West Virginia 2026 Session Status: Enacted 10 R cosponsors

HB 5406 — Relating to driving under the influence

Last action — Chapter 108, Acts, Regular Session, 2026

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House of Delegates
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2026. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (10 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This bill addresses laws regarding driving under the influence.

The bill proposes changes to the existing laws about driving under the influence. It aims to modify how DUI offenses are handled.

Summary

Relating to driving under the influence

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

241 added · 234 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Bill HB 5406 clarify several aspects of driving under the influence laws in West Virginia. Notably, the West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory is now designated as the official certifying entity for secondary chemical tests related to DUI cases, ensuring more consistent testing standards. Additionally, the bill removes propoxyphene from the substances tested in blood analyses and streamlines the procedures for drawing blood by allowing trained phlebotomists to do so. These changes aim to modernize DUI testing methods and potentially improve the accuracy and reliability of evidence used in legal proceedings.

→
Previous
Latest
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION ENGROSSED House Bill 5406 By Delegates Akers, Funkhouser, Kimble, Mallow, Flanigan, Jennings, Marple, Shamblin, Zatezalo, Phillips, and Heckert [By the request of the Department of Homeland Security – West Virginia State Police] [Introduced February 10, 2026;
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION ENROLLED House Bill 5406 BY DELEGATES A KERS, UNKHOUSER , KIMBL, MALLOW , FLANIGAN, ENNINGS , ARPLE , HAMBLIN, ATEZALO , PHILLIP,AND HECKERT (BY THER EQUEST OF THED EPARTMENT OF HOMELAND S ECURITY– W ESTVIRGINIASTATE POLICE) [Passed March 12, 2026;
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary] Eng HB 5406 A BILL to amend and reenact §17C-5-4, §17C-5-5, §17C-5-6, §17C-5-6a, §17C-5-8, and §17C-5- 10 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to driving under the influence;
in effect 90 days from passage (June10, 2026)] Enr HB 5406 AN ACT to amend and reenact §17C-5-4, §17C-5-5, §17C-5-6, §17C-5-6a, §17C-5-8, and §17C- 5-10 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to driving under the influence;
(c) A secondary test of blood or breath is incidental to a lawful arrest and is to be administered at the direction of the arresting law-enforcement officer having probable cause to Eng HB 5406 believe the person has committed an offense prohibited by §17C-5-2 of this code or by an ordinance of a municipality of this state which has the same elements as an offense described in said section:
(c) A secondary test of blood or breath is incidental to a lawful arrest and is to be administered at the direction of the arresting law-enforcement officer having probable cause to Enr HB 5406 believe the person has committed an offense prohibited by §17C-5-2 of this code or by an ordinance of a municipality of this state which has the same elements as an offense described in said section:
(f) Any law-enforcement officer who has been properly trained in the administration of any secondary chemical test authorized by this article, including, but not limited to, certification by the Bureau for Public Health West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory in the operation of any equipment required for the collection and analysis of a breath sample, may conduct the test at any location in the county wherein the arres:Provided, That the law-enforcement officer may conduct the test at the nearest available properly functioning secondary chemical testing device Eng HB 5406 located outside the county in which the arrest was made, if:
(f) Any law-enforcement officer who has been properly trained in the administration of any secondary chemical test authorized by this article, including, but not limited to, certification by the West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory in the operation of any equipment required for the collection and analysis of a breath sample, may conduct the test at any location in the county wherein the arrest is m:Provided, That the law-enforcement officer may conduct the test at the nearest available properly functioning secondary chemical testing device located outside the Enr HB 5406 county in which the arrest was made, if:
(i) (1) For the purpose of this article, the term "law-enforcement officer" or "police officer" means:
(i) (1) For the purpose of this article, the term "law-enforcement officer" or "police officer" shall have the same meaning as the term "law-enforcement officer" is defined pursuant to §30- 29-1 of this code.
(A) Any member of the West Virginia State Police;
(2) In addition to standards promulgated by the Governor’s Committee on Crime, Delinquency, and Correction, pursuant to §30-29-3 of this code, governing the qualification of law-enforcement officers and the entry-level law-enforcement training curricula, the Governor’s Committee on Crime, Delinquency, and Correction shall require the satisfactory completion of a minimum of not less than six hours of training in the recognition of impairment in drivers who are under the influence of controlled substances or drugs other than alcohol.
(B) any sheriff and any deputy sheriff of any county;
(3) In addition to standards promulgated by the Governor’s Committee on Crime, Delinquency, and Correction, pursuant to §30-29-3 of this code, establishing standards governing Enr HB 5406 in-service law-enforcement officer training curricula and in-service supervisory level training curricula, the Governor’s Committee on Crime, Delinquency, and Correction shall require the satisfactory completion of a minimum of not less than six hours of training in the recognition of impairment in drivers who are under the influence of controlled substances or drugs other than alcohol.
(C) any member of a police department in any municipality as defined in §8-1-2 of this code;
(D) any Natural Resources police officer of the Division of Natural Resources;
and (E) any special police officer appointed by the Governor pursuant to the provisions of §61-3-41 of this code who has completed the course of instruction at a law-enforcement training academy as provided for under the provisions of §30-29-9 of this code shall have the same meaning as the term "law- enforcement officer" is defined pursuant to §30-29-1 of this code.
(2) In addition to standards promulgated by the Governor’s Committee on Crime, Delinquency, and Correction, pursuant to §30-29-3 of this code, governing the qualification of law-enforcement officers and the entry-level law-enforcement training curricula, the Governor’s Eng HB 5406 Committee on Crime, Delinquency, and Correction shall require the satisfactory completion of a minimum of not less than six hours of training in the recognition of impairment in drivers who are under the influence of controlled substances or drugs other than alcohol.
(3) In addition to standards promulgated by the Governor’s Committee on Crime, Delinquency, and Correction, pursuant to §30-29-3 of this code, establishing standards governing in-service law-enforcement officer training curricula and in-service supervisory level training curricula, the Governor’s Committee on Crime, Delinquency, and Correction shall require the satisfactory completion of a minimum of not less than six hours of training in the recognition of impairment in drivers who are under the influence of controlled substances or drugs other than alcohol.
When a law-enforcement officer has reason to believe a person has committed an offense prohibited by section two of this article §17C-5-2 of this code or by an ordinance of a municipality of Eng HB 5406 this state which has the same elements as an offense described in said section two of this article §17C-5-2 of this code, the law-enforcement officer may require such person to submit to a preliminary breath analysis for the purpose of determining such person's blood alcohol content.
When a law-enforcement officer has reason to believe a person has committed an offense prohibited by §17C-5-2 of this code or by an ordinance of a municipality of this state which has the same elements as an offense described in §17C-5-2 of this code, the law-enforcement officer may require such person to submit to a preliminary breath analysis for the purpose of determining such person's blood alcohol content.
Any preliminary breath analysis required under this section must be administered with a device and in a manner approved by the department of health West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory for that purpose.
Any preliminary breath Enr HB 5406 analysis required under this section must be administered with a device and in a manner approved by the West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory for that purpose.
Eng HB 5406 Upon the request of the person who is tested, full information concerning the test taken at the direction of the law-enforcement officer shall be made available to him or her.
Upon the request of the person who is tested, full information concerning the test taken at the direction of the law-enforcement officer shall be made available to him or her.
No person who administers any such test upon the request of a law-enforcement officer as herein defined, no hospital in or with which such person is employed or is otherwise associated or in which such test is administered, and no other person, firm or corporation by whom or with which such person is employed or is in any way associated, shall be in any way criminally liable for the administration of such test, or civilly liable in damages to the person tested unless for gross negligence or willful or wanton injury §17C-5-6a.
No person who administers any such test upon the request of a law-enforcement officer as herein defined, no hospital in or with which such person is employed or is otherwise associated or in which such test is administered, and no other person, firm or corporation by whom or with which such person is Enr HB 5406 employed or is in any way associated, shall be in any way criminally liable for the administration of such test, or civilly liable in damages to the person tested unless for gross negligence or willful or wanton injury.
§17C-5-6a.
The breath analysis must be administered as soon as possible after the law- enforcement officer arrives at a reasonable belief that the child has been driving a motor vehicle with any amount of alcohol in his or her blood.
The breath analysis must be administered as soon as possible after the law-enforcement officer arrives at a reasonable belief that the child has been driving a motor vehicle with any amount of alcohol in his or her blood.
Any preliminary breath analysis administered pursuant to this subsection must be administered with a device and in a manner approved by the division of health West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory for that purpose.
Any preliminary breath analysis administered pursuant to this subsection must be administered with a device and in a manner approved by the West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory for that purpose.
If a preliminary breath analysis is administered, the results shall be used solely for the purpose of guiding the officer in deciding whether the child, at the time of driving the motor vehicle, had an alcohol concentration in his or her blood of .0002 .02 of one percent or more, by weight, and should, therefore, be taken into custody to administer a secondary test in accordance with the provisions of this section.
If a preliminary breath analysis is administered, the results shall be used solely for the purpose of guiding the officer in deciding whether the child, at the time of driving the motor vehicle, had an alcohol concentration in his or her blood of .02 of one percent or more, by weight, and should, therefore, be taken into custody to administer a secondary test in accordance with the provisions of this section.
If a preliminary breath analysis is Eng HB 5406 administered and the results of the analysis indicate that the child has an alcohol concentration in his or her blood of less than .0002 .02 of one percent, by weight, the child may not be taken into custody unless other grounds exist under §49-4-705(b) of this code.
If a preliminary breath analysis is administered and the results of the analysis indicate that the child has an alcohol concentration in his or her blood of less than .02 of one percent, by weight, the child may not be taken into custody unless other grounds exist under §49-4-705(b) of this code.
Upon taking a child into custody pursuant to the provisions of this section, the official shall take all reasonable steps to cause notification to be made to the child’s parent or custodian or, if the parent or custodian cannot be located, to a close relative.
Upon taking a child into custody pursuant to the provisions of this section, the official shall take all reasonable steps to Enr HB 5406 cause notification to be made to the child’s parent or custodian or, if the parent or custodian cannot be located, to a close relative.
(c) Upon taking a child into custody pursuant to this section, the official shall take the child to a facility where a secondary test of the child’s blood or urine may be administered at the direction of the official or a test of the child’s breath may be administered by the official.
(c) Upon taking a child into custody pursuant to this section, the official shall take the child to a facility where a secondary test of the child’s blood may be administered at the direction of the official or a test of the child’s breath may be administered by the official.
The law- enforcement agency by which such law-enforcement official is employed shall designate whether the secondary test is a test of either blood breath, or urine or breath:
The law-enforcement agency by which such law-enforcement official is employed shall designate whether the secondary test is a test of either blood or breath:
Notwithstanding the provisions of §17C-5-7 §17C-5-7a of this code, a refusal to submit to a blood test only shall not result in the revocation of the child’s license to operate a motor vehicle in this state.
Notwithstanding the provisions of §17C-5-7a of this code, a refusal to submit to a blood test only shall not result in the revocation of the child’s license to operate a motor vehicle in this state.
Any child taken into custody pursuant to this section shall be given a written statement advising him or her that a refusal to submit to a secondary test of either blood breath, or urine or breath, as finally designated by the law-enforcement agency or official in accordance with this subsection, will result in the suspension of his or her license to operate a motor vehicle in this state for a period of at least 30 days or a revocation of the license for a period up to life.
Any child taken into custody pursuant to this section shall be given a written statement advising him or her that a refusal to submit to a secondary test of either blood or breath, as finally designated by the law- enforcement agency or official in accordance with this subsection, will result in the suspension of his or her license to operate a motor vehicle in this state for a period of at least 30 days or a revocation of the license for a period up to life.
Provided, That the breath test shall be administered in the Eng HB 5406 presence of the official who took the child into custody.
Provided, That the breath test shall be administered in the presence of the official who took the child into custody.
The qualified person administering the breath test must be a member of the West Virginia state police State Police, the sheriff of the county where the child was taken into custody, or any deputy of the sheriff or a law-enforcement official of another municipality within the county wherein the child was taken into custody.
The qualified person administering the breath test must be a member of the State Police, the sheriff of the county where the child was Enr HB 5406 taken into custody, or any deputy of the sheriff or a law-enforcement official of another municipality within the county wherein the child was taken into custody.
(f) If the results of any secondary test administered pursuant to this section indicate that the child, at the time of driving the motor vehicle, had an alcohol concentration in his or her blood of .0008 .08 of one percent or less, by weight, and if the law-enforcement official does not have reasonable cause to believe that the act of the child in driving the motor vehicle is such that it would provide grounds for arrest for an offense defined under the provisions of §17C-5-2 of this code if the child were an adult, then the official shall release the child:
(f) If the results of any secondary test administered pursuant to this section indicate that the child, at the time of driving the motor vehicle, had an alcohol concentration in his or her blood of .08 of one percent or less, by weight, and if the law-enforcement official does not have reasonable cause to believe that the act of the child in driving the motor vehicle is such that it would provide grounds for arrest for an offense defined under the provisions of §17C-5-2 of this code if the child were an adult, then the official shall release the child:
Provided, That if the results of any secondary test administered pursuant to this section indicate that the child, at the time of driving the motor vehicle, had an alcohol concentration in his or her blood of .0002 .02 of one percent or more, by weight, the child shall only be released to a parent or custodian, or to some other responsible adult.
Provided, That if the results of any secondary test administered pursuant to this section indicate that the child, at the time of driving the motor vehicle, had an alcohol concentration in his or her blood of .02 of one percent or more, by weight, the child shall only be released to a parent or custodian, or to some other responsible adult.
Eng HB 5406 §17C-5-8.
§17C-5-8.
(a) Upon trial for the offense of driving a motor vehicle in this state while under the influence of alcohol, controlled substances or drugs, or upon the trial of any civil or criminal action arising out of acts alleged to have been committed by any person driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, controlled substances or drugs, evidence of the amount of alcohol in the person's blood at the time of the arrest or of the acts alleged, as shown by a chemical analysis of his or her blood or breath, is admissible, if the sample or specimen was taken within the time period provided in subsection (g).
(a) Upon trial for the offense of driving a motor vehicle in this state while under the influence of alcohol, controlled substances or drugs, or upon the trial of any civil or criminal action arising out of acts alleged to have been committed by any person driving a motor vehicle while Enr HB 5406 under the influence of alcohol, controlled substances or drugs, evidence of the amount of alcohol in the person's blood at the time of the arrest or of the acts alleged, as shown by a chemical analysis of his or her blood or breath, is admissible, if the sample or specimen was taken within the time period provided in subsection (g).
(1) Evidence that there was, at that time, five hundredths .05 of one percent or less, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood, is prima facie evidence that the person was not under the influence of alcohol;
(1) Evidence that there was, at that time, .05 of one percent or less, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood, is prima facie evidence that the person was not under the influence of alcohol;
(2) Evidence that there was, at that time, more than five hundredths .05 of one percent and less than eight hundredths .08 of one percent, by weight, of alcohol in the person's blood is relevant evidence, but it is not to be given prima facie effect in indicating whether the person was under the influence of alcohol;
(2) Evidence that there was, at that time, more than .05 of one percent and less than .08 of one percent, by weight, of alcohol in the person's blood is relevant evidence, but it is not to be given prima facie effect in indicating whether the person was under the influence of alcohol;
(3) Evidence that there was, at that time, eight hundredths .08 of one percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood, shall be admitted as prima facie evidence that the person was under the influence of alcohol.
(3) Evidence that there was, at that time, .08 of one percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood, shall be admitted as prima facie evidence that the person was under the influence of alcohol.
(1) The number of grams of alcohol per one hundred 100 cubic centimeters of blood;
(1) The number of grams of alcohol per 100 cubic centimeters of blood;
(2) The number of grams of alcohol per two hundred ten 210 liters of breath;
(2) The number of grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath;
or (3) The number of grams of alcohol per eighty-six 86 milliliters of serum.
or (3) The number of grams of alcohol per 86 milliliters of serum.
Eng HB 5406 (d) A chemical analysis of blood for the purpose of determining the controlled substance or drug concentration of a person's blood, must include, but is not limited to, the following drugs or classes of drugs:
(d) A chemical analysis of blood for the purpose of determining the controlled substance or drug concentration of a person's blood, must include, but is not limited to, the following drugs or classes of drugs:
(5) Phencyclidine (PCP);
Enr HB 5406 (5) Phencyclidine (PCP);
Show all 66 changed rows (26 more)
Previous
Latest
(7) Propoxyphene;
(7) Methadone;
(8) (7) Methadone;
(8) Barbiturates;
(9) (8) Barbiturates;
and (9) Synthetic narcotics.
and (10) (9) Synthetic narcotics.
(e) (1) A chemical analysis of a person's blood or breath, in order to give rise to the presumptions or to have the effect provided for in this section, must be performed in accordance with methods and standards approved by the West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory.
(e) (1) A chemical analysis of a person's blood or breath, in order to give rise to the presumptions or to have the effect provided for in this section, must be performed in accordance with methods and standards approved by the state Bureau for Public Health West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory.
(A) The West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory shall prescribe, by legislative rules promulgated pursuant to §29A-3-1 et seq.
(A) The Bureau for Public Health West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory shall prescribe, by legislative rules promulgated pursuant to article three, chapter twenty-nine-a §29A- 3-1 et seq.
(B) Legislative rules proposed by the Bureau for Public Health West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory must specify the test or tests that are approved for reliability of result and ease of administration using scientific methods and instrumentation generally accepted in the forensic community, and must provide an approved method of administration which must be followed in all such tests given under this section.
(B) Legislative rules proposed by the West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory must specify the test or tests that are approved for reliability of result and ease of administration using scientific methods and instrumentation generally accepted in the forensic community, and must provide an approved method of administration which must be followed in all such tests given under this section.
Eng HB 5406 (C) The bureau West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory shall review prescribed standards and methods at least every two years to ensure that the methods and standards are approved for reliability of result and ease of administration using scientific methods and instrumentation generally accepted in the forensic community.
(C) The West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory shall review prescribed standards and methods at least every two years to ensure that the methods and standards are approved for reliability of result and ease of administration using scientific methods and instrumentation generally accepted in the forensic community.
(2) A chemical analysis of blood to determine the alcohol content or the controlled substance or drug content of blood shall be conducted by a qualified an accredited laboratory or by the State Police scientific laboratory of the West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory.
(2) A chemical analysis of blood to determine the alcohol content or the controlled substance or drug content of blood shall be conducted by an accredited laboratory or by the West Virginia State Police Forensic Laboratory.
(g) For the purposes of the admissibility of a chemical test under subsection (a):
Enr HB 5406 (g) For the purposes of the admissibility of a chemical test under subsection (a):
Fee for withdrawing blood sample and making urine test;
Fee for withdrawing blood sample;
A reasonable fee shall be allowed to the person withdrawing a blood sample or administering a urine test at the request and direction of a law-enforcement officer in accordance with the provisions of this article.
A reasonable fee shall be allowed to the person withdrawing a blood sample at the request and direction of a law-enforcement officer in accordance with the provisions of this article.
If the person whose blood sample was withdrawn or whose urine was tested was arrested and charged with a violation of section two of this article §17C-5-2 of this code, the county having venue of such charge shall pay said the fee, and if said the person arrested is subsequently convicted of such charge, such fee shall be taxed as a part of the costs of the criminal proceeding and shall be paid, notwithstanding any other provision of this code to the Eng HB 5406 contrary, into the General Fund of said county.
If the person whose blood sample was withdrawn was arrested and charged with a violation of §17C- 5-2 of this code, the county having venue of such charge shall pay the fee, and if the person arrested is subsequently convicted of such charge, such fee shall be taxed as a part of the costs of the criminal proceeding and shall be paid, notwithstanding any other provision of this code to the contrary, into the General Fund of said county.
If the person whose blood sample was withdrawn or whose urine was tested was arrested and charged with a violation of a similar ordinance of any municipality, said municipality shall pay said the fee, and if said the person arrested is subsequently convicted of such charge, such fee shall be taxed as a part of the costs of the criminal proceeding and shall be paid, notwithstanding any other provision of this code to the contrary, into the General Fund of said municipality.
If the person whose blood sample was withdrawn was arrested and charged with a violation of a similar ordinance of any municipality, said municipality shall pay the fee, and if the person arrested is subsequently convicted of such charge, such fee shall be taxed as a part of the costs of the criminal proceeding and shall be paid, notwithstanding any other provision of this code to the contrary, into the General Fund of said municipality.
12
Enr HB 5406 The Clerk of the House of Delegates and the Clerk of the Senate hereby certify that the foregoing bill is correctly enrolled.
...............................................................
Clerk of the House of Delegates ...............................................................
Clerk of the Senate Originated in the House of Delegates.
In effect 90 days from passage.
...............................................................
Speaker of the House of Delegates ...............................................................
President of the Senate __________ The within is ................................................
this the...........................................
Day of ..........................................................................................................., 2026.
.............................................................
Governor 13
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Filed for introduction

  2. To Judiciary

  3. Introduced in House

  4. To House Judiciary

  5. To House Courts

  6. Markup Discussion

  7. To House Judiciary

  8. Markup Discussion

  9. Do pass

  10. On 1st reading, Special Calendar

  11. Read 1st time

  12. On 2nd reading, Special Calendar

  13. Read 2nd time

  14. On 3rd reading, Special Calendar

  15. Read 3rd time

  16. Passed House (Roll No. 187)

  17. Communicated to Senate

  18. Introduced in Senate

  19. To Judiciary

  20. To Judiciary

  21. Reported do pass

  22. Immediate consideration

  23. Read 1st time

  24. On 2nd reading

  25. Laid over on 2nd reading 3/9/2026

  26. Read 2nd time

  27. On 3rd reading with right to amend

  28. Laid over on 3rd reading 3/11/2026 with right to amend

  29. Read 3rd time

  30. Passed Senate (Roll No. 509)

  31. Communicated to House

  32. Completed legislative action

  33. House received Senate message

  34. To Governor 3/25/2026 - Senate Journal

  35. To Governor 3/25/26

  36. Approved by Governor 3/27/2026

  37. Approved by Governor 3/27/2026 - House Journal

  38. Approved by Governor 3/27/2026 - Senate Journal

  39. Chapter 108, Acts, Regular Session, 2026

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 141 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (10)

Not signed on (141)

141 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 141 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Roll Call

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 13000
Unaffiliated 21000
Total 34000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
ROSE — Yea
BARNHART — Yea
RUCKER — Yea
JEFFRIES — Yea
TAKUBO — Yea
MARTIN — Yea
TARR — Yea
MAYNARD, M — Yea
TAYLOR — Yea
MORRIS — Yea
WELD — Yea
OLIVERIO — Yea
WILLIS — Yea
PHILLIPS — Yea
WOELFEL — Yea
GARCIA — Yea
QUEEN — Yea
WOODRUM — Yea
ROBERTS — Yea
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
HAMILTON — Yea
Amy Grady Republican Yea
Anne B. Charnock Republican Yea
Brian Helton Republican Yea
Charles H. Clements Republican Yea
Craig A. Hart Republican Yea
Darren Thorne Republican Yea
Jason Barrett Republican Yea
Laura Wakim Chapman Republican Yea
Mike Azinger Republican Yea
Scott Fuller Republican Yea
T. Kevan Bartlett Republican Yea
Vince Deeds Republican Yea
Zack Maynard Republican Yea

Official roll call →

PASSAGE

Passed 96 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 86002
Democrat 8001
Unaffiliated 2001
Total 96004
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (100)
Member Party Vote
Flanigan — Yea
Linville — Yea
Kump — Not Voting
Anitra Hamilton Democrat Yea
Evan Hansen Democrat Yea
Hollis Lewis Democrat Yea
John Williams Democrat Yea
Kayla Young Democrat Yea
Mike Pushkin Democrat Yea
Rick Garcia Democrat Yea
Sean Hornbuckle Democrat Yea
Shawn Fluharty Democrat Not Voting
Adam Burkhammer Republican Yea
Adam Vance Republican Not Voting
Andy Shamblin Republican Yea
Betsy Kelly Republican Yea
Bill Bell Republican Yea
Bill Ridenour Republican Yea
Bob Fehrenbacher Republican Yea
Bryan Smith Republican Not Voting
Bryan Ward Republican Yea
Carl "Bill" Roop Republican Yea
Carl Martin Republican Yea
Charles Sheedy Republican Yea
Chris Phillips Republican Yea
Christopher W. Toney Republican Yea
Chuck Horst Republican Yea
Clay Riley Republican Yea
D. Rolland Jennings Republican Yea
Dana Ferrell Republican Yea
Dave Foggin Republican Yea
David Cannon Republican Yea
David Green Republican Yea
David McCormick Republican Yea
Dean Jeffries Republican Yea
Doug Smith Republican Yea
Elias Coop-Gonzalez Republican Yea
Eric Brooks Republican Yea
Erica Moore Republican Yea
Evan Worrell Republican Yea
Gary G. Howell Republican Yea
Geno Chiarelli Republican Yea
George Miller Republican Yea
George Street Republican Yea
Gregory A. Watt Republican Yea
Guy Ward Republican Yea
Henry Dillon Republican Yea
Ian T. Masters Republican Yea
James Robert "JB" Akers II Republican Yea
Jarred Cannon Republican Yea
Jeff Campbell Republican Yea
Jeff Eldridge Republican Yea
Jeffrey Stephens Republican Yea
Jim Butler Republican Yea
Jimmy Willis Republican Yea
Joe Ellington Republican Yea
Joe Funkhouser Republican Yea
Joe Parsons Republican Yea
Joe Statler Republican Yea
John Jordan Republican Yea
John Paul Hott Republican Yea
Jonathan Kyle Republican Yea
Jonathan Pinson Republican Yea
Jordan Bridges Republican Yea
Jordan Maynor Republican Yea
Josh Holstein Republican Yea
Kathie Hess Crouse Republican Yea
Keith Marple Republican Yea
Laura Kimble Republican Yea
Lisa White Republican Yea
Lori Dittman Republican Yea
Margitta Mazzocchi Republican Yea
Mark Dean Republican Yea
Mark Zatezalo Republican Yea
Marshall W. Clay Republican Yea
Marty Gearheart Republican Yea
Matthew Rohrbach Republican Yea
Michael Amos Republican Yea
Michael Hite Republican Yea
Michael Hornby Republican Yea
Mickey Petitto Republican Yea
Pat McGeehan Republican Yea
Patrick Lucas Republican Yea
Phil Mallow Republican Yea
Ray Canterbury Republican Yea
Rick Hillenbrand Republican Yea
Roger Hanshaw Republican Yea
Roy Cooper Republican Yea
Ryan Browning Republican Yea
S. Chris Anders Republican Yea
Sarah Drennan Republican Yea
Scot C. Heckert Republican Yea
Stanley Adkins Republican Yea
Tresa Howell Republican Yea
Tristan Leavitt Republican Yea
Vacant1 Republican Yea
Vernon Criss Republican Yea
Walter Hall Republican Yea
Wayne Clark Republican Yea
William Anderson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 5406 do?
Relating to driving under the influence
Who sponsors HB 5406?
HB 5406 is sponsored by Flanigan, James Robert "JB" Akers II (Republican), Joe Funkhouser (Republican), Laura Kimble (Republican), Phil Mallow (Republican), D. Rolland Jennings (Republican), Keith Marple (Republican), Andy Shamblin (Republican), Mark Zatezalo (Republican), Chris Phillips (Republican), and Scot C. Heckert (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 5406?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 5406?
Track HB 5406 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5406

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5406

Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →