Child abduction prevention; creating the Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act; establishing requirements ...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 79 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 79.
You're tracking SB 79
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 79 — Child abduction prevention; creating the Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act; establishing requirements and procedures for abduction prevention orders. Effective date.
Last action — Coauthored by Representative Blair (principal House author)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
433 added · 726 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Senate Bill 79 introduces several important changes in how child abduction prevention measures are handled. Notably, it adds provisions for the involvement of law enforcement, specifying their authority to take certain actions to prevent imminent abduction. This is significant because it enhances communication and cooperation between courts and law enforcement, aiming to provide quicker and more effective responses to potential child abduction cases.
STATESENATE OFFLOOR OKLAHOMAVERSION 2February 1st19, Session2025 of the 60th Legislature (2025) 3 SENATE BILL 79NO. By:
Weaver79 4By: 5 AS INTRODUCED 7 An Act relating to child abduction prevention;
Weaver 5 An Act relating to child abduction prevention;
Req.BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
No.SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 1 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) SECTION 1.
733NEW PageLAW 1A 1new BEsection ITof ENACTEDlaw BYto THEbe PEOPLEcodified OFin THEthe STATEOklahoma OFStatutes OKLAHOMA:as Section 561-1 of Title 43, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
3This SECTIONact 1.shall be known and may be cited as the “Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act”.
NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 561-1 of Title 43, unless there 5 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
6 This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Uniform Child 7 Abduction Prevention Act”.
NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified 9 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 561-2 of Title 43, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
The term includes a proceeding for divorce, dissolution of marriage, separation, neglect, abuse, dependency, guardianship, Req.paternity, termination of parental rights, or protection from domestic violence;
No.SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 2 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) 5.
733 Page 2 paternity, termination of parental rights, or protection from 2 domestic violence;
3 5.
5 6.
6 7.
“Record” means information that is inscribed on a tangible 7 medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form;
9 8.
Req.SECTION 3.
No.NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 561-3 of Title 43, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
733SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 3 SECTION(Bold 3.face denotes Committee Amendments) The provisions of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act as provided in Sections 551-110, 551-111, and 551- 112 of Title 43 of the Oklahoma Statutes shall apply to cooperation and communications among courts in proceedings under this act.
NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified 2 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 561-3 of Title 43, unless there 3 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
The provisions of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and 5 Enforcement Act as provided in Sections 551-110, 551-111, and 551- 6 112 of Title 43 of the Oklahoma Statutes shall apply to cooperation 7 and communications among courts in proceedings under this act.
NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified 9 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 561-4 of Title 43, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
Req.SECTION 5.
No.NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 561-5 of Title 43, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
733 Page 4 SECTION 5.
NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified 2 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 561-5 of Title 43, unless there 3 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
A petition under this act may be filed only in a court that 5 has jurisdiction to make a child custody determination with respect 6SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 4 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) to the child at issue under Article 2 of the Uniform Child Custody 7 Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, Section 551-201 et seq.
9 B.
Req.3.
No.The identity, customary address, and current physical location of the respondent;
7334. Page 5 3.
TheA identity,statement customaryof address,whether a prior action to prevent abduction or domestic violence has been filed by a party or other individual or entity having custody of the child, and currentthe physicaldate, 2location, locationand disposition of the respondent;action;
3SENATE 4.FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 5 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) 5.
A statement of whether a priorparty action to preventthe abductionproceeding or domestic violence has been filedarrested byfor a partycrime orrelated otherto individualdomestic 5violence, stalking, or entitychild havingabuse custodyor ofneglect, the child, and the date, location, and 6 disposition of the action;case;
7 5.
A statement of whether a party to the proceeding has been arrested for a crime related to domestic violence, stalking, or 9 child abuse or neglect, and the date, location, and disposition of the case;
abandoning employment, Req.b.
No.selling a primary residence, c.
Show all 114 changed lines (74 more)
733terminating Pagea 6lease, b.d.
sellingclosing abank primaryor residence,other 2financial c.management accounts, liquidating assets, hiding or destroying financial documents, or conducting any unusual financial activities, SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 6 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) e.
terminatingapplying for a lease,passport 3or d.visa or obtaining travel documents for the respondent, a family member, or the child, or f.
closing bank or other financial management accounts, liquidating assets, hiding or destroying financial 5 documents, or conducting any unusual financial 6 activities, 7 e.
applying for a passport or visa or obtaining travel documents for the respondent, a family member, or the 9 child, or f.
is not a party to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and does not provide for the extradition of an abducting parent or for the return of an abducted child, Req.b.
No.is a party to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction but:
733(1) the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is not in force between the United States and that country, SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 7 b.(Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) (2) is noncompliant according to the most recent compliance report issued by the United States Department of State, or (3) lacks legal mechanisms for immediately and effectively enforcing a return order under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, c.
is a party to the Hague Convention on the Civil 2 Aspects of International Child Abduction but:
3 (1) the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is not in force 5 between the United States and that country, 6 (2) is noncompliant according to the most recent 7 compliance report issued by the United States Department of State, or 9 (3) lacks legal mechanisms for immediately and effectively enforcing a return order under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, c.
(1) enable the respondent, without due cause, to prevent the petitioner from contacting the child, (2) restrict the petitioner from freely traveling to or exiting from the country because of the petitioner’s gender, nationality, marital status, or religion, or Req.(3) restrict the child’s ability to legally leave the country after the child reaches the age of majority because of a child’s gender, nationality, or religion, SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 8 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) e.
No.is included by the United States Department of State on a current list of state sponsors of terrorism, f.
733does Pagenot 8have (3)an restrictofficial theUnited child’sStates abilitydiplomatic topresence legallyin leave the 2country, country after the child reaches the age of 3 majority because of a child’s gender, nationality, or religion,g. 5 e.
is included by the United States Department of State 6 on a current list of state sponsors of terrorism, 7 f.
does not have an official United States diplomatic presence in the country, or 9 g.
Req.B.
No.In the hearing on a petition under this act, the court shall consider any evidence that the respondent believed in good faith that the respondent’s conduct was necessary to avoid imminent harm to the child or respondent and any other evidence that may be SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 9 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) relevant to whether the respondent may be permitted to remove or retain the child.
733SECTION Page8. 9 B.
InNEW theLAW hearingA onnew asection petitionof underlaw thisto act,be thecodified court shall 2 consider any evidence that the respondent believed in good faith 3 that the respondent’sOklahoma conductStatutes wasas necessarySection to561-8 avoidof imminentTitle harm43, tounless thethere childis orcreated respondenta andduplication anyin othernumbering, evidencereads thatas mayfollows: be 5 relevant to whether the respondent may be permitted to remove or 6 retain the child.
7 SECTION 8.
NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 561-8 of Title 43, unless there 9 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
The order shall include the provisions Req.required by subsection A of this section and measures and conditions, including provisions in subsections C, D, and E of this section, that are reasonably calculated to prevent abduction of the child, giving due consideration to the custody and visitation rights SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 10 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) of the parties.
No.The court shall consider the age of the child, the potential harm to the child from an abduction, the legal and practical difficulties of returning the child to the jurisdiction if abducted, and the reasons for the potential abduction, including evidence of domestic violence, stalking, or child abuse or neglect.
733 Page 10 required by subsection A of this section and measures and 2 conditions, including provisions in subsections C, D, and E of this 3 section, that are reasonably calculated to prevent abduction of the child, giving due consideration to the custody and visitation rights 5 of the parties.
The court shall consider the age of the child, the 6 potential harm to the child from an abduction, the legal and 7 practical difficulties of returning the child to the jurisdiction if abducted, and the reasons for the potential abduction, including 9 evidence of domestic violence, stalking, or child abuse or neglect.
removing or retaining the child in violation of a child custody determination, Req.c.
No.removing the child from school or a child care or similar facility, or d.
733 Page 11 c.
removing the child from school or a child care or 2 similar facility, or 3 d.
5SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 11 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) 3.
A requirement that a party register the order in another 6 state as a prerequisite to allowing the child to travel to that 7 state;
9 a.
to the United States Department of State Office of Children’s Issues and the relevant foreign consulate or embassy, an authenticated copy of the order Req.detailing passport and travel restrictions for the child, b.
No.
733 Page 12 detailing passport and travel restrictions for the 2 child, 3 b.
SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 12 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) (1) proof that the respondent has provided the 5 information in subparagraph a of this paragraph, 6 and 7 (2) an acknowledgment in a record from the relevant foreign consulate or embassy that no passport 9 application has been made, or passport issued, on behalf of the child, c.
and Req.6.
No.Upon the petitioner’s request, a requirement that the respondent obtain an order from the relevant foreign country containing terms identical to the child custody determination issued in the United States.
733SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 13 6.(Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) D.
UponIn thean petitioner’sabduction request,prevention aorder, requirement that the 2court respondentmay obtainimpose anconditions orderon from the relevantexercise foreignof country 3 containing terms identical to the child custody determinationor issuedvisitation inthat: the United States.
51. D.
InLimit anvisitation abductionor preventionrequire order,that visitation with the child by the respondent be supervised until the court mayfinds imposethat 6supervision conditionsis onno longer necessary and order the exerciserespondent ofto custodypay orthe visitationcosts that:of supervision;
7 1.
Limit visitation or require that visitation with the child by the respondent be supervised until the court finds that 9 supervision is no longer necessary and order the respondent to pay the costs of supervision;
or Req.3.
No.Grant any other relief allowed under the laws of this state other than this act.
733F. Page 14 3.
Grant any other relief allowed under the laws of this state 2 other than this act.
3 F.
5SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 14 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) SECTION 9.
NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified 6 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 561-9 of Title 43, unless there 7 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
If a petition under this act contains allegations, and the 9 court finds that there is a credible risk that the child is imminently likely to be wrongfully removed, the court may issue an ex parte warrant to take physical custody of the child.
and Req.4.
No.Provide for the safe interim placement of the child pending further order of the court.
733D. Page 15 4.
ProvideIf forfeasible, thebefore safeissuing interima warrant and before determining the placement of the child pendingafter 2the furtherwarrant is executed, the court SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 15 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) may order a search of the court.relevant databases of the National Crime Information Center system and similar state databases to determine if either the petitioner or respondent has a history of domestic violence, stalking, or child abuse or neglect.
3E. D.
If feasible, before issuing a warrant and before determining the placement of the child after the warrant is executed, the court 5 may order a search of the relevant databases of the National Crime 6 Information Center system and similar state databases to determine 7 if either the petitioner or respondent has a history of domestic violence, stalking, or child abuse or neglect.
9 E.
Req.SECTION 10.
No.NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 561-10 of Title 43, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
733An Pageabduction 16prevention SECTIONorder 10.remains in effect until the earliest of the:
NEWSENATE LAWFLOOR AVERSION new- sectionSB79 ofSFLR lawPage to16 be(Bold codifiedface 2denotes inCommittee theAmendments) Oklahoma1. Statutes as Section 561-10 of Title 43, unless there 3 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
An abduction prevention order remains in effect until the 5 earliest of the:
6 1.
7 2.
or 9 4.
This act modifies, limits, and supersedes the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C., Section 7001 et seq., but does not modify, limit, or supersede 15 U.S.C., Req.Section 7001(c), or authorize electronic delivery of any of the notices described in 15 U.S.C., Section 7003(b).
No.SECTION 13.
733 Page 17 Section 7001(c), or authorize electronic delivery of any of the 2 notices described in 15 U.S.C., Section 7003(b).
3 SECTION 13.
4COMMITTEE 60-1-733REPORT TEKBY: 1/19/2025 5:43:21 AM 6 7 8 9 Req.
No.COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY February 19, 2025 - DO PASS SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB79 SFLR Page 17 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments)
733 Page 18
Show all 114 changed rows (74 more)
Action History
-
Coauthored by Representative Blair (principal House author)
-
Placed on General Order
-
Reported Do Pass Judiciary committee; CR filed
-
Second Reading referred to Judiciary
-
Authored by Senator Weaver
-
First Reading
Sponsors
- District 24 · Primary
- Jason Blair · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- District 24 Republican
- Jason Blair Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mary B. Boren | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Brooks | Democrat | Yea |
| Brent Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Darcy Jech | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Standridge | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Rosino | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Jett | Republican | Yea |
| Todd Gollihare | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 79?
- SB 79 is sponsored by District 24 (Republican) and Jason Blair (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 79?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 79?
- Track SB 79 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 79
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 79
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →