SB 413 — ALCOHOL-TECH
Last action — Session Sine Die
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 93rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Amends the Liquor Control Act of 1934. Makes technical changes in a Section concerning retail sales on Sundays.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
61 added · 13 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to SB 413 allows businesses with liquor licenses to conduct sting operations aimed at enforcing age restrictions on alcohol sales. Under the new rules, these operations can happen as long as the business provides written notice to local law enforcement at least 14 days in advance. This change is important because it aims to improve compliance with underage drinking laws while ensuring that businesses are aware of and prepared for these enforcement actions.
093_SB0413SB413 Engrossed LRB093 09916 LRD 10166 b AN ACT in relation to alcohol.
The Liquor Control Act of 1934 is amended by changing Section 6-146-16.1 as follows:
(235 ILCS 5/6-14)5/6-16.1) (fromSec. Ch.
43,6-16.1. par.
129)Enforcement Sec.actions.
6-14.(a) A licensee or an officer, associate, member, representative, agent, or employee of a licensee may sell, give, or deliver alcoholic liquor to a person under the age of 21 years or authorize the sale, gift, or delivery of alcoholic liquor to a person under the age of 21 years pursuant to a plan or action to investigate, patrol, or otherwise conduct a "sting operation" or enforcement action against a person employed by the licensee or on any licensed premises if the licensee or officer, associate, member, representative, agent, or employee of the licensee provides written notice, at least 14 days before the "sting operation" or enforcement action, unless governing body of the municipality or county having jurisdiction sets a shorter period by ordinance, to the law enforcement agency having jurisdiction, the local liquor control commissioner, or both.
__________e______________Notice Noprovided personunder shallthis sellSection atshall retailbe anyvalid alcoholicfor liquora on"sting Sundaysoperation" unlessor authorizedenforcement byaction generalconducted ordinancewithin or60 resolutiondays of the cityprovision council,of presidentthat andnotice, boardunless the governing body of trustees,the _municipality or county board,having asjurisdiction thesets casea mayshorter be;period by ordinance.
provided,(b) howeverA local liquor control commission or unit of local government that theconducts cityalcohol council,and presidenttobacco compliance operations shall establish a policy and boardstandards offor trustees,_alcohol orand countytobacco board,compliance asoperations theto caseinvestigate maywhether be,a maySB413 furtherEngrossed restrict-2- theLRB093 permissible09916 hoursLRD for10166 theb salelicensee ofis furnishing (1) alcoholic liquorsliquor to persons under such21 licensesyears of age in itsviolation politicalof subdivisionthis asAct or (2) tobacco to persons in violation of the publicSale goodof andTobacco convenienceto mayMinors require.Act.
(Source:(c) The Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board shall develop a model policy and guidelines for the operation of alcohol and tobacco compliance checks by local law enforcement officers.
The Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board shall also require the supervising officers of such compliance checks to have met a minimum training standard as determined by the Board.
The Board shall have the right to waive any training based on current written policies and procedures for alcohol and tobacco compliance check operations and in-service training already administered by the local law enforcement agency, department, or office.
(d) The provisions of subsections (b) and (c) do not apply to a home rule unit with more than 2,000,000 inhabitants.
(e) A home rule unit, other than a home rule unit with more than 2,000,000 inhabitants, may not regulate enforcement actions in a manner inconsistent with the regulation of enforcement actions under this Section.
This subsection (e) is a limitation under subsection (i) of Section 6 of Article VII of the Illinois Constitution on the concurrent exercise by home rule units of powers and functions exercised by the State.
_f______________________i_____________________n_____________ _____n_____________________"______________________n_____________ _____a_____________________n______________________m_____________ _____A______________________w_______________________e___________ _____n_____________________a_________ (Source:
82-783.)92-503, eff.
1-1-02.)
Action History
-
Session Sine Die
-
Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
-
Committee/3rd Reading Deadline Extended-Rule 9(b); May 31, 2003
-
Assigned to Executive Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Jay C. Hoffman
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrived in House
-
Third Reading - Passed; 056-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 24, 2003
-
Second Reading
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 18, 2003
-
Do Pass as Amended Executive; 013-000-000
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Executive
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules
-
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Denny Jacobs
-
Postponed - Executive
-
Assigned to Executive
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. Denny Jacobs
Sponsors
- Paul Jacobs · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Paul Jacobs Republican
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Obama | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Sullivan, J. | — | Yea |
| Petka | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Jones, W. | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Sullivan, D. | — | Not Voting |
| Brady | — | Not Voting |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Philip | — | Not Voting |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Shadid | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Winkel | — | Yea |
| Wojcik | — | Yea |
| Woolard | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Geo-Karis | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Rauschenberger | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Ronen | — | Yea |
| Roskam | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| del Valle | — | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emanuel "Chris" Welch | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lawrence "Larry" Walsh, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 413 do?
- Amends the Liquor Control Act of 1934. Makes technical changes in a Section concerning retail sales on Sundays.
- Who sponsors SB 413?
- SB 413 is sponsored by Paul Jacobs (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 413?
- This bill died with 93rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 413?
- Track SB 413 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 413
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 413
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →