SB 1007 — Conservation District Act; modifying definitions. Effective date.
Last action — Placed on General Order
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
67 added · 127 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill SB 1007 made changes to definitions in the Conservation District Act. Specifically, the wording for terms like "District" and "Director" was streamlined for clarity and consistency. These updates are important because they help ensure that the law is easier to understand and apply, making it more effective in guiding conservation efforts in Oklahoma.
STATESENATE OFFLOOR OKLAHOMAVERSION 2February 1st17, Session2025 of the 60th Legislature (2025) 3 SENATE BILL 1007NO. By:
Murdock1007 4By: 5 AS INTRODUCED 7 An Act relating to the Conservation District Act;
Murdock 5 An Act relating to the Conservation District Act;
Req.4.
No.
845 Page 1 4.
2SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB1007 SFLR Page 1 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) 5.
“Agency of this state” includes “Agency” or “agency of this 3 state” means the government of this state and any subdivision, agency or instrumentality, whether corporate or otherwise, of the 5 government of this state;
6 6.
“United States” or “agencies of the United States” includes 7 the United States of America, and any department, agency or instrumentality of the federal government;
9 7.
Req.SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB1007 SFLR Page 2 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) 9.
No.“District cooperator” means any person that has entered into a cooperative agreement with a conservation district for the purpose of protecting, conserving and practicing wise use of the renewable natural resources under his or her control;
84510. Page 2 9.
“District“Renewable cooperator”natural meansresources”, any“natural personresources” thator has“resources” enteredinclude intoland, 2soil, awater, cooperativevegetation, agreementtrees, withnatural abeauty, conservationscenery district for the purpose 3 of protecting, conserving and practicingopen wisespace; use of the renewable natural resources under his or her control;
5 10.
“Renewable natural resources”, “natural resources” or 6 “resources” include land, soil, water, vegetation, trees, natural 7 beauty, scenery and open space;
“Conservation” includes conservation, development, 9 improvement, maintenance, management, preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, protection and wise use of land, water and related natural resources;
Req.SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB1007 SFLR Page 3 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) 15.
No.“Pollution” shall have the same meaning as such word is defined by the Oklahoma Environmental Quality Act;
84516. Page 3 15.
“Pollution”“Nonpoint shallsource haveworking group” means an advisory group established by the sameOklahoma meaningConservation asCommission suchto wordprovide input into the state’s nonpoint source management and assessment program and is 2open definedto byfederal, thestate Oklahomaand Environmentallocal Qualityenvironmental Act;agencies and natural resource agencies and other interested groups;
3 16.
“Nonpoint source working group” means an advisory group established by the Oklahoma Conservation Commission to provide input 5 into the state’s nonpoint source management and assessment program 6 and is open to federal, state and local environmental agencies and 7 natural resource agencies and other interested groups;
“Watershed” means an area of land that drains to a given 9 point;
Req.SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB1007 SFLR Page 4 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) a.
No.has earned a baccalaureate or higher degree in a field of soil science from an institution of higher education which is accredited by a regional or national accrediting agency, with a minimum of thirty (30) semester hours or forty-five (45) quarter hours of undergraduate work in a field of biological, physical, or earth science with a minimum of fifteen (15) semester hours of core soil science courses, and b.
845 Page 4 a.
has earned a baccalaureate or higher degree in a field 2 of soil science from an institution of higher 3 education which is accredited by a regional or national accrediting agency, with a minimum of thirty 5 (30) semester hours or forty-five (45) quarter hours 6 of undergraduate work in a field of biological, 7 physical, or earth science with a minimum of fifteen (15) semester hours of core soil science courses, and 9 b.
60-1-845COMMITTEE RDREPORT 1/16/2025BY: 2:21:00 PM Req.
No.COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND WILDLIFE February 17, 2025 - DO PASS SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB1007 SFLR Page 5 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments)
845 Page 5
Action History
-
Placed on General Order
-
Reported Do Pass Agriculture and Wildlife committee; CR filed
-
Second Reading referred to Agriculture and Wildlife
-
Authored by Senator Murdock
-
First Reading
Sponsors
- Casey Murdock · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Casey Murdock Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (150)
150 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 150 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carri Hicks | Democrat | Yea |
| Nikki Nice | Democrat | Yea |
| Casey Murdock | Republican | Yea |
| Dana Prieto | Republican | Yea |
| David Bullard | Republican | Yea |
| George Burns | Republican | Yea |
| Grant Green | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Wingard | Republican | Yea |
| Randy Grellner | Republican | Yea |
| Roland Pederson | Republican | Yea |
| Spencer Kern | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Woods | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1007?
- SB 1007 is sponsored by Casey Murdock (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1007?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 1007?
- Track SB 1007 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1007
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1007
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →