Connecticut 2025 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SR 14 — RESOLUTION PROPOSING APPROVAL OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHARTER OAK STATE COLLEGE AND THE CONGRESS OF CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY COLLEGES, SEIU LOCAL 1973.

Last action — ADOPTED, SENATE

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

95 added · 7 removed

95 line(s) added, 7 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Senate Resolution No.
Senate General Assembly File No.
14 January Session, 2025 LCO No.
816 January Session, 2025 Senate Resolution No.
7174 Referred to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS Introduced by:
14 Senate, May 1, 2025 The Senate Committee on Appropriations reported through SEN.OSTENofthe19thDist.,Chairperson oftheCommittee on the part of the Senate, that the resolution ought to be adopted.
SEN.
LOONEY, 11 Dist.
APP Senate Favorable LCO 1 of 1
APP Senate Favorable SR14 / File No.
816 1 SR14 File No.
816 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 26 $ FY 27 $ Board of Regents for Higher OF - Cost 323,434 323,434 Education State Comptroller - Fringe GF - Cost See Below See Below Benefits Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation TheresolutionproposesapprovalofanagreementbetweentheBoard of Regents for Higher Education (BOR) on behalf of Charter Oak State College (COSC) and the Congress of Connecticut Community Colleges, SEIU Local 1973.
It results in an annual cost to BOR of $323,434 beginning in FY 26.
The agreement covers approximately 250 adjunct faculty who teach two or more college-level credits.
This agreement covers one fiscal year for the period of July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025.
The FY 25 General Fund block grant for COSC was approximately $3.2 million which is 17% of its total budget.
The provisions of the contract include the following changes for adjunct teaching faculty:
1) 6.49% wage increase for undergraduate faculty, 2) 5.45% wage increase for graduate faculty, 3) 10% wage increase (from $40 to $44 per hour) for ad-hoc hourly assignments provided by the provost, The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts administered by the Comptroller.
The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes is 40.71% of payroll in FY 26.
SR14 / File No.
816 2 SR14 File No.
816 4) $300 one-time payment for new hires who complete orientation, 5) $20,000 professional development fund, and 6) Faculty Team Lead stipend of $2,000 per year.
The table below contains a summary of the provisions of the agreement and the associated costs to Charter Oak State College.
Component Current Expenditures Difference Difference Expenditures With Contract $ % Wages 3,350,168 3,596,653 246,485 7.4% Work Assigned by Provost 55,340 61,043 5,703 10.3% New Faculty Orientation - 9,315 9,315 Professional Development - 20,000 20,000 Tuition Waivers - 12,731 12,731 Faculty Team Leads - 30,000 30,000 Course Leads 19,000 - (19,000) Program Leads 1,000 - (1,000) Discipline Leads 2,000 - (2,000) Subtotal before Fringe 3,427,508 3,729,742 302,234 8.8% Fringe Benefit Impact 21,200 Total 323,434 Fringe benefit related costs will be incurred on the wage related provisions negotiated in the contract.
These benefits include Social Security, Medicare, and group life insurance at a rate of 7.86%, totaling $21,200 annually.
To the extent the faculty is eligible for retirement benefits, there is an additional cost of 11.51% of payroll.
The agreement is retroactive to the fall 2024 semester which will require catch up payments made upon ratification of the agreement.
The Out Years The cost increase indicated above would continue into the out years.
2Pursuant to PA 23-204, higher education constituent units are responsible for the costs of group life insurance, Social Security, and Medicare for all active employees, totaling an estimated non-pension fringe benefit rate of 7.86% of payroll in FY 26.
A minimal cost is also incurred by the Office of the State Comptroller's Fringe Benefit account associated with employee participation in a state-offered retirement plan.
SR14 / File No.
816 3 SR14 File No.
816 OFA Bill Analysis SR 14 RESOLUTION PROPOSING APPROVAL OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHARTER OAK STATE COLLEGE AND THE CONGRESS OF CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY COLLEGES, SEIU LOCAL 1973.
SUMMARY:
The resolution approves of a collective bargaining agreement between the Board of Regents for Higher Education (BOR) on behalf of Charter Oak State College (COSC) and the Congress of Connecticut Community Colleges, SEIU Local 1973, which was submitted to the Connecticut General Assembly for approval April 8, 2025.
COMMITTEE ACTION Appropriations Committee Senate Favorable Yea 14 Nay 0 SR14 / File No.
816 4
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. ADOPTED, SENATE

  2. FILE NO. 816

  3. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 428

  4. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  5. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  6. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/30/25

  7. FILED WITH LCO

  8. Senate Favorable

  9. PUBLIC HEARING 0423

  10. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Appropriations

  11. FILED WITH SENATE CLERKS

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 187 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (187)

187 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 187 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Senate Roll Call Vote

Passed 25 Yea · 8 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 22003
Republican 3800
Total 25803
% of votes cast 69%22%0%8%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Bob Duff Democratic Yea
Catherine A. Osten Democratic Yea
Ceci Maher Democratic Yea
Christine Cohen Democratic Yea
Derek Slap Democratic Not Voting
Douglas McCrory Democratic Yea
Gary A. Winfield Democratic Yea
Herron Gaston Democratic Yea
James J. Maroney Democratic Yea
Jan Hochadel Democratic Yea
Joan V. Hartley Democratic Not Voting
John W. Fonfara Democratic Yea
Jorge Cabrera Democratic Yea
Julie Kushner Democratic Yea
MD Rahman Democratic Yea
Mae Flexer Democratic Yea
Martha Marx Democratic Yea
Martin M. Looney Democratic Yea
Matthew L. Lesser Democratic Yea
Norman Needleman Democratic Yea
Patricia Billie Miller Democratic Yea
Paul Honig Democratic Yea
Rick Lopes Democratic Yea
Saud Anwar Democratic Yea
Sujata Gadkar-Wilcox Democratic Not Voting
Eric C. Berthel Republican Nay
Heather S. Somers Republican Yea
Henri Martin Republican Yea
Jason Perillo Republican Nay
Jeff Gordon Republican Yea
John A. Kissel Republican Nay
Paul Cicarella Republican Nay
Rob Sampson Republican Nay
Ryan Fazio Republican Nay
Stephen G. Harding Republican Nay
Tony Hwang Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What is the current status of SR 14?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SR 14?
Track SR 14 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SR 14

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SR 14

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →