SB 390 is sponsored by Debbie DeFrancesco Halvorson.

What is the current status of SB 390?

This bill died with 93rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Where can I track SB 390?

Track SB 390 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

SB 390: SCH CONSTUCTION-SPEC ED COOP

Summary

Amends the School Construction Law. Defines "school district" to include an administrative district, or governing board, of a special education joint agreement. Provides that a joint agreement shall be deemed eligible for a school construction project grant or debt service grant if one or more of its member districts satisfies the grant index criteria. Provides that the grant index shall not be used to calculate the amount of the grant the Capital Development Board provides to an eligible joint agreement. Provides that the amount of a school construction project grant for an eligible joint agreement shall be determined on a case-by-case basis, based on the needs of the joint agreement in its entirety. Effective July 1, 2003.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

5 added · 5 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill SB 390 has added five lines of text while removing an equivalent five lines. This may seem like a simple change, but it often indicates that the language has been refined for clarity or that additional details have been included to strengthen the bill. Such adjustments can impact how the bill is interpreted and implemented, so they are essential for ensuring that the legislation meets its intended goals.

~~093_SB0390~~SB390 Engrossed LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b AN ACT concerning schools.

The SB390 Engrossed -2- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b equalized assessed valuation per pupil in average daily attendance of each school district in Category II shall be computed using its grades 9 through 12 average daily attendance figure.

_S_____________________a______________________c_____________ _____e_____________________d______________________e_____________ _____y_____________________r______________________b_____________ _______a___________________d______________________2_____________ _____l_______ "School maintenance project" means a project, other than a school construction project, intended to provide for the maintenance or upkeep of buildings or structures for SB390 Engrossed -3- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b educational purposes, but does not include ongoing operational costs.

(c) The State Board of Education and the Capital Development Board shall not establish standards that disapprove or otherwise establish limitations that restrict the eligibility of a school district with a population exceeding 500,000 for a school construction project grant based on the fact that any or all of the school construction SB390 Engrossed -4- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b project grant will be used to pay debt service or to make lease payments, as authorized by subsection (b) of Section 5-35 of this Law.

In addition to the uses otherwise authorized by this Law, any school district with a population exceeding 500,000 is authorized to use any or all of the school construction project grants (i) to pay debt service, as defined in the Local Government Debt Reform Act, on bonds, as defined in the Local Government Debt Reform Act, issued to finance one or SB390 Engrossed -5- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b more school construction projects and (ii) to the extent that any such bond is a lease or other installment or financing contract between the school district and a public building commission that has issued bonds to finance one or more qualifying school construction projects, to make lease payments under the lease.

~~093_SB0390~~ LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b AN ACT concerning schools.

SB390 Engrossed LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b AN ACT concerning schools.

The -2- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b equalized assessed valuation per pupil in average daily attendance of each school district in Category II shall be computed using its grades 9 through 12 average daily attendance figure.

The SB390 Engrossed -2- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b equalized assessed valuation per pupil in average daily attendance of each school district in Category II shall be computed using its grades 9 through 12 average daily attendance figure.

_S_____________________a______________________c_____________ _____e_____________________d______________________e_____________ _____y_____________________r______________________b_____________ _______a___________________d______________________2_____________ _____l_______ "School maintenance project" means a project, other than a school construction project, intended to provide for the maintenance or upkeep of buildings or structures for -3- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b educational purposes, but does not include ongoing operational costs.

_S_____________________a______________________c_____________ _____e_____________________d______________________e_____________ _____y_____________________r______________________b_____________ _______a___________________d______________________2_____________ _____l_______ "School maintenance project" means a project, other than a school construction project, intended to provide for the maintenance or upkeep of buildings or structures for SB390 Engrossed -3- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b educational purposes, but does not include ongoing operational costs.

(c) The State Board of Education and the Capital Development Board shall not establish standards that disapprove or otherwise establish limitations that restrict the eligibility of a school district with a population exceeding 500,000 for a school construction project grant based on the fact that any or all of the school construction -4- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b project grant will be used to pay debt service or to make lease payments, as authorized by subsection (b) of Section 5-35 of this Law.

(c) The State Board of Education and the Capital Development Board shall not establish standards that disapprove or otherwise establish limitations that restrict the eligibility of a school district with a population exceeding 500,000 for a school construction project grant based on the fact that any or all of the school construction SB390 Engrossed -4- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b project grant will be used to pay debt service or to make lease payments, as authorized by subsection (b) of Section 5-35 of this Law.

In addition to the uses otherwise authorized by this Law, any school district with a population exceeding 500,000 is authorized to use any or all of the school construction project grants (i) to pay debt service, as defined in the Local Government Debt Reform Act, on bonds, as defined in the Local Government Debt Reform Act, issued to finance one or -5- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b more school construction projects and (ii) to the extent that any such bond is a lease or other installment or financing contract between the school district and a public building commission that has issued bonds to finance one or more qualifying school construction projects, to make lease payments under the lease.

In addition to the uses otherwise authorized by this Law, any school district with a population exceeding 500,000 is authorized to use any or all of the school construction project grants (i) to pay debt service, as defined in the Local Government Debt Reform Act, on bonds, as defined in the Local Government Debt Reform Act, issued to finance one or SB390 Engrossed -5- LRB093 10030 NHT 10281 b more school construction projects and (ii) to the extent that any such bond is a lease or other installment or financing contract between the school district and a public building commission that has issued bonds to finance one or more qualifying school construction projects, to make lease payments under the lease.

⬇ Download PDF

View plain text versions (2)

Engrossed View text Current html
Introduced View text html

Action History

January 11, 2005
Session Sine Die
March 26, 2003
Referred to Rules Committee
March 26, 2003
First Reading
March 26, 2003
Chief House Sponsor Rep. David E. Miller
March 26, 2003
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
March 26, 2003
Arrived in House
March 26, 2003
Third Reading - Passed; 038-019-000
March 25, 2003
Fiscal Note Filed
March 25, 2003
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 26, 2003
March 25, 2003
Second Reading
March 25, 2003
Added as Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. M. Maggie Crotty
March 24, 2003
Fiscal Note Filed
March 05, 2003
Fiscal Note Requested by Sen. J. Bradley Burzynski
March 05, 2003
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 6, 2003
March 05, 2003
Do Pass Education; 010-000-000
February 19, 2003
Assigned to Education
February 18, 2003
Referred to Rules
February 18, 2003
First Reading
February 18, 2003
Filed with Secretary by Sen. Debbie DeFrancesco Halvorson

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (1)

Debbie DeFrancesco Halvorson

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Votes

Third Reading

March 26, 2003

Passed 38 Yea · 19 Nay · 2 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	31	19	0	1
Democrat	7	0	0	0
Republican	0	0	0	1
Total	38	19	0	2
% of votes cast	64%	32%	0%	3%

How each member voted (59)

Member	Party	Vote
Sandoval	—	Yea
Sieben	—	Nay
Silverstein	—	Yea
Lauzen	—	Nay
Maloney	—	Yea
Althoff	—	Yea
Martinez	—	Yea
Bomke	—	Nay
Burzynski	—	Nay
Cronin	—	Nay
DeLeo	—	Yea
Garrett	—	Yea
Halvorson	—	Yea
Link	—	Yea
Munoz	—	Yea
Meeks	—	Yea
Obama	—	Yea
Sullivan, J.	—	Yea
Peterson	—	Nay
Philip	—	Nay
Jacobs	—	Yea
Jones, W.	—	Yea
Schoenberg	—	Yea
Cullerton	—	Yea
Demuzio	—	Yea
Shadid	—	Yea
Trotter	—	Yea
Viverito	—	Yea
Brady	—	Nay
Petka	—	Nay
Jones, J.	—	Nay
Watson	—	Nay
Clayborne	—	Yea
Crotty	—	Yea
Geo-Karis	—	Yea
Haine	—	Yea
Hendon	—	Yea
Wojcik	—	Yea
Woolard	—	Yea
Sullivan, D.	—	Not Voting
Luechtefeld	—	Nay
Winkel	—	Nay
Dillard	—	Nay
Radogno	—	Yea
Rauschenberger	—	Nay
Righter	—	Nay
Risinger	—	Nay
Ronen	—	Yea
Roskam	—	Nay
Rutherford	—	Nay
del Valle	—	Yea
Don Harmon	Democrat	Yea
Emanuel "Chris" Welch	Democrat	Yea
Emil Jones, III	Democrat	Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford	Democrat	Yea
Lakesia Collins	Democrat	Yea
Lawrence "Larry" Walsh, Jr.	Democrat	Yea
Mattie Hunter	Democrat	Yea
Dave Syverson	Republican	Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

education

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 390 do?: Amends the School Construction Law. Defines "school district" to include an administrative district, or governing board, of a special education joint agreement. Provides that a joint agreement shall be deemed eligible for a school construction project grant or debt service grant if one or more of its member districts satisfies the grant index criteria. Provides that the grant index shall not be used to calculate the amount of the grant the Capital Development Board provides to an eligible joint agreement. Provides that the amount of a school construction project grant for an eligible joint agreement shall be determined on a case-by-case basis, based on the needs of the joint agreement in its entirety. Effective July 1, 2003.
Who sponsors SB 390?: SB 390 is sponsored by Debbie DeFrancesco Halvorson.
What is the current status of SB 390?: This bill died with 93rd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 390?: Track SB 390 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

SB 390 — SCH CONSTUCTION-SPEC ED COOP