HB 656 — Split District Court/Defender District 43 into 43A/43B.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 01, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
46 added · 44 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of House Bill 656 now splits District Court District 43 into two separate districts: 43A and 43B. This change, which includes hiring a full-time judicial assistant for District 43B, aims to better manage the court's workload and improve access to legal services for the counties involved. By redefining these districts, the bill seeks to streamline court processes and enhance public defense services in the region.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA H.B.SESSION 2025 H 1 HOUSE BILL 656 Short Title:
656Split Apr 1, 2025 SESSION 2025 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK H D HOUSE BILL DRH40377-NDa-36 Short Title:Split Distr Ct/Defender Distr 43 into 43A/43B.
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
Judiciary 1, if favorable, Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House April 2, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED ANACT TO SPLIT DISTRICTCOURT DISTRICT43DISTRICT 43 INTO DISTRICT COURTDISTRICTS 43A AND 43B, TO SPLIT DEFENDER DISTRICT 43 INTO DEFENDER DISTRICTS 43A AND 43B, AND TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS.
SECTION 1.(d) There is appropriated from the General Fund to the Administrative Office of the Courts the sum of seventy-one thousand nine hundred thirty-two dollars ($71,932) in recurring funds and three thousand four hundred thirty-six dollars ($3,436) in nonrecurring *H656-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 funds for the 2026-2027 fiscal year to be used to hire one full-time judicial assistant to serve District Court District 43B.
*DRH40377-NDa-36* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 SECTION 1.(e) Subsection (a) of this section becomes effective January 1, 2027, and elections held in 2026 shall be held accordingly.
8 Defender District Counties ___________________________________________________________________ … 4343A Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Jackson, Macon, Swain 43B Haywood, Jackson After notice to, and consultation with, the affected district bar, senior resident superior court judge, and chief district court judge, the Commission on Indigent Defense Services may recommend to the General Assembly that a district or regional public defender office be established.
A legislativeactlegislative act is required in order to establish a new office or to abolish an existing office." SECTION 2.(b) There is appropriated from the General Fund to the Administrative Office of the Courts, Office of Indigent Defense Services, the sum of two hundred twenty-eight thousand four hundred sixty-one dollars ($228,461) in recurring funds and four thousand eight hundred ninety-five dollars ($4,895) in nonrecurring funds for the 2026-2027 fiscal year to be used to hire one full-time chief public defender to serve Defender District 43B.
Page 2 DRH40377-NDa-36House Bill 656-First Edition
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref to the Com on Judiciary 1, if favorable, Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Mike Clampitt · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 178 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Mike Clampitt Republican
Not signed on (178)
178 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 178 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 656?
- HB 656 is sponsored by Mike Clampitt (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 656?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 01, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 656?
- Track HB 656 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 656
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 656
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →