Counties; creating the Citizen Access to County Facilities Act. Effective date.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 935 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 935.
You're tracking SB 935
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 935 — Counties; creating the Citizen Access to County Facilities Act. Effective date.
Last action — Coauthored by Representative Cantrell (principal House author)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
121 added · 169 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Senate Bill 935 includes a clearer definition of what constitutes a "county" and specifies what is meant by "county facilities." These changes provide more precise language, which helps ensure everyone understands what locations are covered under the new law. This matters because it clarifies the extent of access and protections for citizens using county resources, promoting transparency and accountability in county operations.
STATESENATE OFFLOOR OKLAHOMAVERSION 2February 1st11, Session2025 of the 60th Legislature (2025) 3 SENATE BILL 935NO. By:
Jett935 4By: 5 AS INTRODUCED 7 An Act relating to counties;
Jett 5 An Act relating to counties;
Req.2.
No.“County facilities” means buildings or lands owned and maintained by a county that include, but are not limited to:
1549SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB935 SFLR Page 1 2.(Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) a.
“County facilities” means buildings or lands owned and 2 maintained by a county that include, but are not limited to:
3 a.
senior center, 5 c.
barn, and 6 d.
7 3.
“Inherent risks of an activity using county facilities” means those dangers or conditions that are inherent in an event or 9 activity, including certain hazards, surface and subsurface conditions, natural conditions of land, vegetation, and waters, and ordinary dangers of structures or equipment present in county facilities.
In addition to any limitations of liability afforded pursuant to The Governmental Tort Claims Act and except as provided in subsection B of this section, a county shall not be liable for Req.injury to or death of a participant resulting from the inherent risks of an activity using county facilities, so long as the warning SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB935 SFLR Page 2 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) contained in Section 4 of this act is posted as required and, except as provided in subsection B of this section, no participant or participant’s representative can maintain an action against or recover damages from a county for injury, loss, damage, or death of the participant resulting exclusively from any of the inherent risks of an activity using county facilities.
No.In any action for damages against a county for an activity using county facilities, the county must plead the affirmative defense of assumption of the inherent risks of an activity using county facilities by the participant.
1549 Page 2 injury to or death of a participant resulting from the inherent 2 risks of an activity using county facilities, so long as the warning 3 contained in Section 4 of this act is posted as required and, except as provided in subsection B of this section, no participant or 5 participant’s representative can maintain an action against or 6 recover damages from a county for injury, loss, damage, or death of 7 the participant resulting exclusively from any of the inherent risks of an activity using county facilities.
In any action for damages 9 against a county for an activity using county facilities, the county must plead the affirmative defense of assumption of the inherent risks of an activity using county facilities by the participant.
Req.C.
No.Any limitation on legal liability afforded by this section to a county is in addition to any other limitations of legal liability otherwise provided by law.
1549SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB935 SFLR Page 3 C.(Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) D.
AnyThe limitationdistrict onattorney legalshall liabilitybe affordedallowed byto thisissue sectionan 2indemnification toof alimited countyliability isfor inthe additionfair touse anyof othercounty limitationsfacilities offor legala 3county liabilitywithin otherwisehis providedor byher law.district.
D.SECTION 4.
TheNEW districtLAW attorneyA shallnew besection allowedof law to issuebe ancodified 5in indemnificationthe ofOklahoma limitedStatutes liabilityas forSection the420.3 fairof useTitle of19, countyunless 6there facilitiesis forcreated a countyduplication withinin hisnumbering, orreads heras district.follows:
7 SECTION 4.
NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 420.3 of Title 19, unless there 9 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
Req.Inherent risks of activities using county facilities include, among others, risks of injury inherent to land and equipment, as well as the potential for you to act in a negligent manner that may SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB935 SFLR Page 4 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments) contribute to your injury or death.
No.You are assuming the risk of participating in this activity using county facilities.” C.
1549Failure Pageto 4comply Inherentwith risksthe ofrequirements activitiesconcerning usingwarning countysigns facilities include, among 2 others, risks of injury inherent to land and equipment,notices asprovided wellin asthis 3section theshall potentialprevent for you to act in a negligentcounty mannerfrom thatinvoking maythe contributeprivileges toof yourimmunity injuryprovided orby death.this act.
YouSECTION are5. assuming the risk of 5 participating in this activity using county facilities.” 6 C.
Failure to comply with the requirements concerning warning 7 signs and notices provided in this section shall prevent a county from invoking the privileges of immunity provided by this act.
9 SECTION 5.
60-1-1549COMMITTEE MSBBREPORT 1/19/2025BY: 5:46:18 AM Req.
No.COMMITTEE ON LOCAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT February 11, 2025 - DO PASS SENATE FLOOR VERSION - SB935 SFLR Page 5 (Bold face denotes Committee Amendments)
1549 Page 5
Action History
-
Coauthored by Representative Cantrell (principal House author)
-
Placed on General Order
-
Reported Do Pass Local and County Government committee; CR filed
-
Second Reading referred to Local and County Government
-
Authored by Senator Jett
-
First Reading
Sponsors
- Shane Jett · Primary
- Josh Cantrell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Shane Jett Republican
- Josh Cantrell Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nikki Nice | Democrat | Nay |
| Regina Goodwin | Democrat | Nay |
| Brenda Stanley | Republican | Yea |
| Dana Prieto | Republican | Yea |
| George Burns | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Stewart | Republican | Yea |
| Jerry Alvord | Republican | Yea |
| Kendal Sacchieri | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Hamilton | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 935?
- SB 935 is sponsored by Shane Jett (Republican) and Josh Cantrell (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 935?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 935?
- Track SB 935 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 935
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 935
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →