North Carolina 2025 Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 8 D · 7 R cosponsors

HB 567 — Ensure Access to Biomarker Testing.

Last action — Passed 2nd Reading

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced March 27, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · high confidence
  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 16 sponsors

    3 primary, 13 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (8 D · 7 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

179 added · 77 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of Bill HB 567 now includes additional lines specifying the sponsors of the bill and clarifying the process it will undergo in the legislative committees. These changes help provide transparency about who is supporting the legislation and the steps it will take before becoming law. This matters because it allows the public and interested stakeholders to better understand how and why the bill is being considered, potentially increasing civic engagement and scrutiny.

→
Previous
Latest
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 H 2 HOUSE BILL 567 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/29/25 Short Title:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 H 1 HOUSE BILL 567 Short Title:
Representatives Wheatley, Penny, Campbell, and Moss (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
March 31, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO ENSURE ACCESS TO AN EARLY AND ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS OF DEMENTIA IN ORDER TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO CARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR, ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF, AND REDUCE THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE CONDITION ON NORTH CAROLINIANS.
Health, if favorable, Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House March 31, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO ENSURE ACCESS TO AN EARLY AND ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS OF DEMENTIA IN ORDER TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO CARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR, ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF, AND REDUCE THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE CONDITION ON NORTH CAROLINIANS.
(8) Reserved for future codification purposes.
*H567-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (8) Reserved for future codification purposes.
*H567-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (9) Nationally recognized clinical practice guidelines.
(9) Nationally recognized clinical practice guidelines.
SECTION 1.2.(a) G.S.
Page 2 House Bill 567-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 SECTION 1.2.(a) G.S.
58-50-61 reads as rewritten:
"§ 58-50-61.
Utilization review.
(a) Definitions.
– As used in this section, in G.S.
58-50-62, and in Part 4 of this Article, the term:
… (16a) Urgent healthcare service.
– A healthcare service with respect to which the application of the time periods for making a non-expedited utilization review that,intheopinionofamedicaldoctorwithknowledgeofthecoveredperson's medical condition, could either (i) seriouslyjeopardize the life or health of the covered person or the ability of the covered person to regain maximum function or (ii) subject the covered person to severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the care or treatment that is the subject of the utilization review.
The term urgent healthcare service includes mental and behavioral healthcare services.
… (f) Time Lines for Prospective and Concurrent Reviews.
Utilization Reviews Based Upon Type of Healthcare Service.
– As used in this subsection, the term "necessaryinformation" includes the results of any patient examination, clinical evaluation, or second opinion that may be required.
Prospective and concurrent determinations shall be communicated to The time line for completion of a prospective or concurrent utilization review is as follows:
(1) Non-urgent healthcare services.
– If an insurer requires a utilization review of a healthcare service, then the insurer or its URO shall both render a utilization review determination or noncertification and notifythe covered person and the covered person's provider within three business days after the insurer obtains all necessary information about the admission, procedure, or health care service.
to make the utilization review determination or noncertification.
(2) Urgent healthcare services.
– An insurer or its URO shall both render a utilization review determination or noncertification concerning urgent healthcare services and notify the covered person and the covered person's provider of that utilization review determination or noncertification not later than 24 hours after receiving all necessaryinformation needed to complete the review of the requested healthcare services.
If the covered person's provider or the insurer, or the entity conducting the review on behalf of the insurer, do not both have access to the electronic health records of the covered person, then this subdivision shall not apply and the utilization review will be subject to the time line under subdivision (1) of this subsection.
(f1) Utilization Review Determination Notifications.
– If an insurer or its URO certifies a health care healthcare service, the insurer shall notify notification shall be sent to the covered person's provider.
For If an insurer or its URO issues a noncertification, the insurer shall notify the covered person's provider and send then written or electronic confirmation of the noncertification shall be sent to the covered person's provider and covered person.
In person that is in compliance with subsection (h) of this section.
(f2) Concurrent Review Liability.
– For concurrent reviews,the insurer shall remainliable for health care healthcare services until the covered person has been notified of the noncertification.
… (m) Disclosure of Utilization Review Requirements.
– Information required to be provided under this section shall be described in detail and in easily understandable language.
All of the following apply to an insurer's responsibility to disclose any utilization review procedures:
House Bill 567-First Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (1) Coverage and member handbook.
– In the certificate of coverage and member handbook provided to covered persons, an insurer shall include a clear and comprehensive description of its utilization review procedures, including the procedures for appealing noncertifications and a statement of the rights and responsibilities of covered persons, including the voluntary nature of the appeal process, with respect to those procedures.
An insurer shall also include in the certificate of coverage and the member handbook information about the availability of assistance from the Department's Health Insurance Smart NC, including the telephone number and address of the Program.
program.
(2) Prospective materials.
Show all 60 changed rows (20 more)
Previous
Latest
– An insurer shall include a summary of its utilization review procedures in materials intended for prospective covered persons.
(3) Membership cards.
– An insurer shall print on its membership cards a toll-free telephone number to call for utilization review purposes.
(4) Website.
– An insurer shall make any current utilization review requirements and restrictions readily accessible on its website.
…." SECTION 1.2.(b) This section becomes effective October 1, 2025, and applies to insurance contracts issued, renewed, or amended on or after that date.
SECTION 1.3.(a) G.S.
Page 2 House Bill 567-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 "§ 135-48.51.
"§ 135-48.51.
…." SECTION 1.2.(b) This section becomes effective October 1, 2025, and applies as of the start of the next plan year following the effective date.
…." SECTION 1.3.(b) In accordance with G.S.
135-48.24(b) and G.S.
135-48.30(a)(7) which require the State Treasurer to implement procedures that are substantially similar to the provisions of G.S.
58-50-61 for the North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees (State Health Plan), the State Treasurer and the Executive Administrator of the State Health Planshall review all practices oftheState Health Planand all contracts with, andpractices of, any third party conducting any utilization review on behalf of the State Health Plan to ensure compliance with Section 2 of this act no later than the start of the next plan year.
SECTION 1.3.(c) Effective July 1, 2025, there is appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of State Treasurer the sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) in recurring funds for each year of the 2025-2027 fiscal biennium to be used to implement the coverage required by this section for the State Health Plan.
SECTION 1.3.(d) Except as otherwise provided, this section becomes effective October 1, 2025, and subsection (a) of this section applies as of the start of the next plan year following the effective date.
DHB shall ensure its policies and procedures for the prior authorization of anyservice covered under this section are in compliance with Section 2.2 of this act.
SECTION 2.2.(a) For purposes of this section, the term "urgent prior authorization request" is defined as a request for which a time line for decision longer than 72 hours could seriously jeopardize the beneficiary's life, health, or ability to attain, maintain, or regain maximum function, in the opinion of the beneficiary's healthcare provider.
Page 4 House Bill 567-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 SECTION 2.2.(b) If prior authorization is required for any service covered under Section 2.1 of this act, the time line for completion of a review of that prior authorization request shall be as follows:
(1) For urgent prior authorization requests, DHB shall ensure that the prior authorization request is either approved or denied and notice is given to the beneficiary and beneficiary's healthcare provider within 24 hours after DHB receives all information needed to complete a review of the request for prior authorization.
(2) For non-urgent prior authorization requests, DHB shall ensure that the prior authorization request is either approved or denied and notice is given to the beneficiary and beneficiary's healthcare provider within 72 hours after DHB receives all information needed to complete a review of the request for prior authorization.
House Bill 567-Second Edition Page 3
House Bill 567-First Edition Page 5
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Passed 2nd Reading

  2. Passed 3rd Reading

  3. Special Message Sent To Senate

  4. Special Message Received From House

  5. Passed 1st Reading

  6. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  7. Reptd Fav

  8. Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)

  9. Placed On Cal For 05/07/2025

  10. Withdrawn From Com

  11. Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  12. Reptd Fav Com Substitute

  13. Re-ref Com On Appropriations

  14. Passed 1st Reading

  15. Ref to the Com on Health, if favorable, Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  16. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (13)

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Second Reading

Passed 110 Yea · 2 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 39005
U 2000
Unaffiliated 5001
Republican 64202
Total 110208
% of votes cast 92%2%0%7%
How each member voted (120)
Member Party Vote
CharlesSmith — Yea
vonHaefen — Yea
Reeder — Yea
Campbell — Not Voting
C. Smith — Yea
F. Jackson — Yea
Abe Jones Democratic Yea
Aisha O. Dew Democratic Not Voting
Allen Buansi Democratic Yea
Allison A. Dahle Democratic Yea
Amber M. Baker Democratic Not Voting
Amos L. Quick, III Democratic Yea
B. Ray Jeffers Democratic Yea
Becky Carney Democratic Yea
Beth Helfrich Democratic Yea
Brandon Lofton Democratic Not Voting
Brian Turner Democratic Not Voting
Bryan Cohn Democratic Yea
Carolyn G. Logan Democratic Yea
Cecil Brockman Democratic Yea
Cynthia Ball Democratic Yea
Dante Pittman Democratic Yea
Deb Butler Democratic Yea
Eric Ager Democratic Yea
Garland E. Pierce Democratic Yea
Gloristine Brown Democratic Yea
James Roberson Democratic Yea
Jordan Lopez Democratic Yea
Julia Greenfield Democratic Yea
Kanika Brown Democratic Yea
Laura Budd Democratic Yea
Lindsey Prather Democratic Not Voting
Marcia Morey Democratic Yea
Maria Cervania Democratic Yea
Mary Belk Democratic Yea
Mike Colvin Democratic Yea
Monika Johnson-Hostler Democratic Yea
Phil Rubin Democratic Yea
Pricey Harrison Democratic Yea
Renée A. Price Democratic Yea
Robert T. Reives, II Democratic Yea
Rodney D. Pierce Democratic Yea
Sarah Crawford Democratic Yea
Shelly Willingham Democratic Yea
Terry M. Brown Jr. Democratic Yea
Tim Longest Democratic Yea
Tracy Clark Democratic Yea
Vernetta Alston Democratic Yea
Ya Liu Democratic Yea
Zack Hawkins Democratic Yea
A. Reece Pyrtle, Jr. Republican Yea
Allen Chesser Republican Yea
Ben T. Moss, Jr. Republican Yea
Bill Ward Republican Yea
Blair Eddins Republican Yea
Brenden H. Jones Republican Yea
Brian Biggs Republican Yea
Brian Echevarria Republican Yea
Celeste C. Cairns Republican Yea
Charles W. Miller Republican Yea
Chris Humphrey Republican Yea
Cody Huneycutt Republican Not Voting
David Willis Republican Yea
Dean Arp Republican Yea
Dennis Riddell Republican Yea
Destin Hall Republican Yea
Diane Wheatley Republican Yea
Donna McDowell White Republican Yea
Donnie Loftis Republican Yea
Donny Lambeth Republican Yea
Dudley Greene Republican Yea
Edward C. Goodwin Republican Yea
Erin Paré Republican Yea
Frank Iler Republican Yea
Harry Warren Republican Yea
Heather H. Rhyne Republican Yea
Howard Penny, Jr. Republican Yea
Hugh Blackwell Republican Yea
Jarrod Lowery Republican Yea
Jay Adams Republican Yea
Jeff Zenger Republican Yea
Jeffrey C. McNeely Republican Yea
Jennifer Balkcom Republican Yea
Jerry "Alan" Branson Republican Yea
Jimmy Dixon Republican Yea
John A. Torbett Republican Yea
John M. Blust Republican Yea
John R. Bell, IV Republican Yea
John Sauls Republican Yea
Jonathan L. Almond Republican Yea
Joseph Pike Republican Yea
Julia C. Howard Republican Yea
Karl E. Gillespie Republican Yea
Keith Kidwell Republican Yea
Kelly E. Hastings Republican Nay
Kyle Hall Republican Yea
Larry C. Strickland Republican Yea
Larry W. Potts Republican Yea
Mark Brody Republican Yea
Mark Pless Republican Yea
Matthew Winslow Republican Yea
Mike Clampitt Republican Not Voting
Mike Schietzelt Republican Yea
Mitchell S. Setzer Republican Yea
Neal Jackson Republican Yea
Paul Scott Republican Yea
Phil Shepard Republican Yea
Ray Pickett Republican Yea
Sam Watford Republican Yea
Sarah Stevens Republican Nay
Stephen M. Ross Republican Yea
Steve Tyson Republican Yea
Ted Davis, Jr. Republican Yea
Todd Carver Republican Yea
Todd Johnson Republican Yea
Tricia Ann Cotham Republican Yea
William D. Brisson Republican Yea
Wyatt Gable Republican Yea
Carla D. Cunningham U Yea
Nasif Majeed U Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 567?
HB 567 is sponsored by Donna McDowell White (Republican), Bill Ward (Republican), Renée A. Price (Democratic), Jeffrey C. McNeely (Republican), Zack Hawkins (Democratic), Pricey Harrison (Democratic), Julia Greenfield (Democratic), Maria Cervania (Democratic), Deb Butler (Democratic), Kanika Brown (Democratic), Gloristine Brown (Democratic), Ben T. Moss, Jr. (Republican), Campbell, Howard Penny, Jr. (Republican), Diane Wheatley (Republican), and Neal Jackson (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 567?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced March 27, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 567?
Track HB 567 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 567

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 567

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →