Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 R cosponsors

SB 1024 — Administrative rules; removing expedited rule repeal exception; approval prior to proceeding with rulemaking process; impact statement; requirements. Effective date. Emergency.

Last action — Approved by Governor 05/21/2025

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Kevin Stitt (Republican) on May 21, 2025.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

239 added · 336 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of SB 1024 introduces several important changes to the Administrative Procedures Act. It requires that any proposed rule must receive approval from the Governor or a cabinet secretary within 30 days before an agency can move forward with rulemaking. Additionally, it expands the requirements for rule impact statements to include analyses of alternatives, estimates of employee time and resources, as well as comparisons to federal regulations. These changes aim to enhance oversight and ensure that rulemaking considers various factors, thus promoting more informed decisions.

→
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO.
An Act ENROLLED SENATE BILL NO.
Bergstrom and Jett of the Senate and Kendrix of the House 6 An Act relating to the Administrative Procedures Act;
Bergstrom, Jett, and Bullard of the Senate and Kendrix, Cornwell, and Crosswhite Hader of the House An Act relating to the Administrative Procedures Act;
2021, Section 303, which relates to the procedure for adopting, amending, or repealing a rule;
2021, Section 303, which relates to adopting, amending, or repealing a rule;
requiring agency to submit statement of scope prior to rulemaking;
removing expedited rule repeal exception;
specifying contents of statement;
requiring Governor or cabinet secretary approval within thirty days of proposed rule notice before an agency can proceed with the rulemaking process;
requiring submission of statement to Secretary of State;
adding a rule alternatives analysis to rule impact statement requirements;
requiring determinations by Secretary of State and Governor;
adding employee time and resource estimates to rule impact statement requirements;
prohibiting certain actions by certain employees prior to certain determination;
adding federal regulation summary and comparison to rule impact statement requirements;
providing for submission and publication of certain approved statement;
establishing provisions for revision of statement of scope;
providing for expiration of certain statement of scope;
prohibiting certain rulemaking following expiration;
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
SUBJECT:
Administrative Procedures Act BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
Any agency seeking to promulgate or amend any emergency or permanent rule or rules shall prepare a statement of scope of the rule or rules that it plans to promulgate.
The statement shall include:
1.
A description of the objective of the rule or rules;
ENGR.
S.
B.
NO.
1024 Page 1 2.
A description of any existing policies or provisions included in the rule or rules, the newly proposed policies or provisions to be included in the rule or rules, and an analysis of alternatives to adopting the rule or rules;
3.
The statutory authority for promulgating the rule or rules;
4.
Estimates of the amount of time that would be spent by state employees to develop the rule or rules and of other resources that would be utilized to develop the rule or rules;
5.
A description of all of the entities, whether public or private, that may be affected by the rule or rules;
and 6.
A summary and preliminary comparison of any existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the rule or rules proposed to be promulgated.
B.
1.
An agency that has prepared a statement of scope of any proposed rule or rules shall present that statement to the Secretary of State.
The Secretary of State shall make a determination as to whether the agency has the explicit authority to promulgate the rule or rules as proposed in the statement of scope and shall report the statement of scope and such determination to the Governor who, in his or her discretion, may approve or reject the statement of scope.
2.
The agency shall not begin promulgating the rule or rules pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act until the Governor issues a written notice of approval of the statement of scope.
ENGR.
S.
Show all 138 changed rows (98 more)
Previous
Latest
B.
NO.
1024 Page 2 Except for activity necessary to prepare the statement of scope of the proposed rule or rules, no state employee or official may perform any activity in connection with the drafting of any proposed rule or rules until the Governor approves the statement of scope.
C.
1.
If the Governor approves a statement of scope for any proposed rule or rules, the agency shall send an electronic copy of the statement to the Secretary of State, in the form and manner prescribed by the Secretary of State, for publication in “The Oklahoma Register”.
The agency shall include with any statement of scope sent to the Secretary of State the date of the Governor’s approval of the statement of scope.
The Secretary of State shall assign a discrete identifying number to each statement of scope and shall include that number and the date of the Governor’s approval in the publication of the statement of scope.
2.
On the same day that the agency sends the statement to the chairs of the Administrative Rules Committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
D.
If at any time after a statement of scope is approved under subsection B of this section, the agency changes the scope of the proposed rule or rules in any meaningful or measurable way, including changing the scope of the proposed rule or rules so as to include in the scope any activity, business, material, or product that is not specifically included in the original scope, the agency shall prepare and obtain approval of a revised statement of scope in ENGR.
S.
B.
NO.
1024 Page 3 the same manner as the original statement was prepared and approved under subsection B of this section.
No state employee may perform any activity in connection with the drafting of the proposed rule or rules except for an activity necessary to prepare the revised statement of scope until the revised statement is approved.
E.
A statement of scope shall expire thirty (30) months after the date on which it is published in “The Oklahoma Register”.
After a statement of scope expires, an agency may not submit a proposed rule based upon that statement of scope to the Legislature for review, and any such rule that has not been submitted to the Legislature for review before that date shall be considered withdrawn on such date.
For purposes of this subsection, a revised statement of scope prepared under subsection D of this section shall expire on the date that is thirty (30) months after the date on which the revised statement is published in “The Oklahoma Register”.
F.
Cause notice of any intended action to be published in “The Oklahoma Register” pursuant to subsection B G of this section;
Cause notice of any intended action to be published in “The Oklahoma Register” pursuant to subsection B of this section;
For at least thirty (30) days after publication of the notice of the intended rulemaking action, afford a comment period for all interested persons to submit data, views, or arguments, ENGR.
For at least thirty (30) days after publication of the notice of the intended rulemaking action, afford a comment period for all interested persons to submit data, views, or arguments, orally or in writing.
S.
B.
NO.
1024 Page 4 orally or in writing.
Hold a hearing, if required, as provided by subsection C H of this section;
Hold a hearing, if required, as provided by subsection C of this section;
When an agency provides notice pursuant to paragraph 1 of this subsection, the agency shall provide one (1) electronic copy of the complete text of the proposed rule, amendment, or revocation and ENGR.
When an agency provides notice pursuant to paragraph 1 of this subsection, the agency shall provide one (1) electronic copy of the complete text of the proposed rule, amendment, or revocation and a copy of the notice to the Governor and to the appropriate cabinet secretary.
No agency may shall adopt any proposed rule, amendment, or revocation if unless, within thirty (30) days from providing notice to the Governor and the appropriate cabinet secretary, the agency receives express written disapproval approval from the Governor or the cabinet secretary.
If the Governor or the cabinet secretary disapproves a rule, the affected agency shall be notified in writing of the reasons for disapproval.
If, after thirty (30) ENR.
1024 Page 5 a copy of the notice to the Governor and to the appropriate cabinet secretary.
1024 Page 2 days of providing the notice to the Governor and the cabinet secretary, the agency has not received an express written disapproval approval, the agency may shall not proceed with the rulemaking process.
No agency may adopt any proposed rule, amendment, or revocation if, within thirty (30) days from providing notice to the Governor and the appropriate cabinet secretary, the agency receives express written disapproval from the Governor or the cabinet secretary.
If the Governor or the cabinet secretary disapproves a rule, the affected agency shall be notified in writing of the reasons for disapproval.
If, after thirty (30) days of providing the notice to the Governor and the cabinet secretary, the agency has not received an express written disapproval, the agency may proceed with the rulemaking process.
G.
The notice required by paragraph 1 of subsection A of this section shall include, but not be limited to:
The notice required by paragraph 1 of subsection A F of this section shall include, but not be limited to:
If the agency determines that the rule affects business entities, a request that such entities provide the agency, within the comment period, in dollar amounts if possible, the increase in the level of direct costs such as fees, and indirect costs such as reporting, recordkeeping, equipment, construction, labor, ENGR.
If the agency determines that the rule affects business entities, a request that such entities provide the agency, within the comment period, in dollar amounts if possible, the increase in the level of direct costs such as fees, and indirect costs such as reporting, recordkeeping, equipment, construction, labor, professional services, revenue loss, or other costs expected to be incurred by a particular entity due to compliance with the proposed rule;
S.
B.
NO.
1024 Page 6 professional services, revenue loss, or other costs expected to be incurred by a particular entity due to compliance with the proposed rule;
The time when, the place where, and the manner in which interested persons may present their views thereon pursuant to paragraph 3 of subsection A F of this section;
The time when, the place where, and the manner in which interested persons may present their views thereon pursuant to paragraph 3 of subsection A of this section;
Whether or not the agency intends to issue a rule impact statement according to subsection D I of this section and where copies of such impact statement may be obtained for review by the public;
Whether or not the agency intends to issue a rule impact statement according to subsection D of this section and where copies of such impact statement may be obtained for review by the public;
and 10.
and ENR.
Where copies of the proposed rules may be obtained for review by the public.
An agency may charge persons for the actual cost of mailing a copy of the proposed rules to such persons.
The number of copies of such notice as specified by the Secretary of State shall be submitted to the Secretary of State who shall publish the notice in “The Oklahoma Register” pursuant to the provisions of Section 255 of this title.
Prior to or within three (3) days after publication of the notice in “The Oklahoma Register”, the agency shall cause a copy of ENGR.
1024 Page 7 the notice of the proposed rule adoption and the rule impact statement, if available, to be mailed to all persons who have made a timely request of the agency for advance notice of its rulemaking proceedings.
1024 Page 3 10.
Where copies of the proposed rules may be obtained for review by the public.
An agency may charge persons for the actual cost of mailing a copy of the proposed rules to such persons.
The number of copies of such notice as specified by the Secretary of State shall be submitted to the Secretary of State who shall publish the notice in “The Oklahoma Register” pursuant to the provisions of Section 255 of this title.
Prior to or within three (3) days after publication of the notice in “The Oklahoma Register”, the agency shall cause a copy of the notice of the proposed rule adoption and the rule impact statement, if available, to be mailed to all persons who have made a timely request of the agency for advance notice of its rulemaking proceedings.
H.
ENGR.
ENR.
1024 Page 8 2.
1024 Page 4 2.
A hearing on a proposed rule may not be held earlier than thirty (30) days after notice of the hearing is published pursuant to subsection B G of this section.
A hearing on a proposed rule may not be held earlier than thirty (30) days after notice of the hearing is published pursuant to subsection B of this section.
I.
a description of the classes of persons who most likely will be affected by the proposed rule, including classes that will bear the costs of the proposed rule, and any information on cost impacts received by the agency from any private or public entities, ENGR.
a description of the classes of persons who most likely will be affected by the proposed rule, including classes that will bear the costs of the proposed rule, and any information on cost impacts received by the agency from any private or public entities, c.
a description of the classes of persons who will benefit from the proposed rule, d.
a description of the probable economic impact of the proposed rule upon affected classes of persons or political subdivisions, including a listing of all fee changes and, whenever possible, a separate justification for each fee change, e.
the probable costs and benefits to the agency and to any other agency of the implementation and enforcement of the proposed rule, the source of revenue to be used ENR.
1024 Page 9 c.
1024 Page 5 for implementation and enforcement of the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state revenues, including a projected net loss or gain in such revenues if it can be projected by the agency, f.
a description of the classes of persons who will benefit from the proposed rule, d.
a description of the probable economic impact of the proposed rule upon affected classes of persons or political subdivisions, including a listing of all fee changes and, whenever possible, a separate justification for each fee change, e.
the probable costs and benefits to the agency and to any other agency of the implementation and enforcement of the proposed rule, the source of revenue to be used for implementation and enforcement of the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state revenues, including a projected net loss or gain in such revenues if it can be projected by the agency, f.
an explanation of the measures the agency has taken to minimize compliance costs and a determination of ENGR.
an explanation of the measures the agency has taken to minimize compliance costs and a determination of whether there are less costly or nonregulatory methods or less intrusive methods for achieving the purpose of the proposed rule, i.
a determination of the effect of the proposed rule on the public health, safety, and environment and, if the proposed rule is designed to reduce significant risks to the public health, safety, and environment, an explanation of the nature of the risk and to what extent the proposed rule will reduce the risk, j.
a determination of any detrimental effect on the public health, safety, and environment if the proposed rule is not implemented, and k.
the date the rule impact statement was prepared and if modified, the date modified;
l.
an analysis of alternatives to adopting the rule;
m.
estimates of the amount of time that would be spent by state employees to develop the rule and of the amount of other resources that would be utilized to develop the rule;
and ENR.
1024 Page 10 whether there are less costly or nonregulatory methods or less intrusive methods for achieving the purpose of the proposed rule, i.
1024 Page 6 n.
a determination of the effect of the proposed rule on the public health, safety, and environment and, if the proposed rule is designed to reduce significant risks to the public health, safety, and environment, an explanation of the nature of the risk and to what extent the proposed rule will reduce the risk, j.
a summary and preliminary comparison of any existing or proposed federal regulations that are intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule.
a determination of any detrimental effect on the public health, safety, and environment if the proposed rule is not implemented, and k.
the date the rule impact statement was prepared and if modified, the date modified.
Upon request by an agency, the Governor may also waive the rule impact statement requirements if the agency is required to implement a statute or federal requirement that does not require an agency to interpret or describe the requirements, such as federally mandated ENGR.
Upon request by an agency, the Governor may also waive the rule impact statement requirements if the agency is required to implement a statute or federal requirement that does not require an agency to interpret or describe the requirements, such as federally mandated provisions which afford the agency no discretion to consider less restrictive alternatives.
S.
B.
NO.
1024 Page 11 provisions which afford the agency no discretion to consider less restrictive alternatives.
J.
ENGR.
ENR.
1024 Page 12 Passed the Senate the 26th day of March, 2025.
1024 Page 7 Passed the Senate the 15th day of May, 2025.
3 Presiding Officer of the Senate 5 Passed the House of Representatives the ____ day of __________, 2025.
Presiding Officer of the Senate Passed the House of Representatives the 7th day of May, 2025.
8 Presiding Officer of the House of Representatives ENGR.
Presiding Officer of the House of Representatives OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Received by the Office of the Governor this ____________________ day of ___________________, 20_______, at _______ o'clock _______ M.
By:
_________________________________ Approved by the Governor of the State of Oklahoma this _________ day of ___________________, 20_______, at _______ o'clock _______ M.
_________________________________ Governor of the State of Oklahoma OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE Received by the Office of the Secretary of State this __________ day of __________________, 20 _______, at _______ o'clock _______ M.
By:
_________________________________ ENR.
1024 Page 13
1024 Page 8
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (9)

Action History

  1. Approved by Governor 05/21/2025

  2. Sent to Governor

  3. Signed, returned to Senate

  4. Enrolled, to House

  5. Referred for enrollment

  6. Measure and Emergency passed: Ayes: 34 Nays: 8

  7. HAs adopted

  8. HAs read

  9. Engrossed, signed, to Senate

  10. Referred for engrossment

  11. Third Reading, Measure and Emergency passed: Ayes: 73 Nays: 14

  12. Coauthored by Representative(s) Cornwell, CrosswhiteHader

  13. General Order

  14. Coauthored by Senator(s) Bullard

  15. CR; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Administrative Rules Committee

  16. Second Reading referred to Administrative Rules

  17. First Reading

  18. Engrossed to House

  19. Referred for engrossment

  20. Measure and Emergency passed: Ayes: 39 Nays: 8

  21. Emergency added

  22. General Order, Amended by Floor Substitute

  23. Placed on General Order

  24. Coauthored by Senator Jett

  25. Coauthored by Representative Kendrix (principal House author)

  26. Reported Do Pass Administrative Rules committee; CR filed

  27. Second Reading referred to Administrative Rules

  28. Authored by Senator Bergstrom

  29. First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 19 voted No

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (149)

149 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 149 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Fourth Reading

Passed 34 Yea · 8 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 34005
Democrat 0800
Total 34805
% of votes cast 72%17%0%11%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
Carri Hicks Democrat Nay
Jo Anna Dossett Democrat Nay
Julia Kirt Democrat Nay
Mark Mann Democrat Nay
Mary B. Boren Democrat Nay
Michael Brooks Democrat Nay
Nikki Nice Democrat Nay
Regina Goodwin Democrat Nay
Aaron Reinhardt Republican Not Voting
Adam Pugh Republican Yea
Ally Seifried Republican Yea
Avery Frix Republican Not Voting
Bill Coleman Republican Yea
Brenda Stanley Republican Yea
Brent Howard Republican Yea
Brian Guthrie Republican Yea
Casey Murdock Republican Not Voting
Christi Gillespie Republican Yea
Chuck Hall Republican Yea
Dana Prieto Republican Yea
Darcy Jech Republican Yea
Dave Rader Republican Yea
David Bullard Republican Yea
District 24 Republican Yea
Dusty Deevers Republican Yea
George Burns Republican Yea
Grant Green Republican Yea
Jack Stewart Republican Yea
Jerry Alvord Republican Yea
John Haste Republican Yea
Jonathan Wingard Republican Yea
Julie Daniels Republican Yea
Julie McIntosh Republican Yea
Kelly Hines Republican Not Voting
Kendal Sacchieri Republican Yea
Kristen Thompson Republican Yea
Lisa Standridge Republican Yea
Lonnie Paxton Republican Yea
Micheal Bergstrom Republican Yea
Paul Rosino Republican Yea
Randy Grellner Republican Yea
Roland Pederson Republican Yea
Shane Jett Republican Yea
Spencer Kern Republican Yea
Todd Gollihare Republican Yea
Tom Woods Republican Not Voting
Warren Hamilton Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 73 Yea · 14 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 69109
Democrat 31001
Unaffiliated 1302
Total 7314012
% of votes cast 74%14%0%12%
How each member voted (99)
Member Party Vote
Alonso-Sandoval — Nay
Pittman — Nay
Bennett — Nay
Mr. Speaker — Not Voting
VACANCY: — Not Voting
Crosswhite Hader — Yea
Andy Fugate Democrat Nay
Annie Menz Democrat Nay
Cyndi Munson Democrat Nay
Ellen Pogemiller Democrat Nay
Ellyn Hefner Democrat Not Voting
Jacob Rosecrants Democrat Yea
Jared Deck Democrat Nay
John Waldron Democrat Nay
Melissa Provenzano Democrat Nay
Meloyde Blancett Democrat Nay
Michelle McCane Democrat Yea
Mickey Dollens Democrat Nay
Suzanne Schreiber Democrat Yea
Trish Ranson Democrat Nay
Anthony Moore Republican Yea
Bob Ed Culver Republican Yea
Brad Boles Republican Yea
Brian Hill Republican Yea
Carl Newton Republican Yea
Chad Caldwell Republican Yea
Chris Banning Republican Not Voting
Chris Kannady Republican Yea
Chris Sneed Republican Not Voting
Chuck Hall Republican Yea
Clay Staires Republican Yea
Cody Maynard Republican Yea
Collin Duel Republican Yea
Cynthia Roe Republican Yea
Daniel Pae Republican Yea
Danny Sterling Republican Yea
Danny Williams Republican Yea
David Hardin Republican Yea
David Smith Republican Yea
Dell Kerbs Republican Yea
Derrick Hildebrant Republican Yea
Dick Lowe Republican Not Voting
Eddy Dempsey Republican Not Voting
Emily Gise Republican Yea
Eric Roberts Republican Yea
Erick Harris Republican Yea
Gabe Woolley Republican Yea
George Burns Republican Yea
Gerrid Kendrix Republican Yea
Jack Stewart Republican Nay
Jason Blair Republican Yea
Jay Steagall Republican Yea
Jim Grego Republican Yea
Jim Olsen Republican Yea
Jim Shaw Republican Yea
John George Republican Yea
John Kane Republican Yea
John Pfeiffer Republican Yea
Jonathan Wilk Republican Yea
Josh Cantrell Republican Yea
Josh West Republican Yea
Judd Strom Republican Not Voting
Justin Humphrey Republican Yea
Ken Luttrell Republican Yea
Kenton Patzkowsky Republican Yea
Kevin West Republican Yea
Marilyn Stark Republican Yea
Mark Chapman Republican Yea
Mark Lawson Republican Not Voting
Mark Lepak Republican Yea
Mark Tedford Republican Yea
Max Wolfley Republican Yea
Mike Dobrinski Republican Yea
Mike Kelley Republican Yea
Mike Lay Republican Yea
Mike Osburn Republican Yea
Molly Jenkins Republican Yea
Neil Hays Republican Yea
Nick Archer Republican Not Voting
Nicole Miller Republican Yea
Preston Stinson Republican Not Voting
Rande Worthen Republican Yea
Rick West Republican Yea
Robert Manger Republican Yea
Ronny Johns Republican Yea
Ross Ford Republican Yea
Rusty Cornwell Republican Yea
Ryan Eaves Republican Yea
Scott Fetgatter Republican Yea
Stacy Jo Adams Republican Yea
Stan May Republican Yea
Steve Bashore Republican Yea
T.J. Marti Republican Yea
Tammy Townley Republican Yea
Tammy West Republican Yea
Tim Turner Republican Yea
Tom Gann Republican Yea
Toni Hasenbeck Republican Yea
Trey Caldwell Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Administrative Rules Committee: Do Pass As Amended By Cs

Passed 11 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 10000
Democrat 1200
Total 11200
% of votes cast 85%15%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
John Waldron Democrat Nay
Melissa Provenzano Democrat Nay
Michelle McCane Democrat Yea
Cody Maynard Republican Yea
Collin Duel Republican Yea
Gerrid Kendrix Republican Yea
Jason Blair Republican Yea
Kevin West Republican Yea
Marilyn Stark Republican Yea
Mark Chapman Republican Yea
Molly Jenkins Republican Yea
Rande Worthen Republican Yea
Ryan Eaves Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 39 Yea · 8 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 39000
Democrat 0800
Total 39800
% of votes cast 83%17%0%0%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
Carri Hicks Democrat Nay
Jo Anna Dossett Democrat Nay
Julia Kirt Democrat Nay
Mark Mann Democrat Nay
Mary B. Boren Democrat Nay
Michael Brooks Democrat Nay
Nikki Nice Democrat Nay
Regina Goodwin Democrat Nay
Aaron Reinhardt Republican Yea
Adam Pugh Republican Yea
Ally Seifried Republican Yea
Avery Frix Republican Yea
Bill Coleman Republican Yea
Brenda Stanley Republican Yea
Brent Howard Republican Yea
Brian Guthrie Republican Yea
Casey Murdock Republican Yea
Christi Gillespie Republican Yea
Chuck Hall Republican Yea
Dana Prieto Republican Yea
Darcy Jech Republican Yea
Dave Rader Republican Yea
David Bullard Republican Yea
District 24 Republican Yea
Dusty Deevers Republican Yea
George Burns Republican Yea
Grant Green Republican Yea
Jack Stewart Republican Yea
Jerry Alvord Republican Yea
John Haste Republican Yea
Jonathan Wingard Republican Yea
Julie Daniels Republican Yea
Julie McIntosh Republican Yea
Kelly Hines Republican Yea
Kendal Sacchieri Republican Yea
Kristen Thompson Republican Yea
Lisa Standridge Republican Yea
Lonnie Paxton Republican Yea
Micheal Bergstrom Republican Yea
Paul Rosino Republican Yea
Randy Grellner Republican Yea
Roland Pederson Republican Yea
Shane Jett Republican Yea
Spencer Kern Republican Yea
Todd Gollihare Republican Yea
Tom Woods Republican Yea
Warren Hamilton Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1024?
SB 1024 is sponsored by Micheal Bergstrom (Republican) and Gerrid Kendrix (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1024?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1024?
Track SB 1024 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1024

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1024

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →