SB 702 — Bail Bond Omnibus.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced March 25, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
2 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
20 added · 21 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Senate Bill 702 includes some clarifications in the language regarding court records and the procedure for handling bail forfeitures. It specifies that court records can be submitted electronically and reinforces that forfeitures will not be annulled for any reason except what is explicitly stated in the bill. These changes are significant because they aim to streamline the legal process, making it easier to handle cases involving bail and ensuring consistency in how court records are managed.
FILED SENATE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA MarSESSION 25, 2025 S.B.S 1 SENATE BILL 702 Short Title:
702 SESSION 2025 PRINCIPAL CLERK S D SENATE BILL DRS45355-ND-37B Short Title:
Rules and Operations of the Senate March 26, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO MODIFY LAWS AFFECTING BAIL BONDS.
SECTIONSECTION1.(a) 1.(a) Article26ofChapter15AoftheGeneral StatutesStatutesreads reads as rewritten:
*DRS45355-ND-37B**S702-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (1) A judge authorized to do so releases the obligor from his bond;
The defendant has been served with an Order for Arrest for the Failure to Appear on the criminal charge in the case in question as evidenced bybya acopyof copy of an official court record, including an electronic record,records.
The defendant was incarcerated in a local, state, or federal detention center, jail, or prison located anywhere within the borders of Page 2 DRS45355-ND-37BSenate Bill 702-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 the United States at the time of the failure to appear, or between the failure to appear and the final judgment date, and the district attorney for the county in which the charges are pending was notified of the defendant's incarceration while the defendant was still incarcerated and the defendant remains incarcerated for a period of 10 days following the district attorney's receipt of notice, as evidenced by a copy of the written notice served on the district attorney via hand deliverydelivery, electronic deliverydeliveryusing using a court's electronic filing or case management system, or certified mail and written documentation of date upon which the defendant was released from incarceration, if thedefendant was releasedpriorto thetimethe motion to set asidewas filed,filed.
The forfeiture will not be set aside for anyanyother other reason.
If this forfeiture is not set aside on or before the final judgment date shown above, and if no motion to set it asideis pendingpendingonthatdate,theforfeiturewill onthatdate,theforfeiturewill become a final judgment on that date.
The final judgment will be enforceable bybyexecutionagainst executionagainst the defendant and anyanyaccommodation accommodation bondsman and professional bondsman on the bond.
1A-1, Rule 5, serve a copy of the motion on the district attorney for that DRS45355-ND-37BSenate Bill 702-First Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 county and on the attorney for the countycountyboard board of education.
… (6) If at the hearing the court allows the motion,motion based upon one of the reasons set forth in subsection (b) of this section, the court shall enter an order settingsettingaside asidethethe forfeiture.forfeiture andthe suretysuretyshall shall be relieved ofthe bail bond obligation and no other forfeitures shall be issued for that bail bond.
ForpurposesoftheeffectiveimplementationofthisArticle,eachdistrictattorneyshallensure thattheinformationofacriminaldefendantthatfailstoappearin courtisprovidedtotheNational Crime Information Center within 10 days of the failure to appear in court so that this information may be available nationwide." SECTION 1.(b) For purposes of electronic filing pursuant to Article 26 of Chapter 15A of the General Statutes, the district attorneyattorneyfor for each county and the attorneyattorneyfor for each county board of education shall be listed in the county's electronic filing or case management system as parties and shall each have the burden of maintaining current contact information in that electronic filing or case management system.
"(a) In order to assist licensed sureties and their agents in evaluating potential and current clients for the purposes of bail, the Administrative Office of the Courts shall provide any individual with a current license to act as professional bondsman, surety bondsman, or runner with access to search criminal records in the Administrative Office of the Courts' real-time criminal and civil information systems.systems, including its Odyssey systems." Page 4 DRS45355-ND-37BSenate Bill 702-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 SECTION 3.
DRS45355-ND-37BSenate Bill 702-First Edition Page 5
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Amy S. Galey · Cosponsor
- Warren Daniel · Cosponsor
- Jr. Danny Earl Britt · Primary
- Jr. David W. Craven · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 175 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Danny Earl Britt, Jr. Republican
- David W. Craven, Jr. Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Amy S. Galey Republican
- Warren Daniel Republican
Not signed on (175)
175 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 175 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 702?
- SB 702 is sponsored by Amy S. Galey (Republican), Warren Daniel (Republican), Danny Earl Britt, Jr. (Republican), and David W. Craven, Jr. (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 702?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced March 25, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 702?
- Track SB 702 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 702
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 702
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →