GRANDPARENT VISITATION
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 4357 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 4357.
You're tracking HB 4357
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 4357 — GRANDPARENT VISITATION
Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 94-1026
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 03, 2006. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
0 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. Provides that grandparents, great-grandparents, and siblings of a minor child may petition the court for visitation, provided that the petition must be filed in the county in which the child resides. Provides that a petition may be filed when the custodial parent denies visitation and the other parent is dead, missing for 3 months or more, incompetent, or incarcerated for 3 months preceding the filing of a petition. Provides that any visitation granted under this Section ends by operation of law if the child is adopted however, if one natural parent is dead and the surviving spouse remarries, a subsequent adoption will not terminate visitation granted by a court to parents of the deceased parent. Provides that a petitioner who seeks to overcome the presumption that a parent's actions regarding visitation by the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling are not harmful to the child's health may do so by proof that the child had a significant relationship with the petitioner that, once lost, will cause harm to the child or the petitioner was the primary caregiver of the child. Describes significant existing relationship with a grandchild. A grandparent is not required to present expert testimony to prove the existence of a significant existing relationship between the child and the grandparent. The court may apply a reasonable person standard to determine whether there is a significant relationship between the child and the grandparent, or that the loss of the relationship between the child and the grandparent is likely to cause severe emotional harm to the child. Provides that a child's parent may always file a petition to modify visitation upon changed circumstances. Deletes provision that grandparent visitation subsection does not apply to a child who is the subject of a pending juvenile court case. Deletes provision that bars any petition for visitation after adoption.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
272 added · 295 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Bill HB 4357 now specifically allows any sibling, grandparent, or great-grandparent to request visitation rights for a child who is one year old or older. The changes clarify that these relatives can petition the court if a parent is unreasonably denying them access, expanding the definitions to ensure various family members have rights to visitation. This matters because it strengthens the role of extended family in a child's life, potentially providing more emotional support for the child during custody disputes or other legal proceedings.
HB4357 EngrossedEnrolled LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b AN ACT concerning civil law.
(a-3) Grandparents, great-grandparents, and siblings of a minor childchild, who is one year old or older, have standing to bring an action in circuit court by petition, requesting visitation in accordance with this Section.
Nothing in this subsection (a-3) and subsection (a-5) of this Section shall apply to a child in whose interests a petition is pending under Section 2-13 of the HB4357 Enrolled - 2 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b Juvenile Court Act of 1987 or a petition to adopt an unrelated child is pending.pending under the Adoption Act.
HB4357 Engrossed - 2 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b (a-5)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (a-5), any grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling may file a petition for visitation rights to a minor child if there is an unreasonable denial of visitation by a parent and at least one of the following conditions exists:
or (A-15) a parent has been incarcerated in jail or prison during the 3 month period preceding the filing of the petition.petition;
(B) the child’s mother and father are divorced or have been legally separated from each other or there is pending a dissolution proceeding involving a parent of the child or another court proceeding involving custody or visitation of the child (other than any adoption proceeding of an unrelated child) during the 3 month period prior to the filing of the petition and at least one parent does not object to the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling having visitation with the child.
(C) the(Blank); court, other than a Juvenile Court, has terminated a parent-child relationship and the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling is the parent of the person whose parental rights have been terminated, except in cases of adoption.
Thethe visitationcourt, mustother notthan bea usedJuvenile toCourt, allowhas terminated a parent-child relationship and the parentgrandparent, whogreat-grandparent, lostor parentalsibling rightsis tothe parent HB4357 EngrossedEnrolled - 3 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b unlawfullyof visitthe withperson thewhose child;parental rights have been terminated, except in cases of adoption.
The visitation must not be used to allow the parent who lost parental rights to unlawfully visit with the child;
(2) IfAny a person other than a blood relative or stepparent of the child adopts the child, any visitation rights granted pursuant to this Section before the filing of a petition for adoption of thea child shall automatically endterminate by operation of law upon the entry of an order terminating parental rights or granting the adoption of the child.child, whichever is earlier.
If a blood relative adopts the childperson or ifpersons onewho naturaladopted parent is deceased and the survivingchild naturalare parentrelated remarries,to anythe subsequentchild, adoptionas proceedingsdefined mayby notSection terminate1 any visitation rights belonging to the parents of the deceasedAdoption naturalAct, parent,any unlessperson thewho terminationwas ofrelated visitationto rightsthe ischild orderedas bygrandparent, thegreat-grandparent, courtor havingsibling jurisdictionprior overto the adoption aftershall anhave opportunitystanding to bebring heard,an andaction thepursuant court determines it to bethis inSection therequesting bestvisitation interestwith of the childchild. to terminate or modify such visitation.
A finding of harm may be based upon cessation of the relationship between a minor child and the child’s grandparent, great-grandparent, or HB4357 Engrossed - 4 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b sibling if the court determines, upon proper proof, that:
(A) the child had such a significant existing relationship with the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling that loss of the relationship is likely to occasion emotional harm to the child;
or (B) the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling functioned as a primary caregiver such that cessation of the relationship would interrupt provision of the daily needs of the child and thus occasion physical or emotional harm.
(3a) A grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling is not required to present the testimony or affidavit of an expert witness in order to establish a significant existing relationship with the child or that the loss of the relationship is likely to occasion severe emotional harm to the child.
Instead, the court shall consider whether the facts of the particular case would lead a reasonable person to believe that there is a significant existing relationship between the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling and the child or that the loss of the relationship is likely to occasion severe emotional harm to the child.
HB4357 Enrolled - 4 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b (A) the preference of the child if the child is determined to be of sufficient maturity to express a preference;
(G) the quantity of the visitation time requested and the potential adverse impact that visitation would have on HB4357 Engrossed - 5 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b the child’s customary activities;
(K) whether the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling was a full-timeprimary caretaker of the child for a period of not less than 6 consecutive months.
(a-7)(1) Unless by stipulation of the parties, no motion to modify a grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling visitation order may be made earlier than 2 years after the date the order was filed, unless the court permits it to be made on the basis of affidavits that there is reason to believe the child’s HB4357 Enrolled - 5 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b present environment may endanger seriously the child’s mental, physical, or emotional health.
The court shall state in its decision specific findings of fact in support of its HB4357 Engrossed - 6 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b modification or termination of the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling visitation.
HB4357 Enrolled - 6 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b (B) the child resided continuously with the parent and stepparent for at least 5 years;
HB4357 Engrossed - 7 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b (B) A petition for visitation privileges may not be filed under this subsection (b) if the child who is the subject of the grandparents’ or great-grandparents’ petition has been voluntarily surrendered by the parent or parents, except for a surrender to the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services or a foster care facility, or has been previously adopted by an individual or individuals who are not related to the biological parents of the child or is the subject of a pending adoption petition by an individual or individuals who are not related to the biological parents of the child.
HB4357 Enrolled - 7 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b (d) If any court has entered an order prohibiting a non-custodial parent of a child from any contact with a child or restricting the non-custodial parent’s contact with the child, the following provisions shall apply:
(i) a court has entered an order prohibiting the non-custodial parent from any contact with the child, and the grandparent or great-grandparent is found to have used his or her visitation privileges to HB4357 Engrossed - 8 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b facilitate contact between the child and the non-custodial parent;
"If the (grandparent or great-grandparent, whichever is applicable) who has been granted visitation privileges under this order uses the visitation privileges to facilitate contact between the child and the child’s non-custodial parent, the visitation privileges granted under this order shall be permanently revoked." (e) No parent, not granted custody of the child, or HB4357 Enrolled - 8 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b grandparent, or great-grandparent, or stepparent, or sibling of any minor child, convicted of any offense involving an illegal sex act perpetrated upon a victim less than 18 years of age including but not limited to offenses for violations of Article 12 of the Criminal Code of 1961, is entitled to visitation rights while incarcerated or while on parole, probation, conditional discharge, periodic imprisonment, or mandatory supervised release for that offense, and upon discharge from incarceration for a misdemeanor offense or upon discharge from parole, probation, conditional discharge, periodic imprisonment, or mandatory supervised release for a felony offense, visitation shall be denied until the person successfully completes a treatment program approved by the HB4357 Engrossed - 9 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b court.
(g) (Blank.)(Blank). If an order has been entered limiting, for cause, a minor child’s contact or visitation with a grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling on the grounds that it was in the best interest of the child to do so, that order may be modified only upon a showing of a substantial change in circumstances occurring subsequent to the entry of the order with proof by clear and convincing evidence that modification is in the best interest of the minor child.
If an order has been entered limiting, for cause, a minor child’s contact or visitation with a grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling on the grounds that it was in the best interest of the child to do so, that order may be modified only upon a showing of a substantial change in HB4357 Enrolled - 9 - LRB094 15974 AJO 51205 b circumstances occurring subsequent to the entry of the order with proof by clear and convincing evidence that modification is in the best interest of the minor child.
Action History
-
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 94-1026
-
Effective Date January 1, 2007
-
Governor Approved
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Removed Co-Sponsor Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Paul D. Froehlich
-
Remove Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Paul D. Froehlich
-
Passed Both Houses
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 House Concurs 098-000-000
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Motion to Concur Recommends be Adopted Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; 011-000-000
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules Committee
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Motion Filed Concur Rep. Patricia Reid Lindner
-
Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence Senate Amendment(s) 3
-
Arrived in House
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)
-
Third Reading - Passed; 059-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Adopted; Cullerton
-
Recalled to Second Reading
-
Added as Alternate Co-Sponsor Sen. Mike Jacobs
-
Added as Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Kwame Raoul
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Recommend Do Adopt Judiciary; 010-000-000
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Rules Refers to Judiciary
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Filed with Secretary by Sen. John J. Cullerton
-
Rule 2-10 Third Reading Deadline Extended to January 9, 2007
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Held in Judiciary
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Judiciary
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. John J. Cullerton
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. John J. Cullerton
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 28, 2006
-
Second Reading
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 27, 2006
-
Do Pass Judiciary; 009-000-000
-
Held in Judiciary
-
Added as Alternate Co-Sponsor Sen. Cheryl Axley
-
Postponed - Judiciary
-
Assigned to Judiciary
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. John J. Cullerton
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading February 22, 2006
-
Arrive in Senate
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 112-000-000
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jack D. Franks
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Suzanne Bassi
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Paul D. Froehlich
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Sara Feigenholtz
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; 009-001-004
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; by Voice Vote
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Patricia R. Bellock
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Lovana Jones
-
Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Patricia Reid Lindner
Sponsors
- Patricia Reid Lindner · Cosponsor
- Cheryl Axley · Cosponsor
- Paul Jacobs · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (3)
- Patricia Reid Lindner
- Cheryl Axley
- Paul Jacobs Republican
Not signed on (180)
180 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 180 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 87 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 98 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Saviano | — | Not Voting |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Not Voting |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Not Voting |
| Molaro | — | Not Voting |
| Durkin | — | Not Voting |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Not Voting |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Jenisch | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Tenhouse | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Chavez | — | Yea |
| Churchill | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Giles | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| McKeon | — | Not Voting |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Not Voting |
| Lyons | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire | — | Not Voting |
| Brady | — | Not Voting |
| Parke | — | Yea |
| Jones | — | Not Voting |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Not Voting |
| Scully | — | Not Voting |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Not Voting |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Daniels | — | Not Voting |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Not Voting |
| Osterman | — | Not Voting |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Ramey | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael J. Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Axley | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Shadid | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Petka | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones, W. | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Wilhelmi | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Winkel | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| Dahl | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Geo-Karis | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Raoul | — | Yea |
| Rauschenberger | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Ronen | — | Yea |
| Roskam | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| del Valle | — | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 101 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 112 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Schock | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Beiser | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Not Voting |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Jenisch | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| McKeon | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Joseph | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Tenhouse | — | Yea |
| Tryon | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Bradley, John | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Chavez | — | Yea |
| Churchill | — | Yea |
| Dugan | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Durkin | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Giles | — | Yea |
| Golar | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Parke | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Not Voting |
| D'Amico | — | Yea |
| Daniels | — | Not Voting |
| Hamos | — | Not Voting |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Pritchard | — | Yea |
| Ramey | — | Yea |
| Reis | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael J. Kelly | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 4357 do?
- Amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. Provides that grandparents, great-grandparents, and siblings of a minor child may petition the court for visitation, provided that the petition must be filed in the county in which the child resides. Provides that a petition may be filed when the custodial parent denies visitation and the other parent is dead, missing for 3 months or more, incompetent, or incarcerated for 3 months preceding the filing of a petition. Provides that any visitation granted under this Section ends by operation of law if the child is adopted however, if one natural parent is dead and the surviving spouse remarries, a subsequent adoption will not terminate visitation granted by a court to parents of the deceased parent. Provides that a petitioner who seeks to overcome the presumption that a parent's actions regarding visitation by the grandparent, great-grandparent, or sibling are not harmful to the child's health may do so by proof that the child had a significant relationship with the petitioner that, once lost, will cause harm to the child or the petitioner was the primary caregiver of the child. Describes significant existing relationship with a grandchild. A grandparent is not required to present expert testimony to prove the existence of a significant existing relationship between the child and the grandparent. The court may apply a reasonable person standard to determine whether there is a significant relationship between the child and the grandparent, or that the loss of the relationship between the child and the grandparent is likely to cause severe emotional harm to the child. Provides that a child's parent may always file a petition to modify visitation upon changed circumstances. Deletes provision that grandparent visitation subsection does not apply to a child who is the subject of a pending juvenile court case. Deletes provision that bars any petition for visitation after adoption.
- Who sponsors HB 4357?
- HB 4357 is sponsored by Patricia Reid Lindner, Cheryl Axley, and Paul Jacobs (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 4357?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 03, 2006. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 4357?
- Track HB 4357 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 4357
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 4357
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →