North Carolina 2025 Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 16 R · 1 D cosponsors

HB 162 — Parking Lot Reform/Stormwater Control.

Last action — Ch. SL 2026-39

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Josh Stein (Democratic) on July 07, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 17 sponsors

    3 primary, 14 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (16 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This bill addresses stormwater control in parking lots.

The bill focuses on improving stormwater management in parking lots to enhance environmental protection and functionality. It aims to create better designs for parking facilities that manage water runoff more effectively.

What this means for you
  • Environment: This means enhanced protection of natural water resources through improved stormwater management practices.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

36 added · 113 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of House Bill 162 has clarified the list of sponsors by adding additional representatives, which may indicate broader support for the bill. Additionally, a specific line was removed which may have provided less detail on the process. This change matters because a clearer sponsorship list can help indicate a stronger coalition behind the bill, potentially affecting its chances of passing. The effective date of the bill remains the same, indicating that the timeline for enforcement is unchanged.

→
Previous
Latest
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 H 2 HOUSE BILL 162 Senate Agriculture, Energy, and Environment Committee Substitute Adopted 6/17/26 Short Title:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 H 1 HOUSE BILL 162 Short Title:
Parking Lot Reform/Stormwater Control.
Local Gov't Applicants/Criminal History Check.
Representatives Loftis, N.
Jackson, Ward, and Kidwell (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
February 24, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO RESTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FROM REGULATING CERTAIN ASPECTS OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES AND TO MODIFY THE AUTHORITY OF CERTAIN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO REQUIRE STORMWATER CONTROL FOR REDEVELOPED PROPERTY.
Judiciary 2, if favorable, State and Local Government, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House February 24, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT PROVIDING THAT COUNTIES AND CITIES SHALL REQUIRE CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD CHECKS FOR APPLICANTS FOR EMPLOYMENT IF THE POSITION BEING FILLED REQUIRES THE APPLICANT TO WORK WITH CHILDREN IN ANY CAPACITY.
8 PART I.
SECTION 1.(a) G.S.
PROHIBITING CERTAIN ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS RELATED TO OFF-STREET PARKING SECTION 1.(a) G.S.
153A-94.2 reads as rewritten:
160D-702 reads as rewritten:
"§ 153A-94.2.
"§ 160D-702.
Criminal history record checks of employees permitted.
Grant of power.
(a) The board of commissioners may adopt or provide for rules and regulations or ordinances concerning a requirement that any applicant for employment be subject to a criminal history record check of State and National Repositories of Criminal Histories conducted by the State Bureau of Investigation in accordance with G.S.
… (c) A zoning or other development regulation shall not do any of the following:
143B-1209.25 [G.S.
(1) Set a minimum square footage of any structures subject to regulation under the North Carolina Residential Code.
143B-1209.26].
(2) Require a an off-street parking space to be larger than 9 feet wide by 20 feet long unless the parking space is designated for handicap, parallel, or diagonal parking.
G.S.
(2a) Requireanoff-street parkinglot to meet aminimum numberofparkingspaces per development or structure, regardless of occupancy or use.
143B-1209.26.
The limitations of this subdivision shall not, however, apply to local governments located in the coastal area, as those terms are defined under G.S.
The local or regional public employer may consider the results of these criminal history record checks in its hiring decisions.
113A-103, except with respect to the following properties located in the coastal area:
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, if the position being filled requires an applicant for employment to work with children in any capacity, the board of commissioners shall require the applicant be subject to a criminal historyrecord check conducted by the State Bureau of Investigation in accordance with G.S.
a.
143B-1209.26." SECTION 1.(b) G.S.
Within the boundaries of a National Register Historic District or a local historic district.
160A-164.2 reads as rewritten:
b.
"§ 160A-164.2.
That are either (i) individually listed in the National Register of Historic Places or (ii) individually designated as a local historic landmark.
Criminal history record check of employees permitted.
c.
(a) The council may adopt or provide for rules and regulations or ordinances concerning a requirement that any applicant for employment be subject to a criminal history record check of State and National Repositories of Criminal Histories conducted by the State Bureau of Investigation in accordance with G.S.
Properties located within a district on the Study List for the National Register of Historic Places as maintained by the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office or a national or State historic landmark.
143B-1209.25 [G.S.
(3) Require additional fire apparatus access roads into developments of one- or two-family dwellings that are not in compliance with the required number of fire apparatus access roads into developments of one- or two-familydwellings set forth in the Fire Code of the North Carolina Residential Code for One- and Two-Family Dwellings.
143B-1209.26].
*H162-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (4) Establish or require pavement design standards for public roads or private roads that are more stringent than the minimum pavement design standards adopted by the Department of Transportation.
G.S.
…." SECTION 1.(b) This section becomes effective July 1, 2026.
143B-1209.26.
7 PART II.
The city may consider the results of these criminal history record checks in its hiring decisions.
MODIFY THE AUTHORITY OF CERTAIN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO REQUIRE STORMWATER CONTROL FOR REDEVELOPED PROPERTY SECTION 2.(a) G.S.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, if the position being filled requires an applicant for employment to work with children in any capacity, the council shall require the applicant be subject to a criminal history record check conducted by the State Bureau of Investigation in accordance with G.S.
143-214.7 reads as rewritten:
143B-1209.26." SECTION2.
"§ 143-214.7.
This act becomeseffectiveOctober 1,2025, and applies to applications for employment on or after that date.
Stormwater runoff rules and programs.
*H162-v-1*
… (a1) Definitions.
– The following definitions apply in this section:
(1) Built-upon area.
– As defined in G.S.
143-214.7D.
(2) Development.
– Any land-disturbing activity that increases the amount of built-upon area or that otherwise decreases the infiltration of precipitation into the subsoil.
When additional development occurs at a site that has existing development, the built-upon area of the existing development shall not be included in the density calculations for additional stormwater control requirements, and stormwater control requirements cannot be applied retroactively to existing development, unless otherwise required by federal law.
(2)(3) Redevelopment.
Show all 62 changed rows (22 more)
Previous
Latest
– Any land-disturbing activity that does not result in a net increase in built-upon area and that provides greater or equal stormwater control to that of the previous development.
… (b3) Stormwater runoff rules and programs shall not require private property owners to install new or increased stormwater controls for (i) preexisting development existing built-upon area or (ii) redevelopment activities that do not remove or decrease existing stormwater controls.
When a preexisting development is redeveloped, either in whole or in part, increased stormwater controls shall only be required for the amount of impervious surface being created that exceeds the amount of impervious surface that existed before the redevelopment, irrespective of whether the impervious surface that existed before the redevelopment is to be demolished or relocated during the development activity.
When development or redevelopment occurs at a site that has existing built-upon area, (i) the existing built-upon area shall not be included in the density calculations for additional stormwater control requirements, irrespective of whether the existing built-upon area is to be demolished, relocated, replaced, or remains in place during development activity, (ii) the existing built-upon area at the site is not subject to additional stormwater control requirements under this section, regardless of whether the existing built-upon area is demolished, relocated, replaced, or remains in place during the development activity, (iii) for purposes of determining the size of the area for which stormwater control measures are required for a development or redevelopment, built-upon area that existed before the development or redevelopment shall be applied on a square-foot-for-square-foot basis to reduce the built-upon area for which stormwater control measures are required, and (iv) stormwater control requirements cannot be applied retroactively to existing built-upon area, unless otherwise required by federal law.
A property owner may elect to treat the stormwater resulting from the net increase in built-upon area above the preexisting existing built-upon area at the development or redevelopment for the purpose of exceeding allowable density under the applicable water supply watershed rules as provided in G.S.
143-214.5(d3).
This subsection applies to all local governments regardless of the source of their regulatory authority.
Local governments shall include the requirements of this subsection in their stormwater ordinances.
… Page 2 House Bill 162-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (b8) A local government may offer nonmandatory incentives that waive building, zoning, connection, or other regulations or fees;
provide additional tax and financial benefits;
or institute other incentives for development or redevelopment that implements additional stormwater control measures beyond those required by this section and rules adopted thereunder.
…." SECTION 2.(b) Each local government that implements a stormwater management program shall amend its stormwater ordinance to conform to G.S.
143-214.7(b3), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, within 12 months of the effective date of this section.
Any local stormwater ordinance that is inconsistent with G.S.
143-214.7(b3), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, is void and unenforceable on and after that date.
A local government may adopt, amend, or repeal ordinance provisions implementing G.S.
143-214.7(b8) at any time after the effective date of this section.
SECTION 2.(c) This section is effective when it becomes law and applies to stormwater rules and stormwater program amendments adopted on or after that date.
PART III.
EFFECTIVE DATE SECTION 3.
Except as otherwise provided, this act is effective when it becomes law.
House Bill 162-Second Edition Page 3
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Ch. SL 2026-39

  2. Signed by Gov. 7/6/2026

  3. Pres. To Gov. 7/2/2026

  4. Ratified

  5. Concurred In S Com Sub

  6. Ordered Enrolled

  7. Cal Pursuant 36(b)

  8. Placed On Cal For 06/30/2026

  9. Regular Message Sent To House

  10. Regular Message Received For Concurrence in S Com Sub

  11. Amend Adopted A1

  12. Passed 2nd Reading

  13. Passed 3rd Reading

  14. Engrossed

  15. Reptd Fav

  16. Reptd Fav Com Substitute

  17. Com Substitute Adopted

  18. Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  19. Withdrawn From Com

  20. Re-ref to Agriculture, Energy, and Environment. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate

  21. Regular Message Sent To Senate

  22. Regular Message Received From House

  23. Passed 1st Reading

  24. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  25. Passed 2nd Reading

  26. Passed 3rd Reading

  27. Reptd Fav

  28. Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)

  29. Placed On Cal For 03/25/2025

  30. Reptd Fav

  31. Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  32. Reptd Fav

  33. Re-ref Com On State and Local Government

  34. Passed 1st Reading

  35. Ref to the Com on Judiciary 2, if favorable, State and Local Government, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  36. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (14)

Not signed on (162)

162 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 162 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Second Reading

Passed 44 Yea · 1 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 17102
Republican 27003
Total 44105
% of votes cast 88%2%0%10%
How each member voted (50)
Member Party Vote
Caleb Theodros Democratic Yea
Dan Blue Democratic Yea
DeAndrea Salvador Democratic Yea
Gale Adcock Democratic Yea
Gladys A. Robinson Democratic Yea
Haseeb Fatmi Democratic Yea
Jay J. Chaudhuri Democratic Yea
Jonah Garson Democratic Yea
Joyce Waddell Democratic Yea
Julie Mayfield Democratic Yea
Kandie D. Smith Democratic Yea
Lisa Grafstein Democratic Yea
Michael Garrett Democratic Yea
Mujtaba A. Mohammed Democratic Yea
Natalie S. Murdock Democratic Nay
Paul A. Lowe, Jr. Democratic Yea
Sophia Chitlik Democratic Not Voting
Sydney Batch Democratic Not Voting
Val Applewhite Democratic Yea
Woodson Bradley Democratic Yea
Amy S. Galey Republican Yea
Benton G. Sawrey Republican Yea
Bill Rabon Republican Yea
Bob Brinson Republican Yea
Bobby Hanig Republican Yea
Brad Overcash Republican Yea
Brent Jackson Republican Yea
Carl Ford Republican Yea
Chris Measmer Republican Yea
Dana Jones Republican Yea
Danny Earl Britt, Jr. Republican Yea
David W. Craven, Jr. Republican Yea
Eddie D. Settle Republican Yea
Jim Burgin Republican Not Voting
Kevin Corbin Republican Yea
Lisa S. Barnes Republican Yea
Mark Hollo Republican Yea
Michael A. Lazzara Republican Yea
Michael V. Lee Republican Yea
Norman W. Sanderson Republican Yea
Paul Newton Republican Yea
Phil Berger Republican Yea
Ralph Hise Republican Yea
Steve Jarvis Republican Yea
Timothy D. Moffitt Republican Not Voting
Todd Johnson Republican Not Voting
Tom McInnis Republican Yea
Vickie Sawyer Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Yea
Warren Daniel Republican Yea

Official roll call →

M11 Concur

Passed 105 Yea · 3 Nay · 12 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 28204
Unaffiliated 23003
U 1100
Republican 53005
Total 1053012
% of votes cast 88%3%0%10%
How each member voted (120)
Member Party Vote
Autry — Yea
Clemmons — Yea
Gill — Yea
Harris — Yea
Lucas — Yea
Rudow — Yea
CharlesSmith — Yea
Staton-Williams — Yea
vonHaefen — Yea
Wray — Yea
Crutchfield — Yea
Elmore — Yea
Faircloth — Yea
Lowery — Yea
Mills — Yea
Moore — Yea
Reeder — Yea
Saine — Yea
Sasser — Yea
CarsonSmith — Yea
Sossamon — Yea
Bradford — Not Voting
Cleveland — Not Voting
Fontenot — Not Voting
F. Jackson — Yea
K. Baker — Yea
Abe Jones Democratic Yea
Allen Buansi Democratic Yea
Allison A. Dahle Democratic Yea
Amber M. Baker Democratic Yea
Amos L. Quick, III Democratic Not Voting
B. Ray Jeffers Democratic Yea
Becky Carney Democratic Yea
Brandon Lofton Democratic Yea
Carolyn G. Logan Democratic Not Voting
Cecil Brockman Democratic Yea
Cynthia Ball Democratic Yea
Deb Butler Democratic Yea
Eric Ager Democratic Yea
Garland E. Pierce Democratic Yea
Gloristine Brown Democratic Yea
James Roberson Democratic Yea
Joe John Democratic Yea
Kanika Brown Democratic Not Voting
Laura Budd Democratic Yea
Lindsey Prather Democratic Yea
Marcia Morey Democratic Nay
Maria Cervania Democratic Yea
Mary Belk Democratic Yea
Pricey Harrison Democratic Nay
Renée A. Price Democratic Yea
Robert T. Reives, II Democratic Not Voting
Sarah Crawford Democratic Yea
Shelly Willingham Democratic Yea
Terence Everitt Democratic Yea
Terry M. Brown Jr. Democratic Yea
Tim Longest Democratic Yea
Vernetta Alston Democratic Yea
Ya Liu Democratic Yea
Zack Hawkins Democratic Yea
A. Reece Pyrtle, Jr. Republican Yea
Allen Chesser Republican Yea
Ben T. Moss, Jr. Republican Yea
Bill Ward Republican Yea
Brenden H. Jones Republican Yea
Brian Biggs Republican Yea
Celeste C. Cairns Republican Yea
Charles W. Miller Republican Yea
Chris Humphrey Republican Yea
David Willis Republican Yea
Dean Arp Republican Yea
Dennis Riddell Republican Yea
Destin Hall Republican Not Voting
Diane Wheatley Republican Yea
Donna McDowell White Republican Yea
Donnie Loftis Republican Yea
Donny Lambeth Republican Yea
Dudley Greene Republican Not Voting
Edward C. Goodwin Republican Yea
Erin Paré Republican Yea
Frank Iler Republican Yea
Harry Warren Republican Yea
Howard Penny, Jr. Republican Yea
Hugh Blackwell Republican Yea
Jake Johnson Republican Yea
Jay Adams Republican Yea
Jeff Zenger Republican Yea
Jeffrey C. McNeely Republican Yea
Jennifer Balkcom Republican Yea
Jerry "Alan" Branson Republican Yea
Jimmy Dixon Republican Yea
John A. Torbett Republican Yea
John R. Bell, IV Republican Yea
John Sauls Republican Yea
Joseph Pike Republican Yea
Julia C. Howard Republican Not Voting
Karl E. Gillespie Republican Yea
Keith Kidwell Republican Yea
Kelly E. Hastings Republican Yea
Kyle Hall Republican Yea
Larry C. Strickland Republican Yea
Larry W. Potts Republican Yea
Mark Brody Republican Yea
Mark Pless Republican Yea
Matthew Winslow Republican Yea
Mike Clampitt Republican Yea
Mitchell S. Setzer Republican Yea
Neal Jackson Republican Not Voting
Phil Shepard Republican Yea
Ray Pickett Republican Yea
Sam Watford Republican Yea
Sarah Stevens Republican Yea
Stephen M. Ross Republican Yea
Steve Tyson Republican Yea
Ted Davis, Jr. Republican Yea
Tricia Ann Cotham Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Not Voting
William D. Brisson Republican Yea
Carla D. Cunningham U Yea
Nasif Majeed U Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 162?
HB 162 is sponsored by David Willis (Republican), Shelly Willingham (Democratic), Donna McDowell White (Republican), A. Reece Pyrtle, Jr. (Republican), Joseph Pike (Republican), Charles W. Miller (Republican), Jeffrey C. McNeely (Republican), Allen Chesser (Republican), Todd Carver (Republican), Jerry "Alan" Branson (Republican), Brian Biggs (Republican), Jennifer Balkcom (Republican), Keith Kidwell (Republican), Bill Ward (Republican), Neal Jackson (Republican), Donnie Loftis (Republican), and Jake Johnson (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 162?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 162?
Track HB 162 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 162

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 162

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →