SB 1001 — Coastal Regulatory Reform.
Last action — Amend Adopted A1
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced April 30, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill aims to reform coastal regulations.
This bill seeks to update and streamline the regulations governing coastal areas. The goal is to enhance management and protection efforts for these regions.
What this means for you
- Environment: This means enhanced regulations for coastal environments which may improve conservation efforts.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
129 added · 204 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Senate Bill 1001 removes certain references and clarifications related to funding for beach nourishment and damage mitigation projects. Specifically, it simplifies language about costs associated with permitting and construction of terminal groins. This change may streamline the process for applicants seeking funding and could make it easier for projects to receive financial support, ultimately impacting coastal management efforts in North Carolina.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 S 21 SENATE BILL 1001 Agriculture, Energy, and Environment Committee Substitute Adopted 6/17/26 Short Title:
Senators Lazzara and Sanderson (Primary Sponsors).
Rules and Operations of the Senate May 4, 2026 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO MODIFY THE COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT ACT APPLICATION PROCESSING RULE TO CLARIFY ADJACENT LANDOWNER NOTICE REQUIREMENTS, TO AMEND UPLAND BASIN DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, TO MAKE OTHER TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE UPLAND BASIN PERMITTING STATUTE, AND TO EXPAND THEPERMISSIBLEUSESTHE OFTHECOASTALSTORMDAMAGEMITIGATIONFUNDPERMISSIBLE ANDUSES PROVIDEOF FUNDING,THE ANDCOASTAL TOSTORM CLARIFYDAMAGE AGENCYMITIGATION AUTHORITYFUND OVERAND THEPROVIDE COASTALFUNDING. RESERVE.
– For both CAMA major and minor development permit applications, the CAMA Application Processing Rule shall provide that documentation showing that notice was sent by certified mail to the following:adjacent riparian landowners at the tax address of record shall constitute sufficient notice to meet the requirements of the CAMA Application Processing Rule, and the failure of an adjacent riparian landowner to receive, claim, or respond to such notice shall not delay or prevent the processing of the permit application.
(1)Nothing Documentationin showingthis thatsubsection noticeis wasintended sentto bylimit certifiedor mailprohibit to an adjacentapplicant riparianfor landownera atminor thedevelopment taxpermit addressfrom ofusing recordany satisfiesmethod theof notice requirementspermitted ofby theapplicable CAMAlaw Applicationor Processingrule. Rule if the applicant provides proof that the adjacent riparian landowner received the notice.
(2) If the applicant cannot provide proof that the adjacent riparian landowner received the notice, the permit application may proceed without proof of receipt only if the applicant provides documentation showing that notice was sent bycertified mail, returnreceipt requested,at least 60 days beforeissuance of the permit, to both (i) the adjacent riparian landowner's tax address of record and (ii) the property address of the adjacent riparian property, if a separate property address has been assigned and differs from the landowner's tax address of record.
(3) During the 60-day period following the date the notice was sent by certified mail, the Department of Environmental Quality, the Division of Coastal *S1001-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 Management, or the local permit officer may continue to process the application.
If there is no proof of receipt, however, the permit shall not be issued until the 60-day period has expired.
The failure of an adjacent riparian landowner to receive, claim, or respond to the certified mail notice shall not delay or prevent issuance of the permit after the 60-day period has expired.
(4) Nothing in this subsection is intended to limit or prohibit an applicant for a minor development permit from using any other method of notice permitted by applicable law or rule.
*S1001-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 SECTION 1.(e) Sunset.
4 RESERVED SECTION 2.
7 AMEND UPLAND BASIN DISSOLVED OXYGEN REQUIREMENTS SECTION 3.(a) G.S.
within the project baseline area prior to the development,development. as provided in this subdivision:
a.
b.
AIf demonstrationthe underapplicant provides this sub-subdivisiondemonstration, isthe onlyDepartment for pre-permitting design demonstration purposes and shall benot usedrequire onlyadditional tomechanical determine whether aeration or other active interventions areintended requiredto increase or maintain dissolved oxygen as a condition of permit issuance.issuance unless the Department provides written findings to the applicant within 90 days of the receipt of the demonstration identifying material errors in the applicant's demonstration based on peer-reviewed methodology or site-specific monitoring data." AMEND UPLAND BASIN FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS SECTION 4.
Page 2 Senate Bill 1001-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 c.
If the applicant provides a demonstration under sub-subdivision b.
of this subdivision, the Department shall not require additional mechanical aeration or other active interventions intended to increase or maintain dissolved oxygen as a condition of permit issuance unless the Department provides written findings to the applicant within 90 days of the receipt of the demonstration that identify one or more specific deficiencies in the demonstration.
For purposes of this sub-subdivision, a specific deficiency may include a deficiency in the methodology, assumptions, data representativeness, model calibration, consistency with applicable water quality standards, or site-specific monitoring data relied upon in the demonstration.
d.
Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to modify, supersede, or invalidate any certification issued under section 401 of the federal Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
§ 1341, any federal permit, any permit issued under the Coastal Area Management Act, or any condition of those approvals.
The Department's acceptance of a demonstration under sub-subdivision b.
of this subdivision shall not limit or supersede the Department's continuing authority to require monitoring, adaptive management, mechanical aeration, or other corrective measures as necessary to maintain compliance with applicable water quality standards or with the conditions of any applicable permit or certification." AMEND UPLAND BASIN FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS SECTION 4.
Iftherequirementsofthissubdivisionaremetbyset-asidefunds,theapplicantIftherequirementsofthissubdivision aremetbyset-asidefunds,theapplicant shall establish a trust at a bank, savings and loan institution, credit union, brokerage firm, or company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C.
The Department may specify the form Page 2 Senate Bill 1001-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 in which the bond or set-aside funds are provided, as well as a procedure for transfer of the financial assurance if ownership of the upland basin marina changes." 5 UPLAND BASIN TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS SECTION 5.(a) G.S.
Senate Bill 1001-Second Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 "§ 143-215.73M.
The Fund consists of General Fund appropriations, gifts, grants, devises, monies contributed byanon-Stateentityfor aparticularbeach nourishment ordamagemitigationor damagemitigation project or group of projects, and any other revenues specifically allocated to the Fund by an act of the General Assembly.
COASTAL RESERVE AGENCY AUTHORITY SECTION 6.5.(a) G.S.
113A-129.2 reads as rewritten:
"§ 113A-129.2.
Coastal Reserve Program.
(a) There is hereby created a North Carolina Coastal Reserve System for the purpose of acquiring, improving, and maintaining undeveloped coastal land and water areas in a natural state.
(b) This system shall be established and administered by the Department of Environmental Quality.
In so doing the Department shall consult with and seek the ongoing advice of Quality, subject to (i) use standards adopted for the system by the Coastal Resources Commission and (ii) permits and orders issued by the Coastal Resources Commission.
Commission concerning activities allowed in the system.
The Department may byrule define the areas to be included in this system and set standards for its use.
(c) This system shall be established within the coastal area as defined by G.S.
Show all 49 changed lines (9 more)
113A-103(2).
(d) All acquisitions or dispositions of property for lands within this system shall be in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 146 of the General Statutes.
(e) All lands and waters within the system shall be used primarily for research and education.
Other public uses, such as hunting, fishing, navigation, and recreation, shall be allowed to the extent consistent with these primary uses.
Improvements and alterations to the lands shall be limited to those consistent with these uses.
(f) With respect to any component of the system that is also a dedicated nature preserve pursuant to Part 42 of Article 2 of Chapter 143B of the General Statutes, the Department and the Commission, in accordance with the authority granted to each pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, shall act as primary custodian to manage such components, in accordance with the Page 4 Senate Bill 1001-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 articles of dedication.
The Secretary of Natural and Cultural Resources shall monitor these preserves and shall retain authorityto report alleged violations of the approved management plan or the articles of dedication for such preserves, in which case the Secretary shall request the Department of Administration to coordinate mediation with the primary custodian.
If mediation is unsuccessful in resolving the issue, the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources shall have standing and a right of action in the Superior Court of Wake County, or the county in which the component is located, to enforce the terms of any articles of dedication applicable to such components." SECTION 6.5.(b) This section becomes effective January 1, 2027.
Senate Bill 1001-Second1001-First Edition Page 53
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
Action History
-
Amend Adopted A1
-
Amend Tabled A2
-
Passed 2nd Reading
-
Passed 3rd Reading
-
Engrossed
-
Special Message Sent To House
-
Special Message Received From Senate
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Reptd Fav
-
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Com Substitute Adopted
-
Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Withdrawn From Com
-
Re-ref to Finance. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Com Substitute Adopted
-
Re-ref Com On Appropriations/Base Budget
-
Withdrawn From Com
-
Re-ref to Agriculture, Energy, and Environment. If fav, re-ref to Appropriations/Base Budget
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Norman W. Sanderson · Cosponsor
- Michael A. Lazzara · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 177 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Michael A. Lazzara Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Norman W. Sanderson Republican Voted No
Not signed on (177)
177 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 177 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 12 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 44 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (50)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bode | — | Yea |
| Woodard | — | Yea |
| Krawiec | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Proctor | — | Yea |
| Hunt | — | Not Voting |
| Marcus | — | Not Voting |
| P. Newton | — | Yea |
| Dan Blue | Democratic | Yea |
| DeAndrea Salvador | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gale Adcock | Democratic | Yea |
| Gladys A. Robinson | Democratic | Yea |
| Graig Meyer | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay J. Chaudhuri | Democratic | Yea |
| Joyce Waddell | Democratic | Yea |
| Julie Mayfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Kandie D. Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Lisa Grafstein | Democratic | Yea |
| Michael Garrett | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Mujtaba A. Mohammed | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Natalie S. Murdock | Democratic | Yea |
| Paul A. Lowe, Jr. | Democratic | Yea |
| Sydney Batch | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Val Applewhite | Democratic | Yea |
| Amy S. Galey | Republican | Yea |
| Benton G. Sawrey | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Rabon | Republican | Yea |
| Bobby Hanig | Republican | Yea |
| Brad Overcash | Republican | Yea |
| Brent Jackson | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Ford | Republican | Yea |
| Danny Earl Britt, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| David W. Craven, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Eddie D. Settle | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Burgin | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Corbin | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa S. Barnes | Republican | Yea |
| Michael A. Lazzara | Republican | Yea |
| Michael V. Lee | Republican | Yea |
| Norman W. Sanderson | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Newton | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Berger | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Hise | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Jarvis | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy D. Moffitt | Republican | Yea |
| Tom McInnis | Republican | Yea |
| Vickie Sawyer | Republican | Yea |
| W. Ted Alexander | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 19 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 22% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (50)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bode | — | Yea |
| Woodard | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Proctor | — | Yea |
| Krawiec | — | Nay |
| Hunt | — | Not Voting |
| Marcus | — | Not Voting |
| P. Newton | — | Yea |
| Dan Blue | Democratic | Yea |
| DeAndrea Salvador | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gale Adcock | Democratic | Yea |
| Gladys A. Robinson | Democratic | Nay |
| Graig Meyer | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay J. Chaudhuri | Democratic | Yea |
| Joyce Waddell | Democratic | Yea |
| Julie Mayfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Kandie D. Smith | Democratic | Nay |
| Lisa Grafstein | Democratic | Yea |
| Michael Garrett | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Mujtaba A. Mohammed | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Natalie S. Murdock | Democratic | Yea |
| Paul A. Lowe, Jr. | Democratic | Yea |
| Sydney Batch | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Val Applewhite | Democratic | Nay |
| Amy S. Galey | Republican | Yea |
| Benton G. Sawrey | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Rabon | Republican | Yea |
| Bobby Hanig | Republican | Yea |
| Brad Overcash | Republican | Yea |
| Brent Jackson | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Ford | Republican | Nay |
| Danny Earl Britt, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| David W. Craven, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Eddie D. Settle | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Burgin | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Corbin | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa S. Barnes | Republican | Yea |
| Michael A. Lazzara | Republican | Yea |
| Michael V. Lee | Republican | Yea |
| Norman W. Sanderson | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Newton | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Berger | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Hise | Republican | Nay |
| Steve Jarvis | Republican | Nay |
| Timothy D. Moffitt | Republican | Yea |
| Tom McInnis | Republican | Yea |
| Vickie Sawyer | Republican | Yea |
| W. Ted Alexander | Republican | Nay |
| Warren Daniel | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1001?
- SB 1001 is sponsored by Norman W. Sanderson (Republican) and Michael A. Lazzara (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1001?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced April 30, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 1001?
- Track SB 1001 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1001
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1001
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →