SB 2206 — A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 28-01-17, of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to civil actions having three-year limitations.
Last action — Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 9 nays 36
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Relating to civil actions having three‑year limitations.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
22 added · 67 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Senate Bill 2206 extend the time limit for certain civil actions to three years and clarify the rules about lawsuits against commercial motor carriers. Specifically, if someone is injured or killed due to the operation of a commercial motor vehicle, they can now pursue legal action for up to three years, but there are new caps on noneconomic damages in such cases, limiting recovery to $500,000. This change is significant because it aims to balance the rights of injured parties with the protections for commercial operators, potentially impacting how claims are made and resolved in North Dakota.
25.0285.0300025.0285.04000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO.
2206 of North Dakota Introduced by Senators Conley, Rummel, Clemens Representatives K.
Anderson, Grueneich, Hauck A BILL for an Act to createamend and enactreenact a new subsection to section 28-01-18,28-01-17, a new section to chapter 32-03, and a new section to chapter 39-21 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to civil actions having two-yearthree-year limitations,limitations. limiting noneconomic damages against a commercial motor carrier, and evidence of safety belt usage in civil actions;
and to amend and reenact section 39-21-41.4 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to requiring safety belts in certain motor vehicles;
and to provide a penalty.
A new subsection to section 28-01-18 of the North Dakota Century Code is created and enacted as follows:
An action against a commercial motor carrier for an injury to or the death of an individual other than the owner or operator of the commercial motor vehicle involved.
SECTION 2.
A new section to chapter 32-03 of the North Dakota Century Code is created and enacted as follows:
Commercial motor carrier - Noneconomic damages limited - Reduction of award.
The total amount a person may recover from the owner or operator of a commercial motor carrier for noneconomic damages in a civil action for injury, death, or other loss resulting from the operation of a commercial motor vehicle requiring a commercial driver's license may not exceed five hundred thousand dollars.
A jury in a civil action against a commercial motor carrier may not be informed of the limitation on noneconomic damages.
If a jury awards an amount exceeding five hundred thousand dollars, the court shall reduce the amount to comply with this section.
SECTION 3.
Section 39-21-41.428-01-17 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
Page28-01-17. No.
1Actions 25.0285.03000having Sixty-ninththree-year Legislativelimitations Assembly- 39-21-41.4.Exceptions.
UseThe offollowing safetyactions beltsmust requiredbe incommenced certainwithin motorthree vehiclesyears -after Enforcementthe -claim Evidence.for relief has accrued:
AAn driveraction mayagainst nota operatesheriff or coroner upon a highwayliability aincurred motorby vehiclethe designeddoing forof carryingan feweract thanin eleventhe passengers,sheriff's whichor wascoroner's originallyofficial manufacturedcapacity withand safetyby beltsvirtue unlessof eachthat occupantoffice, isor wearingby athe properlyomission adjustedof andan fastenedofficial safetyduty, belt.including the nonpayment of money collected upon an execution.
However, this subsection does not apply to an action for an escape.
ThisAn sectionaction doesupon nota applystatute for a penalty or forfeiture, if the action is given to a:the party aggrieved, or to such party and the state, unless the statute imposing it prescribes a different limitation.
a.
A child in a child restraint or safety belt in accordance with section 39-21-41.2;
to drivers b.
Drivers of implements of husbandry;
to operators c.
Operators of farm vehicles as defined in subsection 5 of section 39-04-19;
to rural d.
Rural mail carriers while on duty delivering mail;
to an e.
An occupant with a medical or physically disabling condition that prevents appropriate restraint in a safety belt, if a qualified physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice registered nurse states in a signed writing the nature of the condition and the reason restraint is inappropriate;
to an f.
An occupant who is an emergency medical services personnel, during the provision of direct patient care;
or when g.
When all safety belts are in use by other occupants.
AAn physician,action physicianfor assistant,the orforeclosure advancedof practice registered nurse who, in good faith, provides a statementconstruction thatlien. restraint would be inappropriate is not subject to civil liability.
A4. violation for not wearing a safety belt under this section is not, in itself, evidence of negligence.
TheAn factaction ofagainst aan violationemployer offor thisan sectioninjury isto notor admissiblethe indeath anyof proceedingan individual, other than onethe chargingowner or operator, occurring during the violation.operation of a commercial motor vehicle.
SECTION 4.
A new section to chapter 39-21 of the North Dakota Century Code is created and enacted as follows:
Show all 49 changed lines (9 more)
Evidence of safety belt usage in civil actions.
1.
In an action to recover damages arising out of the ownership, common maintenance, or operation of a motor vehicle, failure to wear a safety belt in violation of section 39-21-41.4 may be considered evidence of comparative negligence.
21 25.0285.0300025.0285.04000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 2.
Failure to wear a safety belt in violation of section 39-21-41.4 may be admitted to mitigate damages if the party introducing evidence of the failure to wear a safety belt in violation of section 39-21-41.4 first provides expert evidence showing the failure to wear a safety belt contributed to the death or injury sustained by the plaintiff.
3.
If the evidence supports that the failure to wear a safety belt contributed to the plaintiff's death or injury, the trier of fact may find the failure to wear a safety belt in violation of section 39-21-41.4 contributed to the plaintiff's injury and reduce the amount of the plaintiff's recovery by an amount not to exceed one percent of the damages awarded after any reductions for comparative negligence.
Page No.
3 25.0285.03000
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed FIRST ENGROSSMENT Current pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 9 nays 36
-
Amendment adopted, placed on calendar
-
Reported back amended, do not pass, placed on calendar 4 3 0
-
Rereferred to Judiciary
-
Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 4 3 0
-
Committee Hearing 03:00
-
Committee Hearing 10:30
-
Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee
Sponsors
- Dean Rummel · Cosponsor
- Dori Hauck · Cosponsor
- Jim Grueneich · Cosponsor
- David A. Clemens · Cosponsor
- Karen A. Anderson · Cosponsor
- Cole Conley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on · 36 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Conley, Cole Republican
Co-sponsors (5)
- Rummel, Dean Republican
- Hauck, Dori Republican
- Grueneich, Jim Republican
- Clemens, David A. Republican
- Anderson, Karen A. Republican
Not signed on (142)
142 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 142 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 9 | 31 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 36 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 19% | 77% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (47)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Boschee, Josh | Democratic | Nay |
| Braunberger, Ryan | Democratic | Nay |
| Hogan, Kathy | Democratic | Nay |
| Marcellais, Richard | Democratic | Nay |
| Mathern, Tim | Democratic | Nay |
| Axtman, Michelle | Republican | Nay |
| Barta, Jeff | Republican | Nay |
| Beard, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| Bekkedahl, Brad | Republican | Nay |
| Boehm, Keith | Republican | Not Voting |
| Burckhard, Randy A. | Republican | Nay |
| Castaneda, Jose L. | Republican | Nay |
| Cleary, Sean | Republican | Nay |
| Clemens, David A. | Republican | Yea |
| Conley, Cole | Republican | Yea |
| Cory, Claire | Republican | Nay |
| Davison, Kyle | Republican | Nay |
| Dever, Dick | Republican | Nay |
| Dwyer, Michael | Republican | Yea |
| Enget, Mark | Republican | Nay |
| Erbele, Robert | Republican | Nay |
| Gerhardt, Justin | Republican | Nay |
| Hogue, David | Republican | Nay |
| Kessel, Greg | Republican | Not Voting |
| Klein, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Larson, Diane | Republican | Yea |
| Lee, Judy | Republican | Nay |
| Lemm, Randy D. | Republican | Nay |
| Luick, Larry | Republican | Nay |
| Magrum, Jeffery J. | Republican | Yea |
| Meyer, Scott | Republican | Nay |
| Myrdal, Janne | Republican | Nay |
| Patten, Dale | Republican | Nay |
| Paulson, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Powers, Michelle | Republican | Nay |
| Roers, Kristin | Republican | Nay |
| Rummel, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Schaible, Donald | Republican | Nay |
| Sickler, Jonathan | Republican | Nay |
| Sorvaag, Ronald | Republican | Nay |
| Thomas, Paul J. | Republican | Nay |
| Walen, Chuck | Republican | Nay |
| Wanzek, Terry M. | Republican | Nay |
| Weber, Mark F. | Republican | Nay |
| Weston, Kent | Republican | Nay |
| Wobbema, Mike | Republican | Nay |
| van Oosting, Desiree | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2206 do?
- Relating to civil actions having three‑year limitations.
- Who sponsors SB 2206?
- SB 2206 is sponsored by Rummel, Dean (Republican), Hauck, Dori (Republican), Grueneich, Jim (Republican), Clemens, David A. (Republican), Anderson, Karen A. (Republican), and Conley, Cole (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 2206?
- This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 2206?
- Track SB 2206 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2206
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2206
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →