North Carolina 2025 Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 2 R · 2 D cosponsors

SB 96 — Modify Insufficient Funds Tax Payment Fee.

Last action — Passed 1st Reading

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 13, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    2 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (2 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

7 added · 8 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Senate Bill 96 adds some introductory details, including its designation as part of the 2025 North Carolina General Assembly session. It also removes some outdated information related to the bill's initial filing. These changes are important because they ensure that the bill is correctly identified and up to date for consideration in the legislative process.

→
Previous
Latest
FILED SENATE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Feb 13, 2025 S.B.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 S 1 SENATE BILL 96 Short Title:
96 SESSION 2025 PRINCIPAL CLERK S D SENATE BILL DRS35052-MCf-30 Short Title:
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO MODIFY TO THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS THE PENALTY FOR A TAX PAYMENT THAT IS RETURNED FOR INSUFFICIENT FUNDS OR NONEXISTENCE OF AN ACCOUNT.
Rules and Operations of the Senate February 17, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO MODIFY TO THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS THE PENALTY FOR A TAX PAYMENT THAT IS RETURNED FOR INSUFFICIENT FUNDS OR NONEXISTENCE OF AN ACCOUNT.
*DRS35052-MCf-30*
*S96-v-1*
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Passed 1st Reading

  2. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  3. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 175 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (175)

175 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 175 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

taxation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 96?
SB 96 is sponsored by Joyce Waddell (Democratic), Warren Daniel (Republican), Timothy D. Moffitt (Republican), and Julie Mayfield (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 96?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 13, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 96?
Track SB 96 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 96

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 96

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →