CNTY CD-QUITCLAIM NOTICE
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 2569 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 2569.
You're tracking SB 2569
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 2569 — CNTY CD-QUITCLAIM NOTICE
Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 94-0823
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2006. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Amends the Counties Code. Requires the county recorder to administer a system to notify owners of the filing of a quitclaim deed on their property. Sets forth the requirements for the notification system. Preempts home rule powers. Amends the State Mandates Act to require implementation without reimbursement.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
12 added · 12 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 2569 specifically addresses "quitclaim deeds," making it clear that notifications sent to previous property owners apply only to this type of deed. This change helps ensure that property owners are informed about changes related to their property, which is important for maintaining transparency and protecting their interests. The overall requirement for sending notifications remains the same, but now it is focused more precisely on quitclaim deeds, which can have unique implications for property ownership. This distinction matters because it clarifies the intent of the law and informs property owners when their rights may be affected.
SB2569 EngrossedEnrolled LRB094 18917 RSP 54391 b AN ACT concerning local government.
DeedQuitclaim deed notification.
Upon the recording or filing of a quitclaim deed on any property within a county with a population of 3,000,000 or more, the Recorderrecorder of Deedsdeeds must mail a notification postcard to the previous owner of record at the address listed on the property record in the Recorder’srecorder’s Office.office.
The postpostcard card must state that a newly recorded quitclaim deed has been filed on the property, and must state the date of the new recording, the address of the Recorder’srecorder’s Office,office, and any other information deemed necessary by the Recorder.recorder.
This Section is a denial and limitation of home rule powers under subsection (g)(i) of Section 6 of Article VII of the Illinois Constitution.
Action History
-
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 94-0823
-
Effective Date January 1, 2007
-
Governor Approved
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Passed Both Houses
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Senate Concurs 055-000-000
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion To Concur Recommended Do Adopt Financial Institutions; 008-000-000
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Financial Institutions
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Filed with Secretary Sen. Miguel del Valle
-
Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence House Amendment(s) 01-April 4, 2006
-
Secretary's Desk - Concurrence House Amendment(s) 01
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 114-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; 010-000-000
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; by Voice Vote
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
-
Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Richard T. Bradley
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrived in House
-
Third Reading - Passed; 057-000-000
-
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Mattie Hunter
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading February 22, 2006
-
Second Reading
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading February 14, 2006
-
Do Pass as Amended Financial Institutions; 009-000-000
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Financial Institutions
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Miguel del Valle
-
Assigned to Financial Institutions
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Jacqueline Y. Collins
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. Miguel del Valle
Sponsors
- del Valle · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 55 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Axley | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Not Voting |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Shadid | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Petka | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Not Voting |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones, W. | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Winkel | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Geo-Karis | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Rauschenberger | — | Not Voting |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Ronen | — | Yea |
| Roskam | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| del Valle | — | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 102 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 114 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Not Voting |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Giles | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Jenisch | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Joseph | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Durkin | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| McKeon | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Tenhouse | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Chavez | — | Yea |
| Churchill | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Daniels | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Jones | — | Not Voting |
| Madigan | — | Not Voting |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Parke | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Ramey | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael J. Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Axley | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Shadid | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Sullivan, J. | — | Yea |
| Petka | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Geo-Karis | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones, W. | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Winkel | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Rauschenberger | — | Not Voting |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Ronen | — | Not Voting |
| Roskam | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| del Valle | — | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2569 do?
- Amends the Counties Code. Requires the county recorder to administer a system to notify owners of the filing of a quitclaim deed on their property. Sets forth the requirements for the notification system. Preempts home rule powers. Amends the State Mandates Act to require implementation without reimbursement.
- Who sponsors SB 2569?
- SB 2569 is sponsored by del Valle.
- What is the current status of SB 2569?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2006. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 2569?
- Track SB 2569 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2569
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2569
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →