New Jersey 2018-2019 Regular Session Status: Introduced

S728 —

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed General Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2018-2019 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Identical bill: A3717 (2R) (not yet in our corpus)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

104 added · 180 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to the bill clarifies that pharmacy benefits managers are prohibited from retroactively reducing payments on properly filed claims by pharmacies, specifically identifying this practice as direct and indirect remuneration (DIR) fees, which can complicate pharmacies' revenue management. It specifies that such reductions can only occur if a claim is determined not to be a clean claim during a routine audit. This change aims to provide pharmacies with more predictable revenue by limiting the circumstances under which payments can be adjusted after they have been submitted.

→
Previous
Latest
S728 SCS SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE, No.
S728 SCS SCM Statement 6/17/19 SENATE COMMERCE COMMITTEE   STATEMENT TO   SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE, No.
728 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 218th LEGISLATURE   ADOPTED JUNE 17, 2019     Sponsored by:
  STATE OF NEW JERSEY   DATED:
Senator  LINDA R.
 JUNE 17, 2019         The Senate Commerce Committee reports favorably a Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No.
GREENSTEIN District 14 (Mercer and Middlesex) Senator  VIN GOPAL District 11 (Monmouth)   Co-Sponsored by:
728.
Senators Andrzejczak, Sacco, Gill, Stack and Weinberg         SYNOPSIS      Prohibits pharmacy benefits managers from making certain retroactive reductions in claims payments to pharmacies;
      This substitute bill prohibits a pharmacy benefits manager from retroactively reducing payment on a properly filed claim for payment by a pharmacy.  These retroactive reductions in payment are often, particularly in the case of Medicare Part D, referred to as direct and indirect remuneration (DIR) fees.  Since these fees are commonly “clawed back” retroactively, and in many cases months after the claim is made, this process makes it difficult for pharmacies to operate with predictable revenues.
requires pharmacy benefits managers to disclose certain product information to pharmacies.
     Specifically, the bill provides that, after the date of receipt of a clean claim for payment made by a pharmacy, a pharmacy benefits manager may not retroactively reduce payment on the claim, either directly or indirectly, through aggregated effective rate, direct or indirect remuneration, quality assurance program, or otherwise, except if the claim is found not to be a clean claim during the course of a routine audit performed pursuant to an agreement between the pharmacy benefits manager and the pharmacy.  Under the bill, when a pharmacy adjudicates a claim at the point of sale, the reimbursement amount provided to the pharmacy by the pharmacy benefits manager constitutes a final reimbursement amount.  The bill is not to be construed to prohibit any retroactive increase in payment to a pharmacy pursuant to a written agreement contract between the pharmacy benefits manager, and the pharmacy services administration organization, or a pharmacy.
  CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT      Substitute as adopted by the Senate Commerce Committee.
     Pursuant to the bill, “clean claim” means a claim that has no defect or impropriety, including a lack of any required substantiating documentation, or other circumstance requiring special treatment.
         An Act concerning pharmacy benefits managers and amending and supplementing P.L.2015, c.179        Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
     This bill provides that a pharmacy benefits manager may not recoup funds from a pharmacy in connection with claims for which the pharmacy has already been paid unless the recoupment is:
       1.    (New section)  a.
 After the date of receipt of a clean claim for payment made by a pharmacy, a pharmacy benefits manager shall not retroactively reduce payment on the claim, either directly or indirectly, through aggregated effective rate, direct or indirect remuneration, quality assurance program, or otherwise, except if the claim is found not to be a clean claim during the course of a routine audit performed pursuant to an agreement between the pharmacy benefits manager and the pharmacy.  When a pharmacy adjudicates a claim at the point of sale, the reimbursement amount provided to the pharmacy by the pharmacy benefits manager shall constitute a final reimbursement amount.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit any retroactive increase in payment to a pharmacy pursuant to a written agreement contract between the pharmacy benefits manager, and the pharmacy services administration organization, or a pharmacy.
     b.    For the purpose of this section, “clean claim” means a claim that has no defect or impropriety, including a lack of any required substantiating documentation, or other circumstance requiring special treatment, including, but not limited to, those listed in subsection d.
of this section, that prevents timely payment from being made on the claim.
     c.     A pharmacy benefit manager shall not recoup funds from a pharmacy in connection with claims for which the pharmacy has already been paid unless the recoupment is:
     d.    The provisions of this section shall not apply to an investigative audit of pharmacy records when:
     The provisions of the bill not apply to an investigative audit of pharmacy records when:
     2.    Section 2 of P.L.2015, c.179 (C.17B:27F-2) is amended to read as follows:
      The bill also requires, with respect to execution, renewals, and changes in terms of a contract between a pharmacy benefits manager and a pharmacy, more information to be disclosed to the pharmacy in the contract, and a reasonable process by which contracted pharmacies can access certain pricing information.
     2.    Upon execution or renewal of each contract, or at such a time when there is any material change in the term of the contract, a pharmacy benefits manager shall, with respect to contracts between a pharmacy benefits manager and a pharmacy services administrative organization, or between a pharmacy benefits manager and a contracted pharmacy:
     The bill also requires all contracts between a pharmacy benefits manager and a contracted pharmacy to include certain factors that are subject to a process to appeal disputes.  With respect to appeals that are denied, the bill provides that the pharmacy benefits manager is required to provide certain information relating to the denial.
     a.     (1)  include in the contract the sources utilized to determine multiple source generic drug pricing, brand drug pricing, and the wholesaler in the State of New Jersey where pharmacies may acquire the product, including, if applicable, the brand effective rate, generic effective rate, dispensing fee effective rate, maximum allowable cost or any [successive] other pricing formula [, or of the pharmacy benefits manager] for pharmacy reimbursement;
     The bill provides that a pharmacy benefits manager may not terminate a pharmacy licensed in the State of New Jersey solely on the basis that the pharmacy offers and provides store direct delivery and mail prescriptions to an insured as an ancillary service.
     (2)   update that pricing information every seven calendar days;
     The bill prohibits a pharmacy benefits manager or third-party payer from requiring pharmacy accreditation standards or recertification requirements to participate in a network which are inconsistent with, more stringent than, or in addition to, the federal and State requirements for a pharmacy in this State.
and      (3)   establish a reasonable process by which contracted pharmacies have a method to access relevant maximum allowable cost pricing lists [and any successive pricing formulas in a timely manner] , brand effective rate, generic effective rate, or any other pricing formulas for pharmacy reimbursement;
     The bill provides that the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance may review and approve the compensation program of a pharmacy benefits manager with a health benefits plan to ensure that the reimbursement for pharmacist services paid to a pharmacist or pharmacy is fair and reasonable to provide an adequate pharmacy benefits manager network for a health benefits plan.
and      b.    Maintain a procedure to eliminate drugs from the list of drugs subject to multiple source generic drug pricing and brand drug pricing, or modify maximum allowable cost rates, brand effective rate, generic effective rate, dispensing fee effective rate or any other applicable pricing formula in a timely fashion and make that procedure easily accessible to the pharmacy services administrative organizations or the pharmacies that they are contractually obligated with to provide that information according to the requirements of this section.
      The bill applies P.L.2015, c.179 (C.17B:27F-1 et seq.), the law regulating pharmacy benefits managers, to all pharmacy benefits managers operating in the State and to plans offered through the State Health Benefits Program.
(cf:
     Finally, the bill provides that a pharmacy benefits manager that violates any provision of that law shall be subject to:
P.L.2015, c.179, s.2)        3.    Section 4 of P.L.2015, c.179 (C.17B:27F-4) is amended to read as follows:
     (1)   a warning notice;
     4.    All contracts between a pharmacy benefits manager and a [contracted] pharmacy services administrative organization, or its contracted  pharmacies, and all contracts directly between a pharmacy benefits manager and a pharmacy shall include a process to appeal, investigate, and resolve disputes regarding brand and multiple source generic drug pricing, including, if applicable, brand effective rate, generic effective rate, dispensing fee effective rate, and any other pricing formula for pharmacy reimbursement.  The contract provision establishing the process shall include the following:
     (2)   an opportunity to cure the violation within 14 days following the issuance of the notice;
     a.     The right to appeal shall be limited to 14 calendar days following the initial claim;
     (3)   a hearing before the commissioner within 70 days following the issuance of the notice;
     b.    The appeal shall be investigated and resolved by the pharmacy benefits manager through an internal process within 14 calendar days of receipt of the appeal by the pharmacy benefits manager;
and      (4)   if the violation has not been cured, a penalty of not less than $5,000 or more than $10,000 for each violation.
     c.     A telephone number at which a pharmacy services administrative organization, or a pharmacy may contact the pharmacy benefits manager and speak with an individual who is involved in the appeals process;
     This Senate Committee Substitute is identical to Assembly Bill No.3717 (2R).
and      d.    (1)  If the appeal is denied, the pharmacy benefits manager shall:
     This bill was pre-filed for introduction in the 2018-2019 session pending technical review.  As reported, the bill includes the changes required by technical review, which has been performed.
     (a)   provide the reason for the denial [and] to the pharmacy services administrative organization and its contracted pharmacies, and the pharmacy services administrative organization shall inform its contracted pharmacies of the availability, location and pricing of the appealed drug in the State;
     (b)   provide the reason for the denial directly to a pharmacy, if it contracts directly with a pharmacy benefits manager;
     (c)   identify the national drug code of a drug product that is available for purchase by [contracted pharmacies] the specific contracted pharmacy appealing the claim in this State from wholesalers registered pursuant to P.L.1961, c.52 (C.24:6B-1 et seq.) at a price which is available to the specific contracted pharmacy appealing the claim and which is equal to or less than the maximum allowable cost or the brand effective rate, generic effective rate or other pricing for the appealed drug as determined by the pharmacy benefits manager;
and      (d)   provide the name of wholesalers registered under P.L.1961, c.52 (C.24:6B-1 et seq.) from which the appealing pharmacy can obtain the brand or multiple source generic drug at or below the brand effective rate, generic effective rate, dispensing fee effective rate, maximum allowable cost or any other pricing formula for pharmacy reimbursement;
     (2)   If the appeal is approved, the pharmacy benefits manager shall make the price correction, permit the reporting pharmacy to reverse and rebill the appealed claim, and make the price correction effective for all similarly situated pharmacies from the date of the approved appeal.
     e.     A pharmacy benefits manager shall not terminate a pharmacy licensed in the State of New Jersey solely on the basis that the pharmacy offers and provides store direct delivery and mail prescriptions to an insured as an ancillary service.
(cf:
P.L.2015, c.179, s.4)        4.    (New section)  A pharmacy benefits manager or third-party payer shall not require pharmacy accreditation standards or recertification requirements to participate in a network which are inconsistent with, more stringent than, or in addition to, the federal and State requirements for a pharmacy in this State.
     5.    (New section)  The Commissioner of Banking and Insurance may review and approve the compensation program of a pharmacy benefits manager with a health benefits plan to ensure that the reimbursement for pharmacist services paid to a pharmacist or pharmacy is fair and reasonable to provide an adequate pharmacy benefits manager network for a health benefits plan.
       6.    (New section)  P.L.2015, c.179 (C.17B:27F-1 et seq.) shall apply to all pharmacy benefits managers operating in the State of New Jersey.
       7.    (New section)  A pharmacy benefits manager that violates any provision of P.L.2015, c.179 (C.17B:27F-1 et seq.) shall be subject to:
     a.     a warning notice;
     b.    an opportunity to cure the violation within 14 days following the issuance of the notice;
Show all 44 changed rows (4 more)
Previous
Latest
     c.     a hearing before the commissioner within 70 days following the issuance of the notice;
and      d.    if the violation has not been cured pursuant to subsection b.
of this section, a penalty of not less than $5,000 or more than $10,000 for each violation.
       8.    This act shall take effect on the 90th day next following enactment, except that section 7 of P.L.    , c.   (C.     ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill) shall take effect following the promulgation of regulations by the Department of Banking and Insurance implementing that section.
View plain text versions (3)

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What is the current status of S728?
This bill died with 2018-2019 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track S728?
Track S728 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on S728

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of S728

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →