Illinois 94th Regular Session Status: Enacted

HB 396 — VEH CD-JUDICIAL DRIVING PERMIT

Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 94-0357

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 25, 2005. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Amends the Illinois Vehicle Code. Provides that the first judicial driving permit issued to a person whose driver's license has been summarily suspended under the DUI provisions of the Code may not have a duration of more than 45 days. Provides that the court may extend the original permit after 30 days. Provides that the extension of the permit may be for any length of time, up to the remaining duration of the statutory summary suspension. Provides that if the first extension of the permit is for a shorter period than the remaining duration of the suspension, the driver must return to court to seek any additional extension.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

7 added · 7 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill HB 396 has replaced the term "Engrossed" with "Enrolled" in its heading. This change usually indicates that the bill has gone through its final review and is ready to be signed into law. This distinction is important because it marks the transition from proposed legislation to an officially accepted document, signifying that the bill is one step closer to becoming law.

→
Previous
Latest
HB0396 Engrossed LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b AN ACT concerning transportation.
HB0396 Enrolled LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b AN ACT concerning transportation.
A JDP shall not HB0396 Engrossed - 2 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b become effective prior to the 31st day of the original statutory summary suspension and shall always be subject to the following criteria:
A JDP shall not HB0396 Enrolled - 2 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b become effective prior to the 31st day of the original statutory summary suspension and shall always be subject to the following criteria:
(i) Any person unless and until the court, after considering the results of a current professional HB0396 Engrossed - 3 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b evaluation of the person’s alcohol or other drug use by an agency pursuant to Section 15-10 of the Alcoholism and Other Drug Abuse and Dependency Act and other appropriate investigation of the person, is satisfied that granting the privilege of driving a motor vehicle on the highways will not endanger the public safety or welfare.
(i) Any person unless and until the court, after considering the results of a current professional HB0396 Enrolled - 3 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b evaluation of the person’s alcohol or other drug use by an agency pursuant to Section 15-10 of the Alcoholism and Other Drug Abuse and Dependency Act and other appropriate investigation of the person, is satisfied that granting the privilege of driving a motor vehicle on the highways will not endanger the public safety or welfare.
Whether the person must drive for educational HB0396 Engrossed - 4 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b purposes.
Whether the person must drive for educational HB0396 Enrolled - 4 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b purposes.
(c-1) If the petitioner is issued a citation for a violation of Section 6-303 during the period of a statutory summary suspension entered under Section 11-501.1 of this Code, or if the petitioner is charged with a violation of Section 11-501 or a similar provision of a local ordinance or a similar HB0396 Engrossed - 5 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b out of state offense which occurs after the current violation of Section 11-501 or a similar provision of a local ordinance, the court may not grant the petitioner a JDP unless the petitioner is acquitted or the citation or complaint is otherwise dismissed.
(c-1) If the petitioner is issued a citation for a violation of Section 6-303 during the period of a statutory summary suspension entered under Section 11-501.1 of this Code, or if the petitioner is charged with a violation of Section 11-501 or a similar provision of a local ordinance or a similar HB0396 Enrolled - 5 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b out of state offense which occurs after the current violation of Section 11-501 or a similar provision of a local ordinance, the court may not grant the petitioner a JDP unless the petitioner is acquitted or the citation or complaint is otherwise dismissed.
If the HB0396 Engrossed - 6 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b Petitioner, who has been granted a JDP, is issued a citation for a traffic related offense, including operating a motor vehicle outside the limitations prescribed in the JDP or a violation of Section 6-303, or is convicted of any such an offense during the term of the JDP, the court shall consider cancellation of the limited driving permit.
If the HB0396 Enrolled - 6 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b Petitioner, who has been granted a JDP, is issued a citation for a traffic related offense, including operating a motor vehicle outside the limitations prescribed in the JDP or a violation of Section 6-303, or is convicted of any such an offense during the term of the JDP, the court shall consider cancellation of the limited driving permit.
HB0396 Engrossed - 7 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b (f) The circuit court of venue may, as a condition of the issuance of a JDP, prohibit the person from operating a motor vehicle not equipped with an ignition interlock device.
HB0396 Enrolled - 7 - LRB094 05140 DRH 35180 b (f) The circuit court of venue may, as a condition of the issuance of a JDP, prohibit the person from operating a motor vehicle not equipped with an ignition interlock device.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Public Act . . . . . . . . . 94-0357

  2. Effective Date January 1, 2006

  3. Governor Approved

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Passed Both Houses

  6. Third Reading - Passed; 056-000-000

  7. Added as Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Jacqueline Y. Collins

  8. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 18, 2005

  9. Second Reading

  10. Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading April 21, 2005

  11. Do Pass Judiciary; 008-000-000

  12. Assigned to Judiciary

  13. Referred to Rules

  14. First Reading

  15. Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Edward Petka

  16. Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading April 7, 2005

  17. Arrive in Senate

  18. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 111-000-000

  19. Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Joseph M. Lyons

  20. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  21. Second Reading - Short Debate

  22. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  23. Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; 016-000-000

  24. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; by Voice Vote

  25. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee

  26. Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Patricia Bailey

  27. Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Tom Cross

  28. Assigned to Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee

  29. Referred to Rules Committee

  30. First Reading

  31. Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Patricia Reid Lindner

Sponsors

  • Patricia Reid Lindner · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Patricia Reid Lindner

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 56 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 50003
Democrat 5000
Republican 1000
Total 56003
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Sandoval — Yea
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Bomke — Not Voting
Burzynski — Yea
Halvorson — Yea
Meeks — Yea
Pankau — Yea
Peterson — Yea
Schoenberg — Yea
Munoz — Yea
Shadid — Yea
Brady — Yea
Sieben — Yea
Silverstein — Yea
Sullivan, D. — Yea
Trotter — Yea
Sullivan, J. — Yea
Petka — Yea
Viverito — Yea
Jacobs — Yea
Jones, J. — Yea
Cullerton — Yea
Watson — Yea
Jones, W. — Yea
Wilhelmi — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Crotty — Yea
Dahl — Yea
Garrett — Yea
Haine — Yea
Hendon — Yea
Demuzio — Yea
Lauzen — Yea
Link — Yea
Luechtefeld — Yea
Maloney — Yea
Winkel — Yea
Wojcik — Yea
Cronin — Not Voting
DeLeo — Yea
Dillard — Yea
Forby — Yea
Geo-Karis — Not Voting
Radogno — Yea
Raoul — Yea
Rauschenberger — Yea
Righter — Yea
Risinger — Yea
Ronen — Yea
Roskam — Yea
Rutherford — Yea
del Valle — Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 111 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 100006
Democrat 9000
Republican 2001
Total 111007
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (118)
Member Party Vote
Sacia — Yea
Saviano — Yea
Schmitz — Yea
Schock — Yea
Scully — Not Voting
Acevedo — Yea
Bassi — Yea
Mathias — Yea
Beaubien — Yea
Beiser — Yea
Bellock — Yea
Berrios — Yea
Mautino — Yea
Biggins — Yea
Black — Yea
Boland — Not Voting
May — Yea
Bost — Yea
Brauer — Yea
Brosnahan — Yea
Colvin — Yea
McKeon — Not Voting
Coulson — Yea
Molaro — Yea
Holbrook — Yea
Nekritz — Yea
Jefferson — Yea
Jenisch — Yea
Lang — Yea
Leitch — Yea
Lindner — Yea
McAuliffe — Yea
Bailey — Yea
McCarthy — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Lyons, Eileen — Yea
Meyer — Yea
Millner — Yea
Reitz — Yea
Lyons, Joseph — Yea
Sommer — Yea
Soto — Yea
McGuire — Yea
Bradley, John — Yea
Bradley, Richard — Yea
Brady — Yea
Dugan — Yea
Dunkin — Yea
Dunn — Yea
Eddy — Yea
Flider — Yea
Flowers — Yea
Franks — Yea
Fritchey — Yea
Giles — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Graham — Yea
Granberg — Yea
Hamos — Yea
Mitchell, Bill — Yea
Hannig — Yea
Burke — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Mitchell, Jerry — Yea
Krause — Yea
Madigan — Yea
Moffitt — Yea
Mulligan — Yea
Munson — Yea
Howard — Yea
Myers — Yea
Osmond — Yea
Parke — Yea
Watson — Yea
Jones — Yea
Phelps — Yea
Davis, Monique — Yea
Tenhouse — Yea
Tryon — Yea
Turner — Yea
Verschoore — Yea
Wait — Yea
Washington — Not Voting
Winters — Yea
Yarbrough — Yea
Younge — Yea
Chavez — Yea
Churchill — Yea
Cross — Yea
Cultra — Yea
Currie — Not Voting
D'Amico — Yea
Daniels — Yea
Froehlich — Not Voting
Hassert — Yea
Hultgren — Yea
Jakobsson — Yea
Kosel — Yea
Osterman — Yea
Patterson — Yea
Pihos — Yea
Poe — Yea
Pritchard — Yea
Reis — Yea
Ryg — Yea
Chapa LaVia — Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Michael J. Kelly Democrat Yea
Nicholas K. Smith Democrat Yea
Patrick J. Joyce Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Yea
William "Will" Davis Democrat Yea
Brad Stephens Republican Yea
Chapin Rose Republican Not Voting
Chris Miller Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 396 do?
Amends the Illinois Vehicle Code. Provides that the first judicial driving permit issued to a person whose driver's license has been summarily suspended under the DUI provisions of the Code may not have a duration of more than 45 days. Provides that the court may extend the original permit after 30 days. Provides that the extension of the permit may be for any length of time, up to the remaining duration of the statutory summary suspension. Provides that if the first extension of the permit is for a shorter period than the remaining duration of the suspension, the driver must return to court to seek any additional extension.
Who sponsors HB 396?
HB 396 is sponsored by Patricia Reid Lindner.
What is the current status of HB 396?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 25, 2005. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 396?
Track HB 396 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 396

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 396

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →