Connecticut 2025 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 1371 — AN ACT ESTABLISHING A JUST CAUSE STANDARD FOR TEACHER CONTRACT TERMINATIONS AND REQUIRING CONTRACT TERMINATION HEARINGS FOR TEACHERS THAT HAVE ATTAINED TENURE BE BEFORE A NEUTRAL HEARING OFFICER.

Last action — HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 625

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

13 added · 119 removed

13 line(s) added, 119 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate General Assembly File No.
General Assembly Substitute Bill No.
336 January Session, 2025 Substitute Senate Bill No.
1371 January Session, 2025 AN ACT ESTABLISHING A JUST CAUSE STANDARD FOR TEACHER CONTRACT TERMINATIONS AND REQUIRING CONTRACT TERMINATION HEARINGS FOR TEACHERS THAT HAVE ATTAINED TENURE BE BEFORE A NEUTRAL HEARING OFFICER.
1371 Senate, March 31, 2025 The Committee on Labor and Public Employees reported through SEN.
KUSHNER of the 24th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT ESTABLISHING A JUST CAUSE STANDARD FOR TEACHER CONTRACT TERMINATIONS AND REQUIRING CONTRACT TERMINATION HEARINGS FOR TEACHERS THAT HAVE ATTAINED TENURE BE BEFORE A NEUTRAL HEARING OFFICER.
Upon the teacher's written request, not later than three calendar days after such teacher receives such notice of nonrenewal or termination, a notice of nonrenewal or termination shall be supplemented not later than four calendar days after receipt of sSB1371 / File No.
Upon the teacher's written request, not later than three calendar days after such teacher receives such notice of nonrenewal or termination, a notice of nonrenewal or termination shall be supplemented not later than four calendar days after receipt of the request by a statement of the reason or reasons for such nonrenewal or termination.
336 1 sSB1371 File No.
Such teacher, upon written request filed with the board of education not later than ten calendar days after the receipt of notice of termination, or nonrenewal shall be entitled to a hearing, except as LCO 1 of 5 Substitute Bill No.
336 the request by a statement of the reason or reasons for such nonrenewal or termination.
1371 provided in this subsection, (1) before the board, or (2) if indicated in such request and if designated by the board, before an impartial hearing officer chosen by the teacher and the superintendent in accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of this section.
Such teacher, upon written request filed with the board of education not later than ten calendar days after the receipt of notice of termination, or nonrenewal shall be entitled to a hearing, except as provided in this subsection, (1) before the board, or (2) if indicated in such request and if designated by the board, before an impartial hearing officer chosen by the teacher and the superintendent in accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of this section.
[The board of education shall rescind a nonrenewaldecisiononly iftheboardfindssuchdecisionto be arbitrary and capricious.] Any such teacher whose contract is terminated for the reasons enumerated in subdivisions (3) and (4) of subsection (d) of this section shall have the right to appeal in accordance with the provisions of subsection (e) of this section.
[The board of education shall rescind a nonrenewaldecisiononly iftheboardfindssuchdecisionto bearbitrary and capricious.] Any such teacher whose contract is terminated for the reasons enumerated in subdivisions (3) and (4) of subsection (d) of this section shall have the right to appeal in accordance with the provisions of subsection (e) of this section.
(5) elimination of sSB1371 / File No.
(5) elimination of the position to which the teacher was appointed or loss of a position to another teacher, if no other position exists to which such teacher may be appointed if qualified, provided such teacher, if qualified, shall be LCO 2 of 5 Substitute Bill No.
336 2 sSB1371 File No.
1371 appointed to a position held by a teacher who has not attained tenure, and provided further that determination of the individual contract or contracts of employment to be terminated shall be made in accordance with either (A) a provision for a layoff procedure agreed upon by the board of education and the exclusive employees' representative organization, or (B) in the absence of such agreement, a written policy of the board ofeducation;
336 the position to which the teacher was appointed or loss of a position to another teacher, if no other position exists to which such teacher may be appointed if qualified, provided such teacher, if qualified, shall be appointed to a position held by a teacher who has not attained tenure, and provided further that determination of the individual contract or contracts of employment to be terminated shall be made in accordance with either (A) a provision for a layoff procedure agreed upon by the board of education and the exclusive employees' representative organization, or (B) in the absence of such agreement, a written policy of the board ofeducation;
[If the hearing sSB1371 / File No.
[If the hearing officer is not selected with the assistance of such association after five days, the hearing shall be held before the board of education or a subcommittee of the board.] When the reason for termination is LCO 3 of 5 Substitute Bill No.
336 3 sSB1371 File No.
1371 incompetence or ineffectiveness, the hearing shall [(i)] (A) address the question of whether the performance evaluation ratings of the teacher were determined in good faith in accordance with the program adopted by the local or regional board of education pursuant to section 10-151b and were reasonable in light of the evidence presented, and [(ii)] (B) be limited to twelve total hours of evidence and testimony, with each side allowed not more than six hours to present evidence and testimony except the [board, subcommittee of the board or] impartial hearing officer may extend the time period for evidence and testimony at the hearing when good cause is shown.
336 officer is not selected with the assistance of such association after five days, the hearing shall be held before the board of education or a subcommittee of the board.] When the reason for termination is incompetence or ineffectiveness, the hearing shall [(i)] (A) address the question of whether the performance evaluation ratings of the teacher were determined in good faith in accordance with the program adopted by the local or regional board of education pursuant to section 10-151b and were reasonable in light of the evidence presented, and [(ii)] (B) be limited to twelve total hours of evidence and testimony, with each side allowed not more than six hours to present evidence and testimony except the [board, subcommittee of the board or] impartial hearing officer may extend the time period for evidence and testimony at the hearing when good cause is shown.
A copy of a transcript of the proceedingsofthehearing [shallbefurnishedbytheboardofeducation, upon written request by the teacher within fifteen days after the board's decision, provided the teacher shall assume the cost of any such copy] may be requested by either the board of education or the teacher not sSB1371 / File No.
A copy of a transcript of the proceedingsofthehearing [shallbefurnishedbytheboardofeducation, upon written request by the teacher within fifteen days after the board's decision, provided the teacher shall assume the cost of any such copy] may be requested by either the board of education or the teacher not later than fifteen days after the hearing officer's decision, provided the requesting party shall bear the cost of any such copy.
336 4 sSB1371 File No.
Nothing [herein] contained in this section shall deprive a board of education or LCO 4 of 5 Substitute Bill No.
336 later than fifteen days after the hearing officer's decision, provided the requesting party shall bear the cost of any such copy.
1371 superintendent of the power to suspend a teacher from duty immediately when serious misconduct is charged without prejudice to the rights of the teacher as otherwise provided in this section.
Nothing [herein] contained in this section shall deprive a board of education or superintendent of the power to suspend a teacher from duty immediately when serious misconduct is charged without prejudice to the rights of the teacher as otherwise provided in this section.
sSB1371 / File No.
APP Joint Favorable LCO 5 of 5
336 5 sSB1371 File No.
336 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 26 $ FY 27 $ Local and Regional School STATE Minimal Minimal Districts MANDATE 1 - Potential Cost Explanation The bill results in a potential, minimal cost to local and regional school districts annually beginning in FY 26.
The bill requires local and regional school districts to hire third party hearing officers for all hearings regarding the termination of a teacher.
Currently either a hearing officer or a board of education subcommittee may conduct the hearing.
The cost of the hearings will be shared by all involved parties as under current law.
The cost of the bill to a district will vary based on the number of hearings conducted, the rate charged by such officers, and whether in the absence of the bill the district would have chosen to instead use a subcommittee.
Any cost is expected to be minimal, as such hearings are rare.
The bill also requires a showing of just cause when a teacher is State mandate is defined in Sec.
2-32b(2) of the Connecticut General Statutes, "state mandate" means any state initiated constitutional, statutory or executive action that requires a local government to establish, expand or modify its activities in such a way as to necessitate additional expenditures from local revenues.
sSB1371 / File No.
336 6 sSB1371 File No.
336 terminated and makes the hearing officer's decision final.
These provisionshaveno fiscalimpact,asit isnot expectedtochange any costs to local and regional boards of education associated with personnel decisions.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the number of hearings conducted.
Show all 65 changed rows (25 more)
Previous
Latest
sSB1371 / File No.
336 7 sSB1371 File No.
336 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 1371 AN ACT ESTABLISHING A JUST CAUSE STANDARD FOR TEACHER CONTRACT TERMINATIONS AND REQUIRING CONTRACT TERMINATION HEARINGS FOR TEACHERS THAT HAVE ATTAINED TENURE BE BEFORE A NEUTRAL HEARING OFFICER.
SUMMARY This bill requires a showing of just cause when a nontenured or tenured public school teacher is terminated for the reasons allowed by existing law (i.e.
inefficiency, incompetence, insubordination, moral misconduct, disability, elimination of a position to another teacher, or other due and sufficient reasons).
The current law allows for terminationforoneoftheabove reasonswithout any specifiedshowing.
The bill does not define just cause.
In general, however, “just cause” is a concept developed in case law that involves a termination for employee misconduct that is so serious that it (1) violates an essential condition of employment, (2) breaches the trust or faith inherent in the working relationship, or (3) is fundamentally or directly inconsistent with the employee’s obligations to the employer.
It may also involve certain due process-related considerations leading up to the termination.
The bill also changes who makes the final decision when a tenured teacher is under consideration for termination and requests a hearing.
Current law generally allows such a teacher to request a hearing before either a board of education (BOE) subcommittee or an impartial hearing officer.
The bill eliminates the option for the hearing before a BOE subcommittee.
Under current law, the subcommittee or hearing officer must submit its findings and a recommendation to the BOE, which then makes a final decision on the termination.
The bill instead requires the sSB1371 / File No.
336 8 sSB1371 File No.
336 hearing officer to make the final decision, and makes it binding on the parties.
By law, the teacher and the superintendent jointly select the impartial hearing officer.
If they are not able to agree, the officer must be selected with the help of the American Arbitration Association using its expedited selection process and rules for selecting a neutral arbitrator.
Existing law, unchanged by the bill, similarly allows a nontenured teacher whose contract is not being renewed to request a hearing before either a BOE subcommittee or an impartial hearing officer, which must then submit findings and recommendations to the BOE for final disposition.
Current law only allows a BOE to rescind a nonrenewal decision if it finds that it was arbitrary and capricious.
The bill removes this limitation, giving the BOE greater discretion over when to rescind a nonrenewal decision.
The bill also makes various minor and conforming changes, such as allowing a BOE or teacher to request a hearing transcript (current law allowsa teachertorequest it fromtheBOE)andrequiringtherequesting party to pay for the transcript.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
July 1, 2025 COMMITTEE ACTION Labor and Public Employees Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 9 Nay 4 (03/13/2025) sSB1371 / File No.
336 9
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 625

  2. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  3. SENATE PASSED

  4. SEN. REJ. SEN. AMEND. SCH. B

  5. SEN. REJ. SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  6. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  7. NO NEW FILE BY COMM. ON Appropriations

  8. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  9. FILED WITH LCO

  10. Joint Favorable

  11. REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ON Appropriations

  12. FILE NO. 336

  13. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 210

  14. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  15. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  16. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/31/25

  17. FILED WITH LCO

  18. Joint Favorable Substitute

  19. PUBLIC HEARING 0227

  20. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Labor and Public Employees

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 187 not signed on · 25 voted No

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (187)

187 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 187 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Senate Roll Call Vote

Failed 9 Yea · 25 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 02302
Republican 9200
Total 92502
% of votes cast 25%69%0%6%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Bob Duff Democratic Nay
Catherine A. Osten Democratic Nay
Ceci Maher Democratic Nay
Christine Cohen Democratic Nay
Derek Slap Democratic Nay
Douglas McCrory Democratic Nay
Gary A. Winfield Democratic Nay
Herron Gaston Democratic Nay
James J. Maroney Democratic Nay
Jan Hochadel Democratic Nay
Joan V. Hartley Democratic Nay
John W. Fonfara Democratic Not Voting
Jorge Cabrera Democratic Nay
Julie Kushner Democratic Nay
MD Rahman Democratic Nay
Mae Flexer Democratic Not Voting
Martha Marx Democratic Nay
Martin M. Looney Democratic Nay
Matthew L. Lesser Democratic Nay
Norman Needleman Democratic Nay
Patricia Billie Miller Democratic Nay
Paul Honig Democratic Nay
Rick Lopes Democratic Nay
Saud Anwar Democratic Nay
Sujata Gadkar-Wilcox Democratic Nay
Eric C. Berthel Republican Yea
Heather S. Somers Republican Yea
Henri Martin Republican Yea
Jason Perillo Republican Yea
Jeff Gordon Republican Yea
John A. Kissel Republican Nay
Paul Cicarella Republican Yea
Rob Sampson Republican Yea
Ryan Fazio Republican Yea
Stephen G. Harding Republican Yea
Tony Hwang Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What is the current status of SB 1371?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1371?
Track SB 1371 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1371

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1371

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →