A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact sections 11-11-55.1, 40-22-01.3, and 57-15-41 of the North Dakota Ce...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1389 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1389.
You're tracking HB 1389
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1389 — A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact sections 11-11-55.1, 40-22-01.3, and 57-15-41 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to infrastructure fees levied by cities and counties, and the exemption of infrastructure fees from levy limitations.
Last action — Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 3 nays 44
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Relating to infrastructure fees levied by cities and counties, and the exemption of infrastructure fees from levy limitations.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
115 added · 18 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HB 1389 includes provisions allowing county commissioners to impose an infrastructure fee based on a majority of local voters' approval, rather than relying solely on special assessments. This change widens the financial options available for maintaining infrastructure, helping counties address funding needs more flexibly. Additionally, it clarifies that infrastructure fees will be exempt from existing levy limitations, enabling cities and counties to collect these fees without restrictions that might apply to other types of tax levies. This is significant because it could lead to improved infrastructure maintenance and development in North Dakota.
25.1051.0100025.1051.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO.
1389 of North Dakota Introduced by Representatives Dockter, Heinert, Meier Senator Dever A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact sectionsections 11-11-55.1, 40-22-01.3, and 57-15-41 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to infrastructure fees levied by cities and counties, and the exemption of infrastructure fees from levy limitations.
Section 11-11-55.1 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
11-11-55.1.
Petition or resolution for improvements - Levy of special assessments - Levy of infrastructure fee.
1.
The board of county commissioners of any county, by resolution or upon receipt of a petition of sixty percent of the landowners in a defined area, outside of the limits of any incorporated city, may install the petitioned improvements as benefit the defined area, provide for the financing of the improvements, and levy special assessments for the payment of all or part of the improvements within the defined area.
2.
The board of county commissioners, by resolution or upon petition of sixty percent of the qualified electors who voted in the last general election in a defined area, may levy and collect an infrastructure fee in lieu of general special assessments on all residential and commercial county utility bills for payment of infrastructure maintenance costs.
If a home rule county levies an infrastructure fee, the home rule county also may levy and collect green field special assessments.
3.
In providing for the improvements, the county shall have the authority granted to municipalities in chapters 40-22, 40-23, 40-23.1, 40-24, 40-25, 40-26, 40-27, and 40-28, and the county shall comply with the provisions of those chapters in making the Page No.
1 25.1051.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly improvements.
Whenever action is required of city officials in those chapters, the comparable county officials shall take the action.
4.
A county proposing a project to be funded by an infrastructure fee under this section shall create an infrastructure zone within the county for each proposed project.
5.
The county shall mail to each utility account holder within the proposed infrastructure zone a notice of the proposed zone.
The notice must include:
a.
The total cost of the proposed project;
b.
A description of the proposed project;
c.
The date and time of a public hearing on the proposed project;
and d.
A form on which the utility account holder may protest the fee, stating the deadline for a protest, which may not be fewer than thirty days from the date of the notice.
6.
A county proposing a project to be funded by an infrastructure fee under this section shall hold a public hearing on the project.
The public hearing must take place no earlier than fourteen days after the date of the notice, and before the deadline for the submission of protest forms.
7.
If a county receives protest forms from a majority of utility account holders in a proposed zone the city may not proceed with the project in the proposed zone.
8.
The county may begin a project after the time to protest has passed.
9.
The rate of the fee assessed to commercial property under this section may not be more than two times the rate assessed to residential property.
10.
If a home rule county levies an infrastructure fee, the home rule county also may levy and collect green field special assessments.
11.
As used in this section:
Show all 89 changed lines (49 more)
a.
"General special assessments" means special assessments levied for the purpose of maintaining existing roads and infrastructure and special assessments levied for the construction or repair of arterial roads and infrastructure that provide a benefit to the entire community.
b.
"Green field special assessments" means special assessments levied for infrastructure costs associated with the development of agricultural or undeveloped property.
Page No.
2 25.1051.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly SECTION 2.
AMENDMENT.
Section 40-22-01.3 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
40-22-01.3.
Power of municipality to defray expense of improvements - Infrastructure fee.
1.
Notwithstanding section 40-22-01, a municipality may levy and collect an infrastructure fee.
The fee must replace a general special assessment on all property for payment of infrastructure maintenance costs through a utility bill issued by a municipality.
The money collected under this subsection may not be used for any purpose other than infrastructure maintenance costs.
If a municipality levies an infrastructure fee, the municipality also may levy and collect green field special assessments.
2.
A city proposing a project to be funded by an infrastructure fee under this section shall create an infrastructure zone within the city for each proposed project.
3.
The city shall mail to each utility account holder within the proposed infrastructure zone a notice of the proposed zone.
The notice must include:
a.
The total cost of the proposed project;
b.
A description of the proposed project;
c.
The date and time of a public hearing on the proposed project;
and d.
A form on which the utility account holder may protest the fee, stating the deadline for a protest, which may not be fewer than thirty days from the date of the notice.
4.
A city proposing a project to be funded by an infrastructure fee under this section shall hold a public hearing on the project.
The public hearing must take place no earlier than fourteen days after the date of the notice, and before the deadline for the submission of protest forms.
5.
If a city receives protest forms from a majority of utility account holders in a proposed zone the city may not proceed with the project in the proposed zone.
6.
The city may begin a project after the time to protest has passed.
7.
The rate of the fee assessed to commercial property under this section may not be more than two times the rate assessed to residential property.
8.
If a municipality levies an infrastructure fee, the municipality also may levy and collect green field special assessments.
Page No.
3 25.1051.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 9.
As used in this section:
a.
"General special assessments" means special assessments levied for the purpose of maintaining existing roads and infrastructure and special assessments levied for the construction or repair of arterial roads and infrastructure that provide a benefit to the entire community.
b.
"Green field special assessments" means special assessments levied for infrastructure costs associated with the development of agricultural or undeveloped property.
SECTION 3.
AMENDMENT.
14 25.1051.0100025.1051.02000
Show all 89 changed rows (49 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed FIRST ENGROSSMENT Current pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 3 nays 44
-
Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 5 1 0
-
Committee Hearing 09:00
-
Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation Committee
-
Received from House
-
Second reading, passed, yeas 91 nays 0
-
Amendment adopted, placed on calendar
-
Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 11 2 1
-
Committee Hearing 09:30
-
Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation Committee
Sponsors
- Lisa Meier · Cosponsor
- Pat D. Heinert · Cosponsor
- Dick Dever · Cosponsor
- Jason Dockter · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on · 44 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Dockter, Jason Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Meier, Lisa Republican
- Heinert, Pat D. Republican
- Dever, Dick Republican
Not signed on (144)
144 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 144 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 39 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 44 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 6% | 94% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (47)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Boschee, Josh | Democratic | Nay |
| Braunberger, Ryan | Democratic | Nay |
| Hogan, Kathy | Democratic | Nay |
| Marcellais, Richard | Democratic | Nay |
| Mathern, Tim | Democratic | Nay |
| Axtman, Michelle | Republican | Nay |
| Barta, Jeff | Republican | Nay |
| Beard, Todd | Republican | Nay |
| Bekkedahl, Brad | Republican | Nay |
| Boehm, Keith | Republican | Nay |
| Burckhard, Randy A. | Republican | Nay |
| Castaneda, Jose L. | Republican | Nay |
| Cleary, Sean | Republican | Nay |
| Clemens, David A. | Republican | Nay |
| Conley, Cole | Republican | Nay |
| Cory, Claire | Republican | Nay |
| Davison, Kyle | Republican | Nay |
| Dever, Dick | Republican | Yea |
| Dwyer, Michael | Republican | Nay |
| Enget, Mark | Republican | Nay |
| Erbele, Robert | Republican | Nay |
| Gerhardt, Justin | Republican | Yea |
| Hogue, David | Republican | Nay |
| Kessel, Greg | Republican | Nay |
| Klein, Jerry | Republican | Nay |
| Larson, Diane | Republican | Nay |
| Lee, Judy | Republican | Nay |
| Lemm, Randy D. | Republican | Nay |
| Luick, Larry | Republican | Nay |
| Magrum, Jeffery J. | Republican | Nay |
| Meyer, Scott | Republican | Nay |
| Myrdal, Janne | Republican | Nay |
| Patten, Dale | Republican | Nay |
| Paulson, Bob | Republican | Nay |
| Powers, Michelle | Republican | Nay |
| Roers, Kristin | Republican | Nay |
| Rummel, Dean | Republican | Nay |
| Schaible, Donald | Republican | Nay |
| Sickler, Jonathan | Republican | Nay |
| Sorvaag, Ronald | Republican | Nay |
| Thomas, Paul J. | Republican | Nay |
| Walen, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wanzek, Terry M. | Republican | Nay |
| Weber, Mark F. | Republican | Nay |
| Weston, Kent | Republican | Nay |
| Wobbema, Mike | Republican | Nay |
| van Oosting, Desiree | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 80 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 91 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (94)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brown, Collette | Democratic | Yea |
| Conmy, Liz | Democratic | Yea |
| Davis, Jayme | Democratic | Yea |
| Dobervich, Gretchen | Democratic | Yea |
| Finley-DeVille, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Foss, Austin | Democratic | Yea |
| Hager, LaurieBeth | Democratic | Yea |
| Hanson, Karla Rose | Democratic | Yea |
| Ista, Zachary | Democratic | Yea |
| Mitskog, Alisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Schneider, Mary | Democratic | Yea |
| Anderson, Bert | Republican | Yea |
| Anderson, Dick | Republican | Yea |
| Anderson, Karen A. | Republican | Yea |
| Bahl, Landon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Beltz, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Berg, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Bolinske, Macy | Republican | Yea |
| Bosch, Glenn | Republican | Yea |
| Brandenburg, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Christianson, Nels | Republican | Yea |
| Christy, Josh | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dockter, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Dressler, Ty | Republican | Yea |
| Fegley, Clayton | Republican | Yea |
| Fisher, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Frelich, Kathy | Republican | Yea |
| Grindberg, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Grueneich, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Hagert, Jared C. | Republican | Yea |
| Hatlestad, Patrick R. | Republican | Yea |
| Hauck, Dori | Republican | Yea |
| Headland, Craig | Republican | Yea |
| Heilman, Matthew | Republican | Yea |
| Heinert, Pat D. | Republican | Yea |
| Henderson, Donna | Republican | Yea |
| Hendrix, Jared | Republican | Yea |
| Holle, Dawson | Republican | Yea |
| Hoverson, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Johnson, Jorin | Republican | Yea |
| Johnston, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Jonas, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Karls, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Kasper, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Kempenich, Keith | Republican | Yea |
| Kiefert, Dwight | Republican | Yea |
| Klemin, Lawrence R. | Republican | Yea |
| Koppelman, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Lefor, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Longmuir, Donald W. | Republican | Yea |
| Louser, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Maki, Roger A. | Republican | Yea |
| Marschall, Andrew | Republican | Yea |
| Martinson, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| McLeod, Carrie | Republican | Yea |
| Meier, Lisa | Republican | Yea |
| Monson, David | Republican | Not Voting |
| Morton, Desiree | Republican | Yea |
| Motschenbacher, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, Eric J. | Republican | Yea |
| Nathe, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Nehring, Dennis | Republican | Yea |
| Nelson, Jon O. | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Anna S. | Republican | Yea |
| O'Brien, Emily | Republican | Yea |
| Olson, Jeremy | Republican | Yea |
| Olson, Jeremy | Republican | Yea |
| Osowski, Doug | Republican | Yea |
| Ostlie, Mitch | Republican | Yea |
| Porter, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| Pyle, Brandy L. | Republican | Yea |
| Richter, David | Republican | Yea |
| Rios, Nico | Republican | Yea |
| Rohr, Karen M. | Republican | Yea |
| Ruby, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Ruby, Matthew | Republican | Yea |
| Sanford, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Satrom, Bernie | Republican | Yea |
| Schatz, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Schauer, Austen | Republican | Yea |
| Schreiber-Beck, Cynthia | Republican | Yea |
| Steiner, Vicky | Republican | Yea |
| Stemen, Gregory | Republican | Yea |
| Swiontek, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Toman, Nathan | Republican | Yea |
| Tveit, Bill | Republican | Yea |
| VanWinkle, Lori | Republican | Yea |
| Vetter, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Vigesaa, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Vollmer, Daniel R. | Republican | Yea |
| Wagner, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Warrey, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Weisz, Robin | Republican | Yea |
| Wolff, Christina | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1389 do?
- Relating to infrastructure fees levied by cities and counties, and the exemption of infrastructure fees from levy limitations.
- Who sponsors HB 1389?
- HB 1389 is sponsored by Meier, Lisa (Republican), Heinert, Pat D. (Republican), Dever, Dick (Republican), and Dockter, Jason (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1389?
- This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1389?
- Track HB 1389 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1389
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1389
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →