North Dakota 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26) Status: Passed Senate 6 R cosponsors

SB 2206 — A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 28-01-17, of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to civil actions having three-year limitations.

Last action — Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 9 nays 36

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Relating to civil actions having three‑year limitations.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

22 added · 67 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Senate Bill 2206 extend the time limit for certain civil actions to three years and clarify the rules about lawsuits against commercial motor carriers. Specifically, if someone is injured or killed due to the operation of a commercial motor vehicle, they can now pursue legal action for up to three years, but there are new caps on noneconomic damages in such cases, limiting recovery to $500,000. This change is significant because it aims to balance the rights of injured parties with the protections for commercial operators, potentially impacting how claims are made and resolved in North Dakota.

→
Previous
Latest
25.0285.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly SENATE BILL NO.
25.0285.04000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO.
2206 of North Dakota Introduced by Senators Conley, Rummel, Clemens Representatives K.
2206 Introduced by Senators Conley, Rummel, Clemens Representatives K.
Anderson, Grueneich, Hauck A BILL for an Act to create and enact a new subsection to section 28-01-18, a new section to chapter 32-03, and a new section to chapter 39-21 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to civil actions having two-year limitations, limiting noneconomic damages against a commercial motor carrier, and evidence of safety belt usage in civil actions;
Anderson, Grueneich, Hauck A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 28-01-17, of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to civil actions having three-year limitations.
and to amend and reenact section 39-21-41.4 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to requiring safety belts in certain motor vehicles;
and to provide a penalty.
A new subsection to section 28-01-18 of the North Dakota Century Code is created and enacted as follows:
An action against a commercial motor carrier for an injury to or the death of an individual other than the owner or operator of the commercial motor vehicle involved.
SECTION 2.
A new section to chapter 32-03 of the North Dakota Century Code is created and enacted as follows:
Commercial motor carrier - Noneconomic damages limited - Reduction of award.
The total amount a person may recover from the owner or operator of a commercial motor carrier for noneconomic damages in a civil action for injury, death, or other loss resulting from the operation of a commercial motor vehicle requiring a commercial driver's license may not exceed five hundred thousand dollars.
A jury in a civil action against a commercial motor carrier may not be informed of the limitation on noneconomic damages.
If a jury awards an amount exceeding five hundred thousand dollars, the court shall reduce the amount to comply with this section.
SECTION 3.
Section 39-21-41.4 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
Section 28-01-17 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
Page No.
28-01-17.
1 25.0285.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 39-21-41.4.
Actions having three-year limitations - Exceptions.
Use of safety belts required in certain motor vehicles - Enforcement - Evidence.
The following actions must be commenced within three years after the claim for relief has accrued:
A driver may not operate upon a highway a motor vehicle designed for carrying fewer than eleven passengers, which was originally manufactured with safety belts unless each occupant is wearing a properly adjusted and fastened safety belt.
An action against a sheriff or coroner upon a liability incurred by the doing of an act in the sheriff's or coroner's official capacity and by virtue of that office, or by the omission of an official duty, including the nonpayment of money collected upon an execution.
However, this subsection does not apply to an action for an escape.
This section does not apply to a:
An action upon a statute for a penalty or forfeiture, if the action is given to the party aggrieved, or to such party and the state, unless the statute imposing it prescribes a different limitation.
a.
A child in a child restraint or safety belt in accordance with section 39-21-41.2;
to drivers b.
Drivers of implements of husbandry;
to operators c.
Operators of farm vehicles as defined in subsection 5 of section 39-04-19;
to rural d.
Rural mail carriers while on duty delivering mail;
to an e.
An occupant with a medical or physically disabling condition that prevents appropriate restraint in a safety belt, if a qualified physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice registered nurse states in a signed writing the nature of the condition and the reason restraint is inappropriate;
to an f.
An occupant who is an emergency medical services personnel, during the provision of direct patient care;
or when g.
When all safety belts are in use by other occupants.
A physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice registered nurse who, in good faith, provides a statement that restraint would be inappropriate is not subject to civil liability.
An action for the foreclosure of a construction lien.
A violation for not wearing a safety belt under this section is not, in itself, evidence of negligence.
4.
The fact of a violation of this section is not admissible in any proceeding other than one charging the violation.
An action against an employer for an injury to or the death of an individual, other than the owner or operator, occurring during the operation of a commercial motor vehicle.
SECTION 4.
A new section to chapter 39-21 of the North Dakota Century Code is created and enacted as follows:
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
Previous
Latest
Evidence of safety belt usage in civil actions.
1.
In an action to recover damages arising out of the ownership, common maintenance, or operation of a motor vehicle, failure to wear a safety belt in violation of section 39-21-41.4 may be considered evidence of comparative negligence.
2 25.0285.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 2.
1 25.0285.04000
Failure to wear a safety belt in violation of section 39-21-41.4 may be admitted to mitigate damages if the party introducing evidence of the failure to wear a safety belt in violation of section 39-21-41.4 first provides expert evidence showing the failure to wear a safety belt contributed to the death or injury sustained by the plaintiff.
3.
If the evidence supports that the failure to wear a safety belt contributed to the plaintiff's death or injury, the trier of fact may find the failure to wear a safety belt in violation of section 39-21-41.4 contributed to the plaintiff's injury and reduce the amount of the plaintiff's recovery by an amount not to exceed one percent of the damages awarded after any reductions for comparative negligence.
Page No.
3 25.0285.03000
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 9 nays 36

  2. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  3. Reported back amended, do not pass, placed on calendar 4 3 0

  4. Rereferred to Judiciary

  5. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 4 3 0

  6. Committee Hearing 03:00

  7. Committee Hearing 10:30

  8. Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on · 36 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (142)

142 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 142 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 9 Yea · 36 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 93102
Democratic 0500
Total 93602
% of votes cast 19%77%0%4%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
Boschee, Josh Democratic Nay
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Nay
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Nay
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Nay
Mathern, Tim Democratic Nay
Axtman, Michelle Republican Nay
Barta, Jeff Republican Nay
Beard, Todd Republican Yea
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Nay
Boehm, Keith Republican Not Voting
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Nay
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Nay
Cleary, Sean Republican Nay
Clemens, David A. Republican Yea
Conley, Cole Republican Yea
Cory, Claire Republican Nay
Davison, Kyle Republican Nay
Dever, Dick Republican Nay
Dwyer, Michael Republican Yea
Enget, Mark Republican Nay
Erbele, Robert Republican Nay
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Nay
Hogue, David Republican Nay
Kessel, Greg Republican Not Voting
Klein, Jerry Republican Yea
Larson, Diane Republican Yea
Lee, Judy Republican Nay
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Nay
Luick, Larry Republican Nay
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Yea
Meyer, Scott Republican Nay
Myrdal, Janne Republican Nay
Patten, Dale Republican Nay
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Nay
Roers, Kristin Republican Nay
Rummel, Dean Republican Yea
Schaible, Donald Republican Nay
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Nay
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Nay
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Nay
Walen, Chuck Republican Nay
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Nay
Weber, Mark F. Republican Nay
Weston, Kent Republican Nay
Wobbema, Mike Republican Nay
van Oosting, Desiree Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 2206 do?
Relating to civil actions having three‑year limitations.
Who sponsors SB 2206?
SB 2206 is sponsored by Rummel, Dean (Republican), Hauck, Dori (Republican), Grueneich, Jim (Republican), Clemens, David A. (Republican), Anderson, Karen A. (Republican), and Conley, Cole (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 2206?
This bill died with 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26). It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 2206?
Track SB 2206 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 2206

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 2206

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →