HB 2728 — Administrative rule process; enacting the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2025; effective date; emergency.
Last action — Approved by Governor 05/21/2025
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Kevin Stitt (Republican) on May 21, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
991 added · 219 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill HB 2728 expanded the list of sponsors by adding several new names while removing a few from the previous version. This change matters because it reflects broader support for the bill, potentially increasing its chances of passing. Additionally, the amendments clarify the responsibilities and procedures related to administrative rule processes, emphasizing thorough economic analysis and consultations, which aim to ensure more informed decision-making in rule implementation.
ENGROSSEDAn Act ENROLLED HOUSE BILL NO.
Kendrix, Maynard, Crosswhite Hader, Lepak, Moore, Caldwell (Trey), Boles, Hill, Hildebrant, Steagall, Kane, Cornwell, Kerbs, Hasenbeck, Duel, Hilbert, Olsen, Hays, Stark, George, Grego, Hardin, Townley, West (Kevin), Osburn, Roberts, Miller, Culver, Wolfley, Strom, Fetgatter, Lowe (Dick), Dobrinski, Staires, Burns, Eaves, Turner, Hall, Wilk, Blair, Adams, Chapman, Caldwell (Chad), Bashore, and KanePfeiffer of the House and BergstromBergstrom, Jett, Woods, Prieto, Daniels, Alvord, Sacchieri, Standridge, Murdock, Wingard, Hamilton, Stewart, Weaver, Bullard, Deevers, Guthrie, Stanely, McIntosh, Grellner, Hines, Frix, Burns, Reinhardt, Gillespie, Pederson, Pugh, Gollihare, Seifried, Kern, and JettGreen of the Senate 8 An Act relating to administrative rulerules; processes;
definingproviding terms;short title;
imposingamending dutiesO.S. on agencies with respect to rules;
prescribing2021, procedures;Section 8012, which relates to duties of the Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency (LOFT);
requiringmodifying economicduties impactof analysis;LOFT;
requiring consultationLOFT withto politicalprovide subdivisions;certain analysis and report relating to administrative rules;
requiringspecifying solicitationdate offor informationreport fromsubmissions; certain entities;
establishingrequiring thecompliance Legislativewith EconomicLOFT Analysisby Unitstate withinagencies; the Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency;
imposingrequiring dutiessubmission withand respectpublication to analysis of rules;annual report;
prescribingspecifying limitcontent onof full-time-annual equivalentreport; employees;
requiringamending independent75 analysis;O.S.
requiring2021, reports;Section 250.1, which relates to composition of the Administrative Procedures Act;
requiringupdating cooperationstatutory byreferences; state agencies;
providingamending for75 evaluationO.S. of rules at request of certain officials;
requiring2021, publicSection availability250.3, ofas information;amended by Section 1, Chapter 38, O.S.L.
requiring2023 annual(75 report;O.S.
requiringSupp. quantification of certain results;
prohibiting2024, certainSection rule250.3), fromwhich takingrelates effect without specific approval pursuant to legislativedefinitions; measure;
modifying definitions and defining terms;
amending 75 O.S.
2021, Section 253, as amended by Section 2, Chapter 38, O.S.L.
2023 (75 O.S.
Supp.
2024, Section 253), which relates to emergency rules;
modifying contents of rule impact statement;
providing waiver of certain requirements under certain circumstances;
amending 75 O.S.
2021, Section 303, which relates to permanent rules;
requiring agencies to consult with certain entities prior to rule adoption;
modifying contents of rule impact statement;
amending 75 O.S.
2021, Section 308, as amended by Section 5, Chapter 38, O.S.L.
2023 (75 O.S.
Supp.
2024, Section 308);
updating statutory language;
requiring certain rules to be addressed in certain legislative manner;
and providing an effective date.date;
BEand ITdeclaring ENACTEDan BYemergency. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
Show all 500 changed lines (460 more)
SUBJECT:
Administrative rules BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
ENGR.This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2025”.
SECTION 2.
AMENDATORY 62 O.S.
2021, Section 8012, is amended to read as follows:
ENR.
2728 Page 12 ThisSection act8012. shall be known and may be cited as the "Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2025".
SECTIONA. 2.
NEWThe LAWLegislative AOffice new section of lawFiscal toTransparency be(LOFT) codifiedshall: in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 601 of Title 75, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
As used in this act:
"Agency"Gather meansinformation anyregarding officer, department, bureau, division, board, commission, authority, agency, or institution of this state, except the judicialproposed andbudgets legislative branches, authorized by law to promulgate rules and regulations concerning the administration, enforcement, or interpretation of anyexecutive lawbranch ofagencies thiseach state;fiscal year;
"ImplementationAnalyze andthe complianceinformation costs"and meansevaluate direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, including, but not limited to, fees, the costextent to obtainwhich a license or registration, the costagency ofbudget equipmentdoes required to be installed or used,does additionalnot operatingfulfill costs incurred, the costagency’s ofprimary monitoringduties and reporting,responsibilities andunder anyapplicable otherprovisions costs to comply with the requirements of thefederal, proposedstate, ruleor andother regulation;law;
and 3.
"MajorAnalyze rule"and meansforecast anyall administrativerevenues rule,available whether emergency or permanent in nature, that will result in or is likely to result in One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) or more over the initialagency five-yearfrom periodappropriations, infees, implementationdedicated andrevenue, compliance costs are reasonably expected to be incurred by or passedany alongother tosource; businesses, ENGR.
4.
Compare the agency budget information to the comparable information contained in that agency’s budget requests from prior fiscal years;
and 5.
Conduct such investigations regarding the operations of the agency as required in order to fulfill the duties imposed upon the Office by law or as otherwise directed by the oversight committee;
and 6.
Conduct rule impact analyses for major rules, as defined in Section 250.3 of Title 75 of the Oklahoma Statutes.
The oversight committee, subject to the direction of the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall ensure that the functions performed by the Office pursuant to the provisions of this subsection do not duplicate those of the Senate Committee on Appropriations Committee of the Senate and the House Committee on Appropriations and Budget Committee of the House of Representatives and their respective staffs.
B.
The Office shall further conduct performance evaluations and may conduct independent comprehensive performance audits.
The oversight committee created in Section 3 8013 of this act title may periodically identify specific executive branch agencies, or programs, activities, or functions within executive branch agencies, for which the Office shall conduct a performance evaluation or independent comprehensive performance audit.
C.
As used in Section 8011 et seq.
of this act title, “performance evaluation” means an examination of a program, ENR.
2728 Page 23 localactivity, governmentor units,function andof individualsan asexecutive abranch resultagency, ofconducted thein proposedaccordance rulewith andapplicable regulationgovernment followingauditing thestandards adoptionor auditing and evaluation standards of suchother rule.appropriate authoritative bodies.
The term includes, but is not limited to, an examination of issues related to:
1.
Economy, efficiency, or effectiveness of the agency or program, including any revenue sources used to fund or support the agency or program;
2.
Structure or design of the agency or program to accomplish its goals and objectives;
3.
Adequacy of the agency or program to meet the needs or policy goals identified by the Legislature;
4.
Alternative methods of providing agency or program services or products;
5.
Goals, objectives, and performance measures used by the agency to monitor and report agency or program accomplishments;
6.
The accuracy or adequacy of public documents, reports, or requests prepared by or in relation to the agency or program;
7.
Compliance with appropriate policies, rules, or laws related to the agency or program;
and 8.
Any other issues related to such agencies or programs as directed by the oversight committee.
D.
As used in Section 8011 et seq.
of this act title, “independent comprehensive performance audit (ICPA)” audit” (ICPA) includes, but is not limited to, a review and analysis of the economy, efficiency, effectiveness, and compliance of the policies, management, fiscal affairs, and operations of state agencies, divisions, programs, and accounts.
The results of an ICPA may be used by the Legislature to implement the best budgeting and policy- making practices for government services to run in the most cost- effective way.
The Office may, at the direction of the oversight committee and subject to the approval of the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, contract with a private company, nonprofit organization, or academic institution to assist with an independent comprehensive performance audit or for professional consulting and administrative support ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 4 services.
The Office may, but shall not be required to, contract with the Office of the State Auditor and Inspector to conduct any ICPA.
The Office LOFT shall develop the scope of services for a request for proposals issued, for professional services necessary to complete each ICPA.
Prior to entering into any contract, the Office LOFT shall obtain no less fewer than three separate bids for the auditing services, unless the Office LOFT determines that fewer than three entities meet the qualifications to bid to perform such services as set forth by the Office LOFT.
The cost of the contract shall be paid by the Legislative Services Service Bureau.
An independent comprehensive performance audit shall address, but not be limited to, the following topics:
1.
Policies which shall include constitutional mandates, if any, statutory mandates, statutory authorizations, administrative rules or policies of the affected agency reflected in internal agency documents, or agency practices;
2.
All sources of funding received by the agency, inclusive of federal funds, state appropriations, state-dedicated revenues, fee revenue sources, the use of agency revolving funds, or any other fund or revenue source which is used to pay the expenses of the agency;
3.
Management of the agency which shall include, but not be limited to, its governance, capacity, divisions, programs, accounts, information technology systems, and policies and agency operations which include objective analysis of the roles and functions of the department;
and 4.
A schedule for implementation of agency-specific recommendations.
NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6028016 of Title 75,62, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
EachThe Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency (LOFT) shall provide independent and reliable economic analysis to assist the Legislature in reviewing proposed administrative rules of state agencyagencies promulgatingclassified aas major rulerules shallpursuant provide:to the Administrative Procedures Act.
Unless otherwise approved by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 5 Representatives, the duties prescribed by this section shall be accomplished within the existing full-time-employee count of LOFT.
B.
WhetherWithin thetwenty-one proposed(21) rulecalendar anddays regulationof isreceiving mandateda byproposed federalrule lawand asits asupporting requirementdocuments, forLOFT participatingshall inanalyze orwhether implementingthe aproposing federallyagency subsidizedhas orcomplied assistedwith program and whether the proposedrequirements ruleof andSection regulation303 exceedsof theTitle requirements75 of the applicableOklahoma federalStatutes. law;
LOFT shall assess whether the proposed rule could result in implementation and 2.compliance costs of more than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) over the initial five-year period after implementation.
An2. analysis specifically addressing the following factors:
The reporting requirements of this section shall not be construed to prevent the approval and promulgation of emergency rules pursuant to Section 253 of Title 75 of the Oklahoma Statutes.
C.
1.
LOFT shall furnish a report on each major rule to the chairs of the committees designated by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by the end of the twenty-first calendar day after its submission.
2.
LOFT shall inform the chairs of the designated committees if the rule impact statement from the agency is incomplete or contains substantive inaccuracies.
D.
If a chair of a committee designated under subsection C of this section reasonably believes that the provisions of a proposed nonmajor rule may constitute designation as a major rule, the chair may request that LOFT analyze the rule pursuant to the provisions of this section.
E.
State agencies shall cooperate fully with LOFT and the Legislature in providing data, documentation, and analysis required under this act.
F.
LOFT shall make all analyses and determinations publicly available on its website upon completion.
G.
An annual report summarizing the year’s evaluations and findings shall be submitted electronically to the Governor, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives and shall be published on LOFT’s website.
Within the annual report, LOFT shall quantify the impact of its work, including reductions in regulations, cost savings, and other measurable benefits to the economy.
ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 6 SECTION 4.
AMENDATORY 75 O.S.
2021, Section 250.1, is amended to read as follows:
Section 250.1.
A.
The Administrative Procedures Act shall be composed of two Articles articles.
Sections 250, 250.1, 250.3, 250.4, 250.5, and 250.8 of this title are applicable to both Articles I and II.
Article I relating to agency filing and publication requirements for rules shall consist of Sections 250.2, 250.4, 250.4a, 250.6, 250.7, and 250.9 through 308.2 308.3 of this title and Section 5 of this act.
Article II relating to agency notice and hearing requirements for individual proceedings shall consist of Sections 308a through 323 of this title.
B.
Except as otherwise specifically provided in Section 250.4 of this title, all agencies shall comply with the provisions of Article I and Article II of the Administrative Procedures Act.
SECTION 5.
AMENDATORY 75 O.S.
2021, Section 250.3, as amended by Section 1, Chapter 38, O.S.L.
2023 (75 O.S.
Supp.
2024, Section 250.3), is amended to read as follows:
Section 250.3.
As used in the Administrative Procedures Act:
1.
“Administrative head” means an official or agency body responsible pursuant to law for issuing final agency orders;
2.
“Adopted” means a proposed emergency rule which has been approved by the agency but has not been approved or disapproved by the Governor as an emergency rule as provided by Section 253 of this title, or a proposed permanent rule which has been approved by the agency and not disapproved by the Governor pursuant to paragraph 6 of subsection A of Section 303 of this title, but has not been finally approved or disapproved by the Legislature or the Governor;
3.
“Agency” includes, but is not limited to, any constitutionally or statutorily created state agency, board, bureau, commission, office, authority, institution, public trust in which the state is a beneficiary, or interstate commission, or any instrumentality thereof, except:
a comprehensive analysis of the rule'sLegislature economicor impact, including any costsbranch, committee, or benefitsofficer includingthereof, a detailed quantification of implementation and compliance costs, on the specific businesses, business sectors, public utility ratepayers, individuals, and local government units that will be affected by the proposed rule and regulation and on the state economy as a whole, b.
a detailed explanation of the methodologycourts; and assumptions used to determine the economic impact, including the dollar amounts calculated, ENGR.
ENR.
2728 Page 37 c.4.
an“Emergency estimaterule” ofmeans thea totalrule annual implementation and compliance costs that areis reasonablymade expectedpursuant to beSection incurred253 by or passed along to businesses, local government units, or individuals and a determination of whetherthis thosetitle; costs will exceed One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) over the initial five-year period following the adoption of the proposed rule and regulation, d.
a5. statement of the need for the rule and the legal basis supporting it, e.
any“Final measuresrule” takenor by“finally theadopted agencyrule” tomeans minimizea therule costother andthan impactan ofemergency therule, proposedwhich rulehas andnot regulationbeen onpublished businesspursuant andto economicSection development255 withinof this title but is otherwise in compliance with the Staterequirements of Oklahoma,the localAdministrative government,Procedures andAct, individuals, and f.is:
aa. classification of the rule as major or nonmajor, with a justification for the classification.
approved by the Legislature pursuant to Section 308.3 of this title, provided that any such joint resolution becomes law in accordance with Section 11 of Article VI of the Oklahoma Constitution, b.
approved by the Governor pursuant to subsection C of Section 308.3 of this title, c.
approved by a joint resolution pursuant to subsection B of Section 308 of this title, provided that any such resolution becomes law in accordance with Section 11 of Article VI of the Oklahoma Constitution, or d.
disapproved by a joint resolution pursuant to subsection B of Section 308 of this title or Section 308.3 of this title, which has been vetoed by the Governor in accordance with Section 11 of Article VI of the Oklahoma Constitution and the veto has not been overridden;
6.
“Final agency order” means an order that includes findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Section 312 of this title, is dispositive of an individual proceeding unless there is a request for rehearing, reopening, or reconsideration pursuant to Section 317 of this title, and which is subject to judicial review;
7.
“Hearing examiner” means a person meeting the qualifications specified by Article II of the Administrative Procedures Act and who has been duly appointed by an agency to hold hearings and, as required, render orders or proposed orders;
8.
“Implementation and compliance costs” means direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, including, but not limited to, fees, the cost to obtain a license or registration, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used, additional operating costs incurred, the cost of ENR.
H.
NoNO. agency shall submit a major rule and regulation to the Secretary of State for filing without completing an economic impact analysis for the proposed rule and regulation and providing the analysis to the Legislative Economic Analysis Unit as created pursuant to Section 4 of this act.
C.2728 Page 8 monitoring and reporting, and any other costs to comply with the requirements of the proposed rule;
The9. agency shall consult with counties, municipalities, and school boards, as appropriate, when preparing the economic impact statement of a proposed rule and regulation which increases or ENGR.
“Individual proceeding” means the formal process employed by an agency having jurisdiction by law to resolve issues of law or fact between parties and which results in the exercise of discretion of a judicial nature;
9.
10.
“License” includes the whole or part of any agency permit, certificate, approval, registration, charter, or similar form of permission required by law;
10.
11.
“Major rule” means any administrative rule, whether emergency or permanent in nature, that will result in or is likely to result in One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) or more over the initial five-year period in implementation and compliance costs that are reasonably expected to be incurred by or passed along to businesses, state or local government units, and individuals as a result of the proposed rule following the promulgation of such rule;
12.
“Nonmajor rule” means any rule that is not a major rule;
13.
“Office” means the Office of the Secretary of State;
11.
14.
“Order” means all or part of a formal or official decision made by an agency including, but not limited to, final agency orders;
12.
15.
“Party” means a person or agency named and participating, or properly seeking and entitled by law to participate, in an individual proceeding;
13.
16.
“Permanent rule” means a rule that is made pursuant to Section 303 of this title;
14.
17.
“Person” means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, governmental subdivision, or public or private organization of any character other than an agency;
15.
18.
“Political subdivision” means a county, city, incorporated town, or school district within this state;
16.
19.
“Promulgated” means a finally adopted rule which has been filed and published in accordance with the provisions of the ENR.
2728 Page 49 decreasesAdministrative revenueProcedures ofAct, counties, cities, or schoolan districtsemergency orrule imposes functions or responsibilitiespreemptive onrule counties, cities, or school districts which mayhas increasebeen theirapproved expendituresby orthe fiscalGovernor; liability.
The17. agency shall consult and solicit information from businesses, business associations, local government units, state agencies, or members of the public that may be affected by the proposed rule and regulation or that may provide relevant information.
SECTION20. 4.
NEW“Rule” LAWmeans Aany newagency sectionstatement or group of lawrelated tostatements beof codifiedgeneral inapplicability theand Oklahomafuture Statuteseffect asthat Sectionimplements, 603interprets, ofor Titleprescribes 75,law unlessor therepolicy, isor createddescribes athe duplicationprocedure inor numbering,practice readsrequirements asof follows:the agency.
The term rule includes the amendment or revocation of an effective rule but does not include:
a.
the issuance, renewal, denial, suspension or revocation or other sanction of an individual specific license, b.
the approval, disapproval, or prescription of rates.
For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “rates” shall not include fees or charges fixed by an agency for services provided by that agency including, but not limited to, fees charged for licensing, permitting, inspections, or publications, c.
statements and memoranda concerning only the internal management of an agency and not affecting private rights or procedures available to the public, d.
declaratory rulings issued pursuant to Section 307 of this title, e.
orders by an agency, or f.
press releases or “agency news releases”, provided such releases are not for the purpose of interpreting, implementing, or prescribing law or agency policy;
18.
21.
“Rulemaking” means the process employed by an agency for the formulation of a rule;
19.
22.
“Secretary” means the Secretary of State;
20.
23.
“Small business” means a for-profit enterprise consisting of fifty or fewer full-time or part-time employees;
and 21.
24.
“Technical legal defect” means an error that would otherwise invalidate an action by a court of law.
ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 10 SECTION 6.
AMENDATORY 75 O.S.
2021, Section 253, as amended by Section 2, Chapter 38, O.S.L.
2023 (75 O.S.
Supp.
2024, Section 253), is amended to read as follows:
Section 253.
The1. LEAU is hereby established to assist the Administrative Rules Committee in evaluating major rules proposed by state agencies.
If an agency finds that a rule is necessary as an emergency measure, the rule may be promulgated pursuant to the provisions of this section, if the rule is first approved by the Governor.
The Governor shall not approve the adoption, amendment, revision, or revocation of a rule as an emergency measure unless the agency submits substantial evidence that the rule is necessary as an emergency measure to do any of the following:
a.
protect the public health, safety, or welfare, b.
comply with deadlines in amendments to an agency’s governing law or federal programs, c.
avoid violation of federal law or regulation or other state law, d.
avoid imminent reduction to the agency’s budget, or e.
avoid serious prejudice to the public interest.
As used in this subsection, “substantial evidence” shall mean credible evidence which is of sufficient quality and probative value to enable a person of reasonable caution to support a conclusion.
2.
In determining whether a rule is necessary as an emergency measure, the Governor shall consider whether the emergency situation was created due to the agency’s delay or inaction and could have been averted by timely compliance with the provisions of this chapter.
AAn Legislativeemergency Economicrule Analysisadopted Unitby (LEAU)an shallagency beshall: created within the Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency (LOFT) to provide independent and reliable economic analysis and other information relevant to the conduct of the Legislature's oversight and legislative duties.
TheBe Legislativeprepared Officein ofthe Fiscalformat Transparencyrequired shall,by withinSection ninety251 (90) days of the effective date of this act,title; establish a division within the Office for the purpose of reviewing the Oklahoma Administrative Code and proposed administrative rules of state agencies.
ENGR.2.
a.
Include an impact statement which meets the requirements set forth in subparagraph b of this paragraph, unless the Governor waives the initial requirement in writing upon a finding that the rule impact statement or the specified contents thereof are ENR.
2728 Page 511 2.unnecessary or contrary to the public interest.
TheProvided, Officethe mayrule employimpact nostatement moreshall thanbe fivesubmitted full-time-equivalentno employeesmore (FTEs)than toforty-five serve(45) thedays divisionfrom and carry out the functionsdate inof thissuch section.waiver.
b.
The rule impact statement shall include, but not be limited to:
(1) a statement of the need for the rule and legal basis supporting it, (2) a classification of the rule as major or nonmajor, with a justification for the classification, including an estimate of the total annual implementation and compliance costs that are reasonably expected to be incurred by or passed along to businesses, state or local government units, or individuals and a determination of whether those costs will exceed One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) over the initial five-year period following the promulgation of the proposed rule.
Provided, if the costs exceed One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), the agency shall classify the rule as a major rule, (3) a brief description of the proposed rule, including a determination of whether the proposed rule is mandated by federal law, or as a requirement for participation in or implementation of a federally subsidized or assisted program, and whether the proposed rule exceeds the requirements of the applicable federal law, (2) (4) a description of the classes of persons who most likely will be affected by the proposed rule, including classes that will bear the costs of the proposed rule, and any information on cost impacts received by the agency from any private or public entities, (3) ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 12 (5) a description of the classes of persons who will benefit from the proposed rule, (4) a description of the probable (6) a comprehensive analysis of the rule’s economic impact of the proposed rule upon affected classes of persons or political subdivisions, including any anticipated impacts on the full-time-employee count of the agency, any costs or benefits, and a detailed quantification of implementation and compliance costs on the affected businesses, business sectors, public utility ratepayers, individuals, state or local government units, and on the state economy as a whole.
The analysis shall include a listing of all fee changes and, whenever possible, a separate justification for each fee change, (5) the probable costs and benefits to the agency and to any other agency of the implementation and enforcement of the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state revenues, including a projected net loss or gain in such revenues if it can be projected by the agency, (7) a detailed explanation of the methodology and assumptions used to determine the economic impact, including the dollar amounts calculated, (6) (8) a determination of whether implementation of the proposed rule will have an economic impact on any political subdivisions or require their cooperation in implementing or enforcing the rule, (9) a determination of whether implementation of the proposed rule may have an adverse economic effect on small business as provided by the Oklahoma Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Act, ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 13 (7) an explanation of the measures the agency has taken to minimize compliance costs and a determination of whether there are less costly or nonregulatory methods or less intrusive methods for achieving the purpose of the proposed rule, (10) any measures taken by the agency to minimize the cost and impact of the proposed rule on business and economic development in this state, local government units of this state, and individuals, (8) (11) a determination of the effect of the proposed rule on the public health, safety, and environment and, if the proposed rule is designed to reduce significant risks to the public health, safety, and environment, an explanation of the nature of the risk and to what extent the proposed rule will reduce the risk, (9) (12) a determination of any detrimental effect on the public health, safety, and environment if the proposed rule is not implemented, and (10) (13) the date the rule impact statement was prepared and, if modified, the date modified.
c.
The rule impact statement shall be prepared on or before the date the emergency rule is adopted;
and 3.
Be transmitted pursuant to Section 464 of Title 74 of the Oklahoma Statutes to the Governor, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, and the chief legislative officer of each chamber, along with the information required by this subsection within ten (10) days after the rule is adopted;
and 4.
Not be invalidated on the ground that the contents of the rule impact statement are insufficient or inaccurate.
ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 14 C.
1.
Within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt of a proposed emergency rule filed with the Governor, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, and the chief legislative officer of each chamber, the Governor shall review the demonstration of emergency pursuant to subsection A of this section, and shall separately review the rule in accordance with the standards prescribed in paragraph 3 of this subsection.
2.
Prior to approval of emergency rules, the Governor shall submit the emergency rule to the Secretary of State for review of proper formatting.
WithinIf twenty-onethe (21)Governor calendardetermines daysthe ofagency receivinghas established the proposedrule rulesis andnecessary regulations,as thean LEAUemergency shallmeasure conductpursuant anto independentsubsection analysisA toof determinethis thatsection, the agencyGovernor hasshall compliedapprove with the requirementsproposed foremergency therule economicif impactthe statement.rule is:
Thea. LEAU will assess whether the proposed rule and regulation will result in implementation and compliance costs of more than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) over the initial five-year period after implementation.
clear, concise, and understandable, b.
within the power of the agency to make and within the enacted legislative standards, and c.
made in compliance with the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act.
TheIf LEAUan shallemergency providerule ais reportadopted onunder eachthis majorsection ruledue and regulation to thea committeesdeclared ofstate jurisdiction by the end of theemergency twenty-firstpursuant calendarto daySection after683.1 itset submission.seq.
of Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes, an agency may request the Governor waive the provisions of subsection B of this section.
Such request shall be in writing and shall state the agency’s findings and the justification for such findings.
The agency shall have forty-five (45) days to comply with the provisions of subsection B of this section for any adopted emergency rules where such provisions are waived.
Any rules which do not comply with the requirements of this section shall expire following such time period.
Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to waive any other requirements of this section for emergency rule promulgation by an agency.
D.
1.
Within the forty-five-calendar-day period set forth in paragraph 1 of subsection C of this section, the Governor may approve the emergency rule or disapprove the emergency rule.
Failure of the Governor to approve an emergency rule within the specified period shall constitute disapproval of the emergency rule.
ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 15 2.
If the Governor disapproves the adopted emergency rule, the Governor shall return the entire document to the agency with reasons for the disapproval.
If the agency elects to modify the rule, the agency shall adopt the modifications, and shall file the modified rule in accordance with the requirements of subsection B of this section.
3.
Upon disapproval of an emergency rule, the Governor shall, within fifteen (15) days, make written notification to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the chief legislative officer of each chamber, and the Office of Administrative Rules.
E.
1.
Upon approval of an emergency rule, the Governor shall immediately make written notification to the agency, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the chief legislative officer of each chamber, and the Office of Administrative Rules.
Upon receipt of the notice of the approval, the agency shall file with the Office of Administrative Rules as many copies of the notice of approval and the emergency rule as required by the Secretary.
2.
Emergency rules shall be subject to legislative review pursuant to Section 308 of this title.
3.
The emergency rule shall be published in accordance with the provisions of Section 255 of this title in “The Oklahoma Register” following the approval by the Governor.
The Governor’s approval and the approved rules shall be retained as official records by the Office of Administrative Rules.
F.
1.
Upon approval by the Governor, an emergency rule shall be considered promulgated and shall be in force immediately, or on such later date as specified therein.
An emergency rule shall only be applied prospectively from its effective date.
2.
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the emergency rule shall remain in full force and effect through the first day of the next succeeding regular session of the Legislature following promulgation of such emergency rule until September 14 following such session, unless it is made ineffective pursuant to subsection H of this section.
G.
No agency shall adopt any emergency rule which establishes or increases fees, except during such times as the Legislature is in ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 16 session, unless specifically mandated by the Legislature or federal legislation, or when the failure to establish or increase fees would conflict with an order issued by a court of law.
H.
1.
If an emergency rule is of a continuing nature, the agency promulgating such emergency rule shall initiate proceedings for promulgation of a permanent rule pursuant to Sections 303 through 308.2 308.3 of this title.
If an emergency rule is superseded by another emergency rule prior to the enactment of a permanent rule, the latter emergency rule shall retain the same expiration date as the superseded emergency rule, unless otherwise authorized by the Legislature.
2.
Any promulgated emergency rule shall be made ineffective if:
a.
disapproved by the Legislature, b.
superseded by the promulgation of permanent rules, c.
any adopted rules based upon such emergency rules are subsequently disapproved pursuant to Section 308 of this title, or d.
an earlier expiration date is specified by the agency in the rules.
3.
a.
Emergency rules in effect on the first day of the session shall be null and void on September 15 following sine die adjournment of the Legislature unless otherwise specifically provided by the Legislature.
b.
Unless otherwise authorized by the Legislature, an agency shall not adopt any emergency rule, which has become null and void pursuant to subparagraph a of this paragraph, as a new emergency rule or adopt any emergency rules of similar scope or intent as the emergency rules which became null and void pursuant to subparagraph a of this paragraph.
I.
Emergency rules shall not become effective unless approved by the Governor pursuant to the provisions of this section.
J.
1.
The requirements of Section 303 of this title relating to notice and hearing shall not be applicable to emergency rules ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 17 promulgated pursuant to the provisions of this section.
Provided, this shall not be construed to prevent an abbreviated notice and hearing process determined to be necessary by an agency.
2.
The rule report required pursuant to Section 303.1 of this title shall not be applicable to emergency rules promulgated pursuant to the provisions of this section.
Provided, this shall not be construed to prevent an agency from complying with such requirements at the discretion of such agency.
3.
The statement of submission required by Section 303.1 of this title shall not be applicable to emergency rules promulgated pursuant to the provisions of this section.
K.
Prior to approval or disapproval of an emergency rule by the Governor, an agency may withdraw from review an emergency rule submitted pursuant to the provisions of this section.
Notice of such withdrawal shall be given to the Governor, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 464 of Title of the Oklahoma Statutes, and to the Office of Administrative Rules as required by the Secretary of State.
In order to be promulgated as emergency rules, any replacement rules shall be resubmitted pursuant to the provisions of this section.
L.
Upon completing the requirements of this section, an agency may promulgate a proposed emergency rule.
No emergency rule is valid unless promulgated in substantial compliance with the provisions of this section.
M.
Emergency rules adopted by an agency or approved by the Governor shall be subject to review pursuant to the provisions of Section 306 of this title.
SECTION 7.
AMENDATORY 75 O.S.
2021, Section 303, is amended to read as follows:
Section 303.
A.
Prior to the adoption of any rule or amendment or revocation of a rule and except as provided for pursuant to the expedited rule repeal process provided in Section 9 of this act, the agency shall:
1.
Cause notice of any intended action to be published in “The Oklahoma Register” pursuant to subsection B of this section;
ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 18 2.
For at least thirty (30) days after publication of the notice of the intended rulemaking action, afford a comment period for all interested persons to submit data, views, or arguments, orally or in writing.
The agency shall consider fully all written and oral submissions respecting the proposed rule;
3.
Hold a hearing, if required, as provided by subsection C of this section;
4.
Consider the effect its intended action may have on the various types of business and governmental entities.
Except where such modification or variance is prohibited by statute or constitutional constraints, if an agency finds that its actions may adversely affect any such entity, the agency may modify its actions to exclude that type of entity, or may “tier” its actions to allow rules, penalties, fines, or reporting procedures and forms to vary according to the size of a business or governmental entity or its ability to comply or both.
For business entities, the agency shall include a description of the probable quantitative and qualitative impact of the proposed rule, economic or otherwise, and use quantifiable data to the extent possible, taking into account both short-term and long-term consequences;
TheConsider LEAU shall inform the committeeeffect ifits theintended economicaction impactmay statementhave fromon the agencyvarious istypes incompleteof orconsumer containsgroups. substantive inaccuracies.
If an agency finds that its actions may adversely affect such groups, the agency may modify its actions to exclude that type of activity;
and 6.
When an agency provides notice pursuant to paragraph 1 of this subsection, the agency shall provide one (1) electronic copy of the complete text of the proposed rule, amendment or revocation and a copy of the notice to the Governor and to the appropriate cabinet secretary.
No agency may adopt any proposed rule, amendment or revocation if, within thirty (30) days from providing notice to the Governor and the appropriate cabinet secretary, the agency receives express written disapproval from the Governor or the cabinet secretary.
If the Governor or the cabinet secretary disapproves a rule, the affected agency shall be notified in writing of the reasons for disapproval.
If, after thirty (30) days of providing the notice to the Governor and the cabinet secretary, the agency has not received an express written disapproval, the agency may proceed with the rulemaking process.
B.
The notice required by paragraph 1 of subsection A of this section shall include, but not be limited to:
ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 19 1.
In simple language, a brief summary of the rule;
2.
The proposed action being taken;
3.
The circumstances which created the need for the rule;
4.
The specific legal authority, including statutory citations, authorizing the proposed rule;
5.
The intended effect of the rule;
TheIf LEAUthe shallagency reportdetermines tothat the committeerule designatedaffects bybusiness theentities, Presidenta Prorequest Temporethat ofsuch theentities Oklahomaprovide Statethe Senateagency, andwithin the Speakercomment ofperiod, in dollar amounts if possible, the Oklahomaincrease Housein the level of Representatives.direct costs such as fees, and indirect costs such as reporting, recordkeeping, equipment, construction, labor, professional services, revenue loss, or other costs expected to be incurred by a particular entity due to compliance with the proposed rule;
7.
The time when, the place where, and the manner in which interested persons may present their views thereon pursuant to paragraph 3 of subsection A of this section;
8.
Whether or not the agency intends to issue a rule impact statement according to subsection D of this section and where copies of such impact statement may be obtained for review by the public;
9.
The time when, the place where, and the manner in which persons may demand a hearing on the proposed rule if the notice does not already provide for a hearing.
If the notice provides for a hearing, the time and place of the hearing shall be specified in the notice;
and 10.
Where copies of the proposed rules may be obtained for review by the public.
An agency may charge persons for the actual cost of mailing a copy of the proposed rules to such persons.
The number of copies of such notice as specified by the Secretary of State shall be submitted to the Secretary of State who shall publish the notice in “The Oklahoma Register” pursuant to the provisions of Section 255 of this title.
ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 20 Prior to or within three (3) days after publication of the notice in “The Oklahoma Register”, the agency shall cause a copy of the notice of the proposed rule adoption and the rule impact statement, if available, to be mailed to all persons who have made a timely request of the agency for advance notice of its rulemaking proceedings.
Provided, in lieu of mailing copies, an agency may electronically notify interested persons that a copy of the proposed rule and the rule impact statement, if available, may be viewed on the agency’s website.
If an agency posts a copy of the proposed rule and rule impact statement on its website, the agency shall not charge persons for the cost of downloading or printing the proposed rule or impact statement.
Each agency shall maintain a listing of persons or entities requesting such notice.
State1. agencies shall cooperate fully with the LEAU and the Legislature in providing data, documentation, and analysis required under this act.
ENGR.If the published notice does not already provide for a hearing, an agency shall schedule a hearing on a proposed rule if, within thirty (30) days after the published notice of the proposed rule adoption, a written request for a hearing is submitted by:
a.
at least ten persons, b.
a political subdivision, c.
an agency, or d.
an association having not less than twenty-five members.
At that hearing persons may present oral argument, data, and views on the proposed rule.
2.
A hearing on a proposed rule may not be held earlier than thirty (30) days after notice of the hearing is published pursuant to subsection B of this section.
3.
The provisions of this subsection shall not be construed to prevent an agency from holding a hearing or hearings on the proposed rule although not required by the provisions of this subsection;
provided, that notice of such hearing shall be published in “The Oklahoma Register” at least thirty (30) days prior to such hearing.
D.
1.
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an agency shall issue a rule impact statement of a proposed rule prior to or within fifteen (15) days after the date of publication of the notice of proposed rule adoption.
The rule impact statement may be ENR.
2728 Page 621 D.modified after any hearing or comment period afforded pursuant to the provisions of this section.
The2. President Pro Tempore of the Oklahoma State Senate, Speaker of the Oklahoma House of Representatives, and committee chairs of the Administrative Rules Committees may also direct the division to conduct evaluations of proposed major rules or existing provisions of the administrative code.
The agency shall consult with counties, municipalities, and school boards, as necessary, when preparing the rule impact statement of a proposed rule which increases or decreases the revenue of counties, cities, or school districts, or imposes functions or responsibilities on such entities which may increase the expenditures or fiscal liability of the entity.
The agency shall consult and solicit information from businesses, business associations, local government units, state agencies, or members of the public that may be affected by the proposed rule or that may provide relevant information to the agency.
3.
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the rule impact statement shall include, but not be limited to:
a.
a statement of the need for the rule and legal basis supporting it, b.
a classification of the rule as major or nonmajor, with a justification for the classification, including an estimate of the total annual implementation and compliance costs that are reasonably expected to be incurred by or passed along to businesses, state or local government units, or individuals and a determination of whether those costs will exceed One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) over the initial five- year period following the promulgation of the proposed rule.
Provided, if the costs exceed One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), the agency shall classify the rule as a major rule, c.
a brief description of the purpose of the proposed rule, including a determination of whether the proposed rule is mandated by federal law, or as a requirement for participation in or implementation of a federally subsidized or assisted program, and whether the proposed rule exceeds the requirements of the applicable federal law, b.
d.
a description of the classes of persons who most likely will be affected by the proposed rule, ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 22 including classes that will bear the costs of the proposed rule, and any information on cost impacts received by the agency from any private or public entities, c.
e.
a description of the classes of persons who will benefit from the proposed rule, d.
a description of the probable f.
a comprehensive analysis of the rule’s economic impact of the proposed rule upon affected classes of persons or political subdivisions, including any anticipated impacts on the full-time-employee count of the agency, any costs or benefits, and a detailed quantification of implementation and compliance costs on the affected businesses, business sectors, public utility ratepayers, individuals, state or local government units, and on the state economy as a whole.
The analysis shall include a listing of all fee changes and, whenever possible, a separate justification for each fee change, e.
the probable costs and benefits to the agency and to any other agency of the implementation and enforcement of the proposed rule, the source of revenue to be used for implementation and enforcement of the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state revenues, including a projected net loss or gain in such revenues if it can be projected by the agency, f.
g.
a detailed explanation of the methodology and assumptions used to determine the economic impact, including the dollar amounts calculated, h.
a determination of whether implementation of the proposed rule will have an economic impact on any political subdivisions or require their cooperation in implementing or enforcing the rule, g.
ENR.
H.
B.
NO.
2728 Page 23 i.
a determination of whether implementation of the proposed rule may have an adverse economic effect on small business as provided by the Oklahoma Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Act, h.
an explanation of the measures the agency has taken to minimize compliance costs and a determination of whether there are less costly or nonregulatory methods or less intrusive methods for achieving the purpose of the proposed rule j.
any measures taken by the agency to minimize the cost and impact of the proposed rule on business and economic development in this state, local government units of this state, and individuals, i.
k.
a determination of the effect of the proposed rule on the public health, safety, and environment and, if the proposed rule is designed to reduce significant risks to the public health, safety, and environment, an explanation of the nature of the risk and to what extent the proposed rule will reduce the risk, j.
l.
Show all 500 changed rows (460 more)
View plain text versions (12)
- Enrolled Enrolled (final version) Current pdf
- Engrossed View text pdf
- Floor (House) View text pdf
- Floor (Senate) View text pdf
- HB2728 (4-30-25) (BERGSTROM) FS FA1.PDF View text pdf
- HB2728 (4-30-25) (BERGSTROM) RT FA2.PDF View text pdf
- HB2728 (4-30-25) (BERGSTROM) FA3.PDF View text pdf
- Amended Amended And Engrossed pdf
- Committee Substitute House Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute Proposed Committee Substitute (full committee) 1 pdf
- Committee Substitute Proposed Committee Substitute (full committee) 2 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Approved by Governor 05/21/2025
-
Sent to Governor
-
Enrolled measure signed, returned to House
-
Enrolled, signed, to Senate
-
Referred for enrollment
-
Fourth Reading, Measure and Emergency Passed: Ayes: 74 Nays: 12
-
Coauthored by Representative(s) Duel, Hilbert, Olsen, Hays, Stark, George, Grego, Hardin, Townley, West (Kevin), Osburn, Roberts, Miller, Culver, Wolfley, Strom, Fetgatter, Lowe (Dick), Dobrinski, Staires, Burns, Eaves, Turner, Hall, Wilk, Blair, Adams, Chapman, Caldwell (Chad), Bashore, Pfeiffer
-
SA's read, adopted
-
SA's received
-
Engrossed to House
-
Referred for engrossment
-
Measure and Emergency passed: Ayes: 37 Nays: 7
-
Coauthored by Representative Hasenbeck
-
Title restored
-
Coauthored by Representative Kerbs
-
Emergency added
-
General Order, Amended by Floor Substitute
-
Coauthored by Senator Green
-
Coauthored by Senator Kern
-
Coauthored by Senator Seifried
-
Coauthored by Senator Gollihare
-
Coauthored by Senator Pugh
-
Coauthored by Senator Pederson
-
Coauthored by Senator Gillespie
-
Coauthored by Representative Cornwell
-
Coauthored by Senator Reinhardt
-
Coauthored by Senator Burns
-
Coauthored by Senator Frix
-
Coauthored by Senator Hines
-
Placed on General Order
-
Coauthored by Senator Grellner
-
Coauthored by Senator McIntosh
-
Coauthored by Senator Stanley
-
Coauthored by Senator Guthrie
-
Coauthored by Senator Deevers
-
Coauthored by Senator Bullard
-
Coauthored by Senator Weaver
-
Coauthored by Senator Stewart
-
Coauthored by Senator Hamilton
-
Coauthored by Senator Wingard
-
Coauthored by Senator Murdock
-
Coauthored by Senator Standridge
-
Coauthored by Senator Sacchieri
-
Coauthored by Senator Alvord
-
Title stricken
-
Reported Do Pass as amended Appropriations committee; CR filed
-
Coauthored by Senator Daniels
-
Coauthored by Senator Prieto
-
Coauthored by Senator Woods
-
Referred to Appropriations
-
Reported Do Pass Administrative Rules committee; CR filed
-
Second Reading referred to Administrative Rules Committee then to Appropriations Committee
-
First Reading
-
Engrossed, signed, to Senate
-
Referred for engrossment
-
Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 86 Nays: 3
-
Coauthored by Representative(s) Hill, Hildebrant, Steagall, Kane
-
General Order
-
Coauthored by Senator(s) Jett
-
Coauthored by Representative(s) Lepak, Moore, Caldwell (Trey), Boles
-
Remove as coauthor Representative(s) Jenkins
-
CR; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Appropriations and Budget Committee
-
Withdrawn from Calendar; referred to Appropriations and Budget Committee
-
Authored by Senator Bergstrom (principal Senate author)
-
Coauthored by Representative(s) Maynard, CrosswhiteHader, Jenkins
-
CR; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Administrative Rules Committee
-
Second Reading referred to Administrative Rules
-
Authored by Representative Kendrix
-
First Reading
Sponsors
- Gerrid Kendrix · Primary
- Micheal Bergstrom · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 17 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Gerrid Kendrix Republican
- Micheal Bergstrom Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 66 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| Democrat | 5 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 74 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 12% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pittman | — | Yea |
| Mr. Speaker | — | Yea |
| Alonso-Sandoval | — | Nay |
| Bennett | — | Nay |
| VACANCY: | — | Not Voting |
| Crosswhite Hader | — | Yea |
| Andy Fugate | Democrat | Yea |
| Annie Menz | Democrat | Yea |
| Cyndi Munson | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Ellen Pogemiller | Democrat | Nay |
| Ellyn Hefner | Democrat | Yea |
| Jacob Rosecrants | Democrat | Yea |
| Jared Deck | Democrat | Nay |
| John Waldron | Democrat | Nay |
| Melissa Provenzano | Democrat | Nay |
| Meloyde Blancett | Democrat | Nay |
| Michelle McCane | Democrat | Nay |
| Mickey Dollens | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Suzanne Schreiber | Democrat | Yea |
| Trish Ranson | Democrat | Nay |
| Anthony Moore | Republican | Yea |
| Bob Ed Culver | Republican | Yea |
| Brad Boles | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Hill | Republican | Not Voting |
| Carl Newton | Republican | Yea |
| Chad Caldwell | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Banning | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Kannady | Republican | Not Voting |
| Chris Sneed | Republican | Yea |
| Chuck Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Clay Staires | Republican | Yea |
| Cody Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Collin Duel | Republican | Yea |
| Cynthia Roe | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Pae | Republican | Yea |
| Danny Sterling | Republican | Yea |
| Danny Williams | Republican | Yea |
| David Hardin | Republican | Yea |
| David Smith | Republican | Yea |
| Dell Kerbs | Republican | Yea |
| Derrick Hildebrant | Republican | Yea |
| Dick Lowe | Republican | Yea |
| Eddy Dempsey | Republican | Yea |
| Emily Gise | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Erick Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Gabe Woolley | Republican | Yea |
| George Burns | Republican | Yea |
| Gerrid Kendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Stewart | Republican | Nay |
| Jason Blair | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Steagall | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Grego | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Olsen | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Shaw | Republican | Yea |
| John George | Republican | Yea |
| John Kane | Republican | Yea |
| John Pfeiffer | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Wilk | Republican | Yea |
| Josh Cantrell | Republican | Yea |
| Josh West | Republican | Yea |
| Judd Strom | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Humphrey | Republican | Yea |
| Ken Luttrell | Republican | Yea |
| Kenton Patzkowsky | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin West | Republican | Yea |
| Marilyn Stark | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Lawson | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Lepak | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Tedford | Republican | Not Voting |
| Max Wolfley | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Dobrinski | Republican | Not Voting |
| Mike Kelley | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Lay | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Osburn | Republican | Yea |
| Molly Jenkins | Republican | Yea |
| Neil Hays | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Archer | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Miller | Republican | Not Voting |
| Preston Stinson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Rande Worthen | Republican | Yea |
| Rick West | Republican | Nay |
| Robert Manger | Republican | Yea |
| Ronny Johns | Republican | Yea |
| Ross Ford | Republican | Not Voting |
| Rusty Cornwell | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Eaves | Republican | Not Voting |
| Scott Fetgatter | Republican | Not Voting |
| Stacy Jo Adams | Republican | Yea |
| Stan May | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Bashore | Republican | Yea |
| T.J. Marti | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tammy Townley | Republican | Yea |
| Tammy West | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Turner | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Gann | Republican | Nay |
| Toni Hasenbeck | Republican | Yea |
| Trey Caldwell | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 27 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Democrat | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 28 | 6 | 0 | 13 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 13% | 0% | 28% |
How each member voted (47)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carri Hicks | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jo Anna Dossett | Democrat | Yea |
| Julia Kirt | Democrat | Nay |
| Mark Mann | Democrat | Nay |
| Mary B. Boren | Democrat | Nay |
| Michael Brooks | Democrat | Nay |
| Nikki Nice | Democrat | Nay |
| Regina Goodwin | Democrat | Nay |
| Aaron Reinhardt | Republican | Yea |
| Adam Pugh | Republican | Yea |
| Ally Seifried | Republican | Yea |
| Avery Frix | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Coleman | Republican | Yea |
| Brenda Stanley | Republican | Yea |
| Brent Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Guthrie | Republican | Yea |
| Casey Murdock | Republican | Not Voting |
| Christi Gillespie | Republican | Yea |
| Chuck Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Dana Prieto | Republican | Yea |
| Darcy Jech | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dave Rader | Republican | Not Voting |
| David Bullard | Republican | Not Voting |
| District 24 | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dusty Deevers | Republican | Not Voting |
| George Burns | Republican | Yea |
| Grant Green | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jack Stewart | Republican | Yea |
| Jerry Alvord | Republican | Yea |
| John Haste | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Wingard | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Daniels | Republican | Yea |
| Julie McIntosh | Republican | Yea |
| Kelly Hines | Republican | Yea |
| Kendal Sacchieri | Republican | Yea |
| Kristen Thompson | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Standridge | Republican | Yea |
| Lonnie Paxton | Republican | Not Voting |
| Micheal Bergstrom | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Rosino | Republican | Yea |
| Randy Grellner | Republican | Not Voting |
| Roland Pederson | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Jett | Republican | Not Voting |
| Spencer Kern | Republican | Yea |
| Todd Gollihare | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Woods | Republican | Not Voting |
| Warren Hamilton | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 15% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (47)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carri Hicks | Democrat | Nay |
| Jo Anna Dossett | Democrat | Yea |
| Julia Kirt | Democrat | Nay |
| Mark Mann | Democrat | Nay |
| Mary B. Boren | Democrat | Nay |
| Michael Brooks | Democrat | Nay |
| Nikki Nice | Democrat | Nay |
| Regina Goodwin | Democrat | Nay |
| Aaron Reinhardt | Republican | Yea |
| Adam Pugh | Republican | Yea |
| Ally Seifried | Republican | Yea |
| Avery Frix | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Coleman | Republican | Yea |
| Brenda Stanley | Republican | Yea |
| Brent Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Guthrie | Republican | Yea |
| Casey Murdock | Republican | Yea |
| Christi Gillespie | Republican | Yea |
| Chuck Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Dana Prieto | Republican | Yea |
| Darcy Jech | Republican | Yea |
| Dave Rader | Republican | Yea |
| David Bullard | Republican | Not Voting |
| District 24 | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dusty Deevers | Republican | Yea |
| George Burns | Republican | Yea |
| Grant Green | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Stewart | Republican | Yea |
| Jerry Alvord | Republican | Yea |
| John Haste | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Wingard | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Daniels | Republican | Yea |
| Julie McIntosh | Republican | Yea |
| Kelly Hines | Republican | Yea |
| Kendal Sacchieri | Republican | Yea |
| Kristen Thompson | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Standridge | Republican | Yea |
| Lonnie Paxton | Republican | Yea |
| Micheal Bergstrom | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Rosino | Republican | Yea |
| Randy Grellner | Republican | Not Voting |
| Roland Pederson | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Jett | Republican | Yea |
| Spencer Kern | Republican | Yea |
| Todd Gollihare | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Woods | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Hamilton | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 84% | 11% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| STRIKE THE TITLE - ADOPTED | — | Not Voting |
| Carri Hicks | Democrat | Nay |
| Jo Anna Dossett | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina Goodwin | Democrat | Nay |
| Aaron Reinhardt | Republican | Yea |
| Brenda Stanley | Republican | Yea |
| Brent Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Chuck Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Dana Prieto | Republican | Yea |
| Darcy Jech | Republican | Yea |
| Dave Rader | Republican | Yea |
| District 24 | Republican | Yea |
| Grant Green | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Stewart | Republican | Yea |
| John Haste | Republican | Yea |
| Kristen Thompson | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Rosino | Republican | Yea |
| Todd Gollihare | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Woods | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nikki Nice | Democrat | Nay |
| Dana Prieto | Republican | Yea |
| Dusty Deevers | Republican | Yea |
| George Burns | Republican | Yea |
| Kendal Sacchieri | Republican | Yea |
| Micheal Bergstrom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 70 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 86 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 3% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (100)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alonso-Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Bennett | — | Yea |
| Mr. Speaker | — | Yea |
| Pittman | — | Not Voting |
| Lowe (J) | — | Not Voting |
| VACANCY: | — | Not Voting |
| Crosswhite Hader | — | Yea |
| Andy Fugate | Democrat | Yea |
| Annie Menz | Democrat | Yea |
| Cyndi Munson | Democrat | Yea |
| Ellen Pogemiller | Democrat | Yea |
| Ellyn Hefner | Democrat | Yea |
| Jacob Rosecrants | Democrat | Yea |
| Jared Deck | Democrat | Yea |
| John Waldron | Democrat | Nay |
| Melissa Provenzano | Democrat | Yea |
| Meloyde Blancett | Democrat | Yea |
| Michelle McCane | Democrat | Yea |
| Mickey Dollens | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Suzanne Schreiber | Democrat | Yea |
| Trish Ranson | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Moore | Republican | Yea |
| Bob Ed Culver | Republican | Yea |
| Brad Boles | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Newton | Republican | Yea |
| Chad Caldwell | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Banning | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Kannady | Republican | Not Voting |
| Chris Sneed | Republican | Yea |
| Chuck Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Clay Staires | Republican | Yea |
| Cody Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Collin Duel | Republican | Yea |
| Cynthia Roe | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Pae | Republican | Not Voting |
| Danny Sterling | Republican | Yea |
| Danny Williams | Republican | Yea |
| David Hardin | Republican | Yea |
| David Smith | Republican | Yea |
| Dell Kerbs | Republican | Yea |
| Derrick Hildebrant | Republican | Yea |
| Dick Lowe | Republican | Not Voting |
| Eddy Dempsey | Republican | Yea |
| Emily Gise | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Erick Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Gabe Woolley | Republican | Yea |
| George Burns | Republican | Yea |
| Gerrid Kendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Stewart | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Blair | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Steagall | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Grego | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Olsen | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Shaw | Republican | Yea |
| John George | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Kane | Republican | Yea |
| John Pfeiffer | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Wilk | Republican | Yea |
| Josh Cantrell | Republican | Yea |
| Josh West | Republican | Yea |
| Judd Strom | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Humphrey | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ken Luttrell | Republican | Yea |
| Kenton Patzkowsky | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin West | Republican | Yea |
| Marilyn Stark | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Lawson | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Lepak | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Tedford | Republican | Yea |
| Max Wolfley | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Dobrinski | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Kelley | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Lay | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Osburn | Republican | Yea |
| Molly Jenkins | Republican | Yea |
| Neil Hays | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Archer | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Miller | Republican | Not Voting |
| Preston Stinson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Rande Worthen | Republican | Yea |
| Rick West | Republican | Nay |
| Robert Manger | Republican | Yea |
| Ronny Johns | Republican | Yea |
| Ross Ford | Republican | Yea |
| Rusty Cornwell | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Eaves | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Fetgatter | Republican | Yea |
| Stacy Jo Adams | Republican | Yea |
| Stan May | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Bashore | Republican | Yea |
| T.J. Marti | Republican | Yea |
| Tammy Townley | Republican | Yea |
| Tammy West | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Turner | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Gann | Republican | Nay |
| Toni Hasenbeck | Republican | Yea |
| Trey Caldwell | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (29)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bennett | — | Yea |
| Andy Fugate | Democrat | Yea |
| Melissa Provenzano | Democrat | Yea |
| Meloyde Blancett | Democrat | Yea |
| Trish Ranson | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Moore | Republican | Yea |
| Brad Boles | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Newton | Republican | Yea |
| Chad Caldwell | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Pae | Republican | Yea |
| Danny Sterling | Republican | Yea |
| Dell Kerbs | Republican | Yea |
| George Burns | Republican | Yea |
| Gerrid Kendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Grego | Republican | Yea |
| John Kane | Republican | Yea |
| Josh West | Republican | Yea |
| Judd Strom | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin West | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Hilbert | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Lawson | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Osburn | Republican | Yea |
| Robert Manger | Republican | Yea |
| Ross Ford | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Fetgatter | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Bashore | Republican | Yea |
| Tammy West | Republican | Yea |
| Trey Caldwell | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 8% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| John Waldron | Democrat | Nay |
| Melissa Provenzano | Democrat | Yea |
| Michelle McCane | Democrat | Yea |
| Clay Staires | Republican | Yea |
| Cody Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Collin Duel | Republican | Yea |
| Gerrid Kendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Blair | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin West | Republican | Yea |
| Marilyn Stark | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Molly Jenkins | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Eaves | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2728?
- HB 2728 is sponsored by Gerrid Kendrix (Republican) and Micheal Bergstrom (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2728?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2728?
- Track HB 2728 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2728
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2728
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →