HB 5299 — INTERNET DATING DISCLOSURE ACT
Last action — Session Sine Die
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 94th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Creates the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act. Requires an online dating service provider offering services to residents of this State to disclose clearly and conspicuously, to any member who provides a billing address or a zip code in this State when registering with the provider, that the online dating provider either initiates a background check of felony and sex offense convictions on each member prior to permitting any member to communicate with a member in this State or that the online dating service provider does not initiate such a background check. Provides language concerning the disclosures. Requires that an online dating service provider that conducts criminal background checks to post a safety awareness notification and provides required language for that notification. Provides that failure to comply with the disclosure requirements of the Act shall constitute an unlawful business practice under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. Provides that each failure to provide the required disclosure constitutes a separate violation. Provides for civil penalties. Creates the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act Fund to be used by the Office of the Attorney General for enforcement of the Act. Amends the State Finance Act to create the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act Fund. Amends the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. Adds the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act to the list of Acts that the knowing violation of which constitutes an unlawful business practice.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
15 added · 53 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to HB 5299 adds specific criteria for what constitutes an acceptable criminal background check for online dating services, including requirements for national coverage and regular updates. It clarifies that these checks must be conducted by services maintained within the U.S. This change aims to enhance safety for users by ensuring that the background information shared is reliable and relevant. Additionally, the removal of several lines indicates a streamlining of the bill, focusing on clearer disclosure requirements for dating services regarding background checks.
*LRB09415758LCT50972b* HB5299 94THEngrossed GENERALLRB094 ASSEMBLY15758 StateLCT of50972 Illinoisb andAN 2006ACT HB5299concerning Introducedbusinesses. 01/25/06, by Rep.
John E.
Bradley SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
New Act ILCS 105/5.663 new ILCS 505/2Z from Ch.
121 1/2, par.
262Z Creates the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act.
Requires an online dating service provider offering services to residents of this State to disclose clearly and conspicuously, to any member who provides a billing address or a zip code in this State when registering with the provider, that the online dating provider either initiates a background check of felony and sex offense convictions on each member prior to permitting any member to communicate with a member in this State or that the online dating service provider does not initiate such a background check.
Provides language concerning the disclosures.
Requires that an online dating service provider that conducts criminal background checks to post a safety awareness notification and provides required language for that notification.
Provides that failure to comply with the disclosure requirements of the Act shall constitute an unlawful business practice under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.
Provides that each failure to provide the required disclosure constitutes a separate violation.
Provides for civil penalties.
Creates the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act Fund to be used by the Office of the Attorney General for enforcement of the Act.
Amends the State Finance Act to create the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act Fund.
Amends the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.
Adds the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act to the list of Acts that the knowing violation of which constitutes an unlawful business practice.
LRB094 15758 LCT 50972 b FISCAL NOTE ACT MAY APPLY A BILL FOR HB5299 LRB094 15758 LCT 50972 b AN ACT concerning businesses.
(1) by searching available and regularly updated HB5299 Engrossed - 2 - LRB094 15758 LCT 50972 b government public record databases for felony and sex offense convictions so long as the databases, in the aggregate, provide substantially national coverage;
or (2) by searching a database maintained by a private vendor whose database contains more than 170,000,000 criminal records that are otherwise available to the public, has substantially national coverage, is updated at least every 30 days, is operated and maintained in the United States, and contains at least the same or substantially similar criminal history records as would be otherwise accessible through searches of all the available government databases specified in item (1) of this Section.
INITIATES A LIMITED BACKGROUND CHECK FOR FELONY AND SEX OFFENSE CONVICTIONS BEFORE A MEMBER IS PERMITTED TO COMMUNICATE WITH ANY MEMBER FROM ILLINOIS." HB5299 Engrossed - 3 - LRB094 15758 LCT 50972 b (d) The disclosure required by either subsection (b) or subsection (c) of this Section shall appear on a web page required to be viewed by a person applying to be a member who has indicated a billing address or zip code in this State in the registration process.
An online dating service provider that conducts criminal background checks shall establish an automatic electronic link from any HB5299 Engrossed - 4 - LRB094 15758 LCT 50972 b web page containing the disclosure required by subsection (c) of Section 15 to a web page that provides a safety awareness notification.
""PERSONAL PERSONAL SAFETY AWARENESS NOTICE CAUTION:
HB5299 Engrossed - 5 - LRB094 15758 LCT 50972 b There is no substitute for using good common sense and acting with caution when communicating with any stranger who wants to meet you." (2) A list and description of safety measures reasonably designed to increase awareness of safer dating practices as determined by the provider.
Failure to comply with the disclosure requirements of this Act shall constitute a an unlawful business practice under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.
There is hereby created the Internet Dating HB5299 Engrossed - 6 - LRB094 15758 LCT 50972 b Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act Fund as a special fund in the State Treasury.
262Z) HB5299 Engrossed - 7 - LRB094 15758 LCT 50972 b Sec.
Action History
-
Session Sine Die
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Re-referred to Rules; Pursuant to Senate Rule 3-9(b).
-
Pursuant to Senate Rule 3-9(b) / Referred to Rules
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jack D. Franks
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Postponed - Housing & Community Affairs
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to Housing & Community Affairs
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. John J. Cullerton
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 28, 2006
-
Second Reading
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 27, 2006
-
Do Pass as Amended Housing & Community Affairs; 006-001-000
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Housing & Community Affairs
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. John J. Cullerton
-
Assigned to Housing & Community Affairs
-
Added as Alternate Co-Sponsor Sen. Cheryl Axley
-
Added as Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. William R. Haine
-
Alternate Chief Sponsor Changed to Sen. John J. Cullerton
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. William R. Haine
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrive in Senate
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 074-036-003
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Mike Boland
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Jack McGuire
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Patrick J Verschoore
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. John A. Fritchey
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; 014-000-000
-
Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. John E. Bradley
Sponsors
- John E. Bradley · Cosponsor
- Cheryl Axley · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 181 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (2)
- John E. Bradley
- Cheryl Axley
Not signed on (181)
181 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 181 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 62 | 36 | 0 | 8 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 74 | 36 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 31% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sacia | — | Nay |
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Nay |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Nay |
| Soto | — | Nay |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Nay |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Nay |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Nay |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| May | — | Nay |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Nay |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Nay |
| Jenisch | — | Nay |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Joseph | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Parke | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Tenhouse | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Chavez | — | Yea |
| Churchill | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Daniels | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Nay |
| Lindner | — | Nay |
| McKeon | — | Not Voting |
| Meyer | — | Nay |
| Brady | — | Nay |
| Mulligan | — | Nay |
| Osmond | — | Nay |
| Sullivan | — | Nay |
| Howard | — | Nay |
| Watson | — | Nay |
| Jones | — | Not Voting |
| Tryon | — | Nay |
| Turner | — | Not Voting |
| Washington | — | Not Voting |
| Winters | — | Nay |
| Coulson | — | Nay |
| Cross | — | Nay |
| Cultra | — | Nay |
| Dunkin | — | Not Voting |
| Dunn | — | Nay |
| Durkin | — | Nay |
| Froehlich | — | Not Voting |
| Giles | — | Not Voting |
| Hamos | — | Nay |
| Hassert | — | Nay |
| Hultgren | — | Nay |
| Jefferson | — | Nay |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Nay |
| Poe | — | Nay |
| Pritchard | — | Nay |
| Ramey | — | Nay |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Nay |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael J. Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 5299 do?
- Creates the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act. Requires an online dating service provider offering services to residents of this State to disclose clearly and conspicuously, to any member who provides a billing address or a zip code in this State when registering with the provider, that the online dating provider either initiates a background check of felony and sex offense convictions on each member prior to permitting any member to communicate with a member in this State or that the online dating service provider does not initiate such a background check. Provides language concerning the disclosures. Requires that an online dating service provider that conducts criminal background checks to post a safety awareness notification and provides required language for that notification. Provides that failure to comply with the disclosure requirements of the Act shall constitute an unlawful business practice under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. Provides that each failure to provide the required disclosure constitutes a separate violation. Provides for civil penalties. Creates the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act Fund to be used by the Office of the Attorney General for enforcement of the Act. Amends the State Finance Act to create the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act Fund. Amends the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. Adds the Internet Dating Disclosure and Safety Awareness Act to the list of Acts that the knowing violation of which constitutes an unlawful business practice.
- Who sponsors HB 5299?
- HB 5299 is sponsored by John E. Bradley and Cheryl Axley.
- What is the current status of HB 5299?
- This bill died with 94th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 5299?
- Track HB 5299 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 5299
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 5299
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →