EPA-LIVESTOCK NUISANCE SUITS
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 2744 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 2744.
You're tracking SB 2744
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 2744 — EPA-LIVESTOCK NUISANCE SUITS
Last action — Session Sine Die
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 94th Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Amends the Environmental Protection Act. Provides that no person may bring a civil suit based on potential nuisance with respect to a proposed livestock management facility until all required federal, State, and local permits and approvals for the proposed facility have been granted. Provides that, from the time when all required federal, State, and local permits and approvals have been granted until animals are present and operations have actually begun at the proposed facility, it shall be presumed that a proposed livestock management facility can be lawfully operated in accordance with those permits. Includes related findings and declarations. Effective immediately.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
2 added · 23 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Bill SB 2744 indicate that any legal challenges regarding potential nuisances from new livestock management facilities can only be initiated after all necessary permits and approvals are obtained. This change reinforces the idea that as long as a facility has met all legal requirements for operation, it is assumed to be compliant until it is up and running. This matters because it aims to streamline the process for livestock operations and reduce the likelihood of preemptive lawsuits, which could create delays and uncertainty for farmers looking to establish new facilities.
*LRB09417492RSP52787b* SB2744 94THEngrossed GENERALLRB094 ASSEMBLY17492 StateRSP of52787 Illinoisb andAN 2006ACT SB2744concerning Introducedenvironmental 1/20/2006,protection. by Sen.
Deanna Demuzio SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
ILCS 5/31.3 new Amends the Environmental Protection Act.
Provides that no person may bring a civil suit based on potential nuisance with respect to a proposed livestock management facility until all required federal, State, and local permits and approvals for the proposed facility have been granted.
Provides that, from the time when all required federal, State, and local permits and approvals have been granted until animals are present and operations have actually begun at the proposed facility, it shall be presumed that a proposed livestock management facility can be lawfully operated in accordance with those permits.
Includes related findings and declarations.
Effective immediately.
LRB094 17492 RSP 52787 b A BILL FOR SB2744 LRB094 17492 RSP 52787 b AN ACT concerning environmental protection.
(1) the authority of the Agency to consider or SB2744 Engrossed - 2 - LRB094 17492 RSP 52787 b determine any matter or question relating to the siting, design, construction, or operation of a proposed livestock management facility;
Action History
-
Session Sine Die
-
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Gary Hannig
-
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Kevin Joyce
-
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Kurt M. Granberg
-
Added Alternate Co-Sponsor Rep. Robert F. Flider
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Brandon W. Phelps
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Robert W. Pritchard
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Richard P. Myers
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Rich Brauer
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Dan Reitz
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrived in House
-
Third Reading - Passed; 056-000-000
-
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Martin A. Sandoval
-
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Frank C. Watson
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading February 23, 2006
-
Second Reading
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading February 16, 2006
-
Do Pass Agriculture & Conservation; 006-000-001
-
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Gary G. Dahl
-
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. John O. Jones
-
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Arthur J. Wilhelmi
-
Added as Co-Sponsor Sen. Todd Sieben
-
Assigned to Agriculture & Conservation
-
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. John M. Sullivan
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. Deanna Demuzio
Sponsors
- Deanna Demuzio · Cosponsor
- Robert F. Flider · Cosponsor
- Kurt M. Granberg · Cosponsor
- Gary Hannig · Cosponsor
- Patrick J. Joyce · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 178 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (5)
- Deanna Demuzio
- Robert F. Flider
- Kurt M. Granberg
- Gary Hannig
- Patrick J. Joyce Democrat
Not signed on (178)
178 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 178 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Axley | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Yea |
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Shadid | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Petka | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Geo-Karis | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Not Voting |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones, W. | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Winkel | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Rauschenberger | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Not Voting |
| Ronen | — | Yea |
| Roskam | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| del Valle | — | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2744 do?
- Amends the Environmental Protection Act. Provides that no person may bring a civil suit based on potential nuisance with respect to a proposed livestock management facility until all required federal, State, and local permits and approvals for the proposed facility have been granted. Provides that, from the time when all required federal, State, and local permits and approvals have been granted until animals are present and operations have actually begun at the proposed facility, it shall be presumed that a proposed livestock management facility can be lawfully operated in accordance with those permits. Includes related findings and declarations. Effective immediately.
- Who sponsors SB 2744?
- SB 2744 is sponsored by Deanna Demuzio, Robert F. Flider, Kurt M. Granberg, Gary Hannig, and Patrick J. Joyce (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 2744?
- This bill died with 94th Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 2744?
- Track SB 2744 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2744
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2744
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →