A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact subsection 9 of section 57-51.1-07.5 and sections 57-51.1-07.7 and 5...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 2208 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 2208.
You're tracking SB 2208
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 2208 — A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact subsection 9 of section 57-51.1-07.5 and sections 57-51.1-07.7 and 57-51.1-07.8 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the state share of oil and gas tax revenue allocations, the municipal infrastructure fund, and the county and township infrastructure fund.
Last action — Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 19 nays 27
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Relating to the state share of oil and gas tax revenue allocations, the municipal infrastructure fund, and the county and township infrastructure fund.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
164 added · 111 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Senate Bill 2208 includes a new provision that mandates the allocation of $59.75 million in oil and gas tax revenue to support infrastructure development specifically in non-oil-producing counties. This money will be split evenly between a municipal infrastructure fund and a county and township infrastructure fund. The changes matter because they enhance financial support for local infrastructure projects in areas that may not benefit directly from oil production, ensuring that all regions have opportunities for development and improvement of essential services.
25.1104.0100025.1104.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO.
2208 of North Dakota Introduced by Senators Patten, Bekkedahl, Erbele, Kessel Representatives Brandenburg, Porter A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact subsection 9 of section 57-51.1-07.5 and sections 57-51.1-07.7 and 57-51.1-07.8 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the state share of oil and gas tax revenue allocations, the municipal infrastructure fundfund, and the county and township infrastructure fund.
Subsection 9 of section 57-51.1-07.5 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
9.
The next fifty-nine million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars, or the amount necessary to provide for twice the amount of the distributions under subsection 24 of section 57-51.1-07.7, into the funds designated for infrastructure development in non-oil-producing counties under sections 57-51.1-07.7 and 57-51.1-07.8 with fifty percent deposited into the municipal infrastructure fund and fifty percent deposited into the county and township infrastructure fund;
SECTION 2.
AMENDMENT.
The grant funding mayPage beNo. distributed only to cities located in non-oil-producing counties, excluding hub cities, and may be used only for essential infrastructure projects.
1 25.1104.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly may be distributed only to cities located in non-oil-producing counties, excluding hub cities, and may be used only for essential infrastructure projects.
Page3. No.
1 25.1104.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 3.
If a city adopts an ordinance or policy that interferesexceeds state statute, administrative rule, or policy or interferes, unreasonably restricts, or conflicts with an agriculture or energy infrastructure project that is required to be permitted or approved by a state agency, as reported under this subdivision, the city is not eligible to receive any grants from the fund beginning on the later of the date on which the citystate adoptedtreasurer theis ordinancenotified orby policy,the orboard theof dateuniversity onand whichschool thelands stateof agencya permitsdetermination orof approvesa theviolation project.under this subdivision.
(1) For purposes of this subdivision, an agriculture or energy infrastructure project includes a project permitted or approved under chapter 4.1-25, 23.1-06, 38-08, 38-22, 49-22, 49-22.1, or 61-28 or under administrative rules related to the implementation of those chapters but excludes wind and solar projects approved or permitted under chapter 49-22.
Page No.
2 25.1104.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly (2) A person may report a suspected violation under this subdivision to the board of university and school lands in the form and manner prescribed by the board.
The report must include the name of the city, the city's ordinance or policy suspected of violating state statute, administrative rule, or policy, and the state statute, administrative rule, or policy which the person suspects is violated by the city's ordinance or policy.
Within thirty days after receiving the report, the board shall investigate the suspected violation, in consultation with a state agency having jurisdiction over the relevant state statute, administrative rule, or policy, and shall provide a written determination to the person who submitted the report and to the city named in the report.
The board shall notify the state treasurer if the determination identifies a violation.
Any person aggrieved by the determination may appeal the determination using the procedure under chapter 28-32.
23 25.1104.0100025.1104.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 3.5.
34 25.1104.0100025.1104.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly f.
SECTION 2.3.
45 25.1104.0100025.1104.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 57-51.1-07.8.
If a county or township adopts an ordinance or policy that interferesexceeds state statute, administrative rule, or policy or interferes, unreasonably restricts, or conflicts with an agriculture or energy infrastructure project that is required to be permitted or approved by a state agency, theas countyreported orunder townshipthis issubdivision, not eligible to receive any grants from the fundcounty beginningor Page No.
56 25.1104.0100025.1104.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly ontownship is not eligible to receive any grants from the laterfund ofbeginning on the date on which the citystate adoptedtreasurer theis ordinancenotified orby policy,the orboard theof dateuniversity onand whichschool thelands stateof agencya permitsdetermination orof approvesa theviolation project.under this subdivision.
(1) For purposes of this subdivision, an agriculture or energy infrastructure project includes a project permitted or approved under chapter 4.1-25, 23.1-06, 38-08, 38-22, 49-22, 49-22.1, or 61-28 or under administrative rules related to the implementation of those chapters but excludes wind and solar projects approved or permitted under chapter 49-22.
(2) A person may report a suspected violation under this subdivision to the board of university and school lands in the form and manner prescribed by the board.
The report must include the name of the county or township, the county's or township's ordinance or policy suspected of violating state statute, administrative rule, or policy, and the state statute, administrative rule, or policy which the person suspects is violated by the county's or township's ordinance or policy.
Within thirty days after receiving the report, the board shall investigate the suspected violation, in consultation with any state agency having jurisdiction over the relevant state statute, administrative rule, or policy, and shall provide a written determination to the person who submitted the report and to the county or township named in the report.
The board shall notify the state treasurer if the determination identifies a violation.
Any person aggrieved by the determination may appeal the determination using the procedure under chapter 28-32.
The state treasurer shall distribute the lesser of thirteen percent of the balance of the fund or sixteen million one hundred thousand dollars to non-oil-producing counties for the benefit of the organized and unorganized townships within each non-oil-producing county.Page No.
7 25.1104.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly county.
Page5.7. No.
6 25.1104.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 5.7.
"Road and bridge infrastructure projects" means the projects associated with the construction of new unpaved and paved road and bridge infrastructure or associatedPage withNo. the maintenance, repair, or replacement of existing unpaved and paved road and bridge infrastructure.
8 25.1104.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly associated with the maintenance, repair, or replacement of existing unpaved and paved road and bridge infrastructure.
79 25.1104.0100025.1104.02000
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed FIRST ENGROSSMENT Current pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies the allocation and reporting requirements for oil and gas tax revenue to enhance funding for infrastructure development in non-oil-producing counties.
-
57-51.1-07.5
the next fifty-nine million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars, or the amount necessary to provide for twice the amount of the distributions under subsection 24 of section 57-51.1-07.7, into the funds designated for infrastructure development in non-oil-producing counties under sections 57-51.1-07.7 and 57-51.1-07.8 with fifty percent deposited into the municipal infrastructure fund and fifty percent deposited into the county and township infrastructure fund;→ the next fifty-nine million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars, or the amount necessary to provide for twice the amount of the distributions under subsection 24 of section 57-51.1-07.7, into the funds designated for infrastructure development in non-oil-producing counties under sections 57-51.1-07.7 and 57-51.1-07.8 with fifty percent deposited into the municipal infrastructure fund and fifty percent deposited into the county and township infrastructure fund;This change establishes a structured allocation for infrastructure development funding.
-
57-51.1-07.7
There is created in the state treasury the municipal infrastructure fund. The fund consists of all moneys deposited in the fund under section 57-51.1-07.5. All moneys in the fund are appropriated to the state treasurer on a continuing basis for the purpose of providing grants to cities located in non-oil-producing counties. The grant funding may be distributed only to cities located in non-oil-producing counties, excluding hub cities, and may be used only for essential infrastructure projects.→ There is created in the state treasury the municipal infrastructure fund. The fund consists of all moneys deposited in the fund under section 57-51.1-07.5. All moneys in the fund are appropriated to the state treasurer on a continuing basis for the purpose of providing grants to cities located in non-oil-producing counties. The grant funding may be distributed only to cities located in non-oil-producing counties, excluding hub cities, and may be used only for essential infrastructure projects.This change maintains the fund's purpose while ensuring allocations specifically support cities in non-oil-producing counties.
-
57-51.1-07.8
There is created in the state treasury the county and township infrastructure fund. The fund consists of all moneys deposited in the fund under section 57-51.1-07.5. All moneys in the fund are appropriated to the state treasurer on a continuing basis for the purpose of providing grants to non-oil-producing counties and townships located in non-oil-producing counties. The grant funding may be distributed only to non-oil-producing counties and townships located in non-oil-producing counties and may be used only for road and bridge infrastructure projects.→ There is created in the state treasury the county and township infrastructure fund. The fund consists of all moneys deposited in the fund under section 57-51.1-07.5. All moneys in the fund are appropriated to the state treasurer on a continuing basis for the purpose of providing grants to non-oil-producing counties and townships located in non-oil-producing counties. The grant funding may be distributed only to non-oil-producing counties and townships located in non-oil-producing counties and may be used only for road and bridge infrastructure projects.This modification confirms that funding is allocated specifically for infrastructure projects in non-oil-producing counties and townships.
Action History
-
Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 19 nays 27
-
Amendment adopted, placed on calendar
-
Reported back amended, do not pass, placed on calendar 5 2 0
-
Committee Hearing 02:30
-
Introduced, first reading, referred Energy and Natural Resources Committee
Sponsors
- Todd Porter · Cosponsor
- Greg Kessel · Cosponsor
- Robert Erbele · Cosponsor
- Mike Brandenburg · Cosponsor
- Brad Bekkedahl · Cosponsor
- Dale Patten · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on · 27 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Patten, Dale Republican
Co-sponsors (5)
- Porter, Todd Republican
- Kessel, Greg Republican
- Erbele, Robert Republican
- Brandenburg, Mike Republican
- Bekkedahl, Brad Republican
Not signed on (142)
142 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 142 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 19 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 19 | 27 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 40% | 57% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (47)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Boschee, Josh | Democratic | Nay |
| Braunberger, Ryan | Democratic | Nay |
| Hogan, Kathy | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Marcellais, Richard | Democratic | Nay |
| Mathern, Tim | Democratic | Nay |
| Axtman, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Barta, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Beard, Todd | Republican | Nay |
| Bekkedahl, Brad | Republican | Yea |
| Boehm, Keith | Republican | Nay |
| Burckhard, Randy A. | Republican | Yea |
| Castaneda, Jose L. | Republican | Nay |
| Cleary, Sean | Republican | Yea |
| Clemens, David A. | Republican | Nay |
| Conley, Cole | Republican | Yea |
| Cory, Claire | Republican | Nay |
| Davison, Kyle | Republican | Nay |
| Dever, Dick | Republican | Yea |
| Dwyer, Michael | Republican | Nay |
| Enget, Mark | Republican | Nay |
| Erbele, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Gerhardt, Justin | Republican | Nay |
| Hogue, David | Republican | Yea |
| Kessel, Greg | Republican | Yea |
| Klein, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Larson, Diane | Republican | Yea |
| Lee, Judy | Republican | Yea |
| Lemm, Randy D. | Republican | Nay |
| Luick, Larry | Republican | Nay |
| Magrum, Jeffery J. | Republican | Nay |
| Meyer, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Myrdal, Janne | Republican | Nay |
| Patten, Dale | Republican | Yea |
| Paulson, Bob | Republican | Nay |
| Powers, Michelle | Republican | Nay |
| Roers, Kristin | Republican | Yea |
| Rummel, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Schaible, Donald | Republican | Yea |
| Sickler, Jonathan | Republican | Nay |
| Sorvaag, Ronald | Republican | Nay |
| Thomas, Paul J. | Republican | Nay |
| Walen, Chuck | Republican | Nay |
| Wanzek, Terry M. | Republican | Yea |
| Weber, Mark F. | Republican | Nay |
| Weston, Kent | Republican | Nay |
| Wobbema, Mike | Republican | Nay |
| van Oosting, Desiree | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2208 do?
- Relating to the state share of oil and gas tax revenue allocations, the municipal infrastructure fund, and the county and township infrastructure fund.
- Who sponsors SB 2208?
- SB 2208 is sponsored by Porter, Todd (Republican), Kessel, Greg (Republican), Erbele, Robert (Republican), Brandenburg, Mike (Republican), Bekkedahl, Brad (Republican), and Patten, Dale (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 2208?
- This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 2208?
- Track SB 2208 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2208
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2208
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →