North Dakota 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26) Status: Passed House 4 R cosponsors

HB 1389 — A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact sections 11-11-55.1, 40-22-01.3, and 57-15-41 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to infrastructure fees levied by cities and counties, and the exemption of infrastructure fees from levy limitations.

Last action — Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 3 nays 44

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Relating to infrastructure fees levied by cities and counties, and the exemption of infrastructure fees from levy limitations.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

115 added · 18 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill HB 1389 includes provisions allowing county commissioners to impose an infrastructure fee based on a majority of local voters' approval, rather than relying solely on special assessments. This change widens the financial options available for maintaining infrastructure, helping counties address funding needs more flexibly. Additionally, it clarifies that infrastructure fees will be exempt from existing levy limitations, enabling cities and counties to collect these fees without restrictions that might apply to other types of tax levies. This is significant because it could lead to improved infrastructure maintenance and development in North Dakota.

→
Previous
Latest
25.1051.01000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly HOUSE BILL NO.
25.1051.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO.
1389 of North Dakota Introduced by Representatives Dockter, Heinert, Meier Senator Dever A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 57-15-41 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the exemption of infrastructure fees from levy limitations.
1389 Introduced by Representatives Dockter, Heinert, Meier Senator Dever A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact sections 11-11-55.1, 40-22-01.3, and 57-15-41 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to infrastructure fees levied by cities and counties, and the exemption of infrastructure fees from levy limitations.
Section 11-11-55.1 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
11-11-55.1.
Petition or resolution for improvements - Levy of special assessments - Levy of infrastructure fee.
1.
The board of county commissioners of any county, by resolution or upon receipt of a petition of sixty percent of the landowners in a defined area, outside of the limits of any incorporated city, may install the petitioned improvements as benefit the defined area, provide for the financing of the improvements, and levy special assessments for the payment of all or part of the improvements within the defined area.
2.
The board of county commissioners, by resolution or upon petition of sixty percent of the qualified electors who voted in the last general election in a defined area, may levy and collect an infrastructure fee in lieu of general special assessments on all residential and commercial county utility bills for payment of infrastructure maintenance costs.
If a home rule county levies an infrastructure fee, the home rule county also may levy and collect green field special assessments.
3.
In providing for the improvements, the county shall have the authority granted to municipalities in chapters 40-22, 40-23, 40-23.1, 40-24, 40-25, 40-26, 40-27, and 40-28, and the county shall comply with the provisions of those chapters in making the Page No.
1 25.1051.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly improvements.
Whenever action is required of city officials in those chapters, the comparable county officials shall take the action.
4.
A county proposing a project to be funded by an infrastructure fee under this section shall create an infrastructure zone within the county for each proposed project.
5.
The county shall mail to each utility account holder within the proposed infrastructure zone a notice of the proposed zone.
The notice must include:
a.
The total cost of the proposed project;
b.
A description of the proposed project;
c.
The date and time of a public hearing on the proposed project;
and d.
A form on which the utility account holder may protest the fee, stating the deadline for a protest, which may not be fewer than thirty days from the date of the notice.
6.
A county proposing a project to be funded by an infrastructure fee under this section shall hold a public hearing on the project.
The public hearing must take place no earlier than fourteen days after the date of the notice, and before the deadline for the submission of protest forms.
7.
If a county receives protest forms from a majority of utility account holders in a proposed zone the city may not proceed with the project in the proposed zone.
8.
The county may begin a project after the time to protest has passed.
9.
The rate of the fee assessed to commercial property under this section may not be more than two times the rate assessed to residential property.
10.
If a home rule county levies an infrastructure fee, the home rule county also may levy and collect green field special assessments.
11.
As used in this section:
Show all 89 changed rows (49 more)
Previous
Latest
a.
"General special assessments" means special assessments levied for the purpose of maintaining existing roads and infrastructure and special assessments levied for the construction or repair of arterial roads and infrastructure that provide a benefit to the entire community.
b.
"Green field special assessments" means special assessments levied for infrastructure costs associated with the development of agricultural or undeveloped property.
Page No.
2 25.1051.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly SECTION 2.
AMENDMENT.
Section 40-22-01.3 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
40-22-01.3.
Power of municipality to defray expense of improvements - Infrastructure fee.
1.
Notwithstanding section 40-22-01, a municipality may levy and collect an infrastructure fee.
The fee must replace a general special assessment on all property for payment of infrastructure maintenance costs through a utility bill issued by a municipality.
The money collected under this subsection may not be used for any purpose other than infrastructure maintenance costs.
If a municipality levies an infrastructure fee, the municipality also may levy and collect green field special assessments.
2.
A city proposing a project to be funded by an infrastructure fee under this section shall create an infrastructure zone within the city for each proposed project.
3.
The city shall mail to each utility account holder within the proposed infrastructure zone a notice of the proposed zone.
The notice must include:
a.
The total cost of the proposed project;
b.
A description of the proposed project;
c.
The date and time of a public hearing on the proposed project;
and d.
A form on which the utility account holder may protest the fee, stating the deadline for a protest, which may not be fewer than thirty days from the date of the notice.
4.
A city proposing a project to be funded by an infrastructure fee under this section shall hold a public hearing on the project.
The public hearing must take place no earlier than fourteen days after the date of the notice, and before the deadline for the submission of protest forms.
5.
If a city receives protest forms from a majority of utility account holders in a proposed zone the city may not proceed with the project in the proposed zone.
6.
The city may begin a project after the time to protest has passed.
7.
The rate of the fee assessed to commercial property under this section may not be more than two times the rate assessed to residential property.
8.
If a municipality levies an infrastructure fee, the municipality also may levy and collect green field special assessments.
Page No.
3 25.1051.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 9.
As used in this section:
a.
"General special assessments" means special assessments levied for the purpose of maintaining existing roads and infrastructure and special assessments levied for the construction or repair of arterial roads and infrastructure that provide a benefit to the entire community.
b.
"Green field special assessments" means special assessments levied for infrastructure costs associated with the development of agricultural or undeveloped property.
SECTION 3.
AMENDMENT.
1 25.1051.01000
4 25.1051.02000
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 3 nays 44

  2. Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 5 1 0

  3. Committee Hearing 09:00

  4. Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation Committee

  5. Received from House

  6. Second reading, passed, yeas 91 nays 0

  7. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  8. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 11 2 1

  9. Committee Hearing 09:30

  10. Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on · 44 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (144)

144 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 144 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 3 Yea · 44 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 33900
Democratic 0500
Total 34400
% of votes cast 6%94%0%0%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
Boschee, Josh Democratic Nay
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Nay
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Nay
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Nay
Mathern, Tim Democratic Nay
Axtman, Michelle Republican Nay
Barta, Jeff Republican Nay
Beard, Todd Republican Nay
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Nay
Boehm, Keith Republican Nay
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Nay
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Nay
Cleary, Sean Republican Nay
Clemens, David A. Republican Nay
Conley, Cole Republican Nay
Cory, Claire Republican Nay
Davison, Kyle Republican Nay
Dever, Dick Republican Yea
Dwyer, Michael Republican Nay
Enget, Mark Republican Nay
Erbele, Robert Republican Nay
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Yea
Hogue, David Republican Nay
Kessel, Greg Republican Nay
Klein, Jerry Republican Nay
Larson, Diane Republican Nay
Lee, Judy Republican Nay
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Nay
Luick, Larry Republican Nay
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Nay
Meyer, Scott Republican Nay
Myrdal, Janne Republican Nay
Patten, Dale Republican Nay
Paulson, Bob Republican Nay
Powers, Michelle Republican Nay
Roers, Kristin Republican Nay
Rummel, Dean Republican Nay
Schaible, Donald Republican Nay
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Nay
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Nay
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Nay
Walen, Chuck Republican Yea
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Nay
Weber, Mark F. Republican Nay
Weston, Kent Republican Nay
Wobbema, Mike Republican Nay
van Oosting, Desiree Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 91 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 80003
Democratic 11000
Total 91003
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (94)
Member Party Vote
Brown, Collette Democratic Yea
Conmy, Liz Democratic Yea
Davis, Jayme Democratic Yea
Dobervich, Gretchen Democratic Yea
Finley-DeVille, Lisa Democratic Yea
Foss, Austin Democratic Yea
Hager, LaurieBeth Democratic Yea
Hanson, Karla Rose Democratic Yea
Ista, Zachary Democratic Yea
Mitskog, Alisa Democratic Yea
Schneider, Mary Democratic Yea
Anderson, Bert Republican Yea
Anderson, Dick Republican Yea
Anderson, Karen A. Republican Yea
Bahl, Landon Republican Not Voting
Beltz, Mike Republican Yea
Berg, Mike Republican Yea
Bolinske, Macy Republican Yea
Bosch, Glenn Republican Yea
Brandenburg, Mike Republican Yea
Christianson, Nels Republican Yea
Christy, Josh Republican Not Voting
Dockter, Jason Republican Yea
Dressler, Ty Republican Yea
Fegley, Clayton Republican Yea
Fisher, Jay Republican Yea
Frelich, Kathy Republican Yea
Grindberg, Karen Republican Yea
Grueneich, Jim Republican Yea
Hagert, Jared C. Republican Yea
Hatlestad, Patrick R. Republican Yea
Hauck, Dori Republican Yea
Headland, Craig Republican Yea
Heilman, Matthew Republican Yea
Heinert, Pat D. Republican Yea
Henderson, Donna Republican Yea
Hendrix, Jared Republican Yea
Holle, Dawson Republican Yea
Hoverson, Jeff Republican Yea
Johnson, Jorin Republican Yea
Johnston, Daniel Republican Yea
Jonas, Jim Republican Yea
Karls, Karen Republican Yea
Kasper, Jim Republican Yea
Kempenich, Keith Republican Yea
Kiefert, Dwight Republican Yea
Klemin, Lawrence R. Republican Yea
Koppelman, Ben Republican Yea
Lefor, Mike Republican Yea
Longmuir, Donald W. Republican Yea
Louser, Scott Republican Yea
Maki, Roger A. Republican Yea
Marschall, Andrew Republican Yea
Martinson, Bob Republican Yea
McLeod, Carrie Republican Yea
Meier, Lisa Republican Yea
Monson, David Republican Not Voting
Morton, Desiree Republican Yea
Motschenbacher, Mike Republican Yea
Murphy, Eric J. Republican Yea
Nathe, Mike Republican Yea
Nehring, Dennis Republican Yea
Nelson, Jon O. Republican Yea
Novak, Anna S. Republican Yea
O'Brien, Emily Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Osowski, Doug Republican Yea
Ostlie, Mitch Republican Yea
Porter, Todd Republican Yea
Pyle, Brandy L. Republican Yea
Richter, David Republican Yea
Rios, Nico Republican Yea
Rohr, Karen M. Republican Yea
Ruby, Dan Republican Yea
Ruby, Matthew Republican Yea
Sanford, Mark Republican Yea
Satrom, Bernie Republican Yea
Schatz, Mike Republican Yea
Schauer, Austen Republican Yea
Schreiber-Beck, Cynthia Republican Yea
Steiner, Vicky Republican Yea
Stemen, Gregory Republican Yea
Swiontek, Steve Republican Yea
Toman, Nathan Republican Yea
Tveit, Bill Republican Yea
VanWinkle, Lori Republican Yea
Vetter, Steve Republican Yea
Vigesaa, Don Republican Yea
Vollmer, Daniel R. Republican Yea
Wagner, Scott Republican Yea
Warrey, Jonathan Republican Yea
Weisz, Robin Republican Yea
Wolff, Christina Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1389 do?
Relating to infrastructure fees levied by cities and counties, and the exemption of infrastructure fees from levy limitations.
Who sponsors HB 1389?
HB 1389 is sponsored by Meier, Lisa (Republican), Heinert, Pat D. (Republican), Dever, Dick (Republican), and Dockter, Jason (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 1389?
This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 1389?
Track HB 1389 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1389

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1389

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →