North Carolina 2025 Session Status: In Committee 11 D cosponsors

SB 392 — Safeguard Fair Elections.

Last action — Passed 1st Reading

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced March 24, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Stalled 26% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    2 primary, 9 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (11 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

27 added · 28 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the updated version of Senate Bill 392, some text has been simplified and clarified, particularly in sections regarding the roles of observers at polling places and the process for handling violations. This change is important because it helps ensure that everyone involved in the voting process understands their responsibilities and the actions that can be taken if rules are broken, which can improve the overall integrity of elections.

→
Previous
Latest
FILED SENATE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Mar 24, 2025 S.B.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 S 1 SENATE BILL 392 Short Title:
392 SESSION 2025 PRINCIPAL CLERK S D SENATE BILL DRS35160-LUae-29 Short Title:
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROVIDE INCREASED PROTECTIONS FOR VOTERS AND ELECTIONS OFFICIALS AGAINST VARIOUS FORMS OF INTERFERENCE WITH AN ELECTION AND TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.
Rules and Operations of the Senate March 25, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROVIDE INCREASED PROTECTIONS FOR VOTERS AND ELECTIONS OFFICIALS AGAINST VARIOUS FORMS OF INTERFERENCE WITH AN ELECTION AND TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.
*DRS35160-LUae-29* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (3) Engages in mass, indiscriminate, and groundless challenging of voters solely for the purpose of preventing voters from voting or to delay the process of voting or the lawful and orderly administration of an election.
*S392-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (3) Engages in mass, indiscriminate, and groundless challenging of voters solely for the purpose of preventing voters from voting or to delay the process of voting or the lawful and orderly administration of an election.
(1) Enclose the employees' pay in pay envelopes upon which or in which there is written or printed the name of any candidate or any political mottoes, devices, or arguments containing threats, express or implied, intended or calculated to influence the political opinions or actions of the employees.
(1) Enclose the employees' pay in pay envelopes upon which or in which there is written or printed the name of anycandidate or any political mottoes, devices, or arguments containing threats, express or implied, intended or calculated to influence the political opinions or actions of the employees.
For purposes of this section, a person shall be found to have intimidated or coerced another person if the person knew or reasonably should have known that his or her actions would produce that effect.
For purposes of this section, a person shall be found to have intimidated or coerced another person if the person knew or reasonablyshould have known that his or her actions would produce that effect.
(a) In addition to any other fine or penalty imposed by this Article, the court may order any person convicted of violating this Article to pay a restitution fine, the amount of which shall bedetermined by the courtand becommensurate with theseriousness oftheoffense.
(a) In addition to any other fine or penalty imposed by this Article, the court may order any person convicted of violating this Article to pay a restitution fine, the amount of which shall bedetermined bythe courtand becommensurate with theseriousness oftheoffense.
… Page 2 DRS35160-LUae-29 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (e) In addition to the penalties described under this Article, the State Board and the district attorneys are authorized to investigate, prosecute, and seek increased penalties for a person that intimidates, threatens, or coerces an election worker, as defined in G.S.
… Page 2 Senate Bill 392-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (e) In addition to the penalties described under this Article, the State Board and the district attorneys are authorized to investigate, prosecute, and seek increased penalties for a person that intimidates, threatens, or coerces an election worker, as defined in G.S.
DRS35160-LUae-29 Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (2) Publicofficial.
Senate Bill 392-First Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (2) Publicofficial.
– Anindividual legallyauthorizedorpermitted to executelaws or make decisions on behalf of any government, including any branch, subdivision, or agency of the State or any county, city, district, or other local government.
– Anindividual legallyauthorizedorpermittedto executelaws or make decisions on behalf of any government, including any branch, subdivision, or agency of the State or any county, city, district, or other local government.
Page 4 DRS35160-LUae-29 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (4) Preserves the integrity of election systems and voting equipment.
Page 4 Senate Bill 392-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (4) Preserves the integrity of election systems and voting equipment.
For purposes of this section, a "risk-limiting audit"is ahand-to-eyerecount ofarandomlyselectedsampleofballots in acontest that provides strong statistical evidence that the machine-counted results are correct and is based on a"risk-limit";
For purposes of this section, a "risk-limitingaudit"is ahand-to-eye recount ofarandomlyselected sampleofballots in acontest that provides strong statistical evidence that the machine-counted results are correct and is based on a"risk-limit";
(a) Forpurposes ofthis section, "observer" is defined as an individual appointed pursuant to this section to observe the voting process at a voting place.
(a) Forpurposes ofthis section,"observer"is defined as an individualappointedpursuant to this section to observe the voting process at a voting place.
Individuals appointedto serveat aparticular voting placeorcountywideshall besubmitted to the director of the county board of elections for that county.
Individuals appointedto serveat aparticular votingplaceorcountywideshall besubmitted to the director of the county board of elections for that county.
Before each voting place opens for voting, the county board of elections shall provide a copy of the list of appointed observers for each voting DRS35160-LUae-29 Page 5 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 place to the chief judge for that respective voting place, including any countywide or statewide observers.
Before each voting place opens for voting, the county board of elections shall provide a copy of the list of appointed observers for each voting Senate Bill 392-First Edition Page 5 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 place to the chief judge for that respective voting place, including any countywide or statewide observers.
(2) Listening to conversations betweena voter and election official thattake place in the voting place, provided the conversation is related to election administration.
(2) Listeningto conversations betweena voter and election official thattake place in the voting place, provided the conversation is related to election administration.
(j) A chief judge may remove an observer who engages in prohibited behavior under this section.
(j) A chief judge mayremove an observer who engages in prohibited behavior under this section.
A chief judge may also remove an observer for good cause, which shall include evidence that the observer could impact the conduct of the election.
A chief judge mayalso remove an observer for good cause, which shall include evidence that the observer could impact the conduct of the election.
The director of the Page 6 DRS35160-LUae-29 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 county board of elections must immediately notify the appointing authority so that a replacement observer can be appointed.
The director of the Page 6 Senate Bill 392-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 county board of elections must immediatelynotify the appointing authority so that a replacement observer can be appointed.
DRS35160-LUae-29 Page 7 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (b) The State Board shall develop a process and establish criteria for precinct officials requesting nondisclosure of their personally identifiable information pursuant to this section.
Senate Bill 392-First Edition Page 7 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (b) The State Board shall develop a process and establish criteria for precinct officials requesting nondisclosure of their personally identifiable information pursuant to this section.
–TheNotwithstandingsubsection (j) of this section, the decision of the General Assembly in determining the contest of the election pursuant to this section may not be reviewed by the General Court of Justice.
–TheNotwithstandingsubsection (j) of this section, the decision of the General Assemblyin determiningthe contest of the election pursuant to this section may not be reviewed by the General Court of Justice.
If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this act that can be given effect Page 8 DRS35160-LUae-29 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 without the invalid provisions or application and, to this end, the provisions of this act are severable.
If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this act that can be given effect Page 8 Senate Bill 392-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 without the invalid provisions or application and, to this end, the provisions of this act are severable.
DRS35160-LUae-29 Page 9
Senate Bill 392-First Edition Page 9
View plain text versions (2)

How this bill changes current law

1 change Share ↗

Compared against the N.C. General Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill modifies existing law regarding post-election audits by prohibiting third-party forensic audits.

  • G.S. 163-182.12A

    The State Board shall not permit third-party forensic audits of the election results.

    This addition prohibits third-party entities from conducting forensic audits of election results.

Action History

  1. Passed 1st Reading

  2. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  3. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 168 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (168)

168 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 168 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 392?
SB 392 is sponsored by Joyce Waddell (Democratic), Caleb Theodros (Democratic), DeAndrea Salvador (Democratic), Gladys A. Robinson (Democratic), Mujtaba A. Mohammed (Democratic), Lisa Grafstein (Democratic), Michael Garrett (Democratic), Val Applewhite (Democratic), Natalie S. Murdock (Democratic), Jay J. Chaudhuri (Democratic), and Kandie D. Smith (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 392?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced March 24, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 392?
Track SB 392 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 392

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 392

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →