SB 2383 — A BILL for an Act to create and enact four new sections to chapter 14-09 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to parental rights and responsibilities, equal residential responsibility, and the presumption of fitness; to amend and reenact sections 14-09-00.1, 14-09-06.2, and 14-09-07 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the definition of equal decisionmaking responsibility and equal parenting time, the best interests of the child factors, and the residence of a child; and to provide for application.
Last action — Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 12 nays 35
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Relating to parental rights and responsibilities, equal residential responsibility, and the presumption of fitness; to amend and reenact sections 14‑09‑00.1, 14‑09‑06.2, and 14‑09‑07 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the definition of equal decisionmaking responsibility and equal parenting time, the best interests of the child factors, and the residence of a child; and to provide for application.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
180 added · 246 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 2383 clarify the definitions related to child welfare, including how "harm" is described, and the responsibilities of parents regarding their children. Notably, the phrase about the legitimacy of children and parents has been rephrased, ensuring that their rights cannot be denied without proper legal process. This matters because it strengthens protections for children and parents, reinforcing their rights in situations involving welfare actions, which can have significant impacts on family law and child safety.
25.0774.0200025.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO.
2383 of North Dakota Introduced by Senators Cory, Luick, Paulson Representative Vetter A BILL for an Act to create and enact four new sections to chapter 14-09 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to parental rights and responsibilities, equal residential responsibility, and the presumption of fitness;
4.
"Harm" means negative changes in a child's health which occur when an individual responsible for the child's welfare:
1 25.0774.0200025.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly a.4.
"Harm" means negative changes in a child's health which occur when an individual responsible for the child's welfare:
a.
The court may not apply the best interests and welfare of the child factors under section 14-09-06.2 unlessPage aNo. party establishes by clear and convincing evidence the presumption is properly rebutted in accordance with subsection 2.
2.2 25.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly unless a party establishes by clear and convincing evidence that a parent is unfit to care for a child.
As determined by the court, the presumption of fitness may be rebutted:
Page No.
2 25.0774.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly a.
If a parent has voluntarily chosen to have minimal or no relationship with the child for a period of at least one year after the birth of the child.
b.
If a parent or a parent's immediate family member has interfered with the other parent's ability to establish a relationship with the child, including by refusing to provide the other parent with opportunities to exercise care, residential responsibility, or control, even if a parenting time order has never been entered.
c.
If there exists a history of persistent and unwarranted interference by a parent with the other parent's parenting time, or a history of alienating a child from the other parent, even if a parenting time order has never been entered.
d.
If there exists one incident of domestic violence, as defined in section 14-07.1-01, which resulted in serious bodily injury or involved the use of a dangerous weapon, and the parent who committed the domestic violence was convicted of the crime due to the incident.
A domestic violence protection order that has been issued by a court or magistrate may not be considered by the court as evidence of domestic violence.
e.
If a parent has neglected or abused the child within a reasonable time proximate to the action.
For purposes of this section, "neglected or abused" means a parent:
(1) Abandons, tortures, chronically abuses, or sexually abuses a child;
(2) Fails to make substantial, meaningful efforts to secure treatment for the parent's addiction, mental illness, behavior disorder, or any combination of those conditions for a period of at least one year after the parent has been diagnosed with the condition, and notified by a licensed practitioner the parent is in need of treatment to protect the child from being physically or emotionally harmed;
(3) Engages in conduct prohibited under sections 12.1-20-01 through 12.1-20-08 or chapter 12.1-27.2, in which the child at issue in the action is the victim;
(4) Violates sections 12.1-16-01 through 12.1-16-03 or 14-09-22, in which the victim is another child of the parent;
Page No.
3 25.0774.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly (5) Engages in aiding, abetting, attempting, conspiring, or soliciting in violation of section 12.1-16-01 through 12.1-16-03, in which the child at issue in the action is the victim;
(6) Violates section 12.1-17-02, in which the child at issue in the action is the victim and has suffered serious bodily injury;
(7) Commits an offense under the laws of another jurisdiction which require proof of substantially similar elements as the violations described in subparagraphs d through f;
or (8) Allows the child to be the victim of human trafficking as defined in section 12.1-41-01.
f.
If a parent engages or attempts to engage in conduct, prohibited under sections 12.1-1701 through 12.1-17-04, in which the child at issue in the action is the victim.
g.
If a parent, within a reasonable time proximate to the proceeding, exposes a child to chronic or severe alcohol use or use of any controlled substance as defined in section 19-03.1-01, in a manner not lawfully prescribed by a licensed practitioner.
h.
If a parent allows the child to be in an environment in which the child is exposed to a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia.
i.
If a parent allows a child to be without proper parental care or control, subsistence, education as required by law, or other care necessary for the child's physical, mental, or emotional health, and the deprivation is not due to the lack of financial means of the parent.
Show all 71 changed lines (31 more)
j.
If a parent places the child up for adoption in violation of the law.
k.
If a parent, within a reasonable time proximate to the proceeding, leaves the child without proper parental care or education as required by law, due to the physical, mental, emotional, or other illness or disability of the parent.
l.
If a parent, within a reasonable time proximate to the proceeding, refused to participate in treatment for a child in need of treatment, as ordered by a juvenile court.
Page No.
4 25.0774.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly m.
If a parent has been diagnosed with having a physical injury or psychological condition, as certified by a licensed practitioner, which renders the parent unfit to provide proper care, custody, or control over the child.
Unless the presumptioncourt ofdetermines fitnessa parent is properlyunfit rebuttedto care for a child in accordance with section 3 of this Act, or subsection 2, 4, 5, or 56 is applicableapplicable, making an award of equal residential responsibility inappropriate, a court must grant the parents equal residential responsibility of a child.
If the court determines the parentsparents' resideresidences moreare thanseparated fiftyby milesa apartdistance andthat would make an award of equal residential responsibility would be detrimental to the physical or emotional health of a child, and neither parent is willing to relocate to be closer to the other parent, the court must grant the maximum amount of parenting time possible to the parent who is not awarded primary residential responsibility of the child,child. which must be at least one hundred days per year.
If the child at issue in the action is an infant at the time of the proceeding and the schedule, health, or other circumstances of a parent or the child does not allow for a parenting schedule that provides for exchanges between the parents at least every Pageseven No.days, the court shall determine a parenting schedule that is in the best interests of the child.
5Page 25.0774.02000No. Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly seven days, the court shall determine a parenting schedule that is in the best interests of the child.
3 25.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 5.
6.
If the parties agree through mediation to deviate from equal residential responsibility, the court must give consideration to the preference of the parties unless the agreement is determined by the court to be detrimental to the emotional or physical health of the child.
These factors may not be considered unless the presumptioncourt ofdetermines fitnessa parent is properlyunfit rebuttedto care for a child under section 3 of this Act or the court determines an award of equal residential responsibility is inappropriate under section 5 of this Act.
g.
The mental and physical health of the parents, as that health impacts the child.
64 25.0774.0200025.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly h.g.g.
The mental and physical health of the parents, as that health impacts the child.
h.g.
if there exists one incident of domestic violence, as defined in section 14-07.1-01, which resulted in serious bodily injury Page No.
75 25.0774.0200025.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly ork.j. involved the use of a dangerous weapon, and the parent who committed the domestic violence was convicted of the crime due to the incident.
k.j.
If the court finds false allegations not made in good faith of harm to a child were made by one parent against the other, the court shall consider whether the parent's actions are punishable under chapter 27-10.
A parent with primary residential responsibility for a child may not change the primary residence of the child to another state except upon order of the court or with the Pagewritten No.consent of the other parent, if the other parent has been given parenting time by the decree.
8 25.0774.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly written consent of the other parent, if the other parent has been given parenting time by the decree.
A parent with equal residential responsibility for a child may not change the residence of the child to another statestateoutside except with the written consent of thea otherfifty parentmile orradius orderexcept ofwith the courtwritten allowingconsent thePage moveNo. and awarding that parent primary residential responsibility.
6 25.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of the other parent or order of the court allowing the move and awarding that parent primary residential responsibility.
97 25.0774.0200025.0774.03000
Show all 71 changed rows (31 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed FIRST ENGROSSMENT Current pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 12 nays 35
-
Amendment adopted, placed on calendar
-
Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 5 2 0
-
Committee Hearing 02:30
-
Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee
Sponsors
- Steve Vetter · Cosponsor
- Bob Paulson · Cosponsor
- Larry Luick · Cosponsor
- Claire Cory · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on · 35 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Cory, Claire Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Vetter, Steve Republican
- Paulson, Bob Republican
- Luick, Larry Republican
Not signed on (144)
144 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 144 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 12 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 26% | 74% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (47)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Boschee, Josh | Democratic | Nay |
| Braunberger, Ryan | Democratic | Nay |
| Hogan, Kathy | Democratic | Nay |
| Marcellais, Richard | Democratic | Nay |
| Mathern, Tim | Democratic | Nay |
| Axtman, Michelle | Republican | Nay |
| Barta, Jeff | Republican | Nay |
| Beard, Todd | Republican | Nay |
| Bekkedahl, Brad | Republican | Yea |
| Boehm, Keith | Republican | Nay |
| Burckhard, Randy A. | Republican | Nay |
| Castaneda, Jose L. | Republican | Yea |
| Cleary, Sean | Republican | Nay |
| Clemens, David A. | Republican | Nay |
| Conley, Cole | Republican | Nay |
| Cory, Claire | Republican | Yea |
| Davison, Kyle | Republican | Yea |
| Dever, Dick | Republican | Nay |
| Dwyer, Michael | Republican | Nay |
| Enget, Mark | Republican | Nay |
| Erbele, Robert | Republican | Nay |
| Gerhardt, Justin | Republican | Nay |
| Hogue, David | Republican | Yea |
| Kessel, Greg | Republican | Nay |
| Klein, Jerry | Republican | Nay |
| Larson, Diane | Republican | Yea |
| Lee, Judy | Republican | Nay |
| Lemm, Randy D. | Republican | Nay |
| Luick, Larry | Republican | Yea |
| Magrum, Jeffery J. | Republican | Yea |
| Meyer, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Myrdal, Janne | Republican | Nay |
| Patten, Dale | Republican | Nay |
| Paulson, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Powers, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Roers, Kristin | Republican | Nay |
| Rummel, Dean | Republican | Nay |
| Schaible, Donald | Republican | Nay |
| Sickler, Jonathan | Republican | Nay |
| Sorvaag, Ronald | Republican | Nay |
| Thomas, Paul J. | Republican | Nay |
| Walen, Chuck | Republican | Nay |
| Wanzek, Terry M. | Republican | Nay |
| Weber, Mark F. | Republican | Nay |
| Weston, Kent | Republican | Yea |
| Wobbema, Mike | Republican | Nay |
| van Oosting, Desiree | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2383 do?
- Relating to parental rights and responsibilities, equal residential responsibility, and the presumption of fitness; to amend and reenact sections 14‑09‑00.1, 14‑09‑06.2, and 14‑09‑07 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the definition of equal decisionmaking responsibility and equal parenting time, the best interests of the child factors, and the residence of a child; and to provide for application.
- Who sponsors SB 2383?
- SB 2383 is sponsored by Vetter, Steve (Republican), Paulson, Bob (Republican), Luick, Larry (Republican), and Cory, Claire (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 2383?
- This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 2383?
- Track SB 2383 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2383
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2383
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →