RESIDENTIAL TENANT PROTECTIONS
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 4758 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 4758.
You're tracking HB 4758
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 4758 — RESIDENTIAL TENANT PROTECTIONS
Last action — Third Reading - Short Debate - Lost 024-080-010
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 94th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Creates the Residential Tenant Protection Act. Makes findings, states purposes, and provides definitions of terms. Prohibits residential lock-outs. Describes actions that do not constitute a residential lock-out. Makes a violation a petty offense punishable by a fine of not more than $500 nor less than $200. Also authorizes injunctive relief and damages. Effective immediately.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
139 added · 158 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of HB 4758 clarifies definitions related to landlords and tenants, ensuring that terms are consistent with existing laws. Additionally, it strengthens tenant protections by clearly defining what constitutes "abandonment" of a rental unit, which helps prevent arbitrary evictions. These changes are significant as they aim to provide clearer guidelines and better safeguard tenants' rights against unlawful practices.
*LRB09415383AJO50574b* HB4758 94THEngrossed GENERALLRB094 ASSEMBLY15383 StateAJO of50574 Illinoisb andAN 2006ACT HB4758in Introducedrelation 01/17/06,to byproperty. Rep.
William Davis SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
New Act Creates the Residential Tenant Protection Act.
Makes findings, states purposes, and provides definitions of terms.
Prohibits residential lock-outs.
Describes actions that do not constitute a residential lock-out.
Makes a violation a petty offense punishable by a fine of not more than $500 nor less than $200.
Also authorizes injunctive relief and damages.
Effective immediately.
LRB094 15383 AJO 50574 b A BILL FOR HB4758 LRB094 15383 AJO 50574 b AN ACT in relation to property.
(2) The Illinois State Constitution states in Article I, Section 2, that "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law nor be denied the equal protection of the laws."laws". (3) Residential lock-outs are a form of illegal eviction that runs contrary to the legislative intent of the Forcible Entry and Detainer provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and to the intent of the Illinois State Constitution and forces families out of their homes with virtually no advance notice or warning.
(4)(3) OverResidential 50%lock-outs are a form of illegal eviction that runs contrary to the tenant-occupiedlegislative housingintent inof the StateForcible isEntry protectedand byDetainer municipalprovisions ordinancesof thatthe restrictCode lock-outs,of howeverCivil municipalitiesProcedure thatand areto notthe homeintent ruleof unitsthe areIllinois unableConstitution toand enactforces ordinancesfamilies out of thattheir type.homes with virtually no advance notice or warning.
(4) Over 50% of the tenant-occupied housing in the State is protected by municipal ordinances that restrict lock-outs;
however, municipalities that are not home rule units are unable to enact ordinances of that type.
HB4758 Engrossed - 2 - LRB094 15383 AJO 50574 b (7) Current Illinois law fails to empower local police to act to protect tenants when made aware of a residential lock-out.
(9) A threat of a residential lock-out made to a tenant makes the tenant’s dwelling unit uninhabitable in a practical sense,sense; however these threats have not been treated previously as a residential lock-out under Illinois law.
however, these threats have not been treated previously as a residential lock-out under Illinois law.
ForAs theused purposesin of this Act:
"Landlord" and "tenant" shallhave bethe definedmeanings asgiven to those terms are defined in the Rental Property Utility Service Act.
"Dwelling unit" shallhas have the meaning given to the term "single dwelling unit" in the Dwelling Structure Contract Act.
"Dwelling structure" shallhas have the meaning given to that term in the Dwelling Structure Contract Act.
HB4758 Engrossed - 3 - LRB094 15383 AJO 50574 b "Abandonment" means that circumstancethe when all tenants haveno beenlonger absentoccupy from the dwelling unit forand a(1) period of 21 days or for one rental period, whichever is greater, the tenants have removedprovided theirthe personallandlord propertywith fromactual thenotice dwellingindicating unittheir andintention dwellingnot structure,to andreturn theto rent for the perioddwelling isunit; unpaid.
(2) the tenants have been absent from the dwelling unit for a period of 21 consecutive days, have removed all personal property from the dwelling unit, and have failed to pay rent for that period;
or (3) the tenants have been absent from the dwelling unit for 32 consecutive days and have failed to pay rent for that period.
(1) incapacitating, changing, addingadding, or removing any lock or latching device to any entrance or exit to the dwelling unit or dwelling structure to which the tenant is entitled to have access;
(3) interfering with services to the dwelling unit or dwelling structure including, but not limited to, the failure of the landlord or the agent of the landlord to pay, pursuant to a written or verbal agreement with that HB4758 Engrossed - 4 - LRB094 15383 AJO 50574 b tenant, for services to the dwelling unit or dwelling structure including, but not limited to, the services of electricity, gas, hot or cold water, and heat;
(4) removing personal property of a tenant from the HB4758 - 4 - LRB094 15383 AJO 50574 b tenant’s dwelling unit or the dwelling structure;
(3) temporaryactions interferencein accordance with possession:a court order entered pursuant to the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986, Article 112A of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963, the Civil No Contact Order Act, or any other statute or provision of law providing relief to a victim of domestic or sexual violence;
(A)(4) totemporary makeinterference needed repairs or to conduct an emergency inspection, as necessary and only as provided by law and with properpossession: written notice at least 24 hours in advance of the interference;
HB4758 Engrossed - 5 - LRB094 15383 AJO 50574 b (A) to make needed repairs or to conduct an emergency inspection, as necessary and only as provided by law and with proper written notice at least 24 hours in advance of the interference;
or HB4758 - 5 - LRB094 15383 AJO 50574 b (C) to address an emergency or for a practical necessity, provided that proper written notice of explanation is provided to the tenant no later than 2 days after the entry.
(c) It is an affirmative defense to an alleged violation of this Act if the circumstances concerning the alleged violation are within one of the circumstances described in subparagraphssubparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (3) of subsection (b) of this Section 20 and the landlord gives the type of written notice required by the applicable subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (3) of subsection (b) of this Section 20.
(d) WheneverIn aaddition complaintto ofany aother violationremedy ofsupplied in this Act isor receivedunder byanother alaw, lawif enforcementa agencylandlord thatperforms hasa jurisdictionresidential overlock-out, the locationtenant ofmay thefile dwellingsuit unitin orthe dwellingcircuit structurecourt inand question,upon theproof agencyof a violation shall investigatebe andentitled determineto whetherboth ainjunctive violationrelief hasand occurred.monetary damages.
If thea lawlandlord enforcementthreatens agencyor determinesattempts thatto perform a violationresidential haslock-out, occurred, the agencytenant shallmay forwardfile asuit reportin ofthe itscircuit investigationcourt toand theupon State’sproof Attorney of thea countyviolation inshall whichonly thebe dwellingentitled unitto orinjunctive dwellingrelief. structure is located for prosecution.
Every person who, by himself or herself or by his or her agents or employees, violates any of the provisions of this Section may for each offense be deemed guilty of a petty offense and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500 nor less than $200.
Each day that a violation occurs or continues constitutes a separate and distinct offense for which a fine shall be imposed.
(e) In addition to any other remedy supplied in this Act or under another law, if a landlord violates this Section, the tenant may file suit in the circuit court and upon proof of a violation shall be entitled to both injunctive relief and damages.
Damages shall be either in the amount of 2 times the tenant’s replacement costs, or 6 times the monthly HB4758 - 6 - LRB094 15383 AJO 50574 b rent for the unit, whichever is greater, plus the tenant’s reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
HB4758 Engrossed - 6 - LRB094 15383 AJO 50574 b Section 25.
Action History
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Lost 024-080-010
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Marlow H. Colvin
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Land Conveyance Appraisal Note Requested - Withdrawn by Rep. Mike Bost; As Amended
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Deborah L. Graham
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Karen A. Yarbrough
-
Held on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Short Debate
-
House Floor Amendment No. 4 Adopted by Voice Vote
-
House Floor Amendment No. 4 Recommends Be Adopted Rules Committee; 004-000-000
-
House Floor Amendment No. 4 Referred to Rules Committee
-
House Floor Amendment No. 4 Filed with Clerk by Rep. William Davis
-
Housing Affordability Impact Note Filed As Amended by HA 3
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Kenneth Dunkin
-
Held on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Short Debate
-
House Floor Amendment No. 3 Adopted by Voice Vote
-
House Floor Amendment No. 2 Withdrawn by Rep. William Davis
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Judicial Note Filed As Amended by HA 3
-
Fiscal Note Filed As Amended by HA 3
-
House Floor Amendment No. 3 Recommends Be Adopted Rules Committee; 005-000-000
-
Home Rule Note Filed As Amended by HA 3
-
State Mandates Fiscal Note Filed As Amended by HA 3
-
State Mandates Fiscal Note Filed As Amended by HA 1
-
Home Rule Note Filed As Amended by HA 1
-
House Floor Amendment No. 3 Referred to Rules Committee
-
House Floor Amendment No. 3 Filed with Clerk by Rep. William Davis
-
Housing Affordability Impact Note Filed As Amended by HA 1
-
Fiscal Note Filed As Amended by HA 1
-
Judicial Note Filed As Amended by HA 1
-
Land Conveyance Appraisal Note Requested by Rep. Mike Bost; As Amended
-
Judicial Note Requested by Rep. Mike Bost; As Amended
-
Housing Affordability Impact Note Requested by Rep. Mike Bost; As Amended
-
Home Rule Note Requested by Rep. Mike Bost; As Amended
-
State Mandates Fiscal Note Requested by Rep. Mike Bost; As Amended
-
Fiscal Note Requested by Rep. Mike Bost; As Amended
-
House Floor Amendment No. 2 Recommends Be Adopted Rules Committee; 004-000-000
-
House Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules Committee
-
House Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Clerk by Rep. William Davis
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Housing and Urban Development Committee; 016-000-000
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Housing and Urban Development Committee; by Voice Vote
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Housing and Urban Development Committee
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Paul D. Froehlich
-
Assigned to Housing and Urban Development Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. William Davis
Sponsors
- William "Will" Davis · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- William "Will" Davis Democrat
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 74 | 0 | 13 |
| Democrat | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 80 | 0 | 14 |
| % of votes cast | 20% | 68% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sacia | — | Nay |
| Saviano | — | Nay |
| Schmitz | — | Nay |
| Schock | — | Nay |
| Soto | — | Not Voting |
| Acevedo | — | Not Voting |
| Bassi | — | Nay |
| Beaubien | — | Nay |
| Beiser | — | Nay |
| Bellock | — | Nay |
| Berrios | — | Nay |
| Biggins | — | Nay |
| Mautino | — | Nay |
| Black | — | Nay |
| Boland | — | Nay |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Nay |
| Brauer | — | Nay |
| Brosnahan | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Nay |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Nay |
| Franks | — | Not Voting |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Jenisch | — | Nay |
| Kosel | — | Nay |
| Dugan | — | Nay |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Nay |
| Lindner | — | Nay |
| Mathias | — | Nay |
| McAuliffe | — | Nay |
| McCarthy | — | Nay |
| McKeon | — | Nay |
| Reitz | — | Nay |
| Meyer | — | Nay |
| Moffitt | — | Nay |
| Munson | — | Nay |
| Myers | — | Nay |
| Osmond | — | Nay |
| Parke | — | Nay |
| Phelps | — | Nay |
| Scully | — | Nay |
| Brady | — | Nay |
| Sommer | — | Nay |
| Tenhouse | — | Nay |
| Tryon | — | Nay |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Nay |
| Turner | — | Nay |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Nay |
| Sullivan | — | Nay |
| Hannig | — | Nay |
| Verschoore | — | Nay |
| Wait | — | Nay |
| Winters | — | Nay |
| Watson | — | Nay |
| Davis, Monique | — | Nay |
| Chavez | — | Nay |
| Churchill | — | Nay |
| Coulson | — | Nay |
| Cross | — | Nay |
| Cultra | — | Nay |
| D'Amico | — | Nay |
| Daniels | — | Nay |
| Dunkin | — | Nay |
| Dunn | — | Nay |
| Durkin | — | Nay |
| Eddy | — | Nay |
| Flider | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Nay |
| Granberg | — | Nay |
| Hassert | — | Nay |
| Holbrook | — | Nay |
| Hultgren | — | Nay |
| Jefferson | — | Nay |
| Krause | — | Not Voting |
| Lyons, Joseph | — | Not Voting |
| Lang | — | Not Voting |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Not Voting |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Younge | — | Not Voting |
| Fritchey | — | Not Voting |
| Giles | — | Not Voting |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Jones | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Nay |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Pihos | — | Nay |
| Poe | — | Nay |
| Pritchard | — | Nay |
| Ramey | — | Nay |
| Reis | — | Nay |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Not Voting |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Nay |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Nay |
| Michael J. Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Nay |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Nay |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Nay |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 4758 do?
- Creates the Residential Tenant Protection Act. Makes findings, states purposes, and provides definitions of terms. Prohibits residential lock-outs. Describes actions that do not constitute a residential lock-out. Makes a violation a petty offense punishable by a fine of not more than $500 nor less than $200. Also authorizes injunctive relief and damages. Effective immediately.
- Who sponsors HB 4758?
- HB 4758 is sponsored by William "Will" Davis (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 4758?
- This bill died with 94th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 4758?
- Track HB 4758 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 4758
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 4758
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →