STATE FACILITY CLOSING ACT
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 69 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 69.
You're tracking HB 69
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 69 — STATE FACILITY CLOSING ACT
Last action — Session Sine Die
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 93rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Creates the State Facility Closing Act. Requires that an economic impact statement be performed and a report submitted to the General Assembly prior to the closing of a State facility or agency or the layoff of the lesser of 50 employees or 50% of the State facility or agency's staff. Provides that a community where the closure of a State facility or agency has occurred shall have priority for construction or location of a new facility. Effective immediately.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
4 added · 4 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of Bill HB 69, certain lines of text were removed, likely clarifying or streamlining the language. These changes help to make the bill simpler and easier to understand. Overall, this matters because clearer legislation can lead to better implementation and compliance by those affected.
093_HB0069HB0069 Engrossed LRB093 02593 LCB 02603 b AN ACT concerning State facility closure.
HB0069 Engrossed -2- LRB093 02593 LCB 02603 b "Permanent contract" means a State contract with a private entity, employing at least 50 persons, that does not have a date of completion after which time the private entity is considered to be no longer under contract with the State.
(a) State revenues expected to be saved as a result HB0069 Engrossed -3- LRB093 02593 LCB 02603 b of the proposed layoff or facility or agency closing;
This priority for construction or location of a new State facility HB0069 Engrossed -4- LRB093 02593 LCB 02603 b shall govern unless the State has a compelling interest to cause the location or construction of the agency or facility to be placed in another location or unless the General Assembly finds that the citizens of that community have a compelling interest to cause the location or construction of a new State agency or facility to be placed in a different location.
Action History
-
Session Sine Die
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Mike Boland
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Brandon W. Phelps
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Larry K. Bomke
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrive in Senate
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 099-015-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Michael K. Smith
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Donald L. Moffitt
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Ricca Slone
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass / Short Debate State Government Administration Committee; 009-000-000
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Lou Lang
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Mike Bost
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Roger L. Eddy
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. William B. Black
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Raymond Poe
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Jim Watson
-
Assigned to State Government Administration Committee
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Rich Brauer
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Prefiled with Clerk by Rep. Bill Mitchell
Sponsors
- Bill Mitchell · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Bill Mitchell
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 88 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 99 | 15 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 84% | 13% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Slone | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Nay |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Aguilar | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Nay |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Nay |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Nay |
| Brunsvold | — | Yea |
| Capparelli | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Nay |
| Froehlich | — | Nay |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| McKeon | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Joseph | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Parke | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Giles | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Kurtz | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Nay |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Not Voting |
| McCarthy | — | Nay |
| Millner | — | Nay |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Morrow | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Jones | — | Yea |
| Novak | — | Yea |
| O'Brien | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Davis, Steve | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Eileen | — | Nay |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Tenhouse | — | Nay |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Not Voting |
| Winters | — | Nay |
| Wirsing | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Churchill | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| Daniels | — | Nay |
| Dunn | — | Nay |
| Flowers | — | Not Voting |
| Hartke | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Nay |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael J. Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Not Voting |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 69 do?
- Creates the State Facility Closing Act. Requires that an economic impact statement be performed and a report submitted to the General Assembly prior to the closing of a State facility or agency or the layoff of the lesser of 50 employees or 50% of the State facility or agency's staff. Provides that a community where the closure of a State facility or agency has occurred shall have priority for construction or location of a new facility. Effective immediately.
- Who sponsors HB 69?
- HB 69 is sponsored by Bill Mitchell.
- What is the current status of HB 69?
- This bill died with 93rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 69?
- Track HB 69 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 69
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 69
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →