UTILITIES-TELEPHONE SYSTEM
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1017 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1017.
You're tracking HB 1017
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1017 — UTILITIES-TELEPHONE SYSTEM
Last action — Session Sine Die
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 94th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Amends the Emergency Telephone System Act. Requires one network connection for each T-1 facility. Defines "high-speed channelized service". Provides no public agency or unit of local government shall be liable, except for wilful or wanton misconduct, in connection with placing out-going emergency calls. Adds high-speed channelized service to the types of service that require 5 surcharges per network. Adds to the Section describing the offense of interference with emergency communication a provision that states that any person who without lawful justification interrupts, prevents or otherwise interferes with a 9-1-1 call is subject to Section 26-2 of the Criminal Code (Class A misdemeanor). Amends the Criminal Code by amending the Section describing the offense of interference with emergency communication adding verbal or physical obstruction of a 9-1-1 call or prevention of an emergency communication to the offense. Adds definition of "report of a crime to a law enforcement agency" and "emergency communication" to the criminal offense. Makes the offense solely a Class A misdemeanor (now, Class A and B for different types of interference). Repeals Section 13 of the Emergency Telephone System Act. Effective immediately.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
47 added · 355 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HB 1017 introduces new penalties for individuals who interfere with 9-1-1 emergency calls. It specifically criminalizes any interruption or obstruction of a 9-1-1 call, making those actions punishable under existing criminal laws as a Class A misdemeanor. This change is significant because it aims to enhance public safety by ensuring that emergency communications are prioritized and protected from interference.
*LRB09407515AJO37682b* HB1017 94THEngrossed GENERALLRB094 ASSEMBLY07515 StateAJO of37682 Illinoisb andAN 2006ACT HB1017concerning Introducedcommunications. 02/03/05, by Rep.
Marlow H.
Colvin SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
ILCS 750/2.12 from Ch.
134, par.
32.12 ILCS 750/2.21 new ILCS 750/10.1 from Ch.
134, par.
40.1 ILCS 750/15.2 from Ch.
134, par.
45.2 ILCS 750/15.3 from Ch.
134, par.
45.3 ILCS 5/26-2 from Ch.
38, par.
26-2 ILCS 750/13 rep.
from Ch.
134, par.
43 Amends the Emergency Telephone System Act.
Requires one network connection for each T-1 facility.
Defines "high-speed channelized service".
Provides no public agency or unit of local government shall be liable, except for wilful or wanton misconduct, in connection with placing out-going emergency calls.
Adds high-speed channelized service to the types of service that require 5 surcharges per network.
Adds to the Section describing the offense of interference with emergency communication a provision that states that any person who without lawful justification interrupts, prevents or otherwise interferes with a 9-1-1 call is subject to Section 26-2 of the Criminal Code (Class A misdemeanor).
Amends the Criminal Code by amending the Section describing the offense of interference with emergency communication adding verbal or physical obstruction of a 9-1-1 call or prevention of an emergency communication to the offense.
Adds definition of "report of a crime to a law enforcement agency" and "emergency communication" to the criminal offense.
Makes the offense solely a Class A misdemeanor (now, Class A and B for different types of interference).
Repeals Section 13 of the Emergency Telephone System Act.
Effective immediately.
LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b CORRECTIONAL FISCAL NOTE ACT BUDGET AND MAY APPLY IMPACT NOTE ACT MAY APPLY A BILL FOR HB1017 LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b AN ACT concerning communications.
The Emergency Telephone System Act is amended by changing Sections 2.12, 10.1, 15.2, and 15.3 and by adding Section 2.2115.2 as follows:
(50 ILCS 750/2.12)750/15.2) (from Ch.
32.12) Sec.
2.12.
(a) For the purposes of this Act, "network connections" means the number of voice grade communications channels directly between a subscriber and a telecommunications carrier’s public switched network, without the intervention of any other telecommunications carrier’s switched network, which would be required to carry the subscriber’s inter-premises traffic and which connection either (1) is capable of providing access through the public switched network to a 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone System if one exists, or, (2) if no system exists at the time a surcharge is imposed under Section 15.3 which would be capable of providing access through the public switched network to the local 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone System if one existed.
(b) For the purposes of this Act, no telecommunications carrier providing facilities-based local exchange telecommunications service prior to January 1, 1986 shall be required to offer or provide sophisticated 9-1-1 system features such as selective call routing in any area where that carrier’s local switching facility does not have the capability to do so.
(c) For the purposes of this Act, "telecommunication carrier" does not include a cellular or other mobile communication carrier.
(d) Where multiple voice grade communication channels are connected to a telecommunication carrier’s public switched HB1017 - 2 - LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b network through a private branch exchange service (PBX), there shall be determined to be one network connection for each trunk line capable of transporting either the subscriber’s inter-premises traffic to the public switched network or the subscriber’s 9-1-1 calls to the public agency.
Where multiple voice grade communication channels are connected to a telecommunication carrier’s public switched network through centrex type service, the number of network connections shall be equal to the number of PBX trunk equivalents for the subscriber’s service, as determined by reference to any generally applicable exchange access service tariff filed by the subscriber’s telecommunications carrier with the Commission.
Where multiple voice grade communication channels are connected to a telecommunication carrier’s public switched network through a high-speed channelized service, there shall be determined to be one network connection for each T-1 facility capable of transporting either the subscriber’s inter-premises traffic to the public switched network or the subscriber’s 9-1-1 calls to the public agency.
This subsection is not intended to make any change in the meaning of this Section, but is intended to remove possible ambiguity, thereby confirming the intent of paragraph (a) as it existed prior to and following the effective date of this amendatory Act of 2002.
(Source:
Show all 114 changed lines (74 more)
P.A.
92-557, eff.
1-1-03.) (50 ILCS 750/2.21 new) Sec.
2.21.
High-speed channelized service.
"High-speed channelized service" means any advanced telecommunications service system, such as, but not limited to, Digital Channel Service (DCS) or ISDN PRI that is provisioned through the use of T-1 facilities and that is capable of providing communications between internal stations and external networks.
(50 ILCS 750/10.1) (from Ch.
134, par.
40.1) HB1017 - 3 - LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b Sec.
10.1.
Confidentiality.
(a) 9-1-1 information consisting of names, addresses and telephone numbers of telephone customers whose listings are not published in directories or listed in Directory Assistance Offices is confidential.
Except as provided in subsection (b), information shall be provided on a call-by-call basis only for the purpose of responding to emergency calls.
For the purposes of this subsection (a), "emergency" means a situation in which property or human life is in jeopardy and the prompt notification of the public safety agency is essential.
(b) 9-1-1 information, including information described in subsection (a), may be used by a public safety agency for the purpose of placing out-going emergency calls.
No public agency, public safety agency, emergency telephone system board, or unit of local government assuming the duties of an emergency telephone system board or telecommunications carrier or supplier of a computerized warning system that utilizes automatic out-going call devices or other telecommunication or information service equipment and services to provide warnings of impending or threatened emergencies, and no officer, agent, or employee of any such public agency, public safety agency, emergency telephone system board, or unit of local government shall be liable for any civil damages as a result of any act or omission, except willful or wanton misconduct, in connection with placing out-going emergency calls.
(c) Nothing in this Section prohibits a municipality with a population of more than 500,000 from using 9-1-1 information, including information described in subsection (a), for the purpose of responding to calls made to a non-emergency telephone system that is under the supervision and control of a public safety agency and that shares all or some facilities with an emergency telephone system.
(d) Any public safety agency that uses 9-1-1 information for the purposes of subsection (b) must establish methods and procedures that ensure the confidentiality of information as required by subsection (a).
HB1017 - 4 - LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b (e) Divulging confidential information in violation of this Section is a Class A misdemeanor.
(Source:
P.A.
92-383, eff.
1-1-02.) (50 ILCS 750/15.2) (from Ch.
134, par.
12-19-01.) (50Section ILCS10. 750/15.3) (from Ch.
134, par.
45.3) Sec.
15.3.
Surcharge.
(a) The corporate authorities of any municipality or any county may, subject to the limitations of subsections (c), (d), and (h), and in addition to any tax levied pursuant to the Simplified Municipal Telecommunications Tax Act, impose a monthly surcharge on billed subscribers of network connection provided by telecommunication carriers engaged in the business of transmitting messages by means of electricity originating within the corporate limits of the municipality or county imposing the surcharge at a rate per network connection determined in accordance with subsection (c).
Provided, however, that where multiple voice grade communications channels are connected between the subscriber’s premises and a public switched network through private branch exchange (PBX), high-speed channelized service, or centrex type service, a municipality imposing a surcharge at a rate per network connection, as determined in accordance with this Act, shall impose 5 such surcharges per network connection, as determined HB1017 - 5 - LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b in accordance with subsections (a) and (d) of Section 2.12 of this Act.
For mobile telecommunications services, if a surcharge is imposed it shall be imposed based upon the municipality or county that encompasses the customer’s place of primary use as defined in the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Conformity Act.
A municipality may enter into an intergovernmental agreement with any county in which it is partially located, when the county has adopted an ordinance to impose a surcharge as provided in subsection (c), to include that portion of the municipality lying outside the county in that county’s surcharge referendum.
If the county’s surcharge referendum is approved, the portion of the municipality identified in the intergovernmental agreement shall automatically be disconnected from the county in which it lies and connected to the county which approved the referendum for purposes of a surcharge on telecommunications carriers.
(b) For purposes of computing the surcharge imposed by subsection (a), the network connections to which the surcharge shall apply shall be those in-service network connections, other than those network connections assigned to the municipality or county, where the service address for each such network connection or connections is located within the corporate limits of the municipality or county levying the surcharge.
Except for mobile telecommunication services, the "service address" shall mean the location of the primary use of the network connection or connections.
For mobile telecommunication services, "service address" means the customer’s place of primary use as defined in the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Conformity Act.
With respect to network connections provided for use with pay telephone services for which there is no billed subscriber, the telecommunications carrier providing the network connection shall be deemed to be its own billed subscriber for purposes of applying the surcharge.
(c) Upon the passage of an ordinance to impose a surcharge under this Section the clerk of the municipality or county HB1017 - 6 - LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b shall certify the question of whether the surcharge may be imposed to the proper election authority who shall submit the public question to the electors of the municipality or county in accordance with the general election law;
provided that such question shall not be submitted at a consolidated primary election.
The public question shall be in substantially the following form:
------------------------------------------------------------ Shall the county (or city, village or incorporated town) of ..... impose YES a surcharge of up to ...¢ per month per network connection, which surcharge will be added to the monthly bill you receive ------------------ for telephone or telecommunications charges, for the purpose of installing (or improving) a 9-1-1 Emergency NO Telephone System? ------------------------------------------------------------ If a majority of the votes cast upon the public question are in favor thereof, the surcharge shall be imposed.
However, if a Joint Emergency Telephone System Board is to be created pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement under Section 15.4, the ordinance to impose the surcharge shall be subject to the approval of a majority of the total number of votes cast upon the public question by the electors of all of the municipalities or counties, or combination thereof, that are parties to the intergovernmental agreement.
The referendum requirement of this subsection (c) shall not apply to any municipality with a population over 500,000 or to any county in which a proposition as to whether a sophisticated 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone System should be installed in the county, at a cost not to exceed a specified monthly amount per network connection, has previously been approved by a majority of the electors of the county voting on the proposition at an election conducted before the effective date of this amendatory Act of 1987.
HB1017 - 7 - LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b (d) A county may not impose a surcharge, unless requested by a municipality, in any incorporated area which has previously approved a surcharge as provided in subsection (c) or in any incorporated area where the corporate authorities of the municipality have previously entered into a binding contract or letter of intent with a telecommunications carrier to provide sophisticated 9-1-1 service through municipal funds.
(e) A municipality or county may at any time by ordinance change the rate of the surcharge imposed under this Section if the new rate does not exceed the rate specified in the referendum held pursuant to subsection (c).
(f) The surcharge authorized by this Section shall be collected from the subscriber by the telecommunications carrier providing the subscriber the network connection as a separately stated item on the subscriber’s bill.
(g) The amount of surcharge collected by the telecommunications carrier shall be paid to the particular municipality or county or Joint Emergency Telephone System Board not later than 30 days after the surcharge is collected, net of any network or other 9-1-1 or sophisticated 9-1-1 system charges then due the particular telecommunications carrier, as shown on an itemized bill.
The telecommunications carrier collecting the surcharge shall also be entitled to deduct 3% of the gross amount of surcharge collected to reimburse the telecommunications carrier for the expense of accounting and collecting the surcharge.
(h) Except as expressly provided in subsection (a) of this Section, a municipality with a population over 500,000 may not impose a monthly surcharge in excess of $1.25 per network connection.
(i) Any municipality or county or joint emergency telephone system board that has imposed a surcharge pursuant to this Section prior to the effective date of this amendatory Act of 1990 shall hereafter impose the surcharge in accordance with subsection (b) of this Section.
HB1017 - 8 - LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b (j) The corporate authorities of any municipality or county may issue, in accordance with Illinois law, bonds, notes or other obligations secured in whole or in part by the proceeds of the surcharge described in this Section.
Notwithstanding any change in law subsequent to the issuance of any bonds, notes or other obligations secured by the surcharge, every municipality or county issuing such bonds, notes or other obligations shall be authorized to impose the surcharge as though the laws relating to the imposition of the surcharge in effect at the time of issuance of the bonds, notes or other obligations were in full force and effect until the bonds, notes or other obligations are paid in full.
The State of Illinois pledges and agrees that it will not limit or alter the rights and powers vested in municipalities and counties by this Section to impose the surcharge so as to impair the terms of or affect the security for bonds, notes or other obligations secured in whole or in part with the proceeds of the surcharge described in this Section.
(k) Any surcharge collected by or imposed on a telecommunications carrier pursuant to this Section shall be held to be a special fund in trust for the municipality, county or Joint Emergency Telephone Board imposing the surcharge.
Except for the 3% deduction provided in subsection (g) above, the special fund shall not be subject to the claims of creditors of the telecommunication carrier.
(Source:
P.A.
92-474, eff.
8-1-02;
92-526, eff.
1-1-03;
92-557, eff.
1-1-03;
revised 10-2-02.) Section 10.
(a) A person commits the offense of interference with emergency communication when he or she knowingly, intentionally and without lawful justification interrupts, HB1017 - 9 - LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b verbally or physically obstructs, prevents, disrupts, impedes, or otherwise interferes with the transmission of an emergency a communication over a citizens band radio channel, the purpose of which communication is to inform or inquire about an emergency.
(1) HB1017 Engrossed - 2 - LRB094 07515 AJO 37682 b a condition or circumstance in which an individual is or is reasonably believed by the person transmitting the communication to be in imminent danger of serious bodily injury or in which property is or is reasonably believed by the person transmitting the communication to be in imminent danger of damage or destruction or (2) the report of a crime to a law enforcement agency;
82-418.) (50 ILCS 750/13 rep.) (from Ch.
134, par.
43) Section 90.
The Emergency Telephone System Act is amended by repealing Section 13.
Section 99.
Effective date.
This Act takes effect upon becoming law.
Show all 114 changed rows (74 more)
Action History
-
Session Sine Die
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Kirk W. Dillard
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading April 8, 2005
-
Arrive in Senate
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Mary E. Flowers
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 114-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. William Delgado
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Patricia Bailey
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; 015-000-000
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; by Voice Vote
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
-
Re-assigned to Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
-
Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Marlow H. Colvin
Sponsors
- Marlow H. Colvin · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Marlow H. Colvin
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 102 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 114 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Not Voting |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Jenisch | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Eileen | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Joseph | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Tenhouse | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones | — | Yea |
| Chavez | — | Yea |
| Churchill | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Giles | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| McKeon | — | Not Voting |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Not Voting |
| Currie | — | Not Voting |
| Daniels | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Parke | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael J. Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1017 do?
- Amends the Emergency Telephone System Act. Requires one network connection for each T-1 facility. Defines "high-speed channelized service". Provides no public agency or unit of local government shall be liable, except for wilful or wanton misconduct, in connection with placing out-going emergency calls. Adds high-speed channelized service to the types of service that require 5 surcharges per network. Adds to the Section describing the offense of interference with emergency communication a provision that states that any person who without lawful justification interrupts, prevents or otherwise interferes with a 9-1-1 call is subject to Section 26-2 of the Criminal Code (Class A misdemeanor). Amends the Criminal Code by amending the Section describing the offense of interference with emergency communication adding verbal or physical obstruction of a 9-1-1 call or prevention of an emergency communication to the offense. Adds definition of "report of a crime to a law enforcement agency" and "emergency communication" to the criminal offense. Makes the offense solely a Class A misdemeanor (now, Class A and B for different types of interference). Repeals Section 13 of the Emergency Telephone System Act. Effective immediately.
- Who sponsors HB 1017?
- HB 1017 is sponsored by Marlow H. Colvin.
- What is the current status of HB 1017?
- This bill died with 94th Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1017?
- Track HB 1017 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1017
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1017
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →