DIT Agency Bill.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 819 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 819.
You're tracking HB 819
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 819 — DIT Agency Bill.
Last action — Special Message Sent To Senate
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced April 07, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
15 sponsors
3 primary, 12 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 3 parties (9 R · 4 D · 2 I) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
320 added · 323 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of House Bill 819, some definitions were clarified and the purpose of the North Carolina Longitudinal Data System was reinforced. Specifically, the unique student identifier (UID) now explicitly includes those assigned by various educational institutions, not just public schools. Additionally, the bill emphasizes the system's role in facilitating the exchange of data between educational agencies, which is important for improving educational outcomes and workforce planning. These changes matter because they help ensure that all students, regardless of their educational background, are accounted for in state data systems, enhancing overall educational tracking and analysis.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2025 H 21 HOUSE BILL 819 Committee Substitute Favorable 6/24/25 Short Title:
Representatives Johnson, Blackwell, Hawkins, and Winslow (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House April 9, 2025 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO MAKE VARIOUS CHANGES TO THE GENERAL STATUTES RELATED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, BROADBANDCOMMUNICATIONS FUNDING,SERVICES, AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS.
DEPARTMENTNC OFLONGITUDINAL INFORMATIONDATA TECHNOLOGYSYSTEM CHANGES SECTION 1.1.(a)1.1. G.S.
143B-1320(b)Chapter 116E of the General Statutes reads as rewritten:
"(b)"Chapter Exemptions.116E.
–"Education ExceptNorth asCarolina otherwiseLongitudinal specificallyData providedSystem. by law, the provisions of this Chapter do not apply to the following entities:
the"§ General116E-1. Assembly, the Judicial Department, and The University of North Carolina and its constituent institutions.
institutions,Definitions. and the State Highway Patrol.
These(1) entities"Center" maymeans elect to participate in the informationCenter. technology programs, services, or contracts offered by the Department, including information technology procurement, in accordance with the statutes, policies, and rules of the Department.
– The electionGovernmental mustData beAnalytics madeCenter as established in writing,Part as8 follows:of Article 15 of Chapter 143B of the General Statutes.
(1)(1a) ForCJIS. the General Assembly, by the Legislative Services Commission.
(2)– ForThe thefederal JudicialCriminal Department,Justice byInformation theSystems Chiefin Justice.28 C.F.R.
(3)Part For20. The University of North Carolina, by the Board of Governors.
(4)(2) For"De-identified thedata" constituentmeans institutionsa ofDe-identified Thedata. University of North Carolina, by the respective boards of trustees.
(5)– ForA thedata Stateset Highwayin Patrol,which byparent theand Commanderstudent ofidentity information, including the Stateunique Highwaystudent Patrol."identifier SECTIONand 1.1.(b)student Sectionsocial 38.4security ofnumber, S.L.has been removed.
2023-134(3) reads"FERPA" asmeans rewritten:the FERPA.
"SECTION– 38.4.(a)The Infederal accordanceFamily withEducational G.S.Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C.
143B-1325(c)(13),§ and1232g. notwithstanding any other provision of Article 15 of Chapter 143B of the General Statutes to the contrary, the State Highway Patrol, the State Bureau of Investigation, Investigation and the Division of Emergency Management within the Department of Public Safety shall continue to be entirely exempt from any and all information technology oversight by the Department of Public Safety and the Department of Information Technology.
The(3a) StateHIPAA. Highway Patrol, the State Bureau of Investigation, and the Division of Emergency Management shall initiate a pilot project where those divisions the division shall be deemed as a separate, stand-alone entities entity within the Department of Public Safety in all matters related to information technology, and each the division shall autonomously manage their its own respective information technology infrastructure and all associated services without oversight from the Department of Information Technology or the Department of Public Safety.
Exemption– fromThe informationfederal technologyHealth oversightInsurance includes,Portability butand isAccountability notAct limitedof to,1996. the following:
*H819-v-2*(3b) GeneralIDEA. Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 … "SECTION 38.4.(b) This section expires on June 30, 2025.2027." SECTION 1.1.(c) G.S.
143B-1325(c)– readsThe asfederal rewritten:Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.
"(c)§§ Participating1400, Agencies.et seq.
–(3c) ThePublic Stateschool. CIO shall prepare detailed plans to transition each of the participating agencies.
– As thedefined transitionin plansG.S. are completed, the following participating agencies shall transfer information technology personnel, operations, projects, assets, and appropriate funding to the Department of Information Technology:
…115C-5(7a). (13) Department of Public Safety, with the exception of the following:
(4) "Student data" means data Student data.
– Data relating to student performance.
Student data includes State and national assessments, course enrollment and completion, grade point average, remediation, retention, degree, diploma or credential attainment, enrollment, discipline records, and demographicdata.Studentdatadoesnotincludejuveniledelinquencyrecords, criminal records, and medical and health records.
(5) "System" means the System.
– The North Carolina Longitudinal Data System.System, including components referred to as the North Carolina Longitudinal Data Service.
*H819-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (6) "Unique Student Identifier" or "UID" means the Unique Student Identifier or UID.
– The identifier assigned to each student by one of the following:
StateA Bureaulocal school administrative unit public school based on the identifier system developed by the Department of Investigation.Public Instruction.
RepealedAn institution of higher education, nonpublic school, or other State agency operating or overseeing an educational program, if the student has not been assigned an identifier by Sessiona Lawslocal 2024-57,school s.administrative unit.public school.
3E.1(v),(7) effective"Workforce Decemberdata" 11,means 2024.data Workforce data.
– Data relating to employment status, wage information, geographic location of employment, and employer information.
"§ 116E-2.
Show all 284 changed lines (244 more)
Purpose of the North Carolina Longitudinal Data System.
(a) TheNorth Carolina LongitudinalDataSystem is a statewidedatasystem that contains individual-level student data and workforce data from all levels of education and the State's workforce.
The purpose of the System is to do the following:
(1) Facilitate and enable the exchange of student data among agencies and institutions within the State.
(2) Generate timely and accurate information about student performance that can be used to improve the State's education system and guide decision makers at all levels.
(3) Facilitate and enable the linkage of student data and workforce data.
(b) The linkage of student data and workforce data for the purposes of the System shall be limited to no longer than five years from the later of the date of the student's completion of secondary education or the date of the student's latest attendance at an institution of higher education in the State.
… "§ 116E-4.
Powers and duties of the Center.
(a) The Center shall have the following powers and duties with respect to the System:
… (4) Before the use of any individual data in the System, the Center shall do the following:
a.
Create and publish an inventory of the individual student data proposed to be accessible in the System and required to be reported by State and federal education mandates.System.
b.
Develop and implement policies to comply with FERPA FERPA, IDEA, HIPAA, CJIS, the Internal Revenue Code, and any other privacy measures, measures relevant to data available to the System, as required by law or the Center.
DivisionDevelop ofa Emergencydetailed Management.data security and safeguarding plan that includes the following:
The1. State CIO shall ensure that State agencies' operations are not adversely impacted under the State agency information technology consolidation." PART II.
CHANGESAuthorized TOaccess THEand BROADBANDauthentication POLEfor REPLACEMENTauthorized PROGRAMaccess. SECTION 2.1.
Section2. 38.10 of S.L.
2021-180,Privacy ascompliance amendedstandards. by Section 16.4 of S.L.
2022-6,3. reads as rewritten:
"BROADBANDPrivacy ACCELERATION … "SECTION 38.10.(b) The Broadband Pole Replacement Program (hereinafter "Program") is hereby established for the purpose of speeding and facilitatingsecurity theaudits. deployment of broadband service to individuals, businesses, agricultural operations, and community access points in unserved areas by reimbursing a portion of eligible pole replacement costs incurred by communications service providers.
A4. communications service provider who pays or incurs the costs of removing and replacing an existing pole pole, or placing facilities underground to better protect the critical infrastructure from natural disasters, in connection with a qualified project may apply to the Department for reimbursement in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of eligible pole replacement costs paid or incurred by the applicant or ten thousand dollars ($10,000), whichever is less, for each pole replaced.replaced or, in the case of placing facilities underground, fifty percent (50%) of such costs.
…Breach "SECTIONnotification 38.10.(g) A pole owner shall promptly review a request for access, perform surveys, provide estimates and finalprocedures. invoices, and complete, or require the completion by other attaching entities of, any make-ready work necessary for purposes of offering broadband service in an unserved area.
A5. pole owner shall provide a good-faith estimate for any make-ready costs to the communications service provider within 60 days after receipt of a complete application for access.
IfData requestedretention byand thedisposition communicationspolicies. service provider, the pole owner shall provide accompanying documentation indicating the basis of all estimated fees or other charges, including, but not limitedto, administrative costs,that form thebasis of its estimate.A good-faith estimate shall remain valid for 14 days.
To(5) acceptOversee aroutine good-faithand estimate,ongoing acompliance communicationswith serviceFERPA providerFERPA, mustIDEA, provideHIPAA,CJIS, the poleInternal ownerRevenueCode, withandotherrelevant writtenprivacylawsand acceptancepolicies. and payment of the good-faith estimate.
Make-ready(6) workEnsure shallthat beany conditionedcontracts uponthat paymentgovern ofdatabases thethat good-faithare estimateoutsourced andto shallprivate bevendors completedinclude withinexpress aprovisions reasonablethat timesafeguard frameprivacy mutuallyand agreedsecurity to by the communications service provider and theinclude polepenalties owner.for noncompliance.
APage pole2 ownerHouse mayBill treat819-First multipleEdition requestsGeneral fromAssembly aOf singleNorth communicationsCarolina serviceSession provider2025 as(7) oneDesignate applicationa standard and compliance time line for accesselectronic whentranscripts that includes the requestsuse areof filedUID withinto 90ensure daysthe uniform and efficient transfer of onestudent another.data between local school administrative units and institutions of higher education.
A(8) poleReview ownerresearch mayrequirements deviateand fromset thepolicies timefor limitsthe specifiedapproval in this subsection during performance of make-readydata workrequests forfrom goodState and sufficientlocal causeagencies, thatthe rendersGeneral itAssembly, infeasibleand to complete make-ready work within the timepublic. limits specified in this subsection.
Any(9) deviationEstablish froman theadvisorycommittee timeon limitsdata specifiedqualityto inadvise thisthe subsectionCenter shallon extendissues forrelated ato Pagedata 2auditing Houseand Billtracking 819-Secondto Editionensure Generaldata Assemblyvalidity. Of North Carolina Session 2025 period no longer than necessary.
A(b) communicationsThe serviceCenter provider shall promptlyadopt berules notified,according into writing,Chapter 150B of the reasonGeneral forStatutes aas deviationprovided andin theG.S. new completion date estimate.
A116E-6 communications service provider shall provide notice, in writing, to implement the poleprovisions ownerof nothis laterArticle. than 14 days after attaching equipment to a pole in an unserved area.
This(c) subsectionThe Center shall notreport applytoannually polesto ownedthe byJoint aLegislative utility.Education Oversight Committee, the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, and the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Information Technologybeginning July1, 2019.
"SECTION38.10.(h)The Areport partysubjectshall toinclude adispute arising under subsection(g) ofthis section may invoke the disputefollowing: procedures authorized in G.S.
62-350(1) inAn theupdate sameon mannerthe asimplementation a party seeking resolution of athe disputeSystem's underactivities. G.S.
62-350(c),(2) andAny theproposed Utilitiesor Commissionplanned shallexpansion issue a final order resolving the dispute within 120 days of theSystem datedata. the proceedings were initiated;
provided,(3) however,Any theother Commissionrecommendations maymade extendby the timeCenter, forincluding issuancethe ofmost aeffective finaland orderefficient configuration for good cause and with the agreementSystem. of all parties.
In"§ such116E-5. a dispute, the Commission shall apply the provisions of this section notwithstanding any contrary provisions of any existing agreement.
ThisNorth subsectionCarolina shallLongitudinal notData applySystem. to poles owned by a utility.
"SECTION(a) 38.10.(i)There Nois latercreated than 60 days after the dateNorth fundsCarolina areLongitudinal appropriatedData toSystem. the Program special fund, and on a quarterly basis thereafter, the Department shall maintain and publish on its website all of the following:
(1) The numberSystem shall be located administrativelywithin the Department of applicationsPublic forInstruction reimbursementbut received,shall processed,exercise its powers and rejected,duties includingindependently of the reasonsDepartment applicationsof werePublic rejected.Instruction and the State Board of Education.Information Technology.
(2)(b) The amountSystem ofshall eachallow reimbursement,users theto totaldo number of reimbursements, and the statusfollowing: of any pending reimbursements.
(3)(1) TheEffectively estimatedorganize, remainingmanage, balancedisaggregate, inand theanalyze Programindividual specialstudent fund.and workforce data.
"SECTION(2) 38.10.(j)Examine Thestudent followingprogress definitionsand applyoutcomes inover thistime, section:including preparation for postsecondary education and the workforce.
…(c) (4)The EligibleSystem poleshall replacementbe cost.considered an authorized representative of the Department of Public Instruction, The University of North Carolina, and the North Carolina System of Community Colleges under applicable federal and State statutes for purposes of accessing and compiling student record data for research purposes.
–(d) The actualSystem andshall reasonableperform costs paid or incurred by a party after June 1, 2021, to (i) remove and replace a pole, including the amountfollowing offunctions any expenditures to remove and disposeduties: of the existing pole, purchase and install a replacement pole, and transfer any existing facilities to the new pole.
pole(1) orServe (ii)as placea facilities,data includingbroker lines,for conduit,the andSystem, relatedincluding equipment,data undergroundmaintained toby better protect the criticalfollowing: infrastructure from natural disaster.
The term includes costs paid or incurred by the party responsible for the costs of a pole replacement to reimburse the party that performs the pole replacement.
The term does not include costs that the party incurs initially that have been reimbursed to the party by another party ultimately responsible for the costs.
(5) Pole.
– Any pole used, wholly or partly, for any wire communications or electric distribution, irrespective of who owns or operates the pole.pole, including poles owned by a utility.
(6) Pole owner.
– A city or cooperatively organized entity that owns utility poles.
(7) Qualified project.
– A project undertaken by a communications service provider that is not affiliated with a pole owner seeking to provide or, due to natural disaster or other force majeure event, restore, temporarily or permanently, qualifyinginternet access service on a retail basis to one or more households, businesses, agricultural operations, or community access points in an unserved or underserved area.
The project may be affiliated with a cooperativelyorganizedentitythatownsutilitypolesbutshallnotbeaffiliated with a city that owns utility poles.
A pole owner whose affiliate seeks reimbursement for a qualified project shall not pass through the costs for which reimbursement is sought to unaffiliated communications service providers and shall schedule and perform all work in a nondiscriminatory fashion.
… House Bill 819-Second Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (9) Unserved area.
– An area in which, according to the most recent map of fixed broadband internet access service made available by the Federal Communications Commission, fixed, terrestrial broadband service at speeds ofat least 25 megabits perseconddownloadandat least 3megabits persecond upload is unavailable at the time the communications service provider requests access.
An unserved area also includes an area that was previously served but has become unserved due to damage or destruction by a natural disaster.
A pole or underground installation shall be presumed to be located in an unserved area if the pole is located in an area that is the subject of a federal or State grant to deploy broadband service, the conditions of which limit the availability of a grant to unserved areas.areas or, in the case of a damaged or destroyed facility, was in such an area when the facility was originally constructed.
(10) Utility.
– As defined by 47 U.S.C.
§ 224.
…." SECTION 2.2.
This Part is effective when it becomes law.
Funds encumbered for expenses incurred as of June 1, 2021, prior to the effective date of this Part shall remain eligible for reimbursement.
PART III.
BROADBAND FUND FLEXIBILITY SECTION 3.1.
G.S.
143B-1373.2 is repealed.
SECTION 3.2.
G.S.
143B-1374 is repealed.
SECTION 3.3.(a) The Department of Information Technology shall use funds appropriated for the Growing Rural Economies with Access to Technology program for fixed wireless and satellite broadband grants, established in G.S.
143B-1373.2, to award grants to eligible entities to purchase installation materials for satellite internet service.
Installation materials and internet service must be for the grantee's own use and not for distribution to other parties.
No portion of funds granted under this section shall be used for internet service subscriptions.
The Department shall prioritize grant applicants that operate in one of the 39 counties designated as a disaster area due to Hurricane Helene.
The Department may also give priority to grantees that offer emergency services, disaster relief, educational services, or economic development.
SECTION 3.3.(b) For the purposes of this section, an eligible entity is one of the following:
(1) A State agency.
(2) A local government entity.
(3) A volunteer fire department.
(4) An anchor point, as that term is defined in G.S.
117-18.1(d)(1).
SECTION 3.4.(a) The Department of Information Technology may provide emergency funding to communications service providers to rebuild, repair, or replace broadband infrastructure damaged by Hurricane Helene, including reimbursement of costs already incurred for rebuilding, repairing, or replacing broadband infrastructure, provided that all of the following apply:
(1) An applicant for funding under this section shall only be permitted to recover costs that are not subject to reimbursement from another source of external funding, including insurance.
(2) The Department may cap reimbursement at a portion of the costs incurred based upon evaluation of considerations such as the number of applications anticipated compared to funds available.
(3) Priority shall be given to restoration of broadband service.
Page 4 House Bill 819-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 SECTION 3.4.(b) The Department mayuse up to fiftymillion dollars ($50,000,000) of the funds available from the Broadband Make Ready Accelerator appropriation in S.L.
2021-180 for the emergency funding described in subsection (a) of this section.
Funds shall be used in compliance with applicable federal guidelines associated with the use of federal funds.
The Department may use its emergency procurement authority provided in 09 NCAC 06B .1302 to procure any goods or services in accordance with this section and shall document the request for funding, the emergencysituation or need, the area to be served, and the community's need for the procurement.
SECTION 3.5.
Section 38.15 of S.L.
2021-180, as enacted by Section 16.1(a) of S.L.
2022-6, reads as rewritten:
"SECTION38.15.
Exceptasotherwiseprovided, providedandaftertheintentoftheoriginal appropriation has been satisfied to the extent practicable, the Department of Information Technology shall have flexibility to transfer funding between the programs outlined in Section 38.4, Section 38.5, and Section 38.6 38.6, and Sections 38.10(b) through (k) of this act, so long as the total allocations for the programs remain the same.act." PART IV.
BEAD DEPLOYMENT CHANGES SECTION 4.1.
Section 10.2 of S.L.
2024-55 reads as rewritten:
"SECTION 10.2.(a) Definitions.
– As used in this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) BEAD.
– Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment.
(2) Broadband service.
– For the purposes of this section, a terrestrially deployed mass-market retail service by wire or radio that provides the capability to transmit data to and receive data from all or substantially all internet endpoints, including any capabilities that are incidental to and enable the operationofthecommunicationsservice,butexcludingdial-upinternetaccess service.
… (8) Extremely high cost per location threshold.
– A BEAD subsidy cost per location above which the Office may decline to select a proposal if use of an alternative technology meeting the BEAD Program's technical requirements is necessitated by the fact that selection of an eligible project proposing to provision service via end-to-end fiber-optic facilities to each end-user premises would be cost prohibitive.
The Office will develop a methodology for calculating this threshold in a manner that maximizes use of the best availabletechnologywhileensuringthattheprogram can, at aminimum, meet the prioritization requirements.
The Office will post the methodology for public comment before implementation.
The Office shall not, unless it is determined that it does not have sufficient funding to select each highest-scoringapplicationin theinitial rounddescribedin this section,utilize the extremely high cost per location threshold in the initial round.
… (14) Low-cost broadband service option.
– A broadband service offered to low-income households that meets the eligibility requirements for the federal Affordable Connectivity Program, or similar replacement program, in the project area for at least the length of time defined by federal requirements.
A low-cost broadband service option must be made available and include the following elements:As defined in the IIJA and as interpreted by any subsequent guidance issued by NTIA.
ProvideThe typicalDepartment download speeds of atPublic leastInstruction. 100 Mbps and typical upload speeds of at least 20 Mbps.
House Bill 819-Second Edition Page 5 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 b.
ProvideLocal typicalboards latencyof measurementseducation, oflocal noschool moreadministrative thanunits, 100public milliseconds.schools, and charter schools.
NotThe beUniversity subjectof toNorth nongovernmentalCarolina imposed surcharges and beits subjectconstituent onlyinstitutions. to the same acceptable use policies to which subscribers to all other broadband internet access service plans offered to home subscribers by the participating subgrantee must adhere.
ShallThe beCommunity offeredColleges atSystem aOffice price that does not exceed the highest price listed in the FCC's 2024 Urban Rate Survey data for Fixed Broadband Service for a service offering in North Carolina that provides a download speed of 100 Mbps, upload speed of 20 Mbps, and anlocal unlimitedcommunity capacitycolleges. allowance.
The price may be adjusted by the subgrantee based on the Consumer Price Index, as defined by the UnitedStatesBureauofLaborStatistics,beginningwithanadjustment inthefirstnewcalendar yearafterthedateofenactmentofthissection.
InThe theNorth eventCarolina theIndependent providerCollege laterand increasesUniversities, theInc., speedsand ofprivate onecolleges ofor itsuniversities. low-cost plans, it will permit eligible subscribers that are subscribed to that plan to upgrade to those new speeds at no more than a commensurate change in cost.
…f. (20) Reliable broadband service.
–Nonpublic Terrestrial-basedschools broadbandserving serviceelementary (i) with ninety-five percent (95%) of latency measurements during testing windows falling at or below 100 milliseconds round-trip time and (ii)secondary whichstudents. is designed to ensure that network outages should not exceed, on average, 48 hours over any 365-day period except in the case of natural disasters or other force majeure occurrences.
Locationsg. served exclusively by satellite, terrestrial fixed wireless services utilizing entirely licensed spectrum, using a hybrid of licensed and unlicensed spectrum, or a technology not specified by the FCC for purposes of its Broadband DATA Maps do not meet the definition of "reliable broadband service" and will be considered "unserved" for the purposes of determining eligible locations.As defined in the IIJA and as interpreted by any subsequent guidance issued by NTIA.
(21)The Secretary.Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security.Commerce.
–h. The Secretary of Information Technology.
(22)The Subgrantee.Department of Revenue.
–i. An eligible recipient who receives BEAD funds for an eligible project.
(23)The Underserved.Department of Health and Human Services.
–j. A BSL that has access to reliable broadband service equal to or greater than 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload but less than 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload.
UnlessThe otherwise determined by the Department based on competent findings of fact,Labor. locations that the FCC's Broadband DATA Maps show to have available qualifying broadband service delivered via (i) DSLor (ii) terrestrial fixed wireless services utilizing entirely licensed spectrum, or using a hybrid of licensed and unlicensed spectrum, shall be considered "underserved" for the purpose of determining eligible locations.As defined in the IIJA and as interpreted by any subsequent guidance issued by NTIA.
(24)House Unserved.Bill 819-First Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (2) Ensure routine and ongoing compliance with FERPA, IDEA, HIPAA, CJIS, the Internal Revenue Code, and other relevant privacy laws and policies, including the following:
–a. A BSL that does not have access to reliable broadband service with transmission speeds of at least 25 Mbps download and at least 3 Mbps upload.As defined in the IIJA and as interpreted by any subsequent guidance issued by NTIA.
…The "SECTIONrequired 10.2.(j)use Competitiveof Subgranteede-identified Selectiondata Process.in data research and reporting.
–b. The Office shall implement a competitive subgrantee selection process that conforms with published regulations Page 6 House Bill 819-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 and guidelines underthe BEADProgram underthe IIJA.Applications receiving thehighest score shall receive priority status for the awarding of subgrants pursuant to this section.
AsThe arequired meansdisposition of breakinginformation athat tieis forno applicationslonger receivingneeded. the same score, the Office shall give priority to the application proposing to serve the highest number of new unserved and underserved locations.
Applicationsc. shall be scored on an objective 100-point scale that is published prior to the submission of applications for subgrants.
TheProviding Officedata shallsecurity, determineincluding whether or not a subgrantee has the capacity tofor performaudit multipletrails. projects and shall not be required to award multiple projects to a prequalified subgrantee that has failed to demonstrate its ability to perform.
…."d. PART V.
LIFELINEProviding SERVICEfor PROVIDERSperformance SECTIONof 5.1.regular audits for compliance with data privacy and security standards.
Articlee. 3 of Chapter 62 of the General Statutes is amended byadding a new section to read:
"§Implementing 62-30.1.guidelines and policies that prevent the reporting of other potentially identifying data.
Designating(3) telecommunicationsFacilitate carriers;information and data requests for State and federal education reporting with existing State agencies as appropriate.
rules.(4) Facilitate approved public information requests.
(a)(5) NotwithstandingDevelopaprocessforobtaininginformationanddatarequestedbytheGeneral G.S.Assembly and Governor of current de-identified data and research.
62-3(23)j.(e) Use of data accessible through the System shall be regulated in the following ways:
or(1) G.S.Direct access to data shall be restricted to authorized staff of the System.
62-30,(2) theOnly Utilitiesde-identified Commissiondata may,shall solelybe uponused petitionin ofthe anyanalysis, providerresearch, orand resellerreporting ofconducted mobileby radio communications service, designate the petitioningSystem. provider or reseller of mobile radio communications service as an eligible telecommunications carrier pursuant to 47 C.F.R.
§(3) 54.201The forSystem purposesand recipients of providingdata Lifelinein service.fulfillment of approved data requests shall only use aggregate aggregated data in the release of data in reports and in response to data requests.public reports.
The(4) CommissionDatathat maymaybeidentifiablebasedon adoptthesizeoruniqueness rulesofthe topopulation effectuateunder theconsideration purposesshall ofnot thisbe section.reported in any form by the System.
(b)(5) NothingThe inSystem this section shall confernot uponrelease theinformation Utilities Commission any regulatory jurisdiction over providers or resellers of mobile radio communications service that havemay beennot previouslybe designateddisclosed asunder eligibleFERPA, telecommunicationsIDEA, carriersHIPAA, forCJIS, purposesthe ofInternal providingRevenue LifelineCode, serviceand priorother torelevant theprivacy enactmentlaws ofand thispolicies. section." PART VI.
EFFECTIVE(6) DATEIndividual SECTIONor 6.1.personally identifiable data accessed through the System shall not be a public record under G.S.
132-1.
(f) The System may receive funding from the following sources:
(1) State appropriations.
(2) Grants or other assistance from local school administrative units, public schools, community colleges, constituent institutions of The University of North Carolina, or private colleges and universities.
(3) Federal grants.
(4) Any other grants or contributions from public or private entities received by the System.
(g) Ownership of all data collected and maintained by the System remains with the contributors to the System.
Management and disclosure of data by the System does not change ownership of the data.
"§ 116E-6.
Data sharing.
(a) Local school administrative units, Public schools, charter schools, community colleges, constituent institutions of The University of North Carolina, and State agencies shall do all of the following:
(1) Comply with the data requirements and implementation schedule for the System as set forth by the Center.
(2) Transfer student data and workforce data to the System in accordance with the data security and safeguarding plan developed by the Center under G.S.
116E-5.
Page 4 House Bill 819-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 (b) Private colleges and universities, the North Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities, Inc., and nonpublic schools may transfer student data and workforce data to the System in accordancewith thedatasecurityandsafeguardingplandeveloped underG.S.
116E-5.
(c) All data sharing supported by the System shall comply with all applicable federal and State data and data privacy laws and regulations." 7 PART II.
CYBERSECURITY/DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION SECTION 2.1.(a) Findings.
– The General Assembly finds that it is in the best interest of the State for the Department of Information Technology to lead the State's cybersecurity efforts comprehensively rather than having State agencies handle cybersecurity individually in a fragmentary way.
SECTION 2.1.(b) Funding.
– For the 2025-2027 fiscal biennium, of the funds available in the Information Technology Reserve, the Department of Information Technology may use up to the sum of twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000) each fiscal year to enhance Department capabilities with respect to each of the following areas, and the funds are hereby appropriated for that purpose:
(1) Continuation of cybersecurity projects funded in S.L.
2023-134.
(2) State agency adherence to plans and policies related to cybersecurity incident, security alert, advisory response, security awareness, and agency cybersecurity training protocols.
(3) Monitoring and ensuring State agencyadherence to risk assessment policyfor identification and remediation of critical security vulnerabilities, including, but not limited to, significant cybersecurity incidents.
(4) Review of State agency incident response plans to ensure security standards are met with respect to cybersecurity incidents.
SECTION 2.2.
For the 2025-2027 fiscal biennium, of the funds available in the Information Technology Reserve, the sum of three million eight hundred thousand dollars ($3,800,000) in each fiscal year may be used by the Department of Information Technology to support the further development and integration of the NC HealthConnex system, and the funds are hereby appropriated for that purpose.
Funds shall be used to develop new technical integrations and reconnections between health care provider electronic health record systems and NC HealthConnex.
SECTION 2.3.
G.S.
143B-1378 reads as rewritten:
"§ 143B-1378.
Assessment of agency compliance with cybersecurity standards.plans and standards;
reporting requirements.
At a minimum, the State CIO shall annually assess the ability of each State agency, and each agency's contracted vendors, to comply with the current cybersecurity enterprise-wide set of standards established pursuant to this section.
The assessment shall include, at a minimum, the rate of compliance with the enterprise-wide security standards and an assessment of security organization, security practices, security information standards, network security architecture, and current expenditures of State funds for information technology security.
The assessment of a State agency shall also estimate the initial cost to implement the security measures needed for agencies to fully comply with the standards as well as the costs over the lifecycle of the State agency information system.
Each State agency shall submit information required by the State CIO for purposes of this assessment.
The State CIO shall include the information obtained from the assessment in the State Information Technology Plan.
The State CIO shall consider an agency's noncompliance with cybersecurityplans and standards when reviewing agency requests under Parts 3 and 4 of this Article." SECTION 2.4.(a) The General Assembly finds that it is in the best interests of the State for the Department of Information Technology (Department) to assess duplication in enterprise information technology spending across State agencies to identify opportunities for House Bill 819-First Edition Page 5 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 cost-savings and increased efficiency in information technology resource allocation.
Reducing redundancy in information technology spending will enhance fiscal responsibility and improve coordination of information technology functions across State government.
SECTION 2.4.(b) During the 2025-2026 fiscal year, the Department shall select a third-party vendor to assist in a comprehensive assessment of enterprise information technology spending across all State agencies to determine areas of duplication and inefficiency.
The assessment shall include at least all of the following:
(1) Cybersecurity tools and licenses.
(2) Enterprise software licenses.
(3) Information technology staffing allocations and roles.
(4) Cloud computing services.
(5) Other information technology services and contracts deemed necessary for evaluation.
State agencies shall provide all data, reports, and assistance requested by the Department to facilitate the assessment described in this subsection.
The Department may issue requests for information and proposals as needed to evaluate potential consolidation strategies, cost-saving measures, and improved information technology coordination.
SECTION 2.4.(c) On or before October 1, 2026, the Department shall submit a report to the Office of State Auditor, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Information Technology, and the Fiscal Research Division detailing the following:
(1) Any findings on duplicative information technology spending.
(2) Recommendations for eliminating redundancies and optimizing information technology spending.
(3) An analysis of potential cost-savings and strategies for implementation.
(4) Any legislative or administrative actions necessary to support consolidation efforts.
SECTION 2.5.
To assist in the Department's responsibilityto monitor budgetingand accounting of expenditures for information technology, operations, services, projects, infrastructure, and assets for State agencies pursuant to G.S.
143B-1335, the Office of State Budget and Management and the Office of the State Controller shall establish information technology-specific fund codes within each State agency's existing budget codes no later than December 1, 2025.
The State CIO shall work with the Office of State Controller and the Office of State Budget and Management to develop an implementation plan and shall submit the plan to theJointLegislativeOversight Committeeon Information TechnologyandtheFiscal Research Division on or before September 1, 2026.
SECTION 2.6.
G.S.
143B-1330 reads as rewritten:
"§ 143B-1330.
Planning and financing State information technology resources.
(a) The State CIO shall develop policies for agencyinformation technologyplanning and financing.
Agencies shall prepare and submit such plans as required in this section, as follows:
… (2) The State CIO shall develop a biennial State Information Technology Plan (Plan), including, but not limited to, the use of cloud-based utility computing for use by State agencies.(Plan).
(3) The State CIO shall develop one or more strategic plans for information technology.
The State CIO shall determine whether strategic plans are needed for any agency and shall consider an agency's operational needs, functions, and capabilities when making such determinations.
(b) Based on requirements identified during the strategic planning process, the Department shall develop and transmit to the General Assembly the biennial State Information Technology Plan in conjunction with the Governor's budget of each regular session.
The Plan shall include the following elements:
Page 6 House Bill 819-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025 … (6) As part of the plan, the State CIO shall develop and periodically update a long-range State Information Technology Plan that forecasts, at a minimum, the needs of State agencies for the next 10 years.
(c) Each participating agency shall actively participate in preparing, testing, and implementing an information technology plan required under subsection (b) of this section.
Separate agencies shall prepare biennial information technology plans, including the requirements listed in subsection (b) of this section, and transmit these plans to the Department by a date determined by the State CIO in each even-numbered year.
Agencies shall provide all financial information to the State CIO necessary to determine full costs and expenditures for information technology assets and resources provided by the agencies or through contracts or grants.
The Department shall consult with and assist State agencies in the preparation of these plans;
shall provide appropriate personnel or other resources to the participating agencies and to separate agencies upon request.
Plans shall be submitted to the Department by a date determined by the State CIO in each even-numbered year." SECTION 2.7.(a) G.S.
115C-150.11(c), as enacted by Section 3J.1(a) of S.L.
2024-57, reads as rewritten:
"(c) Administrative Support.
– The Department of Administration shall provide support to each school in matters related to finance, human resources, and procurement, including excluding for information technology.
Each school shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Department of Administration with regard to this support.
No civil liabilityshall attach to the Department of Administration, or to anyof its employees, individually or collectively, for any acts or omissions of a school." SECTION 2.7.(b) This section becomes effective July 1, 2025.
PART III.
EFFECTIVE DATE SECTION 3.1.
House Bill 819-Second819-First Edition Page 7
Show all 284 changed rows (244 more)
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Special Message Sent To Senate
-
Special Message Received From House
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Amend Adopted A1
-
Passed 2nd Reading
-
Passed 3rd Reading
-
Ordered Engrossed
-
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
-
Placed On Cal For 06/25/2025
-
Withdrawn From Com
-
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref to the Com on Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Filed
Sponsors
- David Willis · Cosponsor
- Bill Ward · Cosponsor
- Brian Turner · Cosponsor
- Paul Scott · Cosponsor
- Ray Pickett · Cosponsor
- Jeffrey C. McNeely · Cosponsor
- Nasif Majeed · Cosponsor
- Jordan Lopez · Cosponsor
- Chris Humphrey · Cosponsor
- Carla D. Cunningham · Cosponsor
- Terry M. Brown Jr. · Cosponsor
- Matthew Winslow · Cosponsor
- Zack Hawkins · Primary
- Hugh Blackwell · Primary
- Jake Johnson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 164 not signed on · 22 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- Zack Hawkins Democratic
- Hugh Blackwell Republican
- Jake Johnson Republican
Co-sponsors (12)
- David Willis Republican
- Bill Ward Republican
- Brian Turner Democratic
- Paul Scott Republican
- Ray Pickett Republican
- Jeffrey C. McNeely Republican
- Nasif Majeed U
- Jordan Lopez Democratic
- Chris Humphrey Republican
- Carla D. Cunningham U
- Terry M. Brown Jr. Democratic
- Matthew Winslow Republican
Not signed on (164)
164 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 164 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 21 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| U | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 54 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 102 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 13% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (120)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Autry | — | Yea |
| Clemmons | — | Yea |
| Gill | — | Yea |
| Harris | — | Yea |
| Lucas | — | Yea |
| CharlesSmith | — | Yea |
| Staton-Williams | — | Yea |
| Wray | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Cleveland | — | Yea |
| Crutchfield | — | Yea |
| Elmore | — | Yea |
| Faircloth | — | Yea |
| Fontenot | — | Yea |
| Hardister | — | Yea |
| Lowery | — | Yea |
| Mills | — | Yea |
| Moore | — | Yea |
| Reeder | — | Yea |
| Saine | — | Yea |
| Sasser | — | Yea |
| CarsonSmith | — | Yea |
| Sossamon | — | Yea |
| Rudow | — | Nay |
| vonHaefen | — | Nay |
| F. Jackson | — | Yea |
| K. Baker | — | Yea |
| Abe Jones | Democratic | Yea |
| Allen Buansi | Democratic | Yea |
| Allison A. Dahle | Democratic | Nay |
| Amber M. Baker | Democratic | Yea |
| Amos L. Quick, III | Democratic | Yea |
| B. Ray Jeffers | Democratic | Nay |
| Becky Carney | Democratic | Yea |
| Brandon Lofton | Democratic | Yea |
| Carolyn G. Logan | Democratic | Nay |
| Cecil Brockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Cynthia Ball | Democratic | Yea |
| Deb Butler | Democratic | Nay |
| Eric Ager | Democratic | Nay |
| Garland E. Pierce | Democratic | Yea |
| Gloristine Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| James Roberson | Democratic | Yea |
| Joe John | Democratic | Yea |
| Kanika Brown | Democratic | Nay |
| Laura Budd | Democratic | Nay |
| Lindsey Prather | Democratic | Nay |
| Marcia Morey | Democratic | Nay |
| Maria Cervania | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary Belk | Democratic | Nay |
| Pricey Harrison | Democratic | Nay |
| Renée A. Price | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert T. Reives, II | Democratic | Yea |
| Sarah Crawford | Democratic | Nay |
| Shelly Willingham | Democratic | Yea |
| Terence Everitt | Democratic | Nay |
| Terry M. Brown Jr. | Democratic | Yea |
| Tim Longest | Democratic | Yea |
| Vernetta Alston | Democratic | Yea |
| Ya Liu | Democratic | Yea |
| Zack Hawkins | Democratic | Yea |
| A. Reece Pyrtle, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Allen Chesser | Republican | Yea |
| Ben T. Moss, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Brenden H. Jones | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Biggs | Republican | Yea |
| Celeste C. Cairns | Republican | Yea |
| Charles W. Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Humphrey | Republican | Yea |
| David Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Dean Arp | Republican | Yea |
| Dennis Riddell | Republican | Yea |
| Destin Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Diane Wheatley | Republican | Yea |
| Donna McDowell White | Republican | Yea |
| Donnie Loftis | Republican | Yea |
| Donny Lambeth | Republican | Yea |
| Dudley Greene | Republican | Yea |
| Edward C. Goodwin | Republican | Yea |
| Erin Paré | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Iler | Republican | Yea |
| Harry Warren | Republican | Yea |
| Howard Penny, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Hugh Blackwell | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Adams | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Zenger | Republican | Yea |
| Jeffrey C. McNeely | Republican | Yea |
| Jennifer Balkcom | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy Dixon | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Torbett | Republican | Yea |
| John R. Bell, IV | Republican | Yea |
| John Sauls | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Pike | Republican | Yea |
| Julia C. Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Karl E. Gillespie | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Kidwell | Republican | Yea |
| Kelly E. Hastings | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Larry C. Strickland | Republican | Yea |
| Larry W. Potts | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Brody | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Pless | Republican | Yea |
| Matthew Winslow | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Clampitt | Republican | Yea |
| Mitchell S. Setzer | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Jackson | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Shepard | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ray Pickett | Republican | Not Voting |
| Sam Watford | Republican | Yea |
| Sarah Stevens | Republican | Yea |
| Stephen M. Ross | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Tyson | Republican | Yea |
| Ted Davis, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Tricia Ann Cotham | Republican | Yea |
| W. Ted Alexander | Republican | Not Voting |
| William D. Brisson | Republican | Yea |
| Carla D. Cunningham | U | Yea |
| Nasif Majeed | U | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 14 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| U | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 56 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 93 | 26 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (120)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gill | — | Yea |
| Lucas | — | Yea |
| CharlesSmith | — | Yea |
| Wray | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Cleveland | — | Yea |
| Crutchfield | — | Yea |
| Elmore | — | Yea |
| Faircloth | — | Yea |
| Fontenot | — | Yea |
| Hardister | — | Yea |
| Lowery | — | Yea |
| Mills | — | Yea |
| Moore | — | Yea |
| Reeder | — | Yea |
| Saine | — | Yea |
| Sasser | — | Yea |
| CarsonSmith | — | Yea |
| Sossamon | — | Yea |
| Autry | — | Nay |
| Clemmons | — | Nay |
| Harris | — | Nay |
| Rudow | — | Nay |
| Staton-Williams | — | Nay |
| vonHaefen | — | Nay |
| F. Jackson | — | Yea |
| K. Baker | — | Yea |
| Abe Jones | Democratic | Nay |
| Allen Buansi | Democratic | Nay |
| Allison A. Dahle | Democratic | Yea |
| Amber M. Baker | Democratic | Yea |
| Amos L. Quick, III | Democratic | Nay |
| B. Ray Jeffers | Democratic | Yea |
| Becky Carney | Democratic | Yea |
| Brandon Lofton | Democratic | Nay |
| Carolyn G. Logan | Democratic | Nay |
| Cecil Brockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Cynthia Ball | Democratic | Nay |
| Deb Butler | Democratic | Nay |
| Eric Ager | Democratic | Nay |
| Garland E. Pierce | Democratic | Yea |
| Gloristine Brown | Democratic | Nay |
| James Roberson | Democratic | Yea |
| Joe John | Democratic | Yea |
| Kanika Brown | Democratic | Nay |
| Laura Budd | Democratic | Nay |
| Lindsey Prather | Democratic | Nay |
| Marcia Morey | Democratic | Nay |
| Maria Cervania | Democratic | Nay |
| Mary Belk | Democratic | Nay |
| Pricey Harrison | Democratic | Nay |
| Renée A. Price | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert T. Reives, II | Democratic | Nay |
| Sarah Crawford | Democratic | Nay |
| Shelly Willingham | Democratic | Yea |
| Terence Everitt | Democratic | Nay |
| Terry M. Brown Jr. | Democratic | Yea |
| Tim Longest | Democratic | Nay |
| Vernetta Alston | Democratic | Yea |
| Ya Liu | Democratic | Yea |
| Zack Hawkins | Democratic | Yea |
| A. Reece Pyrtle, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Allen Chesser | Republican | Yea |
| Ben T. Moss, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Brenden H. Jones | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Biggs | Republican | Yea |
| Celeste C. Cairns | Republican | Yea |
| Charles W. Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Humphrey | Republican | Yea |
| David Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Dean Arp | Republican | Yea |
| Dennis Riddell | Republican | Yea |
| Destin Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Diane Wheatley | Republican | Yea |
| Donna McDowell White | Republican | Yea |
| Donnie Loftis | Republican | Yea |
| Donny Lambeth | Republican | Yea |
| Dudley Greene | Republican | Yea |
| Edward C. Goodwin | Republican | Yea |
| Erin Paré | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Iler | Republican | Yea |
| Harry Warren | Republican | Yea |
| Howard Penny, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Hugh Blackwell | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Adams | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Zenger | Republican | Yea |
| Jeffrey C. McNeely | Republican | Yea |
| Jennifer Balkcom | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy Dixon | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Torbett | Republican | Yea |
| John R. Bell, IV | Republican | Yea |
| John Sauls | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Pike | Republican | Yea |
| Julia C. Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Karl E. Gillespie | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Kidwell | Republican | Yea |
| Kelly E. Hastings | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Larry C. Strickland | Republican | Yea |
| Larry W. Potts | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Brody | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Pless | Republican | Yea |
| Matthew Winslow | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Clampitt | Republican | Yea |
| Mitchell S. Setzer | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Jackson | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Shepard | Republican | Yea |
| Ray Pickett | Republican | Yea |
| Sam Watford | Republican | Yea |
| Sarah Stevens | Republican | Yea |
| Stephen M. Ross | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Tyson | Republican | Yea |
| Ted Davis, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Tricia Ann Cotham | Republican | Yea |
| W. Ted Alexander | Republican | Not Voting |
| William D. Brisson | Republican | Yea |
| Carla D. Cunningham | U | Yea |
| Nasif Majeed | U | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 819?
- HB 819 is sponsored by David Willis (Republican), Bill Ward (Republican), Brian Turner (Democratic), Paul Scott (Republican), Ray Pickett (Republican), Jeffrey C. McNeely (Republican), Nasif Majeed (U), Jordan Lopez (Democratic), Chris Humphrey (Republican), Carla D. Cunningham (U), Terry M. Brown Jr. (Democratic), Matthew Winslow (Republican), Zack Hawkins (Democratic), Hugh Blackwell (Republican), and Jake Johnson (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 819?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced April 07, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 819?
- Track HB 819 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 819
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 819
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →