DISSOLUTION-MAINTENANCE-MODIFY
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 363 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 363.
You're tracking SB 363
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 363 — DISSOLUTION-MAINTENANCE-MODIFY
Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 93-0353
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2003. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. Sets forth factors to be considered in a proceeding to review, modify, or terminate maintenance after the entry of the judgment of dissolution of marriage, judgment of legal separation, or judgment of declaration of invalidity of marriage. Removes the showing of substantial change in circumstances requirement for a modification of maintenance.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
8 added · 8 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill SB 363 has updated some of its wording or sections by removing eight lines from the previous version and adding eight new ones. While the specific content of these changes isn't highlighted here, this often indicates an effort to clarify the bill’s intent or to address concerns raised during previous discussions. Such amendments are important because they can improve the bill’s effectiveness and ensure better alignment with the needs of the community it aims to serve.
SB363 EngrossedEnrolled LRB093 02154 LCB 10129 b AN ACT concerning family law.
(A) upon a showing of an inconsistency of at least 20%, but no less than $10 per month, between the amount of the existing order and the amount of child support that results from application of the guidelines specified in Section 505 of this Act unless the inconsistency is due to the fact that the amount of the existing order resulted from a deviation from the guideline amount and there has not been a change in the circumstances that resulted SB363 EngrossedEnrolled -2- LRB093 02154 LCB 10129 b in that deviation;
_a______________________m______________________m____________ _____n_____________________w______________________l_____________ _____m_____________________s________________________w___________ _____e_____________________e______________________e_____________ ______c____________________b______________________i_____________ _____f______________________f__________________ _________________n______________________s_____________ _a_____________________c______________________n_____________ _________________s______________________y_____________ _e_____________________t______________________i_____________ _e_____________________e_______________________a____________ _________________m________________________a___________ _a_____________________t___________ _________________n________________________m___________ _a_____________________e______________________c_____________ _h___________ _________________n______________________c_____________ _r_______________________r____________________)_____________ _h_____________________i_____ _________________,______________________n_____________ _w_____________________y______________________f_____________ SB363 EngrossedEnrolled -3- LRB093 02154 LCB 10129 b _f_____________________o______________________r_____________ _e_____________________i_______________________t____________ _t_____________________;_ __________________o_____________________a_____________ _i_____________________g______________________i_____________ _o_____________________n______________________;_ __________________a_____________________l_____________ _a_____________________n______________________f_____________ _f_____________________o______________________r_____________ _e_____________________i____________________ _________________c______________________p_____________ _o_____________________l___ (b) The provisions as to property disposition may not be revoked or modified, unless the court finds the existence of conditions that justify the reopening of a judgment under the laws of this State.
When a parent obligated to pay support or educational expenses, or both, dies, the amount of support or educational expenses, or both, may be enforced, modified, revoked or commuted to a lump sum payment, as equity may require, and that SB363 EngrossedEnrolled -4- LRB093 02154 LCB 10129 b determination may be provided for at the time of the dissolution of the marriage or thereafter.
and SB363 EngrossedEnrolled -5- LRB093 02154 LCB 10129 b (2) without the necessity of showing a substantial change in circumstances, as follows:
_a______________________m______________________m____________ _____n______________________s_____________________i_____________ _____m_____________________u_______________________w____________ _____e_____________________e______________________e_____________ ______c____________________b______________________i_____________ _____f______________________f__________________ __________________i_____________________t_____________ _a_____________________c______________________n_____________ _________________,________________________t___________ _e______________________t_____________________t_____________ SB363 EngrossedEnrolled -6- LRB093 02154 LCB 10129 b _e_____________________e_______________________a____________ _________________e_______________________a____________ _a_____________________t___________ _________________c________________________m___________ _a_____________________e______________________u_____________ _h___________ _________________o______________________n_____________ _r_____________________e_______________________r____________ _h_____________________i_____ _________________y______________________e_____________ _w_____________________u________________________d___________ _f_____________________o______________________r_____________ _e_____________________i______________________d_____________ _t_____________________;_ __________________o_____________________a_____________ _i_____________________n______________________h_____________ _o_____________________n______________________;_ _________________y______________________n_____________ _a_____________________n______________________f_____________ _f_____________________o______________________r_____________ _e_____________________i____________________ _________________c______________________p_____________ _o_____________________l___ (b) The provisions as to property disposition may not be revoked or modified, unless the court finds the existence of conditions that justify the reopening of a judgment under the laws of this State.
SB363 EngrossedEnrolled -7- LRB093 02154 LCB 10129 b (d) Unless otherwise provided in this Act, or as agreed in writing or expressly provided in the judgment, provisions for the support of a child are terminated by emancipation of the child, or if the child has attained the age of 18 and is still attending high school, provisions for the support of the child are terminated upon the date that the child graduates from high school or the date the child attains the age of 19, whichever is earlier, but not by the death of a parent obligated to support or educate the child.
SB363 EngrossedEnrolled -8- LRB093 02154 LCB 10129 b 92-651, eff.
Action History
-
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 93-0353
-
Effective Date January 1, 2004
-
Governor Approved
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Passed Both Houses
-
Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 118-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; 018-000-000
-
Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Chief House Sponsor Rep. Sidney H. Mathias
-
Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
-
Arrived in House
-
Third Reading - Passed; 058-000-000
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 24, 2003
-
Second Reading
-
Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 6, 2003
-
Do Pass Judiciary; 009-000-000
-
Postponed - Judiciary
-
Assigned to Judiciary
-
Referred to Rules
-
First Reading
-
Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. Ira I. Silverstein
-
Filed with Secretary by Sen. Peter J. Roskam
Sponsors
- Peter J. Roskam · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Peter J. Roskam
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 106 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 118 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (118)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Saviano | — | Yea |
| Schmitz | — | Yea |
| Slone | — | Yea |
| Sommer | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Wirsing | — | Yea |
| Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Leitch | — | Yea |
| Madigan | — | Yea |
| Acevedo | — | Yea |
| Aguilar | — | Yea |
| Beaubien | — | Yea |
| Bassi | — | Yea |
| Bellock | — | Yea |
| Berrios | — | Yea |
| Mautino | — | Yea |
| Biggins | — | Yea |
| Black | — | Yea |
| Boland | — | Yea |
| May | — | Yea |
| Bost | — | Yea |
| Brauer | — | Yea |
| Brosnahan | — | Yea |
| Colvin | — | Yea |
| McAuliffe | — | Yea |
| Coulson | — | Yea |
| Daniels | — | Yea |
| Jakobsson | — | Yea |
| Jefferson | — | Yea |
| O'Brien | — | Yea |
| Osterman | — | Yea |
| Parke | — | Yea |
| Lindner | — | Yea |
| Mathias | — | Yea |
| McCarthy | — | Yea |
| McKeon | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Eileen | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Lyons, Joseph | — | Yea |
| Meyer | — | Yea |
| Millner | — | Yea |
| Reitz | — | Yea |
| Moffitt | — | Yea |
| Molaro | — | Yea |
| Phelps | — | Yea |
| Pihos | — | Yea |
| Scully | — | Yea |
| Tenhouse | — | Yea |
| McGuire | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Richard | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Bill | — | Yea |
| Hannig | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mitchell, Jerry | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Capparelli | — | Yea |
| Churchill | — | Yea |
| Dunkin | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Eddy | — | Yea |
| Flider | — | Yea |
| Flowers | — | Yea |
| Forby | — | Yea |
| Franks | — | Yea |
| Fritchey | — | Yea |
| Froehlich | — | Yea |
| Giles | — | Yea |
| Graham | — | Yea |
| Granberg | — | Yea |
| Grunloh | — | Yea |
| Hamos | — | Yea |
| Hassert | — | Yea |
| Holbrook | — | Yea |
| Howard | — | Yea |
| Krause | — | Yea |
| Kurtz | — | Yea |
| Lang | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Jones | — | Yea |
| Morrow | — | Yea |
| Davis, Monique | — | Yea |
| Davis, Steve | — | Yea |
| Mulligan | — | Yea |
| Munson | — | Yea |
| Myers | — | Yea |
| Nekritz | — | Yea |
| Novak | — | Yea |
| Osmond | — | Yea |
| Pankau | — | Yea |
| Cross | — | Yea |
| Cultra | — | Yea |
| Currie | — | Yea |
| Hultgren | — | Yea |
| Kosel | — | Yea |
| Turner | — | Yea |
| Verschoore | — | Yea |
| Wait | — | Yea |
| Washington | — | Yea |
| Winters | — | Yea |
| Younge | — | Yea |
| Poe | — | Yea |
| Ryg | — | Yea |
| Sacia | — | Yea |
| Chapa LaVia | — | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael J. Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicholas K. Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Patrick J. Joyce | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Rita | Democrat | Yea |
| Sara Feigenholtz | Democrat | Yea |
| William "Will" Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Brad Stephens | Republican | Yea |
| Chapin Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (59)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Sandoval | — | Yea |
| Silverstein | — | Yea |
| Luechtefeld | — | Yea |
| Althoff | — | Yea |
| Martinez | — | Yea |
| Bomke | — | Yea |
| Burzynski | — | Yea |
| Halvorson | — | Yea |
| Obama | — | Yea |
| Lauzen | — | Yea |
| Link | — | Yea |
| Maloney | — | Yea |
| Munoz | — | Yea |
| Meeks | — | Yea |
| Sullivan, D. | — | Yea |
| Brady | — | Yea |
| Sullivan, J. | — | Yea |
| Petka | — | Yea |
| Philip | — | Not Voting |
| Schoenberg | — | Yea |
| Shadid | — | Yea |
| Sieben | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Jones, J. | — | Yea |
| Jones, W. | — | Yea |
| Watson | — | Yea |
| Cullerton | — | Yea |
| Trotter | — | Yea |
| Demuzio | — | Yea |
| Viverito | — | Yea |
| Winkel | — | Yea |
| Wojcik | — | Yea |
| Woolard | — | Yea |
| Clayborne | — | Yea |
| Cronin | — | Yea |
| Crotty | — | Yea |
| DeLeo | — | Yea |
| Dillard | — | Yea |
| Garrett | — | Yea |
| Geo-Karis | — | Yea |
| Haine | — | Yea |
| Hendon | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Radogno | — | Yea |
| Rauschenberger | — | Yea |
| Righter | — | Yea |
| Risinger | — | Yea |
| Ronen | — | Yea |
| Roskam | — | Yea |
| Rutherford | — | Yea |
| del Valle | — | Yea |
| Don Harmon | Democrat | Yea |
| Emanuel "Chris" Welch | Democrat | Yea |
| Emil Jones, III | Democrat | Yea |
| Kimberly A. Lightford | Democrat | Yea |
| Lakesia Collins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lawrence "Larry" Walsh, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Mattie Hunter | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Syverson | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 363 do?
- Amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. Sets forth factors to be considered in a proceeding to review, modify, or terminate maintenance after the entry of the judgment of dissolution of marriage, judgment of legal separation, or judgment of declaration of invalidity of marriage. Removes the showing of substantial change in circumstances requirement for a modification of maintenance.
- Who sponsors SB 363?
- SB 363 is sponsored by Peter J. Roskam.
- What is the current status of SB 363?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2003. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 363?
- Track SB 363 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 363
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 363
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →