
Cris Dush Republican Yea
Doug Mastriano Republican Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Kim L. Ward Republican Yea
Lisa Baker Republican Yea
Rosemary M. Brown Republican Yea
Tracy Pennycuick Republican Yea
Wayne Langerholc Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 635?
SB 635 is sponsored by Wayne Langerholc (Republican), Frank A. Farry (Republican), Michele Brooks (Republican), Lynda Schlegel Culver (Republican), Cris Dush (Republican), Doug Mastriano (Republican), Gene Yaw (Republican), and Patrick J. Stefano (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 635?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced April 14, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 635?
Track SB 635 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 635

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 635

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →