Contracts; allowing certain owners to make certain requirement. Effective date.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1769 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1769.
You're tracking SB 1769
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1769 — Contracts; allowing certain owners to make certain requirement. Effective date.
Last action — Policy recommendation to the Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight committee; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Civil Judiciary
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 02, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
61 added · 60 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of Bill SB 1769, a few minor edits were made to streamline the language defining key terms related to short-term rentals. Specifically, some wording was clarified, but the core definitions of "guest" and "owner" remained unchanged. This matters because clear definitions help ensure everyone involved—property owners, renters, and guests—understands their rights and responsibilities when using short-term rental services. Ultimately, these changes are aimed at making the bill easier to understand without altering its intent.
SENATEENGROSSED FLOOR VERSION March 3, 2026 AS AMENDED SENATE BILL NO.
Thompson of the Senate and Duel of the House 75 An Act relating to contracts;
“Owner” means any person whose ownership interest appears on the most recently filed deed or instrument recorded with the county clerk in the county where the property is located, or any property SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB1769 SFLR Page 1 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) manager or other person designated by the owner to manage or oversee a short-term rental property;
3.ENGR.
S.
B.
NO.
1769 Page 1 3.
SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB1769 SFLR Page 2 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) C.
Any short-term rental platform operating in this state shall allow the option for owners to request identification, as provided for in paragraph 1 of subsection B of this section, and to cancel agreementsENGR. without penalty, as provided for in paragraph 2 of subsection B of this section.
S.
B.
NO.
1769 Page 2 agreements without penalty, as provided for in paragraph 2 of subsection B of this section.
COMMITTEEPassed REPORTthe BY:Senate the 11th day of March, 2026.
COMMITTEE6 ONPresiding JUDICIARYOfficer Marchof 3,the 2026Senate -8 DOPassed PASSthe ASHouse AMENDEDof 9Representatives SENATEthe FLOOR____ VERSIONday -of SB1769__________, SFLR2026. Page 3 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments)
Presiding Officer of the House of Representatives ENGR.
S.
B.
NO.
1769 Page 3
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Policy recommendation to the Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight committee; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Civil Judiciary
-
Referred to Civil Judiciary
-
Second Reading referred to Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight
-
First Reading
-
Engrossed to House
-
Referred for engrossment
-
Measure passed: Ayes: 41 Nays: 3
-
General Order, Considered
-
Placed on General Order
-
Reported Do Pass as amended Judiciary committee; CR filed
-
Coauthored by Representative Duel (principal House author)
-
Second Reading referred to Judiciary
-
Authored by Senator Thompson
-
First Reading
Sponsors
- Kristen Thompson · Primary
- Collin Duel · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Kristen Thompson Republican
- Collin Duel Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jared Deck | Democrat | Yea |
| Suzanne Schreiber | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Ed Culver | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Kannady | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Sneed | Republican | Yea |
| Collin Duel | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Osburn | Republican | Yea |
| Preston Stinson | Republican | Yea |
| Tammy West | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 35 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 41 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 6% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (48)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carri Hicks | Democrat | Yea |
| Jo Anna Dossett | Democrat | Yea |
| Julia Kirt | Democrat | Yea |
| Mark Mann | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mary B. Boren | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Michael Brooks | Democrat | Yea |
| Nikki Nice | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina Goodwin | Democrat | Yea |
| Ronald Stewart | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Aaron Reinhardt | Republican | Yea |
| Adam Pugh | Republican | Yea |
| Ally Seifried | Republican | Yea |
| Avery Frix | Republican | Not Voting |
| Bill Coleman | Republican | Yea |
| Brenda Stanley | Republican | Yea |
| Brent Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Guthrie | Republican | Yea |
| Bryan Logan | Republican | Yea |
| Casey Murdock | Republican | Yea |
| Christi Gillespie | Republican | Yea |
| Dana Prieto | Republican | Yea |
| Darcy Jech | Republican | Yea |
| Dave Rader | Republican | Yea |
| David Bullard | Republican | Yea |
| District 24 | Republican | Yea |
| Dusty Deevers | Republican | Nay |
| George Burns | Republican | Nay |
| Grant Green | Republican | Yea |
| Jerry Alvord | Republican | Yea |
| John Haste | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Wingard | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Daniels | Republican | Yea |
| Julie McIntosh | Republican | Yea |
| Kelly Hines | Republican | Yea |
| Kendal Sacchieri | Republican | Yea |
| Kristen Thompson | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Standridge | Republican | Yea |
| Lonnie Paxton | Republican | Yea |
| Micheal Bergstrom | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Rosino | Republican | Yea |
| Randy Grellner | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Roland Pederson | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Jett | Republican | Nay |
| Spencer Kern | Republican | Yea |
| Todd Gollihare | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Woods | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Hamilton | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| AMD SB1769 CA1 - ADOPTED | — | Not Voting |
| Mary B. Boren | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Brooks | Democrat | Yea |
| Brent Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Darcy Jech | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Standridge | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Rosino | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Jett | Republican | Yea |
| Todd Gollihare | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1769?
- SB 1769 is sponsored by Kristen Thompson (Republican) and Collin Duel (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1769?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 02, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 1769?
- Track SB 1769 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1769
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1769
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →