CRIM PRO-EVIDENCE DISCLOSURE
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1372 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1372.
You're tracking HB 1372
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1372 — CRIM PRO-EVIDENCE DISCLOSURE
Last action — Session Sine Die
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 93rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that in a criminal case, the State shall make timely disclosure to defense counsel, or to the defendant if the defendant is not represented by counsel, of the existence of evidence, known to the State, that is material and tends to negate the guilt of the accused, impeach witnesses whom the State will be calling as witnesses, or mitigate the degree of punishment. Provides that if the State knowingly fails to make timely disclosure of the evidence to the defendant, the court, upon motion of the defendant or upon its own motion, if it makes such a finding, may grant the defendant a new trial (or if the failure to disclose the evidence to the defendant relates only to an issue relevant to sentencing, the court shall vacate the sentence, conduct another sentencing hearing, and shall resentence the defendant). Applies to all actions initiated on or after the effective date of the amendatory Act.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
6 added · 6 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Bill HB 1372 involve adding and removing certain lines of text, potentially clarifying or updating the language of the bill. These changes are important because they can simplify the information being conveyed, ensuring that it is more understandable for everyone. Clearer language can lead to better compliance and implementation of the bill's provisions.
093_HB1372HB1372 Engrossed LRB093 07236 RLC 07392 b AN ACT in relation to criminal law.
(725 ILCS 5/115-21 new) _e_____________________d______________________p_____________ _____s___ _a_____________________c______________________l_____________ _____o_____________________c______________________e_____________ _____d_____________________e______________________e_____________ _____n_____________________a_______________________t____________ _____c_____________________s______________________l_____________ _____t_____________________t______________________n___ _b_____________________r______________________a_____________ _____c_____________________d_______________________t____________ _____e_____________________e______________________d_____________ _____s______________________a_____________________t_____________ ______o____________________p______________________s_____________ _____d_____________________e______________________t_____________ _____l_____________________v_______________________t____________ _____e_____________________e__________________e_____________________e____________ _c______________________d______________________(____________ _____o_____________________o______________________n_____________ _____d_____________________t______________________l_____________ _____s_____________________n______________________s_____________ _____s_____________________a______________________n_____________ ______c____________________a______________________e_____________ _____n____________________ _d______________________n_____________________t_____________ ______m____________________r______________________t_____________ HB1372 Engrossed -2- LRB093 07236 RLC 07392 b ______P__________ __)_____________________i______________________t_____________e_____________________l______________________i_____________ ______t______________________t_____________________f__________________t____________________f______________________o_____________ ______l________________a____________
Action History
-
Session Sine Die
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Kirk W. Dillard
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading March 18, 2003
-
Arrive in Senate
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 106-011-000
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Arthur L. Turner
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Sara Feigenholtz
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Elaine Nekritz
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Robin Kelly
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Suzanne Bassi
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Bob Biggins
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; 010-000-000
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Karen A. Yarbrough
-
Assigned to Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Constance A. Howard
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Patricia R. Bellock
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Eileen Lyons
Sponsors
- Eileen Lyons · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Eileen Lyons
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 96 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 106 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 9% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Slone | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Wirsing | — | Nay |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Aguilar | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Nay |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Brunsvold | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| May | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| McKeon | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Parke | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Eileen | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Joseph | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Giles | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Kurtz | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Nay |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Morrow | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Novak | — | Yea |
| Jones | — | Yea |
| O'Brien | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Davis, Steve | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Nay |
| Watson | — | Nay |
| Poe | — | Nay |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Tenhouse | — | Nay |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Capparelli | — | Yea |
| Churchill | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Nay |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| Daniels | — | Not Voting |
| Hartke | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Nay |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael J. Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Nay |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1372 do?
- Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that in a criminal case, the State shall make timely disclosure to defense counsel, or to the defendant if the defendant is not represented by counsel, of the existence of evidence, known to the State, that is material and tends to negate the guilt of the accused, impeach witnesses whom the State will be calling as witnesses, or mitigate the degree of punishment. Provides that if the State knowingly fails to make timely disclosure of the evidence to the defendant, the court, upon motion of the defendant or upon its own motion, if it makes such a finding, may grant the defendant a new trial (or if the failure to disclose the evidence to the defendant relates only to an issue relevant to sentencing, the court shall vacate the sentence, conduct another sentencing hearing, and shall resentence the defendant). Applies to all actions initiated on or after the effective date of the amendatory Act.
- Who sponsors HB 1372?
- HB 1372 is sponsored by Eileen Lyons.
- What is the current status of HB 1372?
- This bill died with 93rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1372?
- Track HB 1372 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1372
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1372
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →