UNIFORM ACT LIMITING LITIGATIO
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 339 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 339.
You're tracking SB 339
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 339 — UNIFORM ACT LIMITING LITIGATIO
Last action — Session Sine Die
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 94th Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Creates the Limiting Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Act. Provides that a party may bring a special motion to strike any claim that is based on an action involving public participation and petition. Provides that, if the moving party on a special motion to strike meets the prima facie requirements, the responding party must establish a probability of prevailing on the claim. Outlines the procedures for filing a special motion to strike. Provides that a moving party on a special motion to strike who prevails is entitled to costs of litigation, reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection with the motion, and any additional relief, including sanctions upon the responding party and its attorneys or law firms, that the court determines necessary to deter reputation of the conduct and comparable conduct by others. Effective immediately.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 179 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 339 introduces a new law aimed at protecting public participation, allowing individuals to challenge legal claims that stem from their involvement in public activities. If someone brings a case against them, the person defending their right to participate must only show a reasonable chance of winning the case. This change matters because it helps safeguard everyday citizens from legal intimidation, encouraging more open communication and participation in community engagement without the fear of costly lawsuits.
*LRB09406346LCB36422b* SB0339 94THEngrossed GENERALLRB094 ASSEMBLY06346 StateLCB of36422 Illinoisb andAN 2006ACT SB0339concerning Introducedcivil 2/15/2005,law. by Sen.
Kirk W.
Dillard - John J.
Cullerton - Dan Cronin SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
New Act Creates the Limiting Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Act.
Provides that a party may bring a special motion to strike any claim that is based on an action involving public participation and petition.
Provides that, if the moving party on a special motion to strike meets the prima facie requirements, the responding party must establish a probability of prevailing on the claim.
Outlines the procedures for filing a special motion to strike.
Provides that a moving party on a special motion to strike who prevails is entitled to costs of litigation, reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in connection with the motion, and any additional relief, including sanctions upon the responding party and its attorneys or law firms, that the court determines necessary to deter reputation of the conduct and comparable conduct by others.
Effective immediately.
LRB094 06346 LCB 36422 b A BILL FOR SB0339 LRB094 06346 LCB 36422 b AN ACT concerning civil law.
Section 5.
Findings;
purposes.
(a) The General Assembly finds and declares that:
(1) There has been a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for the redress of grievances.
(2) Such lawsuits, called "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation" or "SLAPPs," are typically dismissed as groundless or unconstitutional, but often not before the defendants are put to great expense, harassment, and interruption of their productive activities.
(3) The costs associated with defending such suits can deter individuals and entities from fully exercising their constitutional rights to petition the government and to speak out on public issues.
(4) It is in the public interest for citizens to participate in matters of public concern and provide information to public entities and other citizens on public issues that affect them without fear of reprisal through abuse of the judicial process.
(5) An expedited judicial review would avoid the potential for abuse in these cases.
(b) The purposes of this Act are:
(1) to strike a balance between the rights of persons to file lawsuits and to trial by jury and the rights of persons to participate in matters of public concern;
SB0339 - 2 - LRB094 06346 LCB 36422 b (2) to establish an efficient, uniform, and comprehensive method for speedy adjudication of SLAPPs;
and (3) to provide for attorney’s fees, costs, and additional relief where appropriate.
Section 10.
Definitions.
As used in this Act:
"Claim" means any lawsuit, cause of action, claim, cross-claim, counterclaim, or other judicial pleading or filing requesting relief.
"Government" means a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, official, employee, agent, or other person acting under color of law of the United States, a state, or subdivision of a state or other public authority.
"Moving party" means a person on whose behalf the motion described in Section 20 is filed seeking dismissal of a claim.
"Person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, or any other legal or commercial entity.
"Responding party" means a person against whom the motion described in Section 20 is filed.
Section 15.
Scope;
exclusion.
(a) This Act applies to any claim, however characterized, that is based on an action involving public participation and petition.
As used in this Act, an "action involving public participation and petition" includes:
(1) any oral statement made, or written statement or other document submitted, in a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding or other proceeding authorized by law;
(2) any oral statement made, or written statement or other document submitted, in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding or other proceeding authorized by law;
(3) any oral statement made, or written statement or SB0339 - 3 - LRB094 06346 LCB 36422 b other document submitted, that is reasonably likely to encourage, or to enlist public participation in an effort to effect, consideration or review of an issue in a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding or other proceeding authorized by law;
Show all 78 changed lines (38 more)
(4) any oral statement made, or written statement or other document submitted, in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public concern;
or (5) any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of free speech in connection with an issue of public concern, or in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition.
(b) This Act shall not apply to any action brought by the Attorney General or a State’s Attorney or city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor, to enforce laws aimed at public protection.
Section 20.
Special motion to strike;
burden of proof.
(a) A party may bring a special motion to strike any claim that is based on an action involving public participation and petition, as described in Section 15.
(b) A party bringing a special motion to strike under this Act has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that the claim against which the motion is brought is based on an action involving public participation and petition.
If the moving party meets this burden, the burden shifts to the responding party to establish a probability of prevailing on the claim by presenting substantial evidence to support a prima facie case.
If the responding party meets this burden, the court shall deny the motion.
(c) In making a determination under subsection (b) of this Section, the court shall consider pleadings and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based.
(d) If the court determines that the responding party has SB0339 - 4 - LRB094 06346 LCB 36422 b established a probability of prevailing on the claim:
(1) the fact that the determination has been made and the substance of the determination may not be admitted into evidence at any later stage of the case;
and (2) the determination does not affect the burden of proof or standard of proof that is applied in the proceeding.
(e) The Attorney General’s office or any government body to which the moving party’s acts were directed may intervene to defend or otherwise support the moving party.
Section 25.
Required procedures.
(a) The special motion to strike may be filed within 60 days after the service of the most recent complaint or, in the court’s discretion, at any later time upon terms it deems proper.
A hearing shall be held on the motion not more than 30 days after the service of the motion unless the docket conditions of the court require a later hearing.
(b) All discovery and any pending hearings or motions in the action shall be stayed upon the filing of a special motion to strike under Section 20.
The stay of discovery shall remain in effect until the entry of the order ruling on the motion.
Notwithstanding the stay imposed by this subsection, the court, on motion and for good cause shown, may order that specified discovery or other hearings or motions be conducted.
(c) Any party shall have a right of expedited appeal from a trial court order on the special motion or from a trial court’s failure to rule on the motion in a timely fashion.
Section 30.
Attorney’s fees, costs, and other relief.
(a) The court shall award a moving party who prevails on a special motion to strike made under Section 20, without regard to any limits under State law:
(1) costs of litigation and any reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in connection with the motion;
and (2) any additional relief, including sanctions upon SB0339 - 5 - LRB094 06346 LCB 36422 b the responding party and its attorneys or law firms, as the court determines shall be necessary to deter repetition of the conduct and comparable conduct by others similarly situated.
(b) If the court finds that the special motion to strike is frivolous or is solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the responding party.
Section 35.
Relationship to other laws.
Nothing in this Act shall limit or preclude any rights the moving party may have under any other constitutional, statutory, case or common law, or rule provisions.
Section 40.
Severability of provisions.
If any provision of this Act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity of that provision or application does not affect other provisions or applications of this Act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
Section 99.
Effective date.
This Act takes effect upon becoming law.
Show all 78 changed rows (38 more)
Action History
-
Session Sine Die
-
Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
-
Assigned to Executive Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrived in House
-
Third Reading - Passed; 049-001-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading April 14, 2005
-
Second Reading
-
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Pamela J. Althoff
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading April 6, 2005
-
Do Pass as Amended Judiciary; 010-000-000
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Adopted
-
Postponed - Judiciary
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to Judiciary
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Kirk W. Dillard
-
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Don Harmon
-
Held in Judiciary
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
-
Postponed - Judiciary
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Judiciary
-
Postponed - Judiciary
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Kirk W. Dillard
-
Assigned to Judiciary
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Dan Cronin
-
Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. John J. Cullerton
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. Kirk W. Dillard
Sponsors
- Kirk W. Dillard · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Kirk W. Dillard
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 43 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 2% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sandoval | — | Not Voting |
| Shadid | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Not Voting |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Sullivan, D. | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Geo-Karis | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Sullivan, J. | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Not Voting |
| Petka | — | Not Voting |
| Jones, J. | — | Not Voting |
| Jones, W. | — | Not Voting |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Winkel | — | Yea |
| Wojcik | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Rauschenberger | — | Not Voting |
| Righter | — | Not Voting |
| Risinger | — | Nay |
| Ronen | — | Yea |
| Roskam | — | Not Voting |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| del Valle | — | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 339 do?
- Creates the Limiting Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Act. Provides that a party may bring a special motion to strike any claim that is based on an action involving public participation and petition. Provides that, if the moving party on a special motion to strike meets the prima facie requirements, the responding party must establish a probability of prevailing on the claim. Outlines the procedures for filing a special motion to strike. Provides that a moving party on a special motion to strike who prevails is entitled to costs of litigation, reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection with the motion, and any additional relief, including sanctions upon the responding party and its attorneys or law firms, that the court determines necessary to deter reputation of the conduct and comparable conduct by others. Effective immediately.
- Who sponsors SB 339?
- SB 339 is sponsored by Kirk W. Dillard.
- What is the current status of SB 339?
- This bill died with 94th Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 339?
- Track SB 339 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 339
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 339
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →