Dissolution of marriage; automatic temporary injunction and temporary orders. Emergency.
The bill modifies the Oklahoma Discovery Code to require disclosure of commercial litigation funding agreements upon request. It also sets certain rules regarding the admissibility of information related to these agreements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 625 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 625.
You're tracking SB 625
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 625 — Dissolution of marriage; automatic temporary injunction and temporary orders. Emergency.
Last action — HAs read
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 03, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Signed by Governor Kevin Stitt (Republican) on May 06, 2026.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill regulates the use of commercial litigation funding agreements in Oklahoma.
The bill modifies the Oklahoma Discovery Code to require disclosure of commercial litigation funding agreements upon request. It also sets certain rules regarding the admissibility of information related to these agreements.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
608 added · 613 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of SB 625 updates the Oklahoma Discovery Code by refining the language around how parties can obtain information relevant to their claims or defenses. This amendment specifies the different methods of discovery, such as written questions and document production, while also making grammatical adjustments for clarity. These changes are significant as they aim to streamline the discovery process in legal proceedings, making it easier for parties to gather necessary information efficiently and effectively.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - FLOOR VERSION STATE OF OKLAHOMA 2nd Session of the 60th Legislature (2026) ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO.
Howard of the Senate and Harris of the House 85 An Act relating to the Oklahoma Discovery Code;
production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other SB625property, HFLRfor Pageinspection 1and BOLDother FACEpurposes; denotes Committee Amendments.
property, for inspection and other purposes;
ExceptENGR. as provided in this section or unless the court orders otherwise under this section, the frequency of use of these methods is not limited.
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 1 Except as provided in this section or unless the court orders otherwise under this section, the frequency of use of these methods is not limited.
Subject to subsection B of this section, in any action in which physical or mental injury is claimed, the party making the claim shall provide to the other parties a release or authorization allowing the parties to obtain relevant medical records and bills, and, when relevant, a SB625release HFLRor Pageauthorization 2for BOLDemployment FACEand denotesscholastic Committeerecords. Amendments.
releaseENGR. or authorization for employment and scholastic records.
b.S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 2 b.
Disclosures required under this paragraph shall be made at or within sixty (60) days after service unless a different time is set by stipulation or court order, or unless a party objects that initial disclosures are SB625not HFLRappropriate Pagein 3the BOLDcircumstances FACEof denotesthe Committeeaction Amendments.and states the objection in a motion filed with the court.
notENGR. appropriate in the circumstances of the action and states the objection in a motion filed with the court.
InS. ruling on the objection, the court shall determine what disclosures, if any, are to be made and set the time for disclosure.
B.
NO.
625 Page 3 In ruling on the objection, the court shall determine what disclosures, if any, are to be made and set the time for disclosure.
Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to any party’s claim or defense, reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the parties’ resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the SB625burden HFLRor Pageexpense 4of BOLDthe FACEproposed denotesdiscovery Committeeoutweighs Amendments.its likely benefit.
burdenInformation orwithin expensethis scope of theENGR. proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit.
InformationS. within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.
B.
NO.
625 Page 4 discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.
Production of a commercial litigation funding agreement shall include a certification by sworn affidavit by the producing party as to whether any funds encumbered by the terms SB625of HFLRthe Pageagreement 5have BOLDbeen FACEor denoteswill Committeebe Amendments.sourced from a foreign state or agency or instrumentality of a ENGR.
ofS. the agreement have been or will be sourced from a foreign state or agency or instrumentality of a foreign state as defined in 28 U.S.C., Section 1603, as amended.
B.
NO.
625 Page 5 foreign state as defined in 28 U.S.C., Section 1603, as amended.
The certification shall also include an admission or denial as to whether the party is under the control or direction of an entity SB625controlled HFLRby Pagea 6foreign BOLDadversary FACEand denoteswhether Committeethe Amendments.party will allow access to any documents or ENGR.
controlledS. by a foreign adversary and whether the party will allow access to any documents or information arising in the litigation not generally available to the public to an entity controlled by a foreign adversary.
B.
NO.
625 Page 6 information arising in the litigation not generally available to the public to an entity controlled by a foreign adversary.
SB625 HFLR Page 7 BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.
A party is not required to provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the party identifies as not reasonably accessible becauseENGR. of undue burden or cost.
S.
Show all 148 changed lines (108 more)
B.
NO.
625 Page 7 because of undue burden or cost.
(1) the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or can be obtained from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive, (2) the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity to obtain the information by discovery in the action, or SB625(3) HFLRthe Pageproposed 8discovery BOLDis FACEoutside denotesthe Committeescope Amendments.permitted by subparagraph a of paragraph 1 of this subsection.
(3) the proposed discovery is outside the scope permitted by subparagraph a of paragraph 1 of this subsection.
If an officer, director or managing agent of a corporation or a government official is served with noticeENGR. of a deposition or subpoena regarding a matter about which he or she has no knowledge, he or she may submit at a reasonable time prior to the date of the deposition an affidavit to the noticing party so stating and identifying a person within the corporation or government entity who has knowledge of the subject matter involved in the pending action.
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 8 notice of a deposition or subpoena regarding a matter about which he or she has no knowledge, he or she may submit at a reasonable time prior to the date of the deposition an affidavit to the noticing party so stating and identifying a person within the corporation or government entity who has knowledge of the subject matter involved in the pending action.
SB625(1) HFLRthey Pageare 9otherwise BOLDdiscoverable FACEunder denotesparagraph Committee1 Amendments.of this subsection, and (2) the party shows that it has substantial need for the materials to prepare its case and cannot, ENGR.
(1)S. they are otherwise discoverable under paragraph 1 of this subsection, and (2) the party shows that it has substantial need for the materials to prepare its case and cannot, without undue hardship, obtain their substantial equivalent by other means.
B.
NO.
625 Page 9 without undue hardship, obtain their substantial equivalent by other means.
(1) a written statement that the person has signed or otherwise adopted or approved, or (2) a contemporaneous stenographic, mechanical, electrical, or other recording, or a transcription thereof, which recites SB625substantially HFLRverbatim Pagethe 10person’s BOLDoral FACEstatement. denotes Committee Amendments.
substantially verbatim the person’s oral statement.
a.ENGR.
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 10 a.
Prior to taking the deposition the party must give notice as required in subsections A and C of Section 3230 of this title, and (3) in addition to taking the depositions of expert witnesses the party may, through interrogatories, require the party who expects to call the expert SB625witnesses HFLRto Pagestate 11the BOLDsubject FACEmatter denoteson Committeewhich Amendments.each expert witness is expected to testify;
witnessesthe tosubstance stateof the subjectfacts matterand onopinions to which eachthe expertENGR. witness is expected to testify;
theS. substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion;
B.
NO.
625 Page 11 expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion;
The protection provided by paragraph 3 of this subsection extends to communications between the party’s attorney and any expert witness retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in the case or whose duties as the party’s employee regularly SB625involve HFLRgiving Pageexpert 12testimony, BOLDexcept FACEto denotesthe Committeeextent Amendments.that the communications:
involve(1) givingrelate expertto testimony,compensation exceptfor to the extentexpert’s thatstudy theor communications:testimony, ENGR.
(1)S. relate to compensation for the expert’s study or testimony, (2) identify facts or data that the party’s attorney provided and that the expert considered in forming the opinions to be expressed, or (3) identify assumptions that the party’s attorney provided and that the expert relied upon in forming the opinions to be expressed.
B.
NO.
625 Page 12 (2) identify facts or data that the party’s attorney provided and that the expert considered in forming the opinions to be expressed, or (3) identify assumptions that the party’s attorney provided and that the expert relied upon in forming the opinions to be expressed.
(1) the court shall require that the party seeking discovery pay the expert a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery under SB625division HFLR(2) Pageof 13subparagraph BOLDa FACEof denotesthis Committeeparagraph Amendments.and subparagraph c of this paragraph, and (2) the court shall require that the party seeking discovery with respect to discovery obtained ENGR.
divisionS. (2) of subparagraph a of this paragraph and subparagraph c of this paragraph, and (2) the court shall require that the party seeking discovery with respect to discovery obtained under subparagraph c of this paragraph, pay the other party a fair portion of the fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the latter party in obtaining facts and opinions from the expert.
B.
NO.
625 Page 13 under subparagraph c of this paragraph, pay the other party a fair portion of the fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the latter party in obtaining facts and opinions from the expert.
If information produced in discovery is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, the party making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the SB625claim HFLRand Pagethe 14basis BOLDfor FACEit. denotes Committee Amendments.
claim and the basis for it.
shall not use or disclose the information until the claimENGR. is resolved;
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 14 claim is resolved;
Upon motion by a party or by the person from whom discovery is sought, accompanied by a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer, either in person or by telephone, with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action, and for good cause shown, the court in which the action is pending or on matters relating to a deposition, the district court in the county where the deposition is to be taken may enter any order which justice requires to protect a party or SB625person HFLRfrom Pageannoyance, 15harassment, BOLDembarrassment, FACEoppression denotesor Committeeundue Amendments.delay, burden or expense, including one or more of the following:
person from annoyance, harassment, embarrassment, oppression or undue delay, burden or expense, including one or more of the following:
that the discovery not be had, b.ENGR.
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 15 b.
SB625 HFLR Page 16 BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.
The provisions of paragraph 4 of subsection A of Section 3237 of this title apply to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion.ENGR.
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 16 motion.
This requirement may also be satisfied by requiring the party to file the documents pursuant to the procedure for electronically filing sealed or SB625confidential HFLRdocuments Pageapproved 17for BOLDelectronic FACEfiling denotesin Committeethe Amendments.courts of this state.
confidential documents approved for electronic filing in the courts of this state.
4.ENGR.
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 17 4.
SB625 HFLR Page 18 BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.
The fact that a party is conductingENGR. discovery, whether by deposition or otherwise, shall not operate to delay discovery by any other party.
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 18 conducting discovery, whether by deposition or otherwise, shall not operate to delay discovery by any other party.
(1) the party knows that the response was incorrect in some material respect when made, or SB625(2) HFLRthe Pageparty 19knows BOLDthat FACEthe denotesresponse, Committeewhich Amendments.was correct when made, is no longer true in some material respect, and ENGR.
(2)S. the party knows that the response, which was correct when made, is no longer true in some material respect, and b.
B.
NO.
625 Page 19 b.
Objections or additions to matters set forth in the SB625motion HFLRshall Pagebe 20served BOLDnot FACElater denotesthan Committeeten Amendments.(10) days after service of the motion.
motionENGR. shall be served not later than ten (10) days after service of the motion.
FollowingS. the discovery conference, the court shall enter an order tentatively identifying the issues for discovery purposes, establishing a plan and schedule for discovery, setting limitations on discovery, if any;
B.
NO.
625 Page 20 Following the discovery conference, the court shall enter an order tentatively identifying the issues for discovery purposes, establishing a plan and schedule for discovery, setting limitations on discovery, if any;
SB625 HFLR Page 21 BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.
To the best of the party’s knowledge, information and belief formed after a reasonable inquiry consistent with the Oklahoma DiscoveryENGR. Code and warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law;
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 21 Discovery Code and warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law;
SB625 HFLR Page 22 BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.
“Commercial litigation funder” means any person or entity, other than an attorney permitted to charge a contingent fee representing a party, that enters into a contract establishing a rightENGR. to receive compensation that is contingent on and sourced from any proceeds of the civil action by settlement, judgment, or otherwise.
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 22 right to receive compensation that is contingent on and sourced from any proceeds of the civil action by settlement, judgment, or otherwise.
SB625 HFLR Page 23 BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.
a foreign person that is a national of, is headquartered in, has its principal place of business in,ENGR. or is organized under the law of a foreign adversary country, b.
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 23 in, or is organized under the law of a foreign adversary country, b.
COMMITTEEPassed REPORTthe BY:Senate the 24th day of March, 2025.
COMMITTEEPresiding ONOfficer RULES,of datedthe 04/06/2026Senate -Passed DOthe PASS.House of Representatives the ____ day of __________, 2025.
SB625Presiding HFLROfficer Pageof 24the BOLDHouse FACEof denotesRepresentatives CommitteeENGR. Amendments.
S.
B.
NO.
625 Page 24
Show all 148 changed rows (108 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Engrossed View text Current pdf
- Floor (House) View text pdf
- Floor (Senate) View text pdf
- Amended Amended And Engrossed pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
HAs read
-
Engrossed, signed, to Senate
-
Referred for engrossment
-
Third Reading, Measure and Emergency passed: Ayes: 81 Nays: 0
-
Emergency added
-
Amended by floor substitute
-
General Order
-
CR; Do Pass Rules Committee
-
Referred to Rules
-
Withdrawn from Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Committee
-
Withdrawn from Civil Judiciary Committee
-
Referred to Civil Judiciary
-
Second Reading referred to Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight
-
First Reading
-
Engrossed to House
-
Referred for engrossment
-
Measure passed: Ayes: 39 Nays: 8
-
General Order, Considered
-
Coauthored by Representative Harris (principal House author)
-
Placed on General Order
-
Reported Do Pass Judiciary committee; CR filed
-
Second Reading referred to Judiciary
-
Authored by Senator Howard
-
First Reading
Sponsors
- Brent Howard · Primary
- Erick Harris · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Brent Howard Republican
- Erick Harris Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 65 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| Democrat | 13 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 81 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 0% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (100)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alonso-Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Mr. Speaker | — | Yea |
| VACANCY: | — | Not Voting |
| Crosswhite Hader | — | Yea |
| Aletia Timmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Amanda Clinton | Democrat | Yea |
| Andy Fugate | Democrat | Yea |
| Annie Menz | Democrat | Yea |
| Cyndi Munson | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Ellen Pogemiller | Democrat | Yea |
| Ellyn Hefner | Democrat | Yea |
| Jacob Rosecrants | Democrat | Yea |
| Jared Deck | Democrat | Yea |
| John Waldron | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Melissa Provenzano | Democrat | Yea |
| Meloyde Blancett | Democrat | Yea |
| Michelle McCane | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mickey Dollens | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Ronald Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Suzanne Schreiber | Democrat | Yea |
| Trish Ranson | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Moore | Republican | Yea |
| Bob Ed Culver | Republican | Yea |
| Brad Boles | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Newton | Republican | Yea |
| Chad Caldwell | Republican | Not Voting |
| Chris Banning | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Kannady | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Sneed | Republican | Yea |
| Clay Staires | Republican | Yea |
| Cody Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Collin Duel | Republican | Yea |
| Cynthia Roe | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Pae | Republican | Yea |
| Danny Sterling | Republican | Yea |
| Danny Williams | Republican | Yea |
| David Hardin | Republican | Yea |
| David Smith | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dell Kerbs | Republican | Not Voting |
| Derrick Hildebrant | Republican | Yea |
| Dick Lowe | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dillon Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Eddy Dempsey | Republican | Yea |
| Emily Gise | Republican | Not Voting |
| Eric Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Erick Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Gabe Woolley | Republican | Yea |
| Gerrid Kendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Blair | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Steagall | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jim Grego | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jim Olsen | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Shaw | Republican | Yea |
| John George | Republican | Yea |
| John Kane | Republican | Yea |
| John Pfeiffer | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jonathan Wilk | Republican | Yea |
| Josh Cantrell | Republican | Yea |
| Josh West | Republican | Yea |
| Judd Strom | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Humphrey | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ken Luttrell | Republican | Not Voting |
| Kenton Patzkowsky | Republican | Not Voting |
| Kevin Norwood | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin West | Republican | Not Voting |
| Marilyn Stark | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Lawson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Mark Lepak | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Tedford | Republican | Yea |
| Max Wolfley | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Dobrinski | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Kelley | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Lay | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Osburn | Republican | Yea |
| Molly Jenkins | Republican | Yea |
| Neil Hays | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Archer | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Preston Stinson | Republican | Yea |
| Rande Worthen | Republican | Yea |
| Rick West | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Robert Manger | Republican | Yea |
| Ronny Johns | Republican | Yea |
| Ross Ford | Republican | Yea |
| Rusty Cornwell | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Eaves | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Fetgatter | Republican | Yea |
| Stacy Jo Adams | Republican | Yea |
| Stan May | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Bashore | Republican | Yea |
| T.J. Marti | Republican | Yea |
| Tammy Townley | Republican | Yea |
| Tammy West | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Turner | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Gann | Republican | Yea |
| Toni Hasenbeck | Republican | Yea |
| Trey Caldwell | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andy Fugate | Democrat | Yea |
| Ellyn Hefner | Democrat | Yea |
| Erick Harris | Republican | Yea |
| John George | Republican | Yea |
| John Pfeiffer | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Lawson | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Osburn | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Archer | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Bashore | Republican | Yea |
| Tammy West | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (47)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carri Hicks | Democrat | Nay |
| Jo Anna Dossett | Democrat | Nay |
| Julia Kirt | Democrat | Nay |
| Mark Mann | Democrat | Nay |
| Mary B. Boren | Democrat | Nay |
| Michael Brooks | Democrat | Nay |
| Nikki Nice | Democrat | Nay |
| Regina Goodwin | Democrat | Nay |
| Aaron Reinhardt | Republican | Yea |
| Adam Pugh | Republican | Yea |
| Ally Seifried | Republican | Yea |
| Avery Frix | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Coleman | Republican | Yea |
| Brenda Stanley | Republican | Yea |
| Brent Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Guthrie | Republican | Yea |
| Casey Murdock | Republican | Yea |
| Christi Gillespie | Republican | Yea |
| Chuck Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Dana Prieto | Republican | Yea |
| Darcy Jech | Republican | Yea |
| Dave Rader | Republican | Yea |
| David Bullard | Republican | Yea |
| District 24 | Republican | Yea |
| Dusty Deevers | Republican | Yea |
| George Burns | Republican | Yea |
| Grant Green | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Stewart | Republican | Yea |
| Jerry Alvord | Republican | Yea |
| John Haste | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Wingard | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Daniels | Republican | Yea |
| Julie McIntosh | Republican | Yea |
| Kelly Hines | Republican | Yea |
| Kendal Sacchieri | Republican | Yea |
| Kristen Thompson | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Standridge | Republican | Yea |
| Lonnie Paxton | Republican | Yea |
| Micheal Bergstrom | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Rosino | Republican | Yea |
| Randy Grellner | Republican | Yea |
| Roland Pederson | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Jett | Republican | Yea |
| Spencer Kern | Republican | Yea |
| Todd Gollihare | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Woods | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Hamilton | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mary B. Boren | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Brooks | Democrat | Nay |
| Brent Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Darcy Jech | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Standridge | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Rosino | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Jett | Republican | Yea |
| Todd Gollihare | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 625?
- SB 625 is sponsored by Brent Howard (Republican) and Erick Harris (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 625?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 03, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 625?
- Track SB 625 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 625
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 625
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →