North Carolina 2025 Session Status: Enacted 58 R cosponsors

HB 402 — Limit Rules With Substantial Financial Costs.

Last action — Veto Overridden

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 13, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Josh Stein (Democratic) on July 29, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 66% · moderate confidence

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 60 sponsors

    3 primary, 57 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (58 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    1 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

172 added · 145 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of HB 402 has clarified the rules regarding the effective date of permanent rules. Specifically, it specifies that a permanent rule approved by the Commission will take effect on the first day of the month after approval, but new language has been added to outline circumstances that would delay this, such as a significant economic impact or if there are written objections. This change is important because it provides clearer guidelines for when rules can come into effect, helping affected individuals and businesses anticipate the impact of new regulations.

→
Previous
Latest
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 H 2 HOUSE BILL 402 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/15/25 Short Title:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 H 1 HOUSE BILL 402 Short Title:
Representatives Chesser, Bell, Zenger, and Schietzelt (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
March 17, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO ENACT THE REGULATIONS FROM THE EXECUTIVE IN NEED OF SCRUTINY ACT AND TO CLARIFY THE JUDICIAL DEFERENCE AFFORDED TO AGENCY INTERPRETATIONS OF RULES.
Regulatory Reform, if favorable, Judiciary 1, if favorable, Commerce and Economic Development, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House March 17, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO ENACT THE REGULATIONS FROM THE EXECUTIVE IN NEED OF SCRUTINY ACT.
– A permanent rule approved by the Commission becomes effective on the first dayof the month following the month the rule is approved bythe Commission, unless (i) the Commission received written objections to the rule in accordance with subsection (b2) of this section, section, (ii) the rule would have a substantial economic impact as calculated under G.S.
– A permanent rule approved by the Commission becomes effective on the first dayof the month following the month the rule is approved bythe Commission, unless (i) the Commission received written objections to the rule in accordance with subsection (b2) of this section, section, (ii) the rule would have an aggregate economic impact on all persons affected of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) as calculated under G.S.
150B-21.4(b1)(4a), or unless (iii) the agency that adopted the rule specifies a later effective date.
150B-21.4(b1)(3a) in a 12-month period and requires ratification by the General Assembly pursuant to subsection (b3) of this section, or (iii) unless the agency that adopted the rule specifies a later effective date.
14-4.1, if the Commission received written objections to the rule in accordance with subsection (b2) of this section, or if the rule would have a substantial economic impact as calculated under G.S.
14-4.1, if the Commission received written objections to the rule in accordance with subsection (b2) of this section, the rule becomes effective on the earlier of the thirty-first legislative day or the day of adjournment of the next regular session of the General Assembly that begins at least 25 days after the date the Commission approved the rule, unless a different effective date applies under this section.
150B-21.4(b1)(4a), the rule becomes effective on the earlier of the thirty-first legislative day or the day of adjournment of the next regular session of the General Assembly that begins at least 25 days after the date the Commission approved the rule, unless a different effective date applies under this section.
Notwithstanding any rule of either house of the General Assembly, any member of the General Assembly may introduce a bill during the first 30 legislative days of any regular session to disapprove a rule that has been approved by the Commission and that either has not become effective or has become effective by executive order under subsection (c) of this section.
Notwithstanding any rule of either house of the General Assembly, any member of the General Assembly may introduce a bill during the first 30 legislative days of any regular session to *H402-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 disapprove a rule that has been approved by the Commission and that either has not become effective or has become effective by executive order under subsection (c) of this section.
*H402-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 …." SECTION 2.
(b2) Objection.
– Any person who objects to the adoption of a permanent rule may submit written comments to the agency.
If the objection is not resolved prior to adoption of the rule, a person may submit written objections to the Commission.
If the Commission receives written objections from 10 or more persons, no later than 5:00 P.M.
of the day following the day the Commission approves the rule, clearly requesting review by the legislature in accordance with instructions posted on the agency's Web site pursuant to G.S.
150B-19.1(c)(4), and the Commission approves the rule, the rule will become effective as provided in subsection (b1) of this section.
The Commission shall notify the agency that the rule is subject to legislative disapproval on the day following the day it receives 10 or more written objections.
If the Commission receives objections from 10 or more persons clearly requesting review by the legislature, and the rule objected to is one of a group of related rules adopted by the agency at the same time, the agency that adopted the rule may cause any of the other rules in the group to become effective as provided in subsection (b1) of this section by submitting a written statement to that effect to the Codifier of Rules before the other rules become effective.
A rule that requires ratification by the General Assembly pursuant to subsection (b3) of this section shall not be subject to this subsection.
(b3) Rules with Substantial Economic Impact.
– (1) A permanent rule that would have an aggregate economic impact on all persons affected of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) as calculated under G.S.
150B-21.4(b1)(3a) in a 12-month period shall become effective only if the General Assembly ratifies a bill to approve the rule.
If a bill that specifically approves the rule is ratified by the General Assembly, the rule shall become effective on the later of (i) the first day of the month following the month that the bill ratifying the rule becomes effective or (ii) the date specified by the agency adopting the rule.
(2) Notwithstanding any rule of either house of the General Assembly, any member of the General Assembly may introduce a bill during any regular or special session to approve a rule upon the earlier of the following:
a.
The day following the day that the Joint Legislative Administrative Procedure Oversight Committee has reviewed the rule and made a favorable or unfavorable recommendation to the General Assembly.
b.
Sixty days after the Joint Legislative Administrative Procedure Oversight Committee receives the rule from the Commission, if the Joint Legislative Administrative Procedure Oversight Committee has not made a favorable or unfavorable recommendation to the General Assembly.
…." SECTION 2.
If an agency requests the Office of State Budget and Management to prepare a fiscal note for a proposed rule change, that Office must prepare the note within 90 days after receiving a written request for the note.
If an agency requests the Office of State Budget and Management to prepare a fiscal note for a proposed rule change, that Office must prepare the note within 90 days after receiving a written request for the Page 2 House Bill 402-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 note.
period, as calculated under subdivision (4a) of this subsection.
(3a) Estimate the cost of the baseline, if the proposed rule amends or readopts an existing rule.
(3a) Estimate the combined cost of the baseline conditions and the proposed rule.
(4a) Estimate the combined cost of the baseline conditions and the proposed rule as calculated in subdivisions (3a) and (4) of this subsection.
150B-34 reads as rewritten:
150B-21.11 reads as rewritten:
"§ 150B-34.
"§ 150B-21.11.
Final decision or order.
Procedure when Commission approves permanent rule.
Page 2 House Bill 402-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (a) In each contested case the administrative law judge shall make a final decision or order that contains findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(a) When the Commission approves a permanent rule, it must notify the agency that adopted the rule of the Commission's approval, and deliver the approved rule to the Codifier of Rules.
The administrative law judge shall decide the case based upon the preponderance of the evidence, giving due regard to evidence.
(b) If the approved rule will increase or decrease expenditures or revenues of a unit of local government, the Commission must also notify the Governor of the Commission's approval of the rule and deliver a copy of the approved rule to the Governor by the end of the month in which the Commission approved the rule.
The administrative law judge shall be informed by the demonstrated knowledge and expertise of the agency with respect to facts and inferences within the specialized knowledge of the agency.agency but shall exercise independent judgment in making a final decision or order.
(c) If the approved rule wouldhave anaggregateeconomicimpact onall persons affected of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) as calculated under G.S.
(b) Repealed by Session Laws 1991, c.
150B-21.4(b1)(3a) in a 12-month period, the Rules Review Commission shall notifythe cochairs of the Joint Legislative Administrative Procedure Oversight Committee that the rule was approved." SECTION 4.
35, s.
Show all 77 changed rows (37 more)
Previous
Latest
6.
(c) Repealed by Session Laws 2011-398, s.
18.
For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.
(d) Except for the exemptions contained in G.S.
150B-1, the provisions of this section regarding the decision of the administrative law judge shall apply only to agencies subject to Article 3 of this Chapter, notwithstanding any other provisions to the contrary relating to recommended decisions by administrative law judges.
(e) An administrative law judge may grant judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to a motion made in accordance with G.S.
1A-1, Rule 12(c), or summary judgment, pursuant to a motion made in accordance with G.S.
1A-1, Rule 56, that disposes of all issues in the contested case.
Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a decision granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings or summary judgment need not include findings of fact or conclusions of law, except as determined by the administrative law judge to be required or allowed by G.S.
1A-1, Rule 12(c), or Rule 56." SECTION 4.
150B-51 reads as rewritten:
120-70.101 reads as rewritten:
"§ 150B-51.
"§ 120-70.101.
Scope and standard of review.
Purpose and powers of Committee.
(a), (a1) Repealed bySessions Laws, 2011-398, s.
The Joint Legislative Administrative Procedure Oversight Committee has the following powers and duties:
27.
House Bill 402-First Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (1) To review rules to which the Rules Review Commission has objected to determine if statutory changes are needed to enable the agency to fulfill the intent of the General Assembly.
For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.
(2) To receive reports prepared by the Rules Review Commission containing the text and a summary of each rule approved by the Commission.
(b) The court reviewing a final decision may affirm the decision or remand the case for further proceedings.
(3) Repealed by Session Laws 2009-125, s.
It may also reverse or modify the decision if the substantial rights of the petitioners may have been prejudiced because the findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are:
1, effective October 1, 2009.
(1) In violation of constitutional provisions;
(3a) To review the activities of State occupational licensing boards to determine if the boards are operating in accordance with statutory requirements and if the boards are still necessaryto achieve the purposes for which theywere created.
(2) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency or administrative law judge;
This review shall not include decisions concerning board personnel matters or determinations on individual licensing applications or individual disciplinary actions.
(3) Made upon unlawful procedure;
(4) To review State regulatory programs to determine if the programs overlap, have conflicting goals, or could be simplified and still achieve the purpose of the regulation.
(4) Affected by other error of law;
(5) To review existing rules to determine if the rules are necessary or if the rules can be streamlined.
(5) Unsupported by substantial evidence admissible under G.S.
(5a) To review and make recommendations on whether the General Assembly should ratify rules that would have an aggregate economic impact on all persons affected of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) as calculated under G.S.
150B-29(a), 150B-30, or 150B-31 in view of the entire record as submitted;
150B-21.4(b1)(3a) in a 12-month period, pursuant to G.S.
or (6) Arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion.
150B-21.3(b3).
(c) In reviewing a final decision in a contested case, the court shall determine whether the petitioner is entitled to the relief sought in the petition based upon its review of the final decision and the official record.
The Committee shall review a rule and make a recommendation within 60 days of receiving the rule from the Commission.
With regard to asserted errors pursuant to subdivisions (1) through (4)ofsubsection (b)ofthis section,thecourtshall conduct itsreviewofthefinal decision using the de novo standard of review.
(6) To review the rule-makingprocess to determine if the procedures for adopting rules give the public adequate notice of and information about proposed rules.
With regard to asserted errors pursuant to subdivisions (5) and (6) of subsection (b) of this section, the court shall conduct its review of the final decision using the whole record standard of review.
(7) To review any other concerns about administrative law to determine if statutory changes are needed.
In conducting its review of the final decision, the court shall be informed by the demonstrated knowledge and expertise of the agency with respect to facts and inferences within the specialized knowledge of the agency but shall exercise independent judgment in making its order.
(8) To report to the General Assembly from time to time concerning the Committee's activities and any recommendations for statutory changes." SECTION 5.
(d) In reviewing a final decision allowing judgment on the pleadings or summary judgment, the court may enter any order allowed by G.S.
This act is effective when it becomes law and applies to rules adopted on or after that date.
1A-1, Rule 12(c) or Rule 56.
Page 4 House Bill 402-First Edition
If the order of the court does not fully adjudicate the case, the court shall remand the case to the administrative law judge for such further proceedings as are just." House Bill 402-Second Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 SECTION 5.
This act is effective when it becomes law.
Sections 1 and 2 of this act apply to rules adopted on or after that date.
Sections 3 and 4 of this act apply to actions pending or filed on or after that date.
Page 4 House Bill 402-Second Edition
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (8)

Action History

  1. Veto Overridden

  2. Veto Received From House

  3. Placed on Today's Calendar

  4. Veto Overridden

  5. Ch. SL 2025-82

  6. Withdrawn From Cal

  7. Placed On Cal For 07/29/2025

  8. Placed On Cal For 07/14/2025

  9. Vetoed 06/27/2025

  10. Received from the Governor

  11. Pres. To Gov. 6/19/2025

  12. Ratified

  13. Concurred In S Com Sub

  14. Ordered Enrolled

  15. Cal Pursuant 36(b)

  16. Placed On Cal For 06/17/2025

  17. Regular Message Sent To House

  18. Regular Message Received For Concurrence in S Com Sub

  19. Amend Adopted A1

  20. Amend Tabled A2

  21. Passed 2nd Reading

  22. Passed 3rd Reading

  23. Engrossed

  24. Reptd Fav

  25. Reptd Fav Com Substitute

  26. Com Substitute Adopted

  27. Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  28. Withdrawn From Com

  29. Re-ref to Regulatory Reform. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate

  30. Regular Message Received From House

  31. Passed 1st Reading

  32. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  33. Regular Message Sent To Senate

  34. Amend Failed A1

  35. Passed 2nd Reading

  36. Passed 3rd Reading

  37. Serial Referral To Commerce and Economic Development Stricken

  38. Reptd Fav Com Substitute

  39. Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  40. Reptd Fav

  41. Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)

  42. Placed On Cal For 04/16/2025

  43. Reptd Fav

  44. Re-ref Com On Judiciary 1

  45. Passed 1st Reading

  46. Ref to the Com on Regulatory Reform, if favorable, Judiciary 1, if favorable, Commerce and Economic Development, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  47. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 57 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 28 voted No

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (57)

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Motion 11 Veto Override

Passed 30 Yea · 19 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 30000
Democratic 01901
Total 301901
% of votes cast 60%38%0%2%
How each member voted (50)
Member Party Vote
Caleb Theodros Democratic Nay
Dan Blue Democratic Nay
DeAndrea Salvador Democratic Nay
Gale Adcock Democratic Nay
Gladys A. Robinson Democratic Nay
Graig Meyer Democratic Not Voting
Jay J. Chaudhuri Democratic Nay
Joyce Waddell Democratic Nay
Julie Mayfield Democratic Nay
Kandie D. Smith Democratic Nay
Lisa Grafstein Democratic Nay
Michael Garrett Democratic Nay
Mujtaba A. Mohammed Democratic Nay
Natalie S. Murdock Democratic Nay
Paul A. Lowe, Jr. Democratic Nay
Sophia Chitlik Democratic Nay
Sydney Batch Democratic Nay
Terence Everitt Democratic Nay
Val Applewhite Democratic Nay
Woodson Bradley Democratic Nay
Amy S. Galey Republican Yea
Benton G. Sawrey Republican Yea
Bill Rabon Republican Yea
Bob Brinson Republican Yea
Bobby Hanig Republican Yea
Brad Overcash Republican Yea
Brent Jackson Republican Yea
Carl Ford Republican Yea
Chris Measmer Republican Yea
Dana Jones Republican Yea
Danny Earl Britt, Jr. Republican Yea
David W. Craven, Jr. Republican Yea
Eddie D. Settle Republican Yea
Jim Burgin Republican Yea
Kevin Corbin Republican Yea
Lisa S. Barnes Republican Yea
Mark Hollo Republican Yea
Michael A. Lazzara Republican Yea
Michael V. Lee Republican Yea
Norman W. Sanderson Republican Yea
Paul Newton Republican Yea
Phil Berger Republican Yea
Ralph Hise Republican Yea
Steve Jarvis Republican Yea
Timothy D. Moffitt Republican Yea
Todd Johnson Republican Yea
Tom McInnis Republican Yea
Vickie Sawyer Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Yea
Warren Daniel Republican Yea

Official roll call →

A1 Cervania Second Reading

Failed 52 Yea · 57 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 32101
Unaffiliated 121203
U 2000
Republican 64407
Total 5257011
% of votes cast 43%48%0%9%
How each member voted (120)
Member Party Vote
Autry — Yea
Clemmons — Yea
Harris — Yea
Lucas — Yea
Rudow — Yea
CharlesSmith — Yea
Staton-Williams — Yea
vonHaefen — Yea
Wray — Yea
Faircloth — Yea
Lowery — Yea
Bradford — Nay
Crutchfield — Nay
Elmore — Nay
Fontenot — Nay
Hardister — Nay
Mills — Nay
Reeder — Nay
Saine — Nay
Sasser — Nay
CarsonSmith — Nay
Sossamon — Nay
Moore — Not Voting
Gill — Not Voting
Cleveland — Not Voting
F. Jackson — Yea
K. Baker — Nay
Abe Jones Democratic Yea
Allen Buansi Democratic Nay
Allison A. Dahle Democratic Yea
Amber M. Baker Democratic Yea
Amos L. Quick, III Democratic Yea
B. Ray Jeffers Democratic Yea
Becky Carney Democratic Yea
Brandon Lofton Democratic Yea
Carolyn G. Logan Democratic Not Voting
Cecil Brockman Democratic Yea
Cynthia Ball Democratic Yea
Deb Butler Democratic Yea
Eric Ager Democratic Yea
Garland E. Pierce Democratic Yea
Gloristine Brown Democratic Yea
James Roberson Democratic Yea
Joe John Democratic Yea
Kanika Brown Democratic Yea
Laura Budd Democratic Yea
Lindsey Prather Democratic Yea
Marcia Morey Democratic Yea
Maria Cervania Democratic Yea
Mary Belk Democratic Yea
Pricey Harrison Democratic Yea
Renée A. Price Democratic Yea
Robert T. Reives, II Democratic Yea
Sarah Crawford Democratic Yea
Shelly Willingham Democratic Yea
Terence Everitt Democratic Yea
Terry M. Brown Jr. Democratic Yea
Tim Longest Democratic Yea
Vernetta Alston Democratic Yea
Ya Liu Democratic Yea
Zack Hawkins Democratic Yea
A. Reece Pyrtle, Jr. Republican Nay
Allen Chesser Republican Nay
Ben T. Moss, Jr. Republican Nay
Bill Ward Republican Nay
Brenden H. Jones Republican Nay
Brian Biggs Republican Yea
Celeste C. Cairns Republican Nay
Charles W. Miller Republican Nay
Chris Humphrey Republican Nay
David Willis Republican Not Voting
Dean Arp Republican Nay
Dennis Riddell Republican Yea
Destin Hall Republican Nay
Diane Wheatley Republican Nay
Donna McDowell White Republican Nay
Donnie Loftis Republican Nay
Donny Lambeth Republican Nay
Dudley Greene Republican Nay
Edward C. Goodwin Republican Nay
Erin Paré Republican Nay
Frank Iler Republican Nay
Harry Warren Republican Yea
Howard Penny, Jr. Republican Nay
Hugh Blackwell Republican Not Voting
Jake Johnson Republican Nay
Jay Adams Republican Nay
Jeff Zenger Republican Nay
Jeffrey C. McNeely Republican Nay
Jennifer Balkcom Republican Nay
Jimmy Dixon Republican Nay
John A. Torbett Republican Nay
John R. Bell, IV Republican Nay
John Sauls Republican Yea
Joseph Pike Republican Nay
Julia C. Howard Republican Not Voting
Karl E. Gillespie Republican Nay
Keith Kidwell Republican Nay
Kelly E. Hastings Republican Not Voting
Kyle Hall Republican Yea
Larry C. Strickland Republican Nay
Larry W. Potts Republican Nay
Mark Brody Republican Nay
Mark Pless Republican Nay
Matthew Winslow Republican Nay
Mike Clampitt Republican Nay
Mitchell S. Setzer Republican Nay
Neal Jackson Republican Yea
Phil Shepard Republican Nay
Ray Pickett Republican Nay
Sam Watford Republican Not Voting
Sarah Stevens Republican Not Voting
Stephen M. Ross Republican Nay
Steve Tyson Republican Nay
Ted Davis, Jr. Republican Nay
Tricia Ann Cotham Republican Nay
W. Ted Alexander Republican Not Voting
William D. Brisson Republican Nay
Carla D. Cunningham U Yea
Nasif Majeed U Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation finance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 402?
HB 402 is sponsored by Matthew Winslow (Republican), David Willis (Republican), Donna McDowell White (Republican), Diane Wheatley (Republican), Harry Warren (Republican), Bill Ward (Republican), Steve Tyson (Republican), John A. Torbett (Republican), Larry C. Strickland (Republican), Phil Shepard (Republican), Mitchell S. Setzer (Republican), Paul Scott (Republican), Stephen M. Ross (Republican), Dennis Riddell (Republican), Heather H. Rhyne (Republican), Reeder, A. Reece Pyrtle, Jr. (Republican), Larry W. Potts (Republican), Ray Pickett (Republican), Howard Penny, Jr. (Republican), Erin Paré (Republican), Ben T. Moss, Jr. (Republican), Charles W. Miller (Republican), Jeffrey C. McNeely (Republican), Jarrod Lowery (Republican), Donnie Loftis (Republican), Keith Kidwell (Republican), Neal Jackson (Republican), Frank Iler (Republican), Cody Huneycutt (Republican), Chris Humphrey (Republican), Kelly E. Hastings (Republican), Kyle Hall (Republican), Dudley Greene (Republican), Edward C. Goodwin (Republican), Karl E. Gillespie (Republican), Wyatt Gable (Republican), Blair Eddins (Republican), Brian Echevarria (Republican), Jimmy Dixon (Republican), Ted Davis, Jr. (Republican), Tricia Ann Cotham (Republican), Todd Carver (Republican), Campbell, Celeste C. Cairns (Republican), Mark Brody (Republican), Jerry "Alan" Branson (Republican), John M. Blust (Republican), Hugh Blackwell (Republican), Brian Biggs (Republican), Jennifer Balkcom (Republican), Dean Arp (Republican), Jonathan L. Almond (Republican), Jay Adams (Republican), Mike Schietzelt (Republican), Jeff Zenger (Republican), John R. Bell, IV (Republican), Allen Chesser (Republican), Jake Johnson (Republican), and Sarah Stevens (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 402?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 13, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 402?
Track HB 402 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 402

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 402

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →