HB 686 — Safe Cosmetics Act.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 01, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
18 sponsors
3 primary, 15 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 3 parties (16 D · 1 I · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
104 added · 103 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of House Bill 686, titled the Safe Cosmetics Act, the language surrounding the definitions of "nonfunctional by-product" and "nonfunctional contaminant" has been clarified and expanded. Specifically, it now emphasizes that these terms refer to unintended elements that arise during the manufacturing process and have no effect on the product's performance. This change is important because it provides clearer guidance on what substances cosmetic manufacturers need to monitor, helping ensure safer products for consumers.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA H.B.SESSION 2025 H 1 HOUSE BILL 686 Short Title:
686Safe Apr 1, 2025 SESSION 2025 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK H D HOUSE BILL DRH40389-NM-29 Short Title:Safe Cosmetics Act.
RepresentativeRepresentatives Belk.Belk, Ball, Harrison, and von Haefen (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House April 3, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROHIBIT THE DISTRIBUTION OR SALE OF A COSMETIC PRODUCT CONTAINING CERTAIN RESTRICTED SUBSTANCES AS AN INTENTIONALLY ADDED CHEMICAL IN ANY AMOUNT, INCLUDING AS A NONFUNCTIONAL BY-PRODUCT OR A NONFUNCTIONALNONFUNCTIONALCONTAMINANT CONTAMINANT ABOVE THE PRACTICAL QUANTIFICATION LIMIT.
or *H686-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 b.
*DRH40389-NM-29* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 "Nonfunctional by-product" includes, but is not limited to, an unreacted raw material, a breakdown product of an intentionally added chemical, or a by-product of the manufacturing process.
Page 2 House Bill 686-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 l.
Page 2 DRH40389-NM-29 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 …." SECTION 2.
While such regulations relating to such substance are in effect, a food,drug,orcosmeticshallfood,drug, orcosmeticshall not, byreason ofbearingorcontainingofbearingorcontainingsuch suchsubstanceinsubstancein accordance with the regulations be considered adulterated within the meaning of G.S.
The practical quantification limit for a given restricted substance may be different depending on the analytical method used." SECTIONSECTION4. 4.
DRH40389-NM-29House Bill 686-First Edition Page 3
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Nasif Majeed · Cosponsor
- Carolyn G. Logan · Cosponsor
- Zack Hawkins · Cosponsor
- Julia Greenfield · Cosponsor
- Aisha O. Dew · Cosponsor
- Allison A. Dahle · Cosponsor
- Sarah Crawford · Cosponsor
- Tracy Clark · Cosponsor
- Maria Cervania · Cosponsor
- Becky Carney · Cosponsor
- Deb Butler · Cosponsor
- Kanika Brown · Cosponsor
- Amber M. Baker · Cosponsor
- Pricey Harrison · Primary
- Cynthia Ball · Primary
- Mary Belk · Primary
- Julie von Haefen · Cosponsor
- Neal Jackson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 161 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Pricey Harrison Democratic
- Cynthia Ball Democratic
- Mary Belk Democratic
Co-sponsors (15)
- Nasif Majeed U
- Carolyn G. Logan Democratic
- Zack Hawkins Democratic
- Julia Greenfield Democratic
- Aisha O. Dew Democratic
- Allison A. Dahle Democratic
- Sarah Crawford Democratic
- Tracy Clark Democratic
- Maria Cervania Democratic
- Becky Carney Democratic
- Deb Butler Democratic
- Kanika Brown Democratic
- Amber M. Baker Democratic
- Julie von Haefen Democratic
- Neal Jackson Republican
Not signed on (161)
161 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 161 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 686?
- HB 686 is sponsored by Nasif Majeed (U), Carolyn G. Logan (Democratic), Zack Hawkins (Democratic), Julia Greenfield (Democratic), Aisha O. Dew (Democratic), Allison A. Dahle (Democratic), Sarah Crawford (Democratic), Tracy Clark (Democratic), Maria Cervania (Democratic), Becky Carney (Democratic), Deb Butler (Democratic), Kanika Brown (Democratic), Amber M. Baker (Democratic), Pricey Harrison (Democratic), Cynthia Ball (Democratic), Mary Belk (Democratic), Julie von Haefen (Democratic), and Neal Jackson (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 686?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 01, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 686?
- Track HB 686 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 686
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 686
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →