S3064 —

S3064 SBA1R Statement[First 10/22/20Reprint] SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE   STATEMENT TO   SENATE, No.

 3064 withSTATE committeeOF amendmentsNEW JERSEY 219th LEGISLATURE   STATEINTRODUCED OFOCTOBER NEW19, JERSEY2020   DATED:  Sponsored by:

 OCTOBERSenator  22,STEVEN 2020V.         The Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee reports favorably Senate Bill No.

3064,OROHO withDistrict committee24 amendments.(Morris, Sussex and Warren) Senator  PAUL A.

     SARLO ThisDistrict bill36 requires(Bergen theand StatePassaic) Treasurer  toCo-Sponsored issueby: a report to the Legislature concerning New York’s taxation of New Jersey resident’s income.  The report is required to include:

     Senators (1) O'Scanlon, anSingleton explanation of efforts the State has taken to address the inequity of New York’s taxation of New Jersey residents’ income,       (2)  the estimated total credits the State has granted, or will grant, to New Jersey residents for income taxes paid to New York in each tax year beginning with Tax Year 2011 and endingTesta with  an  estimate  for  TaxSYNOPSIS Year     2020,Requires       (3)  a discussion of steps that the State mayTreasurer take to protectissue thereport Stateconcerning of New Jersey’sYork’s publictaxation fisc, and the paychecks of New Jersey residents, from New York and its political subdivisions taxing authority,       (4)  an estimate of New Jersey residents’ taxincome. savings should the State be able to shift residents’ income tax payments from New York and its political subdivisions to New Jersey,       (5)  a discussion of any state or federal statutory or case law impediments to successfully achieving equitable taxation of New Jersey commuters working for employers in New York,       (6)  an analysis of how other states and jurisdictions address the tax implications of residents living in one state and commuting to another,       (7)  a discussion of the State’s efforts to participate in the litigation between the State of New Hampshire and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts concerning Massachusetts’ taxation of New Hampshire residents, and       (8) recommendations as to how the State may resolve the inequitable tax treatment of New Jersey commuters working for employers in New York.

       TheCURRENT StateVERSION TreasurerOF isTEXT permitted     toAs contractreported withby athe thirdSenate partyBudget toand prepareAppropriations allCommittee oron aOctober portion22, of2020, thewith report.amendments.

The   reportAn isAct requiring the State Treasurer to beissue delivereda withinreport sixconcerning monthsNew York’s taxation of theNew bill’sJersey enactment.residents’ income.

COMMITTEE  AMENDMENTS:     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

       The     committee1.    amendedThe theLegislature billfinds to require the Treasurer to include in the report a discussion of the  State’s efforts to participate in the litigation between the State of New Hampshire and thedeclares Commonwealththat: of Massachusetts concerning Massachusetts’ taxation of New Hampshire residents.

      FISCALa.     IMPACT:Thousands of New Jersey residents, many of whom work from home, have New York income taxes taken from their paychecks because their employers are located in the State of New York.

          Thisb.    billNew isJersey notallows certifiedthose asresidents requiringto claim a fiscaltax note.credit against their New Jersey income tax liability for the taxes they paid to New York, so that their income is not taxed again.

     c.     It is grossly inequitable that the State of New York receives and retains income tax revenue from New Jersey residents who may only infrequently and sporadically travel to New York to conduct business.

     d.    The inequity extends to New Jersey residents who may be required to pay higher New York income tax rates.

     e.     Current inequities have been growing over time as technology improvements have allowed New York businesses to decrease office space available to New Jersey residents working in New York and effectively use New Jersey’s infrastructure and services as support for their employees.

     f.     Current inequities have further been exacerbated by COVID-19, which is hastening the trend of New Jersey residents no longer truly working in New York and New York businesses downsizing New York office space available to New Jersey residents.

     g.    With creativity and affirmative steps, the State Treasurer and the Division of Taxation could increase revenues available to the State of New Jersey and reduce New Jersey residents’ income tax liabilities if New Jersey aggressively sought to protect against the State of New York from gaming the tax system in a manner that drains revenue from the pockets of the New Jersey residents and syphons money away from the State of New Jersey’s budget.

        2.   Within six months following the enactment of P.L.    , c.    (C.        ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill), the State Treasurer shall submit a report to the Legislature in accordance with section 2 of P.L.1991, c.164 (C.52:14-19.1) concerning New York’s taxation of New Jersey residents’ income.

The State Treasurer may contract with a third party to prepare all or a portion of the report.

      The report shall include:

      a.   an explanation of efforts the State has taken to address the inequity of New York’s taxation of New Jersey resident’s income, including any State efforts to educate New Jersey residents and New York employers of the possible illegality of New York’s taxation of New Jersey residents who, because of necessity and as required by their employers, are working from their homes in New Jersey;

      b.   the estimated total credits the State has granted, or will grant, to New Jersey residents for income taxes paid to New York and its political subdivision in each tax year beginning with Tax Year and ending with Tax Year 2020;

      c.   a discussion of steps that the State may take to protect the State of New Jersey’s public fisc, and the paychecks of New Jersey residents, from New York and its political subdivisions’ taxing authority;

      d.   an estimate of New Jersey residents’ tax savings should the State be able to shift residents’ income tax payments from New York and its political subdivisions to New Jersey;

      e.   a discussion of any New Jersey, New York, or other state or federal statutory or case law impediments to successfully achieving equitable taxation of New Jersey commuters working for employers in New York;

      f.    an analysis of how other states and jurisdictions address the tax implications of residents living in one state and commuting to another;

      1g.  a discussion of the State’s efforts to participate in the litigation between the State of New Hampshire and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts concerning Massachusetts’ taxation of New Hampshire residents, or if no efforts have been made, an explanation of why not;1 and      1[g]  h1.     recommendations as to how the State may resolve the inequitable tax treatment of New Jersey commuters working for employers in New York.

       3.    This act shall take effect immediately.