Connecticut 2025 Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 2 R · 1 D cosponsors

HB 5271 — AN ACT PROHIBITING GAMING-RELATED ADVERTISING, MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES AT PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

Last action — SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 626

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

38 added · 47 removed

38 line(s) added, 47 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Substitute Bill No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
5271 January Session, 2025 AN ACT PROHIBITING GAMING-RELATED ADVERTISING, MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES AT PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.
298 January Session, 2025 Substitute House Bill No.
5271 House of Representatives, March 27, 2025 The Committee onGeneralLawreportedthrough REP.LEMAR of the 96th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT PROHIBITING GAMING-RELATED ADVERTISING, MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES AT PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.
(2) Not be aimed exclusively or primarily at individuals under twenty-one years of age, or at individuals under eighteen years of age if pertaining exclusively to keno, online lottery ticket sales or fantasy contests, or any combination thereof;
(2) Not be aimed exclusively or primarily at individuals under twenty-one years of age, or at individuals under eighteen years of age if sHB5271 / File No.
(3) Not directly advertise, target or promote Internet games or retail sports wagering to specific individuals, rather than a general audience, who are excluded pursuant to a self-exclusion process as described in LCO 1 of 3 Substitute Bill No.
298 1 sHB5271 File No.
5271 subdivision (5) of subsection (c) of this section, through methods, including, but not limited to, electronic mail, telephone calls, text messages, direct messaging applications, mail and social media;
298 pertaining exclusively to keno, online lottery ticket sales or fantasy contests, or any combination thereof;
(3) Not directly advertise, target or promote Internet games or retail sports wagering to specific individuals, rather than a general audience, who are excluded pursuant to a self-exclusion process as described in subdivision (5) of subsection (c) of this section, through methods, including, but not limited to, electronic mail, telephone calls, text messages, direct messaging applications, mail and social media;
[(8)] (9) Not be placed before any audience where the majority of the viewers or participants is presumed to be under twenty-one years of age, or, if pertaining exclusively to keno, online lottery ticket sales or fantasy contests, or any combination thereof, to those under eighteen years of age;
[(8)] (9) Not be placed before any audience where the majority of the viewers or participants is presumed to be under twenty-one years of sHB5271 / File No.
[(9)] (10) Not imply greater chances of winning compared to other LCO 2 of 3 Substitute Bill No.
298 2 sHB5271 File No.
5271 licensees;
298 age, or, if pertaining exclusively to keno, online lottery ticket sales or fantasy contests, or any combination thereof, to those under eighteen years of age;
[(9)] (10) Not imply greater chances of winning compared to other licensees;
-LCO LCO 3 of 3
-LCO sHB5271 / File No.
298 3 sHB5271 File No.
298 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill prohibits a gaming entity from advertising or marketing on a public college or universities campus resulting in no fiscal impact to the state.
The Department of Consumer Protection regulates this marketplace and has the resources and expertise to meet the requirements of the bill.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None sHB5271 / File No.
298 4 sHB5271 File No.
298 OLR Bill Analysis HB 5271 AN ACT PROHIBITING GAMING-RELATED ADVERTISING, MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES AT PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.
SUMMARY This bill prohibits a gaming entity or someone acting on the entity’s behalf from publishing, airing, displaying, or disseminating any advertising, marketing, or other promotions on a:
1.
public institution of higher education’s campus or 2.
website, online service, mobile application, or social media platform established by, or maintained by or on behalf of, an institution.
The bill applies to a “gaming entity licensee,” which is a master wagering licensee, a licensed online gaming operator, a licensed online gaming service provider, or a licensed sports wagering retailer (see BACKGROUND).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Upon passage BACKGROUND Prohibited Advertising By law, gaming entity licensees and those acting on their behalf are restricted from conducting advertising in a number of ways.
These restrictions include prohibiting advertising that is aimed at, or is placed before, anaudience where themajorityoftheviewersorparticipants are presumed to be people under age 21 (or under 18 if the advertising is related only to keno, online lottery sales, fantasy contests, or a combination of them).
The law also prohibits advertising that uses language to appeal specifically to these people or media outlets or social sHB5271 / File No.
298 5 sHB5271 File No.
298 media that appeal primarily to them.
Master Wagering Licensee By law, a “master wagering licensee” is generally the Mashantucket Pequot or Mohegan tribes or the Connecticut Lottery Corporation (CLC).
Online Gaming Operator By law, an “online gaming operator” is a person or business that operates an electronic wagering platform and contracts directly with a master wagering licensee to provide (1) one or more Internet games or (2) retail sports wagering.
Online Gaming Service Provider By law, an “online gaming service provider” is a person or business, other than an online gaming operator, that provides goods or services to, or otherwise transacts business related to, Internet games or retail sports wagering with a master wagering licensee or a licensed online gaming operator, online gaming service provider, or sports wagering retailer.
Show all 50 changed rows (10 more)
Previous
Latest
Sports Wagering Retailer By law, a “sports wagering retailer” is a person or business that contracts with CLC to facilitate retail sports wagering operated by CLC throughanelectronicwagering platformatupto15facilitiesinthestate.
Related Bills sSB 1235, favorably reported by the General Law Committee, among other things, generally prohibits gaming entities and those acting on their behalf from advertising, on a website or other medium, participation in gambling that is prohibited in the state unless it is related to a person who is licensed to offer and accept wagers in another U.S.
state or territory or on the tribal lands of a federally recognized Indian tribe.
sSB 1237, favorably reported by the General Law Committee, among other things, permits CLC advertising that implies a greater chance of sHB5271 / File No.
298 6 sHB5271 File No.
298 winning based on wagering in greater quantities or amounts for online keno and online lottery draw games that have DCP-approved features that increase the chance of winning.
HB 5269, favorably reported by the General Law Committee, among other things, prohibits gaming entities and those acting on their behalf from advertising offers of a financial incentive to induce people to engage in gaming.
HB 5272, favorably reported by the General Law Committee, prohibits gaming entities and those acting on their behalf from advertising offers or providing bonuses, credits, or other inducements to engage in or continue gaming.
COMMITTEE ACTION General Law Committee Joint Favorable Yea 22 Nay 0 (03/12/2025) sHB5271 / File No.
298 7
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 626

  2. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  3. TRANSMITTED PURSUANT TO JOINT RULE 17

  4. HOUSE PASSED, HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  5. HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  6. FILE NO. 298

  7. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 200

  8. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  9. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  10. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/26/25

  11. FILED WITH LCO

  12. Joint Favorable

  13. PUBLIC HEARING 0219

  14. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON General Law

  15. DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE

  16. Vote to Draft

  17. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON General Law

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 184 not signed on · 17 voted No

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (184)

184 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 184 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

House Roll Call Vote

Passed 129 Yea · 19 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 831201
Republican 42502
Unaffiliated 4200
Total 1291903
% of votes cast 85%13%0%2%
How each member voted (151)
Member Party Vote
Ryan — Yea
Collins Main — Yea
Mccarthy Vahey — Nay
Morrin Bello — Nay
Sanchez, J. — Yea
Sanchez, R. — Yea
Aimee Berger-Girvalo Democratic Yea
Alphonse Paolillo Democratic Yea
Andre F. Baker Democratic Yea
Anne M. Hughes Democratic Yea
Anthony L. Nolan Democratic Yea
Antonio Felipe Democratic Not Voting
Aundre Bumgardner Democratic Yea
Bob Godfrey Democratic Yea
Bobby G. Gibson Democratic Yea
Brandon Chafee Democratic Nay
Christopher Poulos Democratic Yea
Christopher Rosario Democratic Yea
Corey P. Paris Democratic Yea
Daniel Gaiewski Democratic Nay
David DeFronzo Democratic Yea
Derell Wilson Democratic Yea
Dominique Johnson Democratic Yea
Eleni Kavros DeGraw Democratic Nay
Farley Santos Democratic Yea
Frank Smith Democratic Yea
Fred Gee Democratic Yea
Gary A. Turco Democratic Yea
Geoff Luxenberg Democratic Yea
Geraldo C. Reyes Democratic Nay
Gregory Haddad Democratic Yea
Hector Arzeno Democratic Yea
Henry J. Genga Democratic Yea
Hilda E. Santiago Democratic Yea
Hubert D. Delany Democratic Yea
Jaime S. Foster Democratic Yea
James Sanchez Democratic Yea
Jane M. Garibay Democratic Yea
Jason Doucette Democratic Yea
Jason Rojas Democratic Nay
Jennifer Leeper Democratic Yea
Jill Barry Democratic Yea
Jillian Gilchrest Democratic Yea
John Santanella Democratic Nay
John-Michael Parker Democratic Yea
Jonathan Fazzino Democratic Yea
Jonathan Jacobson Democratic Yea
Jonathan Steinberg Democratic Yea
Joseph P. Gresko Democratic Yea
Josh Elliott Democratic Yea
Joshua M. Hall Democratic Yea
Juan R. Candelaria Democratic Yea
Julio A. Concepcion Democratic Yea
Kadeem Roberts Democratic Yea
Kai J. Belton Democratic Yea
Kaitlyn Shake Democratic Yea
Kara Rochelle Democratic Yea
Kate Farrar Democratic Nay
Kenneth Gucker Democratic Yea
Kerry S. Wood Democratic Yea
Kevin Brown Democratic Yea
Larry B. Butler Democratic Yea
Laurie Sweet Democratic Yea
Liz Linehan Democratic Yea
Lucy Dathan Democratic Yea
Marcus Brown Democratic Yea
Maria P. Horn Democratic Yea
Mary Fortier Democratic Yea
Mary M. Mushinsky Democratic Yea
Mary Welander Democratic Nay
Maryam Khan Democratic Yea
Matt Blumenthal Democratic Yea
Matthew Ritter Democratic Yea
Melissa Osborne Democratic Yea
Michael "MJ" Shannon Democratic Yea
Michael D. Quinn Democratic Yea
Michael DiGiovancarlo Democratic Yea
Mike Demicco Democratic Nay
Minnie Gonzalez Democratic Yea
Moira Rader Democratic Yea
Nicholas Menapace Democratic Yea
Nick Gauthier Democratic Yea
Patricia A. Dillon Democratic Yea
Patrick Biggins Democratic Yea
Patrick S. Boyd Democratic Nay
Raghib Allie-Brennan Democratic Yea
Rebecca Martinez Democratic Yea
Renee LaMark Muir Democratic Yea
Robin E. Comey Democratic Nay
Roland J. Lemar Democratic Yea
Ronald A. Napoli Democratic Yea
Sarah Keitt Democratic Yea
Savet Constantine Democratic Yea
Stephen R. Meskers Democratic Yea
Steven J. Stafstrom Democratic Yea
Steven Winter Democratic Yea
Susan M. Johnson Democratic Yea
Tammy R. Exum Democratic Yea
Toni E. Walker Democratic Yea
Travis Simms Democratic Yea
Trenee McGee Democratic Yea
William Heffernan Democratic Nay
Amy Romano Republican Yea
Anne Dauphinais Republican Yea
Arnold Jensen Republican Yea
Ben McGorty Republican Yea
Bill Buckbee Republican Nay
Brian Lanoue Republican Yea
Cara Christine Pavalock-D'Amato Republican Nay
Carol Hall Republican Yea
Chris Aniskovich Republican Yea
Chris Stewart Republican Not Voting
Christie M. Carpino Republican Yea
Craig C. Fishbein Republican Nay
Dave W. Yaccarino Republican Yea
David Rutigliano Republican Yea
Devin R. Carney Republican Yea
Donna Veach Republican Not Voting
Doug Dubitsky Republican Nay
Gale L. Mastrofrancesco Republican Yea
Greg S. Howard Republican Yea
Irene M. Haines Republican Yea
Jason Buchsbaum Republican Yea
Jay M. Case Republican Yea
Joe Canino Republican Yea
Joe Hoxha Republican Yea
Joe Polletta Republican Yea
John E. Piscopo Republican Yea
Joseph H. Zullo Republican Yea
Karen Reddington-Hughes Republican Yea
Kathy Kennedy Republican Nay
Kurt Vail Republican Yea
Lezlye Zupkus Republican Yea
Mark DeCaprio Republican Yea
Mark W. Anderson Republican Yea
Martin Foncello Republican Yea
Mitch Bolinsky Republican Yea
Nicole Klarides-Ditria Republican Yea
Patrick E. Callahan Republican Yea
Seth Bronko Republican Yea
Steve Weir Republican Yea
Tami Zawistowski Republican Yea
Tammy Nuccio Republican Yea
Tim Ackert Republican Yea
Tina Courpas Republican Yea
Tom Delnicki Republican Yea
Tom O'Dea Republican Yea
Tony J. Scott Republican Yea
Tracy Marra Republican Yea
Vincent J. Candelora Republican Yea
William Pizzuto Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 5271?
HB 5271 is sponsored by David Rutigliano (Republican), Craig C. Fishbein (Republican), and William Heffernan (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 5271?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 5271?
Track HB 5271 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5271

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5271

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →