SB 1326 — Prosecution of Defendants
Last action — Died in Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 07, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Prosecution of Defendants; Revising the qualifications for an insanity defense; updating reporting requirements for examining experts; revising requirements for dismissal of charges; requiring involuntary commitment for persons found not guilty by reason of insanity in certain circumstances; revising mitigating circumstances for sentencing, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
280 added · 121 removed280 line(s) added, 121 removed.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 1326 By Senator Martin 33-01489-26 20261326__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to the prosecutionCommittee ofon defendants;Criminal Justice;
and Senator Martin 591-02425-26 20261326c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to the prosecution of defendants;
specifyingrevising that it is a defense to a prosecution under any law that a defendant, as a result of mental disease or defect, lacked the culpablequalifications mentalfor state required as an elementinsanity ofdefense; the crime charged;
specifying that mental disease or defect is not otherwise a defense to a prosecution under any law;
deleting the affirmative defense to a criminal prosecution that, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the defendant was insane;
deleting provisions for establishing the affirmative defense;
deleting a provision relating to the burden of proof relating to the affirmative defense;
requiringupdating anreporting expertrequirements for examining aexperts; defendant’s mental competence to proceed to administer a clinically recognized instrument to determine whether the defendant is malingering and include the results in his or her report;
916.145, F.S.;
revising requirements for dismissal of charges;
amending s.
916.15, F.S.;
requiring involuntary commitment for persons found not guilty by reason of insanity in certain circumstances;
amending s.
revising a mitigating circumstancecircumstances underfor whichsentencing; a departure from the lowest permissible sentence is reasonably justified;
creating s.
921.245, F.S.;
authorizing the incorporation into a convicted defendant’s criminal sentence certain specialized treatment for mental health disease or defects;
prohibiting such treatment from providing a basis for a sentencing court to depart from the lowest permissible sentence;
specifying that certain Page 1 of 4 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 SB 1326 33-01489-26 20261326__ provisions do not prevent a sentencing court from considering a defendant’s mental disease or defect when imposing a sentence within the permissible sentencing range;
775.027 Insanity Defensedefense.— of lack of culpable mental state.— (1) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.—All persons are presumed to be sane.
It is aan affirmative defense to a criminal prosecution underthat, anyat lawthe thattime aof defendant,the ascommission a result of mentalthe diseaseacts orconstituting defect, lacked the culpableoffense, mental state required as an element of the crimedefendant charged.was insane.
MentalInsanity disease or defect is notestablished otherwisewhen athe defensedefendant tohad a prosecutionmental underinfirmity, anydisease, lawor andefect affirmativeand defensebecause toof athis criminalcondition, prosecution that, at the timedefendant ofdid thenot commissionknow ofwhat thehe actsor constitutingshe thewas offense,doing theor defendantits wasconsequences.: insane.
Insanity is established when:
Did not know what he or she was doing or its consequences;Page 1 of 9 CODING:
or 2.
Although the defendant knew what he or she was doing and its consequences, the defendant did not know that what he or she was doing was wrong.
Mental infirmity, disease, or defect does not constitute a Page 2 of 4 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 1326 33-01489-26591-02425-26 20261326__20261326c1 defenseconsequences; of insanity except as provided in this subsection.
or 2.
Although the defendant knew what he or she was doing and its consequences, the defendant did not know that what he or she was doing was wrong.
Mental infirmity, disease, or defect does not constitute a defense of insanity except as provided in this subsection.
In addition, an examining expert shall administer a clinically recognized instrument to determine whether the defendant is malingering consider and include the results of this instrument in his or her report,report alongwhether withthe anyexpert otherfinds factorthat deemedthe relevantdefendant byis thePage expert.2 of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 1326 591-02425-26 20261326c1 malingering, what instrument or method was used as the basis for any such finding, and any other factor deemed relevant by the expert.
ParagraphSection (d)916.145, of subsection (2) of section 921.0026, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
Show all 141 changed lines (101 more)
921.0026916.145 MitigatingDismissal circumstances.—Thisof sectioncharges.— applies(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), the charges against a defendant adjudicated incompetent to Pageproceed 3due ofto 4mental CODING:illness may not shall be dismissed unless:
without prejudice to the state if (a) The defendant remains incompetent to proceed for a duration of time equal to the maximum statutory sentence for such charges;
and (b) The maximum statutory sentence for such charges is more than 5 years.
(2) If the defendant’s maximum statutory sentence is equal to or less than 5 years, 5 continuous, uninterrupted years after such determination, unless the court in its order specifies its reasons for believing that the defendant will become competent to proceed within the foreseeable future and specifies the time within which the defendant is expected to become competent to proceed.
the court may dismiss such charges at least 3 years after such determination of incompetency, unless the charge is:
(a) Arson;
(b) Sexual battery;
(c) Robbery;
(d) Kidnapping;
(e) Aggravated child abuse;
(f) Aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled Page 3 of 9 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 1326 33-01489-26591-02425-26 20261326__20261326c1 anyadult; felony offense, except any capital felony, committed on or after October 1, 1998.
(2)(g) MitigatingAggravated circumstancesassault underwith which a departuredeadly fromweapon; the lowest permissible sentence is reasonably justified include, but are not limited to:
(d)(h) TheMurder; defendant requires specialized treatment for a mental disorder that is unrelated to substance abuse or addiction or for a physical disability, and the defendant is amenable to treatment.
(i) Manslaughter;
(j) Aggravated manslaughter of an elderly person or disabled adult;
(k) Aggravated manslaughter of a child;
(l) Unlawful throwing, projecting, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb;
(m) Armed burglary;
(n) Aggravated battery;
(o) Aggravated stalking;
(p) A forcible felony as defined in s.
776.08 and not listed elsewhere in this subsection;
(q) An offense where an element of the offense requires the possession, use, or discharge of a firearm;
(r) An attempt to commit an offense listed in this subsection;
(s) An offense allegedly committed by a defendant who has had a forcible or violent felony conviction within the 5 years immediately preceding the date of arrest for the nonviolent felony sought to be dismissed;
(t) An offense allegedly committed by a defendant who, after having been found incompetent and placed under court supervision in a community-based program, is formally charged by a state attorney or the Office of the Statewide Prosecutor with a new felony offense;
or (u) An offense for which there is an identifiable victim and such victim has not consented to the dismissal.
Page 4 of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 1326 591-02425-26 20261326c1 (3)(2) This section does not prohibit the state from refiling dismissed charges if the defendant is declared to be competent to proceed in the future.
Section 921.245,916.15, Florida Statutes, is createdamended to read:
921.245916.15 MentalInvoluntary healthcommitment treatmentof for convicted defendants.— (1) If a convicted defendant requiresadjudicated specializednot treatmentguilty forby areason mentalof diseaseinsanity.— or(1) defectThe thatdetermination isof unrelatedwhether toa substance abuse or addiction, and the defendant is amenable to treatment, such treatment may be incorporated into his or her criminal sentence, but the treatment may not provideguilty aby basisreason forof ainsanity sentencingshall courtbe todetermined departin fromaccordance thewith lowests. permissible sentence established by the Criminal Punishment Code.
(2)775.027 Thisand section does not prevent a sentencing court from considering a defendant’s mental disease or defect when imposing a sentence within the permissibleapplicable sentencingRule range3.217, establishedFlorida byRules theof Criminal PunishmentProcedure. Code.
(2) A defendant who is acquitted of criminal charges because of a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity shall may be involuntarily committed pursuant to such finding if the defendant has a mental illness and, because of the illness, is manifestly dangerous to himself or herself or others.
(3)(a) Every defendant acquitted of criminal charges by reason of insanity and found to meet the criteria for involuntary commitment shall may be committed and treated in accordance with the provisions of this section and the applicable Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
(b) Immediately after receipt of a completed copy of the court commitment order containing all documentation required by the applicable Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the department shall request all medical information relating to the defendant from the jail.
The jail shall provide the department with all medical information relating to the defendant within 3 business days after receipt of the department’s request or at the time the defendant enters the physical custody of the Page 5 of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 1326 591-02425-26 20261326c1 department, whichever is earlier.
(c) The department shall admit a defendant so adjudicated to an appropriate facility or program for treatment and shall retain and treat such defendant.
No later than 6 months after the date of admission, prior to the end of any period of extended commitment, or at any time that the administrator or his or her designee determines that the defendant no longer meets the criteria for continued commitment placement, the administrator or designee shall file a report with the court pursuant to the applicable Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
(4) In all proceedings under this section, both the defendant and the state shall have the right to a hearing before the committing court.
Evidence at such hearing may be presented by the hospital administrator or the administrator’s designee as well as by the state and the defendant.
The defendant shall have the right to counsel at any such hearing.
In the event that a defendant is determined to be indigent pursuant to s.
27.52, the public defender shall represent the defendant.
The parties shall have access to the defendant’s records at the treating facilities and may interview or depose personnel who have had contact with the defendant at the treating facilities.
(5) The commitment hearing shall be held within 30 days after the court receives notification that the defendant no longer meets the criteria for continued commitment.
The defendant must be transported to the committing court’s jurisdiction for the hearing.
Each defendant returning to a jail shall continue to receive the same psychotropic medications as prescribed by the facility physician at the time of discharge from a forensic or civil facility, unless the jail physician Page 6 of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 1326 591-02425-26 20261326c1 determines there is a compelling medical reason to change or discontinue the medication for the health and safety of the defendant.
If the jail physician changes or discontinues the medication and the defendant is later determined at the competency hearing to be incompetent to stand trial and is recommitted to the department, the jail physician may not change or discontinue the defendant’s prescribed psychotropic medication upon the defendant’s next discharge from the forensic or civil facility.
Section 921.0026, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
921.0026 Mitigating circumstances.—This section applies to any felony offense, except any capital felony, committed on or after October 1, 1998.
(1) A downward departure from the lowest permissible sentence, as calculated according to the total sentence points pursuant to s.
921.0024, is prohibited unless there are circumstances or factors that reasonably justify the downward departure.
Mitigating factors to be considered include, but are not limited to, those listed in subsection (2).
The imposition of a sentence below the lowest permissible sentence is subject to appellate review under chapter 924, but the extent of downward departure is not subject to appellate review.
(2) Mitigating circumstances under which a departure from the lowest permissible sentence is reasonably justified include, but are not limited to:
(a) The departure results from a legitimate, uncoerced plea bargain.
(b) The defendant was an accomplice to the offense and was Page 7 of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 1326 591-02425-26 20261326c1 a relatively minor participant in the criminal conduct.
(c) The capacity of the defendant to appreciate the criminal nature of the conduct or to conform that conduct to the requirements of law was substantially impaired.
(d)1.
The defendant requires specialized treatment for a:
a.
Severe physical disability;
or b.
Severe and persistent mental illness that is unrelated to substance abuse or addiction, and has been diagnosed by a qualified professional, as that term is defined in s.
39.01.
The court may not depart from the lowest permissible sentence under this subparagraph if the defendant is a danger to himself or herself or others, or is convicted of murder, manslaughter, or any offense listed in s.
943.0435.
2.
This paragraph may not be construed to allow a convicted defendant to receive outpatient therapy in lieu of a term of incarceration.
mental disorder that is unrelated to substance abuse or addiction or for a physical disability, and the defendant is amenable to treatment.
(e) The need for payment of restitution to the victim outweighs the need for a prison sentence.
(f) The victim was an initiator, willing participant, aggressor, or provoker of the incident.
(g) The defendant acted under extreme duress or under the domination of another person.
(h) Before the identity of the defendant was determined, the victim was substantially compensated.
(i) The defendant cooperated with the state to resolve the current offense or any other offense.
(j) The offense was committed in an unsophisticated manner Page 8 of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 1326 591-02425-26 20261326c1 and was an isolated incident for which the defendant has shown remorse.
(k) At the time of the offense the defendant was too young to appreciate the consequences of the offense.
(l) The defendant is to be sentenced as a youthful offender.
(m) The defendant’s offense is a nonviolent felony, the defendant’s Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet total sentence points under s.
921.0024 are 60 points or fewer, and the court determines that the defendant is amenable to the services of a postadjudicatory treatment-based drug court program and is otherwise qualified to participate in the program as part of the sentence.
For purposes of this paragraph, the term “nonviolent felony” has the same meaning as provided in s.
948.08(6).
(n) The defendant was making a good faith effort to obtain or provide medical assistance for an individual experiencing a drug-related overdose.
(3) Except as provided in paragraph (2)(m), the defendant’s substance abuse or addiction, including intoxication at the time of the offense, is not a mitigating factor under subsection (2) and does not, under any circumstances, justify a downward departure from the permissible sentencing range.
Section 6.
Page 49 of 49 CODING:
Show all 141 changed rows (101 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- S 1326 c1 View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 1326 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Died in Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice
-
Now in Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice
-
Remaining references corrected to Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice; Rules
-
Original reference(s) removed: Judiciary
-
CS by Criminal Justice read 1st time
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Criminal Justice; YEAS 5 NAYS 2
-
On Committee agenda-- Criminal Justice, 02/02/26, 3:30 pm, 37 Senate Building --Motion to Reconsider Adopted
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Criminal Justice, 01/26/26, 3:30 pm, 37 Senate Building --Pending Reconsideration (Favorable; YEAS 4 NAYS 3)
-
Referred to Criminal Justice; Judiciary; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Jonathan Martin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Martin, Jonathan Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1326 do?
- Prosecution of Defendants; Revising the qualifications for an insanity defense; updating reporting requirements for examining experts; revising requirements for dismissal of charges; requiring involuntary commitment for persons found not guilty by reason of insanity in certain circumstances; revising mitigating circumstances for sentencing, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 1326?
- SB 1326 is sponsored by Martin, Jonathan (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1326?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 07, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 1326?
- Track SB 1326 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1326
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1326
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →